Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DMD # 38968
1
Culture-period-dependent changes in the uptake of transporter substrates in
sandwich-cultured rat and human hepatocytes
Naoki Kotani, Kazuya Maeda, Takao Watanabe, Mariko Hiramatsu, Li-kun Gong,
Yi-an Bi, Toshiaki Takezawa, Hiroyuki Kusuhara and Yuichi Sugiyama
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, the University of Tokyo, 3-1, 7-Chome
Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan (N.K., K.M., T.W., M.H., H.K. and Y.S.)
Center for Drug Safety and Evaluation Research, State Key Laboratory of New Drug
Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 501
Haike Road, Zhang Jiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong, Shanghai 201203, China (L-K. G.)
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA
(Y-A. B.)
Laboratory of Animal Cell Biology, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences,
Ikenodai 2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0901, Japan (T.T.)
DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as doi:10.1124/dmd.111.038968
Copyright 2011 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
2
Running title: Uptake activity in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes
Address correspondence:
Yuichi Sugiyama, Ph.D.
Department of Molecular Pharmacokinetics
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences
The University of Tokyo
7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
113-0033 JAPAN
Phone: +81-3-5841-4770
Fax: +81-3-5841-4766
Email: [email protected]
Number of text pages: 40 Number of tables: 2 Number of figures: 7 Number of references: 40 Number of words in the Abstract: 237 Number of words in the Introduction: 712 Number of words in the Discussion: 1484
Abbreviations: SCH, sandwich-cultured hepatocytes; SCRH, sandwich-cultured rat
hepatocytes; SCHH, sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes; OATP, organic
anion-transporting polypeptide; CLuptake, in vitro uptake clearance; CLH,vitro, hepatic
clearance predicted from in vitro uptake clearance; CLH,vivo, observed hepatic clearance
in vivo; CLbile,vitro, biliary clearance predicted from in vitro SCH experiments; CLbile,vivo,
observed biliary excretion clearance in vivo
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
3
Abstract
Sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH) are a useful tool for evaluating
hepatobiliary drug transport in vitro. Some studies have investigated the in vitro–in
vivo correlations of the biliary clearance of drugs using SCH. In most cases, the
biliary clearance observed in vivo correlated well with the predicted clearance, but the
predicted absolute values were underestimated when based on in vitro experiments with
SCH. We hypothesized that the downregulated function of uptake transporters is one
of the cause of this underestimation. Therefore, the uptake of taurocholate, digoxin,
pravastatin, and rosuvastatin was investigated in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes
(SCRH) cultured for 5, 24, 48, and 96 h, and the predicted hepatic clearance (CLH,vitro)
was calculated with a dispersion model. In SCRH cultured for 96 h, the saturable
uptake of taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin decreased to 7.5%, 3.3%,
64%, and 23%, respectively, of their uptake in hepatocytes cultured for 5 h, and a better
prediction of in vivo hepatic clearance (CLH,vivo) was achieved when based on CLH,vitro
of 5 h-cultured hepatocytes. These results suggest that the uptake activity is
considerably reduced in cell culture, even in a sandwich-culture format. In a similar
study, we also examined taurocholate and rosuvastatin in sandwich-cultured human
hepatocytes (SCHH). Unlike in SCRH, the saturable uptake of these compounds did
not differ markedly in SCHH cultured for 5 h or 96 h. Thus, the uptake activity in
SCHH was maintained relatively well compared with that in SCRH.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
4
Introduction
Together with their metabolism, many endogenous and exogenous compounds
undergo hepatic uptake and biliary excretion mediated by transporters, which facilitate
the efficient detoxification of xenobiotics. Several experimental tools have been
established to evaluate hepatic uptake, such as cell lines stably expressing human uptake
transporters and cryopreserved human hepatocytes. In contrast, it is fairly difficult to
evaluate the biliary excretion of compounds from hepatocytes to bile in humans.
Primary cultured hepatocytes are used to predict the hepatic transport and metabolism of
drugs, but a previous report suggested that their polarity was lost, followed by the
internalization of the efflux transporters a short time after the cells were isolated
(Hoffmaster et al., 2004), with a rapid reduction in the expression and activities of the
uptake transporters in long-term-cultured hepatocytes(Liang et al., 1993; Ishigami et al.,
1995; Rippin et al., 2001). This limits the utility of this experimental system for the
assessment of the biliary excretion of drugs.
In sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH), the hepatocytes are repolarized and
the expression, cellular localization, and transport activities of the hepatic transporters
are well maintained (Liu et al., 1998; Hoffmaster et al., 2004), and functional
canalicular networks, called “bile pockets”, are also formed between these hepatocytes
(Swift et al.). The accumulation of compounds in the bile pockets can be measured by
opening them in Ca2+-free buffer (Liu et al., 1999b; Bi et al., 2006). Therefore, SCH
are the only in vitro experimental system in which the biliary excretion of drugs from
the blood to the bile can be evaluated. SCH can be useful for several applications such
as the prediction of overall biliary clearance of compounds whose clearance was not
dominated only by uptake process, the determination of the contribution of each efflux
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
5
transporter to the overall efflux of drugs, and the impact of the inhibition of efflux
transporters by coadministered drugs on the change in the biliary transport of substrate
drugs (Swift et al.).
Until now, several studies have tried to demonstrate an in vitro–in vivo
correlation for the biliary clearance of drugs using SCH. In most cases, a good
correlation between the biliary clearance predicted from in vitro SCH experiments
(CLbile,vitro) and the biliary clearance observed in vivo (CLbile,vivo) has been reported, but
the absolute values for CLbile,vitro are often underestimated. For example, Fukuda et al.
(2008) showed that the absolute CLbile,vitro values for some angiotensin II receptor
blockers (ARBs), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme reductase inhibitors (statins),
and antibiotics were about 20- to 200-fold lower than the CLbile,vivo values, although
good correlations between CLbile,vitro and CLbile,vivo were observed (Fukuda et al., 2008).
Abe et al. (2008, 2009) compared the CLbile,vitro of some ARBs and statins with their
CLbile,vivo in both sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes (SCRH) and sandwich-cultured
human hepatocytes (SCHH), and these CLbile,vitro values were also 20- to 200-fold lower
in the SCRH and about 20-fold lower in the SCHH than the CLbile,vivo values (Abe et al.,
2008; Abe et al., 2009). Li et al. (2010) tried to improve the in vitro–in vivo
correlation of the biliary clearance of drugs using SCRH by introducing an appropriate
scaling factor, because CLbile,vitro was about sixfold lower than CLbile,vivo based on a
conventional calculation method (Li et al., 2010). All of these results indicated that
the transport activity was reduced in SCH, but the exact reasons for its underestimation
were still unknown.
