Upload
baby0310
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
1/63
Stochastic Methods in Credit Risk
Modelling, Valuationand HedgingIntroduction to Credit Risk and Credit
Derivatives
Tomasz R. Bielecki
Northeastern Illinois University
In collaboration with Marek Rutkowski
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
2/63
TRB 2
Part 1: Portfolio Credit Risk
Measuring credit risk.
Portfolio analysis.
CVaR models.
CreditMetrics.
CreditGrades.
Counterparty credit risk.
Reference credit risk.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
3/63
TRB 3
Part 2: Credit Derivatives
Counterparty credit risk.
Reference credit risk.
Classification of credit derivatives.
Total return swaps.
Credit default swaps.
Spread linked swaps.
Credit options.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
4/63
TRB 4
Part 3: Mathematical Modelling
Mertons model of corporate debt.
Black and Cox approach.
Intensity-based approach to credit risk.
Hybrid models.
Implied probabilities of default.
Markov models of credit ratings.
Market risk and term structure models.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
5/63
Credit Risk: Modelling, Valuation
and Hedging
Part 1: Portfolio Credit Risk
The central point is the quantitative estimate ofthe amount of economic capital needed to
support a banks risk-taking activities
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
6/63
TRB 6
Measuring Credit Risk
Credit risk models should capture:
Systematic vs Idiosyncratic Risk Sources
Credit spread risk,
Downgrade risk (credit rating), Default risk (default probability),
Recovery rate risk (recovery rate),
Exposure at default (loss given default),
Portfolio diversification (correlation risk), Historical Probabilities vs Risk-Neutral Probabilities.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
7/63
TRB 7
Portfolio Analysis I
What is really important:
Concentration risk, Basle Committee 25% rule; Herfindahl-Hirshman Index
Diversification effect,
Rating structure, CVaR, Credit Value-at-Risk
Risk-adjusted performance measures,
Capital optimisation,
Sensitivity and stress test analysis.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
8/63
TRB 8
Portfolio Analysis II
How should we define and measure credit riskof a portfolio of loans or bonds?
What are the measures of capital profitabilitythe bank should apply?
What is the risk-return profile of the bankscredit portfolio?
What is the capital amount required for theassumed rating of the banks credit portfolio?
Important questions to risk managers:
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
9/63
TRB 9
Portfolio Analysis III
Which credit exposures represent the highestrisk-adjusted profitability?
What are the main factors affecting the banks
credit portfolio risk-adjusted profitability? What are the main sources of the banks
credit risk concentration and diversification?
How can the bank improve its portfolio
profitability?
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
10/63
TRB 10
CVaR Models I
Types of Credit Risk Models: Risk aggregation:
- Top-down,Aggregate risk in consumer, credit card, etc., portfolios;default rates for entire portfolios
- Bottom-up, Individual asset level; default rates for individual obligors.
Systemic factors recognition:- Conditional,
- Unconditional.
Default measurement:
- Default mode, Two modes: default or no-default
- Mark-to-market (model), Credit migrations accounted for.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
11/63
TRB 11
CVaR Models II
Currently proposed industry sponsoredCVaR models:
CreditMetrics (RiskMetrics),
CreditGrades (RiskMetrics),
Credit Monitor/EDF (KMV/Moodys),
CreditRisk+ (Credit Suisse FB),
CreditPortfolioView (McKinsey).
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
12/63
TRB 12
CVaR Models III
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
13/63
TRB 13
CreditMetrics I
A tool for assessing portfolio risk due tochanges in debt value caused by changes inobligor credit quality.
Changes in value caused not only by possibledefault events, but also by upgrades anddowngrades in credit quality are included.
The value-at-risk (VaR) - the volatility of value,
not just the expected losses, is assessed.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
14/63
TRB 14
CreditMetrics II
Risk is assessed within the full context of aportfolio. The correlation of credit quality movesacross obligors is addressed. This allows todirectly calculate the diversification benefits.
Value changes are relatively small with minorup(down)grades, but could be substantial if
there is a default (rare event).
This is far from the more normally distributed
market risks that VaR models typically address.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
15/63
TRB 15
CreditMetrics III
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
16/63
TRB 16
CreditMetrics IV
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
17/63
TRB 17
CreditGrades I
Is meant to provide a simple framework linkingthe credit risk and equity markets (a first-passage-time model).
