Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    1/63

    Stochastic Methods in Credit Risk

    Modelling, Valuationand HedgingIntroduction to Credit Risk and Credit

    Derivatives

    Tomasz R. Bielecki

    Northeastern Illinois University

    [email protected]

    In collaboration with Marek Rutkowski

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    2/63

    TRB 2

    Part 1: Portfolio Credit Risk

    Measuring credit risk.

    Portfolio analysis.

    CVaR models.

    CreditMetrics.

    CreditGrades.

    Counterparty credit risk.

    Reference credit risk.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    3/63

    TRB 3

    Part 2: Credit Derivatives

    Counterparty credit risk.

    Reference credit risk.

    Classification of credit derivatives.

    Total return swaps.

    Credit default swaps.

    Spread linked swaps.

    Credit options.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    4/63

    TRB 4

    Part 3: Mathematical Modelling

    Mertons model of corporate debt.

    Black and Cox approach.

    Intensity-based approach to credit risk.

    Hybrid models.

    Implied probabilities of default.

    Markov models of credit ratings.

    Market risk and term structure models.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    5/63

    Credit Risk: Modelling, Valuation

    and Hedging

    Part 1: Portfolio Credit Risk

    The central point is the quantitative estimate ofthe amount of economic capital needed to

    support a banks risk-taking activities

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    6/63

    TRB 6

    Measuring Credit Risk

    Credit risk models should capture:

    Systematic vs Idiosyncratic Risk Sources

    Credit spread risk,

    Downgrade risk (credit rating), Default risk (default probability),

    Recovery rate risk (recovery rate),

    Exposure at default (loss given default),

    Portfolio diversification (correlation risk), Historical Probabilities vs Risk-Neutral Probabilities.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    7/63

    TRB 7

    Portfolio Analysis I

    What is really important:

    Concentration risk, Basle Committee 25% rule; Herfindahl-Hirshman Index

    Diversification effect,

    Rating structure, CVaR, Credit Value-at-Risk

    Risk-adjusted performance measures,

    Capital optimisation,

    Sensitivity and stress test analysis.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    8/63

    TRB 8

    Portfolio Analysis II

    How should we define and measure credit riskof a portfolio of loans or bonds?

    What are the measures of capital profitabilitythe bank should apply?

    What is the risk-return profile of the bankscredit portfolio?

    What is the capital amount required for theassumed rating of the banks credit portfolio?

    Important questions to risk managers:

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    9/63

    TRB 9

    Portfolio Analysis III

    Which credit exposures represent the highestrisk-adjusted profitability?

    What are the main factors affecting the banks

    credit portfolio risk-adjusted profitability? What are the main sources of the banks

    credit risk concentration and diversification?

    How can the bank improve its portfolio

    profitability?

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    10/63

    TRB 10

    CVaR Models I

    Types of Credit Risk Models: Risk aggregation:

    - Top-down,Aggregate risk in consumer, credit card, etc., portfolios;default rates for entire portfolios

    - Bottom-up, Individual asset level; default rates for individual obligors.

    Systemic factors recognition:- Conditional,

    - Unconditional.

    Default measurement:

    - Default mode, Two modes: default or no-default

    - Mark-to-market (model), Credit migrations accounted for.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    11/63

    TRB 11

    CVaR Models II

    Currently proposed industry sponsoredCVaR models:

    CreditMetrics (RiskMetrics),

    CreditGrades (RiskMetrics),

    Credit Monitor/EDF (KMV/Moodys),

    CreditRisk+ (Credit Suisse FB),

    CreditPortfolioView (McKinsey).

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    12/63

    TRB 12

    CVaR Models III

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    13/63

    TRB 13

    CreditMetrics I

    A tool for assessing portfolio risk due tochanges in debt value caused by changes inobligor credit quality.

    Changes in value caused not only by possibledefault events, but also by upgrades anddowngrades in credit quality are included.

    The value-at-risk (VaR) - the volatility of value,

    not just the expected losses, is assessed.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    14/63

    TRB 14

    CreditMetrics II

    Risk is assessed within the full context of aportfolio. The correlation of credit quality movesacross obligors is addressed. This allows todirectly calculate the diversification benefits.

    Value changes are relatively small with minorup(down)grades, but could be substantial if

    there is a default (rare event).

    This is far from the more normally distributed

    market risks that VaR models typically address.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    15/63

    TRB 15

    CreditMetrics III

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    16/63

    TRB 16

    CreditMetrics IV

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    17/63

    TRB 17

    CreditGrades I

    Is meant to provide a simple framework linkingthe credit risk and equity markets (a first-passage-time model).