CLbile,vitro is usually calculated based on the drug concentration in the medium
of SCH, and corresponds to the biliary clearance based on the plasma unbound
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
6
concentration in vivo. Based on the pharmacokinetic theory, the uptake process is the
first step in the hepatic elimination of drugs, and changes in uptake activity directly
affect the overall hepatic clearance. Therefore, we hypothesized that the
downregulation of uptake transporters is one of the major causes of the underestimation
of CLbile,vitro in the SCH system.
In the present study, the changes in transporter uptake activity in SCRH were
investigated using several transporter substrates (taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin, and
rosuvastatin), as were these changes in SCHH (taurocholate, rosuvastatin). The
predicted hepatic clearance (CLH,vitro) values were calculated based on a dispersion
model, under the assumption that the uptake process is the rate-determining process in
hepatic clearance, and were also compared with in vivo hepatic clearance (CLH,vivo)
values in hepatocytes cultured for either 5 h or 96 h.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
7
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and reagents
[3H]-Pravastatin (45.5 Ci/mmol) and unlabeled pravastatin were kindly donated
by Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). [3H]-Rosuvastatin (79 Ci/mmol) and
unlabeled rosuvastatin were donated by AstraZeneca (Macclesfield, UK).
[3H]-Taurocholate (4.6 Ci/mmol) and [3H]-digoxin (40 Ci/mmol) were purchased from
PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Boston, MA). Triton X-100, ethylene glycol
tetraacetic acid (EGTA), and dexamethasone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.
Louis, MO). L-Glutamine, bovine serum albumin (BSA), and collagenase (type I) were
obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd (Tokyo, Japan). Williams’ medium
E (WME), hepatocyte wash medium (HWM), fetal bovine serum (FBS),
penicillin–streptomycin solution, human recombinant insulin, and standard (containing
Ca2+/Mg2+) and Ca2+/Mg2+-free Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) were purchased
from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). BioCoat™ 24-well plates, Percoll, BD Matrigel™,
and ITS+ culture supplement (6.25 mg/mL insulin, 6.25 mg/mL transferrin, 6.25 μg/mL
selenious acid, 5.35 mg/mL linoleic acid, and 1.25 g/mL BSA) were purchased from
BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). The hepatocyte thawing medium (InVitroGRO™ HT
medium), plating medium (InVitroGRO™ CP medium), incubation medium
(InVitroGRO™ HI medium), and Torpedo™ Antibiotic Mix were purchased from
Celsis In Vitro Technologies (Baltimore, MD). All other chemicals and reagents were
commercially available and of analytical grade.
Animals
Male Sprague Dawley rats (SD rats; 7–8 weeks old) were purchased from Japan
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
8
SLC (Shizuoka, Japan). All animals were maintained under standard conditions with a
12-h dark/light cycle and were acclimatized for one week before the experiment. Food
and water were available ad libitum. All the study protocols were performed in
accordance with the guidelines provided by the Institutional Animal Care Committee,
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Isolation and culture of rat hepatocytes
Hepatocytes were isolated from the male SD rats with a two-step collagenase
perfusion procedure. Briefly, after anesthesia with an intraperitoneal injection of
sodium pentobarbital (64.8 mg/kg), the rat livers were perfused with Ca2+/Mg2+-free
perfusion buffer containing 1 mM EGTA for 5 min at a flow rate of 35–40 mL/min,
followed by perfusion with perfusion buffer containing 5 mM CaCl2, 20 mg/mL BSA,
and 1.0 mg/mL collagenase for 5 min at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. The hepatocytes
from the digested liver were dispersed in HWM, and were separated from the
connective tissue by filtering them through a sterile nylon mesh and from the
nonparenchymal cells by centrifugation at 50 × g for 1 min. The cell pellets were
resuspended in 45% isotonic Percoll in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged
at 90 × g for 4 min. The cells were then resuspended again in HWM and washed once
by centrifugation at 50 × g for 1 min. The resultant cell pellets were resuspended in
WME containing 5% FBS, 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, 1 μM
dexamethasone, 4 μg/mL insulin, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Cell viability was
determined by Trypan blue exclusion. Only those hepatocytes with greater than 90%
viability were used for further experiments. The hepatocytes were seeded onto
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
9
BioCoat™ 24-well plates at a density of 2.0 × 105 viable cells/well in 0.5 mL of
supplemented WME. The hepatocytes were allowed to attach for 5 h at 37 °C in a
humidified chamber under a 95% air/5% CO2 atmosphere. The plates were then
swirled gently and the medium containing the unattached cells was aspirated. WME
supplemented with 5% FBS, 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, 0.1 μM
dexamethasone, 4 μg/mL insulin, and 2 mM L-glutamine was added to each well (this
procedure was not applied to the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes). Within 18–24 h of
seeding, the cells were overlain with ice-cold 0.25 mg/mL BD Matrigel™ in WME
supplemented with 1% ITS+™ premix, 0.1 μM dexamethasone, and 2 mM L-glutamine
at 0.5 mL/well. BD Matrigel™ was only applied to the 48- or 96-h-cultured
hepatocytes. The cultures were maintained in supplemented WME, which was
changed every 24 h. Hepatocytes cultured for 5, 24, 48, or 96 h were used for the
uptake study, and cultured for 5, 24, or 96 h were used for Western blot analysis.
Western blot analysis of uptake transporters in SCRH
Crude membrane was prepared from SCRH cultured for designated time as
reported previously (Sasaki et al., 2002). After the crude membrane fraction was
suspended in phosphate buffered saline, it was immediately frozen in liquid N2 and
stored at -80°C until used. The protein concentration of the crude membrane prepared
from SCRH was determined by the method of Lowry with bovine serum albumin as a
standard (Lowry et al., 1951). The crude membrane fraction was dissolved in
EzApply containing DTT (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) and loaded onto SDS-PAGE mini
4-12 % gel (TEFCO, Tokyo, Japan). The molecular weight was determined using a
Precision Plus Western C protein standard (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins were
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
10
transferred electrophoretically to an Immuno-Blot PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules,
CA) using a blotter (Transblot; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) at 100 V for 1 h. The
membrane was blocked with 10-fold diluted 10 x EzBlock (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) by
Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TTBS) for 1 h at room temperature.