Tracks the risk-neutral default probabilities.
Based on the ideas of the structural approach,due to Merton (1973), Black and Cox (1976).
Main deficiency are artificially low short-termcredit spreads. CreditGrades corrects this by
taking random default barrier and recovery rate. This is essentially a pricing model
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
18/63
TRB 18
CreditGrades II
Asset valueVfollows a lognormal proces with
a constant volatility (under real-world probability).
Default occurs at the first crossing of the defaultbarrier by V.
Default barrieris the product of the expectedglobal recovery of the firms liabilities and thecurrent debt per share of the firm.
The CreditGrade is the model-implied 5-yearcredit spread.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
19/63
TRB 19
CreditGrades III
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
20/63
TRB 20
CreditGrades: Case Study
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
21/63
TRB 21
CreditGrades: Spin Summary
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
22/63
TRB 22
CreditGrades: No Spin Critique
CGappears to mix statistical and risk neutralprobabilities.
CG assumes no-drift condition for asset valueprocess, which appears to be unjustified.
Transparent formulae for probabilities of defaultresulting in CG framework and, apparently,relying on market observables only, appear to befounded on questionable (in general) relationship
between volatility of equity and volatility of theasset value process.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
23/63
TRB 23
Credit Monitor I
Credit Monitor provides M-KMVs EDF creditmeasures on corporate and financial firmsglobally, updated on a monthly basis with upto five years of historical EDF information.
EDF (expected defaul t frequency) is aforward looking measure of actualprobability of default. EDF is firm specific.
Credit Monitor model follows the structural
approach to calculate EDFs. [The credit riskis driven by the firms value process.]
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
24/63
TRB 24
Credit Monitor II
Credit Monitor deals with firms whoseequities are publicly traded. The market
information contained in the firms stockprice and the balance sheet is mapped tothe firms EDF.
Credit Monitor used in M-KVMs Port fo l io
Manager
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
25/63
TRB 25
CreditRisk+ I
An approach focused only on default event; itignores migration and market risk.
For a large number of obligors, the number of
defaults during a given period has a Poissondistribution. The loss distribution of a bond/loanportfolio is derived.
Belongs to the class of intensity-based (or
reduced-form) models. Default risk is not linkedto the capital structure of the firm.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
26/63
TRB 26
CreditRisk+ II
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
27/63
TRB 27
CreditPortfolioView
A multifactor model focused on the simulationof the joint distribution of default and migrationprobabilities for various rating groups.
Default/migration probabilities are linked to thestate of the economy through macroeconomicfactors (an econometric model).
Conditional probabilities of default are modelled
as a logit function of the index:
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
28/63
Credit Risk: Modelling, Valuation
and Hedging
Part 2: Credit DerivativesThe central points are providing protection
against credit risk and diversification of
credit risk exposure
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
29/63
TRB 29
Counterparty Credit Risk
Derivatives trading generates exposure to
the credit risk of the counterparty involved in
a given contract (typical examples: bonds,vulnerable options, defaultable swaps).
Counterparty credit risk is a function of:
Creditworthiness of the counterparty,
Size of profits accrued yet unrealised,
Ability to use legally binding nettingagreements.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
30/63
TRB 30
Reference Credit Risk
Credit derivatives are privately held negotiablebilateral contracts that allow users to manage theirexposure to credit risk, so-called reference creditrisk.
Credit derivatives are financial assets like forwardcontracts, swaps and options for which the price isdriven by the credit risk of economic agents (private
investors or governments).
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
31/63
TRB 31
Why Credit Derivatives?
Credit derivatives connect the different fixed-incomemarkets by being the clearing-house for credit risktransfer.
Insurance against credit events to reduce borrowing
costs. Diversification of exposure by means of synthetic
loans.
Assume positions in markets that might otherwise beinaccessible.
Accounting and tax advantages.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
32/63
TRB 32
Default Protection
Default protection:
Suppose a bank concerned that one of itscustomers may not be able to repay a loan.
The bank can protect itself against loss bytransferring the credit risk to another party,while keeping the loan on its books.
Useful links: www.defaultrisk.com
www.margrabe.com
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
33/63
TRB 33
Special Features
Pay-out typically based on extremal event (forinstance, the default event).
Limited liquidity (currently).
Insurance components may require actuarialanalysis (under statistical probability).