    Tracks the risk-neutral default probabilities.

    Based on the ideas of the structural approach,due to Merton (1973), Black and Cox (1976).

    Main deficiency are artificially low short-termcredit spreads. CreditGrades corrects this by

    taking random default barrier and recovery rate. This is essentially a pricing model

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    18/63

    TRB 18

    CreditGrades II

    Asset valueVfollows a lognormal proces with

    a constant volatility (under real-world probability).

    Default occurs at the first crossing of the defaultbarrier by V.

    Default barrieris the product of the expectedglobal recovery of the firms liabilities and thecurrent debt per share of the firm.

    The CreditGrade is the model-implied 5-yearcredit spread.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    19/63

    TRB 19

    CreditGrades III

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    20/63

    TRB 20

    CreditGrades: Case Study

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    21/63

    TRB 21

    CreditGrades: Spin Summary

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    22/63

    TRB 22

    CreditGrades: No Spin Critique

    CGappears to mix statistical and risk neutralprobabilities.

    CG assumes no-drift condition for asset valueprocess, which appears to be unjustified.

    Transparent formulae for probabilities of defaultresulting in CG framework and, apparently,relying on market observables only, appear to befounded on questionable (in general) relationship

    between volatility of equity and volatility of theasset value process.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    23/63

    TRB 23

    Credit Monitor I

    Credit Monitor provides M-KMVs EDF creditmeasures on corporate and financial firmsglobally, updated on a monthly basis with upto five years of historical EDF information.

    EDF (expected defaul t frequency) is aforward looking measure of actualprobability of default. EDF is firm specific.

    Credit Monitor model follows the structural

    approach to calculate EDFs. [The credit riskis driven by the firms value process.]

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    24/63

    TRB 24

    Credit Monitor II

    Credit Monitor deals with firms whoseequities are publicly traded. The market

    information contained in the firms stockprice and the balance sheet is mapped tothe firms EDF.

    Credit Monitor used in M-KVMs Port fo l io

    Manager

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    25/63

    TRB 25

    CreditRisk+ I

    An approach focused only on default event; itignores migration and market risk.

    For a large number of obligors, the number of

    defaults during a given period has a Poissondistribution. The loss distribution of a bond/loanportfolio is derived.

    Belongs to the class of intensity-based (or

    reduced-form) models. Default risk is not linkedto the capital structure of the firm.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    26/63

    TRB 26

    CreditRisk+ II

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    27/63

    TRB 27

    CreditPortfolioView

    A multifactor model focused on the simulationof the joint distribution of default and migrationprobabilities for various rating groups.

    Default/migration probabilities are linked to thestate of the economy through macroeconomicfactors (an econometric model).

    Conditional probabilities of default are modelled

    as a logit function of the index:

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    28/63

    Credit Risk: Modelling, Valuation

    and Hedging

    Part 2: Credit DerivativesThe central points are providing protection

    against credit risk and diversification of

    credit risk exposure

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    29/63

    TRB 29

    Counterparty Credit Risk

    Derivatives trading generates exposure to

    the credit risk of the counterparty involved in

    a given contract (typical examples: bonds,vulnerable options, defaultable swaps).

    Counterparty credit risk is a function of:

    Creditworthiness of the counterparty,

    Size of profits accrued yet unrealised,

    Ability to use legally binding nettingagreements.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    30/63

    TRB 30

    Reference Credit Risk

    Credit derivatives are privately held negotiablebilateral contracts that allow users to manage theirexposure to credit risk, so-called reference creditrisk.

    Credit derivatives are financial assets like forwardcontracts, swaps and options for which the price isdriven by the credit risk of economic agents (private

    investors or governments).

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    31/63

    TRB 31

    Why Credit Derivatives?

    Credit derivatives connect the different fixed-incomemarkets by being the clearing-house for credit risktransfer.

    Insurance against credit events to reduce borrowing

    costs. Diversification of exposure by means of synthetic

    loans.

    Assume positions in markets that might otherwise beinaccessible.

    Accounting and tax advantages.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    32/63

    TRB 32

    Default Protection

    Default protection:

    Suppose a bank concerned that one of itscustomers may not be able to repay a loan.

    The bank can protect itself against loss bytransferring the credit risk to another party,while keeping the loan on its books.

    Useful links: www.defaultrisk.com

    www.margrabe.com

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    33/63

    TRB 33

    Special Features

    Pay-out typically based on extremal event (forinstance, the default event).

    Limited liquidity (currently).

    Insurance components may require actuarialanalysis (under statistical probability).