After washing with TTBS, the membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C in 1 x
EzBlock with 1000-fold diluted anti-Oatp1a1 (antiserum that we had produced
previously in rabbit (Aoki et al., 2008)), 120-fold diluted anti-Oatp1a4 (alpha diagnostic
international Inc., San Antonio, US), 100-fold diluted anti-Oatp1b2 (N-17 antibody,
Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., California, US), or Anti-Actin Clone C4 (MILLIPORE,
Billerica, MA). For the detection of Oatp1a1 and 1a4, the membrane was placed in
contact with 5000-fold diluted goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish
peroxidase (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), for the detection of Oatp1b2, the membrane was
placed in contact with 1000-fold diluted donkey anti-goat IgG conjugated with alkaline
phosphatase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., California, US), and for the detection of
β-actin, the membrane was placed in contact with 1000-fold diluted goat anti-mouse
IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) for 1 h in 1 x
EzBlock. The immunoreactive band was detected using an AP conjugate Substrate Kit
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Culture of cryopreserved human hepatocytes
Three batches of cryopreserved human hepatocytes were used in this study: lot
KQG was purchased from Celsis In Vitro Technologies, lot HH190 was purchased from
BD Gentest (Becton Drive, NJ), and lot Hu0930 was purchased from CellzDirect
(Durham, NC). The cryopreserved human hepatocytes were prepared according to the
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
11
protocol suggested by Celsis In Vitro Technologies. Torpedo™ Antibiotic Mix (1.1
mL) was mixed into 50 mL of InVitroGRO™ HT medium, InVitroGRO™ CP medium,
and InVitroGRO™ HI medium, to produce complete thawing medium, plating medium,
and incubation medium, respectively. Before these media were used, they were
prewarmed in a water bath to 37 °C. The cryopreserved human hepatocytes were
incubated for about 1 min in the water bath at 37 °C and were diluted immediately with
thawing medium. The hepatocytes were then centrifuged at 50 × g for 3 min and the
supernatant was aspirated. The cell pellets were resuspended in 5 mL of plating
medium and cell viability was determined by Trypan blue exclusion. Only those
hepatocytes with greater than 85% viability were used for further experiments. The
hepatocytes were seeded onto BioCoat™ 24-well plates at a density of 7.5 × 105 viable
cells/well in 0.5 mL of plating medium and were cultured in a humidified chamber at
37 °C under a 95% air/5% CO2 atmosphere. Within 18–24 h of seeding, the medium
containing the unattached hepatocytes was removed and the hepatocytes were overlain
with ice-cold 0.25 mg/mL BD Matrigel™ in 0.5 mL/well incubation medium. BD
Matrigel™ was only applied to the 96-h-cultured hepatocytes. The cultures were
maintained in the incubation medium, which was changed every 24 h. Hepatocytes
cultured for 5 h or 96 h were used for the uptake study.
Transport assay with SCH
The uptake studies were performed according to the method described
previously (Liu et al., 1999a). Briefly, rat hepatocytes cultured in a collagen-sandwich
configuration (cultured for 96 h) were rinsed twice and preincubated at 37 °C for 10 min
with 0.5 mL of standard HBSS to maintain their tight junctions and bile canaliculi, or
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
12
Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS with 1 mM EGTA to disrupt their tight junctions. Uptake was
initiated by the addition of 0.5 mL of standard HBSS containing radiolabeled
compounds with unlabeled substrates. The uptake reaction was terminated at the
designated time by addition of 1 mL of ice-cold HBSS after the removal of the
incubation buffer. The hepatocytes were then rinsed three times with 1 mL of ice-cold
HBSS. The hepatocytes were lysed with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS (0.5 mL/well)
with vigorous shaking for 30 min at room temperature. The radioactivity associated
with the cell lysate (500 μL) and the incubation buffer (100 μL) was analyzed with a
liquid scintillation counter (TRI-CARB 3100TR; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical
Sciences, Boston, MA) after the addition of 3 mL of scintillation cocktail (Clear-sol I;
Nacalai Tesque, Tokyo, Japan) to the scintillation vials. The remaining 25 μL of cell
lysate was used to determine the protein concentration with a BCA protein assay kit
(Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL), with BSA as the standard. All data were corrected
for nonspecific binding by subtracting the radioactivity in hepatocyte-free wells from
that in hepatocyte-containing wells. The biliary excretion index (BEI), which is defined
as the percentage of the amount of substrates accumulated in the bile pockets in the total
accumulation in SCH after incubation for 10 min, was calculated with Eq. 1 (Liu et al.,
1999a):
100 onAccumulati
onAccumulati onAccumulatiEIB
)/MgCa(
free)-/Mg(Ca)/MgCa(
22
2222
×−
=++
++++
+
+ (Eq. 1)
where Accumulation(+ Ca2+
/Mg2+
) and Accumulation(Ca2+
/Mg2+
free) indicate the cumulative
uptake amount of compounds for 10 min in SCH preincubated with buffer in the presence
or absence of Ca2+/Mg2+ ions, respectively. Using the B-CLEAR® technology (Qualyst,
Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC), the amount of substrate secreted into the bile pockets
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
13
can be estimated as the difference in the cumulative uptake of the compound into the SCH
in the presence and absence of Ca2+/Mg2+ ions, because these ions are required in the
medium to maintain the tight junctions that seal the bile pockets tightly. The absence of
Ca2+/Mg2+ ions causes the disruption of the tight junctions and the subsequent leakage of
the contents from the bile pockets into the medium.
Determination of the uptake clearance of the compounds using SCH
To evaluate the uptake clearance of each compound in SCH, uptake studies were
performed as described above, using only standard HBSS. The hepatocytes cultured for
the designated time periods were incubated in standard HBSS containing radiolabeled
compounds and unlabeled substrates for designated times. The uptake studies were
performed using two different concentrations of each compound to estimate the
contribution of transporter-mediated saturable uptake and passive diffusion to the overall
uptake clearance. Saturable uptake clearance was estimated as the difference between
the in vitro uptake clearance of a tracer concentration (CLuptake,tracer:μL/min/mg protein)
and an excess concentration (CLuptake,excess):
excessuptake,traceruptake, CLCLclearance) uptake (saturable −= (Eq. 2)
All data were corrected for nonspecific binding by subtracting the radioactivity in
hepatocyte-free wells from that in hepatocyte-containing wells.
Calculation method used to predict the in vivo biliary clearance from the in vitro
data
CLuptake was determined by calculating the slope of the distribution volume (Vd)
(μL/mg protein), given as the amount of radioactivity associated with the cells (dpm/mg
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
14
protein) divided by its concentration in the incubation medium (dpm/μl), between 0.5
and x min (5 min for taurocholate, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin; 2 min for digoxin) (Eq.
3). In these ranges, the linearity of the time-dependent uptake was confirmed for each
compound.