Operational risk management important - cantbuy perfect insurance, and tail events are
extremal (Bankers Trust)
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
34/63
TRB 34
A Simplified Taxonomy
Credit derivatives are usually rather involved.
They can be divided into three basic classes:
Swaps:
- Total rate of return swap, default swap, and
spread-linked swap. Notes:
- Default note, spread-linked note, and leverednotes.
Options:
- Price, spread, and default options.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
35/63
TRB 35
Spectrum
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
36/63
TRB 36
Total return (or asset) swap - TRS,
Credit-linked note - CLN,
Credit default swap (or option) - CDS,
Securitized pool (of corporates) - CDO, Option on a corporate bond,
Credit spread swap (or option),
Insured cash-flow stream (swap guarantee).
Vanilla Credit Derivatives
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
37/63
TRB 37
Total Return Swap I
Party A Party BAsset Total Return
Floating Payments
Underlying assets may be bonds, loans, or other creditinstruments. Permits the separation of asset ownership
and economic exposure: balance sheet rental orout-sourcing, for example.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
38/63
TRB 38
Total Return Swap II
Total Rate of Return Swap is a derivative contractthat simulates the purchase of an instrument (note,bond, share, etc.) with 100% financing, typicallyfloating rate.
The contract may be marked to market at eachreset date, with the total return receiver receiving(paying) any increase in value of the underlyinginstrument, and the total return payer receiving(paying) any decrease in the value of the underlying
instrument.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
39/63
TRB 39
Credit Default Swap I
Party A Party B
Default Premium
Recovery (after default)
Recovery is paid only if there is a default, so this is apure credit risk product. That is, price and spreadrisk is stripped away. Bs exposure is like that of an
off-balance sheet loan.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
40/63
TRB 40
Credit Default Swap II
Credit default swap is a contract between a buyerand a seller of protection, in which:
(a) the buyer of protection pays the seller a fixed,regular fee,
(b) the seller of protection provides the buyer with acontingent exchange that occurs either at thematurity of the underlying instrument or at theswap's date of early termination. The trigger eventfor the contingent payoff is a defined credit event (adefault on the underlying instrument or other relatedevent).
C f S
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
41/63
TRB 41
Credit Default Swap III
C dit D f lt S IV
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
42/63
TRB 42
Credit Default Swap IV
C dit D f lt S V
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
43/63
TRB 43
Credit Default Swap V
Spread Linked Swap
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
44/63
TRB 44
Spread-Linked Swap
Party A Party B
Periodic payments
Payments based on spread
Bs payments are based on the credit spread of
a reference security. B may only make a final
payment at maturity based on the credit spread.A pays LIBOR plus a fixed spread, say.
Default Notes
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
45/63
TRB 45
Default Notes
Default notes: For example, an issuer (credit cardcompany, say) agrees to pay back $100 at maturity and8% coupons semiannually, but if some default eventoccurs the coupons drop to 4%.
The investor will pay less than he would for a similar notewithout credit-linkage in compensation for the option hehas sold to the issuer.
Spread-linked notes: Like above, except that here the
coupon paid by the investor depends on the creditspread for some reference security.
Levered Notes
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
46/63
TRB 46
Levered Notes
For example, corporate bonds might be pooled, andthe cash-flows repackaged in the form of a note thatpays a high (leveraged) coupon in return for acceptingwith this the risk that the payments will stop (or besignificantly reduced) if there are one or more defaults
in the pool.
The cash-flows might also be packaged in the form oflower-yielding money market instruments, thus earningprofits for the issuer (at the cost of accepting some ofthe credit risk). In this case, it is the issuer who assumesthe leveredposition.
Credit Options
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
47/63
TRB 47
Credit Options
Security with the payoff contingent on the
following credit events:
the price of a reference security drops below
a strike price (determined by a strike spread), the credit spread for a reference security
tightens or widens, or
there is a default event of the referenceentity.
Exotic Variations
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
48/63
TRB 48
Exotic Variations
Basket credit derivatives (correlation-sensitiveproducts).
Event-contingent option (if a certain project iscompleted on time, say).
Real options (sell real decision risk instead of market
factor risk). Fixed-income products linked to earthquakes or other
catastrophes.
Notes linked to real earnings and inflation (lessvolatility in real rates).
Types of Risks
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
49/63
TRB 49
Types of Risks
Credit risk (obvious) and the price risk (sincethis affects profitability, and therefore credit
quality).