    Operational risk management important - cantbuy perfect insurance, and tail events are

    extremal (Bankers Trust)

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    34/63

    TRB 34

    A Simplified Taxonomy

    Credit derivatives are usually rather involved.

    They can be divided into three basic classes:

    Swaps:

    - Total rate of return swap, default swap, and

    spread-linked swap. Notes:

    - Default note, spread-linked note, and leverednotes.

    Options:

    - Price, spread, and default options.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    35/63

    TRB 35

    Spectrum

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    36/63

    TRB 36

    Total return (or asset) swap - TRS,

    Credit-linked note - CLN,

    Credit default swap (or option) - CDS,

    Securitized pool (of corporates) - CDO, Option on a corporate bond,

    Credit spread swap (or option),

    Insured cash-flow stream (swap guarantee).

    Vanilla Credit Derivatives

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    37/63

    TRB 37

    Total Return Swap I

    Party A Party BAsset Total Return

    Floating Payments

    Underlying assets may be bonds, loans, or other creditinstruments. Permits the separation of asset ownership

    and economic exposure: balance sheet rental orout-sourcing, for example.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    38/63

    TRB 38

    Total Return Swap II

    Total Rate of Return Swap is a derivative contractthat simulates the purchase of an instrument (note,bond, share, etc.) with 100% financing, typicallyfloating rate.

    The contract may be marked to market at eachreset date, with the total return receiver receiving(paying) any increase in value of the underlyinginstrument, and the total return payer receiving(paying) any decrease in the value of the underlying

    instrument.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    39/63

    TRB 39

    Credit Default Swap I

    Party A Party B

    Default Premium

    Recovery (after default)

    Recovery is paid only if there is a default, so this is apure credit risk product. That is, price and spreadrisk is stripped away. Bs exposure is like that of an

    off-balance sheet loan.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    40/63

    TRB 40

    Credit Default Swap II

    Credit default swap is a contract between a buyerand a seller of protection, in which:

    (a) the buyer of protection pays the seller a fixed,regular fee,

    (b) the seller of protection provides the buyer with acontingent exchange that occurs either at thematurity of the underlying instrument or at theswap's date of early termination. The trigger eventfor the contingent payoff is a defined credit event (adefault on the underlying instrument or other relatedevent).

    C f S

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    41/63

    TRB 41

    Credit Default Swap III

    C dit D f lt S IV

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    42/63

    TRB 42

    Credit Default Swap IV

    C dit D f lt S V

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    43/63

    TRB 43

    Credit Default Swap V

    Spread Linked Swap

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    44/63

    TRB 44

    Spread-Linked Swap

    Party A Party B

    Periodic payments

    Payments based on spread

    Bs payments are based on the credit spread of

    a reference security. B may only make a final

    payment at maturity based on the credit spread.A pays LIBOR plus a fixed spread, say.

    Default Notes

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    45/63

    TRB 45

    Default Notes

    Default notes: For example, an issuer (credit cardcompany, say) agrees to pay back $100 at maturity and8% coupons semiannually, but if some default eventoccurs the coupons drop to 4%.

    The investor will pay less than he would for a similar notewithout credit-linkage in compensation for the option hehas sold to the issuer.

    Spread-linked notes: Like above, except that here the

    coupon paid by the investor depends on the creditspread for some reference security.

    Levered Notes

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    46/63

    TRB 46

    Levered Notes

    For example, corporate bonds might be pooled, andthe cash-flows repackaged in the form of a note thatpays a high (leveraged) coupon in return for acceptingwith this the risk that the payments will stop (or besignificantly reduced) if there are one or more defaults

    in the pool.

    The cash-flows might also be packaged in the form oflower-yielding money market instruments, thus earningprofits for the issuer (at the cost of accepting some ofthe credit risk). In this case, it is the issuer who assumesthe leveredposition.

    Credit Options

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    47/63

    TRB 47

    Credit Options

    Security with the payoff contingent on the

    following credit events:

    the price of a reference security drops below

    a strike price (determined by a strike spread), the credit spread for a reference security

    tightens or widens, or

    there is a default event of the referenceentity.

    Exotic Variations

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    48/63

    TRB 48

    Exotic Variations

    Basket credit derivatives (correlation-sensitiveproducts).

    Event-contingent option (if a certain project iscompleted on time, say).

    Real options (sell real decision risk instead of market

    factor risk). Fixed-income products linked to earthquakes or other

    catastrophes.

    Notes linked to real earnings and inflation (lessvolatility in real rates).

    Types of Risks

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    49/63

    TRB 49

    Types of Risks

    Credit risk (obvious) and the price risk (sincethis affects profitability, and therefore credit

    quality).