0.5-xCL min50dmind
uptake.,,x VV −
= (Eq. 3)
The hepatic clearance (CLH,vitro) predicted from the in vitro uptake clearance was
calculated with Eqs 4–7 based on a dispersion model (Roberts and Rowland, 1986),
under the assumption that the uptake process is a rate-determining process in the overall
biliary clearance and uptake clearance is thought to be equal to the hepatic intrinsic
clearance (CLint,B = CLuptake).
)F(Q hh −= 1CL vitroH, (Eq. 4)
{ } { }N2
N2 1)/2/(aexpa)(11)/2/(aexpa)(1
4a
DDFh +−⋅−−−⋅+
= (Eq. 5)
2/1)41(a NN DR ⋅+= (Eq. 6)
hN Q
R Bint,B
CLf ⋅= (Eq. 7)
where Qh represents the hepatic blood flow, which is 67 mL/min/kg in rats (Nies et al.,
1976) and 20.7 mL/min/kg in humans (Davies and Morris, 1993); and fB represent the
blood unbound fraction of the test compounds, respectively. fB, the blood-to-plasma
concentration ratio (RB), and the in vivo hepatic clearance are cited from other reports.
Dispersion number (DN) was defined as an indicator for the degree of spreading of an
injected solute on transit through an organ in the dispersion model and set at 0.17
according to the previous reports (Roberts and Rowland, 1986; Iwatsubo et al., 1996).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
15
A physiological scaling factors of 40 g liver/kg, 1 × 106 cells/mg protein, and 120 × 106
cells/g liver for rat were used for scaling up in vitro clearance to the body level (Seglen,
1976; Davies and Morris, 1993; Bayliss et al., 1999). In humans, a physiological
scaling factor of 25.7 g liver/kg body weight, 1.5 × 106 cells/mg protein, and 107 × 106
cells/g liver, were used for in vivo scaling up (Davies and Morris, 1993; Ghibellini et al.,
2007).
Statistics
Statistical differences were analyzed with Student’s t-test to identify the
significant differences between two sets of data and by one-way analysis of variance
with Dunnett’s test for multiple pairwise comparisons. Differences were considered
statistically significant at P < 0.05.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
16
Results
Confirmation of hepatic transport function in SCH
To confirm that sandwich culture was successfully performed and that the bile
pockets were reestablished in this study, we performed an accumulation study of SCH
using standard and Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS. A significantly higher accumulation of
taurocholate was observed in the hepatocytes incubated with standard HBSS than in
hepatocytes incubated with Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS in both SCRH (Fig. 1) and SCHH
(Fig. 5). The BEI values for taurocholate, calculated with Eq. 1, in SCRH and SCHH
were 63.1 ± 5.8% and 51.0 ± 17.3%, respectively. In contrast, the absence of Ca2+ in
the incubation buffer had no effect on the accumulation of salicylic acid in the SCRH or
SCHH.
Changes in uptake activities in SCRH
The amount of each test compound taken up into the rat hepatocytes decreased
in a culture-period-dependent manner (Fig. 2). The same accumulation study was
performed three times and reproducible results were obtained. The typical data were
shown in Fig. 2 because the absolute values of the uptake amount into hepatocytes
varied among experiments. Uptake was temporarily improved only for pravastatin in
the 48-h-cultured hepatocytes (24 h after the cells were overlain with Matrigel), but it
also decreased in the 96-h-cultured hepatocytes, as did the other compounds. The
contribution of passive diffusion to the overall uptake was very small for taurocholate,
pravastatin, and rosuvastatin (≤ 10% of the overall uptake into the 5-h-cultured
hepatocytes), but was about 50% for digoxin (Fig. 3). When we compared the uptake
activities in the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes with those in the 96-h-cultured hepatocytes,
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
17
the saturable uptake of taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin, calculated
with Eq. 2, decreased from 23.5 ± 1.1 to 1.79 ± 0.70, from 2.73 ± 0.86 to 0.016 ± 0.327,
from 6.40 ± 0.65 to 4.10 ± 0.99, and from 46.7 ± 4.5 to 10.9 ± 1.4 μL/min/mg protein,
respectively.
Alteration of expression levels of uptake transporters in SCRH
The expression levels of Oatp1a1/1a4/1b2 in SCRH over time in culture were
evaluated by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4). The expression levels of these
transporters hardly changed between 5-h- and 24-h-cultured hepatocytes. Oatp1a1
expression was maintained even in 96-h-cultured hepatocytes. However, the expression
levels of Oatp1a4 and 1b2 drastically decreased in 96-h-cultured hepatocytes.
Comparison of CLH,vitro and CLH,vivo in SCRH
To investigate the time-dependent changes in the uptake activities in SCRH,
we calculated the predicted hepatic clearance from the in vitro uptake clearance
(CLH,vitro) based on CLuptake for the 5-h- or 96-h-cultured hepatocytes using a dispersion
model (Eqs 4�7). CLH,vitro of taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin
decreased from 32.1 to 5.65, from 12.7 to 7.96, from 29.4 to 22.5, and from 16.7 to 5.21
mL/min/kg, respectively, during the long-term culture required for SCH. The CLH,vitro
values for the 5-h- and 96-h-cultured hepatocytes were compared with the observed
CLH,vivo cited in other reports (Table 1). The predicted CLH,vitro values for these
compounds, calculated from the data for the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes, were 1 to
3.6–fold lower than the CLH,vivo values, whereas those calculated from the data for the
96-h-cultured hepatocytes were very low.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
18
Changes in uptake activities in SCHH
A similar type of uptake study was also performed in SCHH to check whether
the downregulation of these uptake activities also occurs in human hepatocytes.
Unlike the results for SCRH, the uptake of the test compounds into three different
batches of human hepatocytes did not differ so much between the 5-h- and
96-h-cultured hepatocytes (Fig. 6). The contribution of passive diffusion to the overall
uptake of taurocholate and rosuvastatin was also very small (Fig. 7). When the uptake
activities of the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes and the 96-h-cultured SCHH were compared,
the saturable uptake calculated with Eq. 2, in each batch of human hepatocytes (KQG,
HH190, and Hu0930) changed from 18.2 ± 0.5, 15.6 ± 0.4, and 22.9 ± 0.4 μL/min/mg
protein, respectively, to 15.5 ± 0.5, 20.6 ± 0.6, and 11.9 ± 0.3 μL/min/mg protein,
respectively, for taurocholate, and from 7.47 ± 0.36, 8.71 ± 0.43, and 7.99 ± 0.28
μL/min/mg protein, respectively, to 7.58 ± 0.26, 6.79 ± 0.22, and 4.52 ± 0.19
μL/min/mg protein, respectively, for rosuvastatin.