Operational risk (contingency planing for
worst-case scenario, for example). Liquidity risk (can be mitigated by doing
deals back-to-back, and including early
termination provisions).
Legal risk (Orange County).
Benefits from Credit Derivatives
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
50/63
TRB 50
Benefits from Credit Derivatives
Better serve customer needs.Diversification of exposures.
Efficient use of balance sheet.
Profiting from market views.
Traders receive information on orderflow, customer interest, etc.
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
51/63
Credit Risk: Modelling, Valuation
and Hedging
Part 3: Mathematical ModellingThe central point is providing formal quantitative tools to
properly serve the purposes listed in Parts 1 and 2
Mertons Model of Corporate Debt
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
52/63
TRB 52
Merton s Model of Corporate Debt
Let us denote: V- total value of the firms assets,
L - face value of the firms debt,
T- maturity of the debt, - (random) time of default.
Default occurs at time Tif the total value of the
firms assets at time Tis lower than the face
value Lof the firms debt.
Dynamics of Firms Assets
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
53/63
TRB 53
The process representing the total value of thefirms assets is governed by the stochastic (random)equation:
Dynamics of Firm s Assets
where is the standard Brownian motion(one-dimensional Wiener process).The interest rate and the dividend yieldare constant.
Mertons Default Time
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
54/63
TRB 54
The time of default is given by
Merton s Default Time
The recovery payoff at time equals
and thus the corporate bond satisfies
Mertons Valuation Formula
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
55/63
TRB 55
The price at time of a -maturity corporatebond equals:
Merton s Valuation Formula
where is the time to maturityand
Black and Cox Model
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
56/63
TRB 56
Black and Cox Model
Basic assumptions of Mertons model are preserved.Value of firms assets is lognormally distributed.
The random instant of default is specified as the firstmoment the value of the firm crosses some barrier:premature default.
The latter assumption is assumed to represent the so-called safety covenants.
Closed-form solution for the value of corporate debt isavailable (but it is rather involved).
Structural Approach
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
57/63
TRB 57
Structural Approach
The total value of the firms assets is noteasily observed. The total value of sharescan be taken as a proxy.
The internal structure of the reference firm
is an essential ingredient of the model.
On the other hand, both the cross-defaultprovision and the debts seniority structure
are relatively easy to cover.
Intensity-Based Approach
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
58/63
TRB 58
Intensity Based Approach
Value of the firm is not explicitly modelled. The intensity of the random time of default
plays the role of a models input.
Valuation result for corporate bonds and
credit derivatives are relatively simple, evenin the case ofbasket credit derivatives.
In practice, the intensity of default can be
inferred from observed prices of bonds
(the calibrated orimplied default intensity).
Default Time
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
59/63
TRB 59
Default Time
Structural approach: is a predictable stopping timewith respect to the filtration generated by the value
process. Default is announced by a sequence of
stopping times.
Intensity-based approach: is a totally inaccessible
stopping time with respect to the reference filtration
(including the observations of the default time. Default
comes as a surprise.
Credit Ratings
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
60/63
TRB 60
Credit Ratings
Some more recent methods take into accountnot only the default event, but also the currentand futures rating of each firm.
In most cases, the process that models theup/downgrades is a Markov process.
Instead of a default intensity, the whole matrixof intensities of migrations is specified.
Official ratings are given by specialized ratingagencies; they do not necessarily reflect (risk-neutral) probabilities of credit migrations.
Intensities of Migrations
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
61/63
TRB 61
g
The matrix of intensities of credit migrations has thefollowing form
where Kis the number of credit ratings andthe K-th class represents default event.State Kis an absorbing state.
References
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
62/63
M. Ammann: Credit Risk Valuation: Methods,Models, and Applications. Springer 2001.
A. Arvanitis and J. Gregory: Credit Risk:The Complete Guide. Risk Books 2001.
T. R. Bielecki and M. Rutkowski: Credit Risk:Modelling, Valuation and Hedging. Springer 2002.
D. Cossin and H. Pirotte:Advanced Credit RiskAnalysis. J. Wiley & Sons 2000.
B. Schmid: Pricing Credit Linked FinancialInstruments. Springer 2002.
D. Duffie and K. J. Singleton: Credit Risk, PrincetonUniversity Press 2003.
CreditGrades II
7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki
63/63
TRB 63