    Operational risk (contingency planing for

    worst-case scenario, for example). Liquidity risk (can be mitigated by doing

    deals back-to-back, and including early

    termination provisions).

    Legal risk (Orange County).

    Benefits from Credit Derivatives

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    50/63

    TRB 50

    Benefits from Credit Derivatives

    Better serve customer needs.Diversification of exposures.

    Efficient use of balance sheet.

    Profiting from market views.

    Traders receive information on orderflow, customer interest, etc.

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    51/63

    Credit Risk: Modelling, Valuation

    and Hedging

    Part 3: Mathematical ModellingThe central point is providing formal quantitative tools to

    properly serve the purposes listed in Parts 1 and 2

    Mertons Model of Corporate Debt

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    52/63

    TRB 52

    Merton s Model of Corporate Debt

    Let us denote: V- total value of the firms assets,

    L - face value of the firms debt,

    T- maturity of the debt, - (random) time of default.

    Default occurs at time Tif the total value of the

    firms assets at time Tis lower than the face

    value Lof the firms debt.

    Dynamics of Firms Assets

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    53/63

    TRB 53

    The process representing the total value of thefirms assets is governed by the stochastic (random)equation:

    Dynamics of Firm s Assets

    where is the standard Brownian motion(one-dimensional Wiener process).The interest rate and the dividend yieldare constant.

    Mertons Default Time

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    54/63

    TRB 54

    The time of default is given by

    Merton s Default Time

    The recovery payoff at time equals

    and thus the corporate bond satisfies

    Mertons Valuation Formula

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    55/63

    TRB 55

    The price at time of a -maturity corporatebond equals:

    Merton s Valuation Formula

    where is the time to maturityand

    Black and Cox Model

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    56/63

    TRB 56

    Black and Cox Model

    Basic assumptions of Mertons model are preserved.Value of firms assets is lognormally distributed.

    The random instant of default is specified as the firstmoment the value of the firm crosses some barrier:premature default.

    The latter assumption is assumed to represent the so-called safety covenants.

    Closed-form solution for the value of corporate debt isavailable (but it is rather involved).

    Structural Approach

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    57/63

    TRB 57

    Structural Approach

    The total value of the firms assets is noteasily observed. The total value of sharescan be taken as a proxy.

    The internal structure of the reference firm

    is an essential ingredient of the model.

    On the other hand, both the cross-defaultprovision and the debts seniority structure

    are relatively easy to cover.

    Intensity-Based Approach

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    58/63

    TRB 58

    Intensity Based Approach

    Value of the firm is not explicitly modelled. The intensity of the random time of default

    plays the role of a models input.

    Valuation result for corporate bonds and

    credit derivatives are relatively simple, evenin the case ofbasket credit derivatives.

    In practice, the intensity of default can be

    inferred from observed prices of bonds

    (the calibrated orimplied default intensity).

    Default Time

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    59/63

    TRB 59

    Default Time

    Structural approach: is a predictable stopping timewith respect to the filtration generated by the value

    process. Default is announced by a sequence of

    stopping times.

    Intensity-based approach: is a totally inaccessible

    stopping time with respect to the reference filtration

    (including the observations of the default time. Default

    comes as a surprise.

    Credit Ratings

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    60/63

    TRB 60

    Credit Ratings

    Some more recent methods take into accountnot only the default event, but also the currentand futures rating of each firm.

    In most cases, the process that models theup/downgrades is a Markov process.

    Instead of a default intensity, the whole matrixof intensities of migrations is specified.

    Official ratings are given by specialized ratingagencies; they do not necessarily reflect (risk-neutral) probabilities of credit migrations.

    Intensities of Migrations

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    61/63

    TRB 61

    g

    The matrix of intensities of credit migrations has thefollowing form

    where Kis the number of credit ratings andthe K-th class represents default event.State Kis an absorbing state.

    References

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    62/63

    M. Ammann: Credit Risk Valuation: Methods,Models, and Applications. Springer 2001.

    A. Arvanitis and J. Gregory: Credit Risk:The Complete Guide. Risk Books 2001.

    T. R. Bielecki and M. Rutkowski: Credit Risk:Modelling, Valuation and Hedging. Springer 2002.

    D. Cossin and H. Pirotte:Advanced Credit RiskAnalysis. J. Wiley & Sons 2000.

    B. Schmid: Pricing Credit Linked FinancialInstruments. Springer 2002.

    D. Duffie and K. J. Singleton: Credit Risk, PrincetonUniversity Press 2003.

    CreditGrades II

  • 7/27/2019 Cime Ems 2003 Bielecki

    63/63

    TRB 63