Comparison of CLH,vitro and CLH,vivo in SCHH
The CLH,vitro values were calculated based on CLuptake in 5-h-cultured
hepatocytes from each batch of human hepatocytes, using the same method we used for
SCRH, and were compared with CLH,vivo (Table 2). The CLH,vitro values for
taurocholate and rosuvastatin were 9.68 ± 0.69 and 2.96 ± 0.17 mL/min/kg, respectively
(means ± S.E. of three batches), and both of these values were 1.9 to 3.0–fold lower
than the CLH,vivo values. CLuptake for taurocholate in the 96-h-cultured hepatocytes was
87% (KQG), 132% (HH190), or 54% (Hu0930) of the CLuptake observed in the
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
19
5-h-cultured hepatocytes, and the CLuptake for rosuvastatin was 104% (KQG), 90%
(HH190), or 59% (Hu0930) of the CLuptake observed in the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes
(Fig. 7), so the CLH,vitro values did not differ as much in the 96-h culture in SCHH as
they did for SCRH.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
20
Discussion
The prediction of biliary clearance in vivo using SCH has been demonstrated in
previous reports, but in most cases, the absolute values for the biliary clearance of
various drugs have tended to be underestimated. We hypothesized that the
downregulation of uptake transporters in SCH is an important factor in this
underprediction, and investigated the dependence of the uptake clearance of several
compounds on the culture time in rat and human SCH.
The overall intrinsic biliary clearance (CLbile,int,all) is composed of several
microscopic parameters: uptake clearance from the medium or blood to the cells (PSup),
backflux clearance from the cells to the medium or blood (PSback), metabolic clearance
(PSmet), and intrinsic efflux clearance into the bile (PSeff), as shown in the following
equation (Shitara et al., 2006):
backmeteff
meteffupint,, PSPSPS
PSPSPS
+++
×=allbileCL (Eq. 8)
From this equation, CLbile,int,all is always proportional to PSup. In the present
study, the effect of the culture period on the changes in the transport activity mediated by
hepatic uptake transporters in SCH was investigated and its impact on the prediction of
biliary clearance in vivo was also evaluated.
To confirm that the sandwich-culture technique was correctly established in our
hands, we first checked the transport of typical ligands in our SCH. The accumulation
of taurocholate was significantly higher in hepatocytes incubated with standard HBSS
than in those incubated with Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS, and its BEI values ranged from 45
to 70% in SCRH, and from 50 to 60% in SCHH in our experiments. These values
were comparable to those in previous reports (Liu et al., 1999a; Abe et al., 2009). In
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
21
contrast, no difference in the accumulation of salicylate in SCRH and SCHH was
observed when they were incubated with standard HBSS or Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS, as
previously demonstrated (Liu et al., 1999a). Therefore, our experimental
sandwich-culture technique was confirmed to be comparable to those of previous
studies.
The initial uptake of transporter substrates (taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin,
and rosuvastatin) into SCRH was then observed to investigate the effect of the culture
period on their uptake activity. Transporter-mediated uptake activity is thought to be
well maintained for several hours after the isolation of hepatocytes (Ishigami et al.,
1995; Liu et al., 1999a). However, four-day culture is required for the optimal
formation of the canalicular networks and the expression of the efflux transporters in
SCRH (Chandra et al., 2001). Therefore, we decided to compare the uptake clearance
in 5-h- and 96-h-cultured hepatocytes in this study. The saturable uptake of all the
compounds we tested was observed clearly, and the uptake clearance of taurocholate,
digoxin, and rosuvastatin decreased through the culture period, whereas that of
pravastatin recovered temporarily in the 48-h-cultured hepatocytes (24 h after they were
overlain with Matrigel), but decreased again in the 96-h-cultured hepatocytes (Figs 2
and 3). Taurocholate is a typical substrate of Na+-taurocholate cotransporting
polypeptide (Ntcp) and its uptake clearance in 96-h-cultured SCH decreased to 13% of
that in the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes (Fig. 3). This result is similar to the reduction in
Ntcp protein expression detected with an immunoblot analysis (Liu et al., 1998). The
saturable uptake of digoxin, pravastatin, and rosuvastatin in 96-h-cultured SCRH
decreased to 3.3%, 64%, and 23% of that in the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes, respectively
(Fig. 3). Because digoxin is an Oatp1a4-specific substrate (Shitara et al., 2002), our
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
22
result implies that the transport function of Oatp1a4 was greatly reduced during the 96-h
culture period required for SCH. In our data, half of the digoxin uptake was
dominated by active saturable transport in isolated rat hepatocytes, while previous
report indicated that 79% of its uptake was saturable in cultured rat hepatocytes (Ito et
al., 2007). The apparent discrepancy may come from the different experimental
systems and possible alteration of passive permeability by the inhibition of
Na+/K+-ATPase by 100 μM digoxin. So it is still possible that active transport of
digoxin was partly preserved at 96-h-cultured SCRH. Multiple Oatp transporters are
involved in the uptake of pravastatin and rosuvastatin (Ho et al., 2006). These data
suggest that the relative contribution of each transporter to the hepatic uptake of
rosuvastatin and pravastatin differs in rats.
We also evaluated the expression levels of Oatps in SCRH by Western blot
analysis (Fig. 4). Although the expression level of Oatp1a1 was maintained relatively
well also in 96-h-cultured SCRH compared with that in 5-h-cultured hepatocytes, that of
Oatp1a4 decreased drastically in 96-h-cultured SCRH. These results are comparable
with the previous report (Hoffmaster et al., 2004), and support our results in which the
saturable uptake of digoxin, an Oatp1a4-selective substrate, was drastically decreased in
96-h-cultured SCRH. Oatp1b2 expression was also largely decreased after long-term
culture, whereas uptake activity of pravastatin was well preserved, which suggests that
pravastatin uptake into hepatocytes is not only dominated by Oatp1b2, but also by
Oatp1a1 (Hsiang et al., 1999) and Oatp1a4 (Tokui et al., 1999).
Next, we tried to predict the hepatic clearance of drugs in vivo (CLH,vivo) from
the in vitro uptake clearance in 5-h- and 96-h-cultured hepatocytes under the assumption
that the uptake process is a rate-determining process in the overall biliary clearance
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
23
(Table 1). Because the hepatic clearance of some of the test compounds was very
close to the hepatic blood flow rate, a dispersion model (DN = 0.17) was used to test this
prediction (Roberts and Rowland, 1986). Our results indicate that the predicted
hepatic clearance (CLH,vitro) decreased together with the reduced uptake function in the
96-h-cultured SCRH compared with that in the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes. In the
sandwich-culture format, the in vitro clearance from the medium to the bile pockets is
defined as the accumulation rate of the compound in the bile pockets divided by the
medium concentration, and corresponds to the in vivo biliary clearance from the blood
to the bile. Considering Eq. 8, the CLH,vitro value predicted from the uptake clearance
in vitro is the upper limit of the clearance calculated from SCH. Therefore, the
CLH,vitro predicted from uptake clearance in SCRH could be further underestimated
relative to CLH,vivo. These results suggest that we must consider the reduced function
of uptake transporters in SCRH when predicting the biliary clearance in vivo using
SCRH.
To understand the predictability of SCH in humans, the same type of study was
performed in SCHH. The uptake of taurocholate and rosuvastatin did not decrease as
much in the 96-h-cultured SCHH relative to that in the 5-h-cultured human hepatocytes
(Figs 6 and 7), so the function of uptake transporters was maintained relatively well in
SCHH compared with that in SCRH. NTCP also makes a large contribution to the
uptake of taurocholate in human hepatocytes (Hagenbuch and Dawson, 2004), whereas
OATP1B1 rather than OATP1B3 plays a major role in the uptake of rosuvastatin
(Kitamura et al., 2008). These results are consistent with a previous study
demonstrating that the expression levels of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 in SCHH were
almost the same on day 1 and day 6 (Hoffmaster et al., 2004). Why the expression and
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
24
function of uptake transporters are better maintained in SCHH than in SCRH is
unknown, but this tendency was also observed in primary cultured hepatocytes (Jigorel
et al., 2005). The predicted CLH,vitro values were 1.9 to 3.0-fold lower than the CLH,vivo
for taurocholate and rosuvastatin in both the 5-h-cultured hepatocytes and the
96-h-cultured SCHH (Table 2). (Watanabe et al., 2009) reported that a scaling factor
(x 1.7–4.3) was required to fit the calculated value to the CLH,vivo value when they
assessed the CLH,vitro value for four kinds of statins using cryopreserved human
hepatocytes in suspension, which is comparable to our situations.
In the previous report, there was 20-fold difference at least between in vitro
biliary clearance predicted by SCHH and human in vivo biliary clearance (Abe et al.,
2009), but in our results, the difference between the predicted hepatic clearance from in
vitro uptake assay and in vivo hepatic clearance was only about 2.5-fold. This
discrepancy may be due to the change in the backflux or biliary efflux intrinsic
clearance, large inter-batch difference in the uptake clearance of substrates, and partial
saturation of OATP transporters because of the substrate concentration they used was
almost similar to the Km values for OATP transporters.
In conclusion, we have investigated the changes in the uptake of transporter
substrates over several days in culture in both SCRH and SCHH. In SCRH, the uptake
activity was dramatically down-regulated throughout the culture period, and the reduced
uptake activity led to the underestimation of CLH,vitro from the in vitro data for SCRH.
One of the strategies for the prediction of in vivo biliary clearance may be available by
taking correlation between in vitro and in vivo biliary clearance of many compounds
with some scaling factors. Conversely, the uptake activity was maintained relatively
well in SCHH, so our results suggest that we can predict the hepatobiliary transport of
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
25
compounds in the human liver well using SCHH. More data regarding the prediction
of biliary clearance in vivo from experiments in SCHH in vitro are required to confirm
the usefulness of SCHH.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
26
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. for kindly
providing us with radiolabeled and unlabeled rosuvastatin and pravastatin, respectively.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
27
Authorship Contributions
Participated in research design: Kotani, Maeda, Kusuhara, and Sugiyama.
Conducted experiments: Kotani, Maeda, Watanabe, Hiramatsu, Gong and Sugiyama
Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Bi and Takezawa
Performed data analysis: Kotani, Maeda, Watanabe, Hiramatsu, Gong, Kusuhara, and
Sugiyama
Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Kotani, Maeda, and Sugiyama
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
28
References
Abe K, Bridges AS and Brouwer KL (2009) Use of sandwich-cultured human
hepatocytes to predict biliary clearance of angiotensin II receptor blockers and
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Drug Metab Dispos 37:447-452.
Abe K, Bridges AS, Yue W and Brouwer KL (2008) In vitro biliary clearance of
angiotensin II receptor blockers and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A
reductase inhibitors in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes: comparison with in
vivo biliary clearance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326:983-990.
Aoki K, Nakajima M, Hoshi Y, Saso N, Kato S, Sugiyama Y and Sato H (2008) Effect of
aminoguanidine on lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in rat liver transporters
and transcription factors. Biol Pharm Bull 31:412-420.
Bayliss MK, Bell JA, Jenner WN, Park GR and Wilson K (1999) Utility of hepatocytes to
model species differences in the metabolism of loxtidine and to predict
pharmacokinetic parameters in rat, dog and man. Xenobiotica 29:253-268.
Bi YA, Kazolias D and Duignan DB (2006) Use of cryopreserved human hepatocytes in
sandwich culture to measure hepatobiliary transport. Drug Metab Dispos
34:1658-1665.
Chandra P, Lecluyse EL and Brouwer KL (2001) Optimization of culture conditions for
determining hepatobiliary disposition of taurocholate in sandwich-cultured rat
hepatocytes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 37:380-385.
Davies B and Morris T (1993) Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and
humans. Pharm Res 10:1093-1095.
Fukuda H, Ohashi R, Tsuda-Tsukimoto M and Tamai I (2008) Effect of plasma protein
binding on in vitro-in vivo correlation of biliary excretion of drugs evaluated by
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
29
sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos 36:1275-1282.
Ghibellini G, Vasist LS, Leslie EM, Heizer WD, Kowalsky RJ, Calvo BF and Brouwer
KL (2007) In vitro-in vivo correlation of hepatobiliary drug clearance in humans.
Clin Pharmacol Ther 81:406-413.
Hagenbuch B and Dawson P (2004) The sodium bile salt cotransport family SLC10.
Pflugers Arch 447:566-570.
Harrison LI and Gibaldi M (1976) Pharmacokinetics of digoxin in the rat. Drug Metab
Dispos 4:88-93.
Hayashi H and Sugiyama Y (2007) 4-phenylbutyrate enhances the cell surface expression
and the transport capacity of wild-type and mutated bile salt export pumps.
Hepatology 45:1506-1516.
Ho RH, Tirona RG, Leake BF, Glaeser H, Lee W, Lemke CJ, Wang Y and Kim RB
(2006) Drug and bile acid transporters in rosuvastatin hepatic uptake: function,
expression, and pharmacogenetics. Gastroenterology 130:1793-1806.
Hoffmaster KA, Turncliff RZ, LeCluyse EL, Kim RB, Meier PJ and Brouwer KL (2004)
P-glycoprotein expression, localization, and function in sandwich-cultured
primary rat and human hepatocytes: relevance to the hepatobiliary disposition of a
model opioid peptide. Pharm Res 21:1294-1302.
Hsiang B, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Wu Y, Sasseville V, Yang WP and Kirchgessner TG (1999) A
novel human hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP2).
Identification of a liver-specific human organic anion transporting polypeptide
and identification of rat and human hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase
inhibitor transporters. J Biol Chem 274:37161-37168.
Inoue M, Morino Y and Nagase S (1985) Transhepatic transport of taurocholic acid in
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
30
normal and mutant analbuminemic rats. Biochim Biophys Acta 833:211-216.
Ishigami M, Tokui T, Komai T, Tsukahara K, Yamazaki M and Sugiyama Y (1995)
Evaluation of the uptake of pravastatin by perfused rat liver and primary cultured
rat hepatocytes. Pharm Res 12:1741-1745.
Ito S, Nasu R, Tsujimoto M, Murakami H, Ohtani H and Sawada Y (2007) Effect of
macrolide antibiotics on uptake of digoxin into rat liver. Biopharm Drug Dispos
28:113-123.
Iwatsubo T, Hirota N, Ooie T, Suzuki H and Sugiyama Y (1996) Prediction of in vivo
drug disposition from in vitro data based on physiological pharmacokinetics.
Biopharm Drug Dispos 17:273-310.
Jigorel E, Le Vee M, Boursier-Neyret C, Bertrand M and Fardel O (2005) Functional
expression of sinusoidal drug transporters in primary human and rat hepatocytes.
Drug Metab Dispos 33:1418-1422.
Kitamura S, Maeda K, Wang Y and Sugiyama Y (2008) Involvement of multiple
transporters in the hepatobiliary transport of rosuvastatin. Drug Metab Dispos
36:2014-2023.
Li N, Singh P, Mandrell KM and Lai Y (2010) Improved extrapolation of hepatobiliary
clearance from in vitro sandwich cultured rat hepatocytes through absolute
quantification of hepatobiliary transporters. Mol Pharm 7:630-641.
Liang D, Hagenbuch B, Stieger B and Meier PJ (1993) Parallel decrease of
Na(+)-taurocholate cotransport and its encoding mRNA in primary cultures of rat
hepatocytes. Hepatology 18:1162-1166.
Liu L, Mak E, Tirona RG, Tan E, Novikoff PM, Wang P, Wolkoff AW and Pang KS
(2005) Vascular binding, blood flow, transporter, and enzyme interactions on the
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
31
processing of digoxin in rat liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 315:433-448.
Liu X, Brouwer KL, Gan LS, Brouwer KR, Stieger B, Meier PJ, Audus KL and LeCluyse
EL (1998) Partial maintenance of taurocholate uptake by adult rat hepatocytes
cultured in a collagen sandwich configuration. Pharm Res 15:1533-1539.
Liu X, LeCluyse EL, Brouwer KR, Gan LS, Lemasters JJ, Stieger B, Meier PJ and
Brouwer KL (1999a) Biliary excretion in primary rat hepatocytes cultured in a
collagen-sandwich configuration. Am J Physiol 277:G12-21.
Liu X, LeCluyse EL, Brouwer KR, Lightfoot RM, Lee JI and Brouwer KL (1999b) Use
of Ca2+ modulation to evaluate biliary excretion in sandwich-cultured rat
hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289:1592-1599.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with
the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265-275.
Nies AS, Wilkinson GR, Rush BD, Strother JR and McDevitt DG (1976) Effects of
alteration of hepatic microsomal enzyme activity on liver blood flow in the rat.
Biochem Pharmacol 25:1991-1993.
Rippin SJ, Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ and Stieger B (2001) Cholestatic expression pattern of
sinusoidal and canalicular organic anion transport systems in primary cultured rat
hepatocytes. Hepatology 33:776-782.
Roberts MS and Rowland M (1986) Correlation between in-vitro microsomal enzyme
activity and whole organ hepatic elimination kinetics: analysis with a dispersion
model. J Pharm Pharmacol 38:177-181.
Sasaki M, Suzuki H, Ito K, Abe T and Sugiyama Y (2002) Transcellular transport of
organic anions across a double-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney II cell
monolayer expressing both human organic anion-transporting polypeptide
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
32
(OATP2/SLC21A6) and Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2
(MRP2/ABCC2). J Biol Chem 277:6497-6503.
Seglen PO (1976) Preparation of isolated rat liver cells. Methods Cell Biol 13:29-83.
Shitara Y, Horie T and Sugiyama Y (2006) Transporters as a determinant of drug
clearance and tissue distribution. Eur J Pharm Sci 27:425-446.
Shitara Y, Sugiyama D, Kusuhara H, Kato Y, Abe T, Meier PJ, Itoh T and Sugiyama Y
(2002) Comparative inhibitory effects of different compounds on rat oatpl
(slc21a1)- and Oatp2 (Slc21a5)-mediated transport. Pharm Res 19:147-153.
Swift B, Pfeifer ND and Brouwer KL Sandwich-cultured hepatocytes: an in vitro model
to evaluate hepatobiliary transporter-based drug interactions and hepatotoxicity.
Drug Metab Rev 42:446-471.
Tokui T, Nakai D, Nakagomi R, Yawo H, Abe T and Sugiyama Y (1999) Pravastatin, an
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, is transported by rat organic anion transporting
polypeptide, oatp2. Pharm Res 16:904-908.
Watanabe T, Kusuhara H, Maeda K, Kanamaru H, Saito Y, Hu Z and Sugiyama Y (2010)
Investigation of the rate-determining process in the hepatic elimination of
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in rats and humans. Drug Metab Dispos
38:215-222.
Watanabe T, Maeda K, Kondo T, Nakayama H, Horita S, Kusuhara H and Sugiyama Y
(2009) Prediction of the hepatic and renal clearance of transporter substrates in
rats using in vitro uptake experiments. Drug Metab Dispos 37:1471-1479.
Yamazaki M, Tokui T, Ishigami M and Sugiyama Y (1996) Tissue-selective uptake of
pravastatin in rats: contribution of a specific carrier-mediated uptake system.
Biopharm Drug Dispos 17:775-789.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
33
Footnote
This study was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Research on Publicly
Essential Drugs and Medical Devices from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
of Japan and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) [20249008] from the Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). B-CLEAR® is a registered trademark of
Qualyst, Inc. and is covered by US Patent No. 6,780,580, EU Patent No. 00919459.8,
and other US, Japanese, and international patents, both issued and pending.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
34
Legends for Figures
Fig. 1 Ca2+-dependent uptake of taurocholate and salicylic acid by SCRH
The uptake of [3H]-taurocholate (1 μM) (A) and [14C]-salicylic acid (2 μM)
(B) by rat hepatocytes cultured for 96 h in a sandwich configuration in the presence or
absence of Ca2+ ions in the incubation medium for 10 min. Each datum is a mean ±
S.E. (n = 3). ** P < 0.01.
Fig. 2 Culture-time-dependent uptake of taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin, and
rosuvastatin by SCRH
The uptake of [3H]-taurocholate (1 μM) (A), [3H]-digoxin (0.01 μM) (B),
[3H]-pravastatin (0.1 μM) (C), and [3H]-rosuvastatin (0.1 μM) (D) was observed in rat
hepatocytes cultured on a collagen-coated dish for 5 h (closed squares) and for 24 h
(closed triangles),or cultured in a sandwich configuration for 48 h (closed diamonds)
and 96 h (closed circles). The uptake of test compounds was determined for 0.5, 2, 5,
10, and 15 min. The same accumulation study was performed three times and
reproducible results were observed. This figure shows typical data from single
preparation, which are means ± S.E. (n = 3). The same accumulation study was
performed three times and reproducible results were obtained. Where vertical bars are
not shown, the S.E. values are within the limits of the symbols.
Fig. 3 Ratio of the uptake clearance of taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin, or
rosuvastatin in each culture period normalized by that in 5-h-cultured
hepatocytes
Ratio of the uptake clearance of [3H]-taurocholate (closed bar, 1 μM; open bar,
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
35
1 mM) (A), [3H]-digoxin (closed bar, 0.01 μM; open bar, 100 μM) (B),
[3H]-pravastatin (closed bar, 0.1 μM; open bar, 1 mM) (C), or [3H]-rosuvastatin
(closed bar, 0.1 μM; open bar, 100 μM) (D) in 5-h-cultured hepatocytes to that in
96-h-cultured hepatocytes was shown as a percent of control. The data are means ±
S.E. (n = 9; triplicate in three independent preparations for closed bars and n = 6;
triplicate in two independent preparations for open bars). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01
compared with the uptake clearance in 5-h-cultured hepatocytes.
Fig. 4 Culture time-dependent alteration of protein expression levels of uptake
transporters for organic anions in SCRH
Protein expression levels of Oatp1a1/1a4/1b2 and β-actin (internal control)
in 5-h-, 24-h-, and 96-h-cultured rat hepatocytes were examined by Western blot
analysis.
Fig. 5 Ca2+-dependent uptake of taurocholate and salicylic acid by SCHH
The uptake of [3H]-taurocholate (1 μM) (A) and [14C]-salicylic acid (2 μM)
(B) by human hepatocytes (lot; KQG) cultured for 96 h in a sandwich configuration in
the presence or absence of Ca2+ ions in the incubation medium for 10 min. Each
datum is a mean ± S.E. (n = 3). * P < 0.05.
Fig. 6 Culture-time-dependent uptake of taurocholate and rosuvastatin by SCHH
The uptake of [3H]-taurocholate (1 μM) (A, B, C) or [3H]-rosuvastatin (0.1
μM) (D, E, F) was observed in human hepatocytes cultured on a collagen-coated dish
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
36
for 5 h (closed circles) or cultured in a sandwich configuration for 96 h (open circles).
The uptake of test compounds was determined for 0.5 and 5 min. We used three
different batches of human hepatocytes: KQG (A, D), HH190 (B, E), and Hu0930 (C,
F). The data are means ± S.E. (n = 6). Where vertical bars are not shown, the S.E.
values are within the limits of the symbols.
Fig. 7 Ratio of the uptake clearance of taurocholate or rosuvastatin in
96-h-cultured SCHH normalized by that in 5-h-cultured hepatocytes
Ratio of the uptake clearance of [3H]-taurocholate (closed bar, 1 μM; open bar,
1 mM) (A) or [3H]-rosuvastatin (closed bar, 0.1 μM; open bar, 100 μM) (B) in
5-h-cultured hepatocytes to that in 96-h-cultured hepatocytes was shown as a percent
of control. Data are means ± S.E. (n = 6; triplicate in two independent preparations).
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 compared with the uptake clearance in 5-h-cultured
hepatocytes.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
37
Table 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters for taurocholate, digoxin, pravastatin, and
rosuvastatin in rats obtained from the literature, and a comparison of rat hepatic
clearance in vivo (CLH,vivo; A) with the hepatic clearance predicted from the uptake
clearance in SCRH (CLH,vitro; B).
(A)
CLH,P
(mL/min/kg) RB CLH,vivo
(mL/min/kg)
Taurocholate 31.4a 0.6b 52.3
Digoxin 13.3d 1.04e 12.7
Pravastatin 62g
Rosuvastatin 37.6h 0.631i 59.6
(B)
fB
CLH,vitro
(5 h) (mL/min/kg)
CLH,vitro
(96 h) (mL/min/kg)
Taurocholate 0.4c 32.1 (0.615)
5.65 (0.108)
Digoxin 0.615e 12.7 (1.00)
7.96 (0.627)
Pravastatin 1.2g 29.4 (0.475)
22.5 (0.362)
Rosuvastatin 0.083i 16.7 (0.281)
5.21 (0.0874)
CLH,P: in vivo hepatic clearance based on the plasma concentration was assessed as the
difference between the total plasma clearance and the renal plasma clearance for each
compound; RB: ratio of the blood concentration to the plasma concentration of each
compound; fB: unbound fraction of each compound in the total blood.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
38
The CLH,vitro/CLH,vivo ratio is described in parentheses under the CLH,vitro values in
Table 1 (B).
a (Hayashi and Sugiyama, 2007)
b Blood-to-plasma concentration ratio of taurocholate in rats is assumed to be 0.6
c (Inoue et al., 1985)
d (Harrison and Gibaldi, 1976)
e (Liu et al., 2005)
f (Yamazaki et al., 1996)
g (Watanabe et al., 2010)
h (Kitamura et al., 2008)
i (Watanabe et al., 2009)
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
39
Table 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters for taurocholate and rosuvastatin in humans, and a
comparison of human nonrenal (hepatic) clearance (CLH,vivo; A) with the biliary
clearance in vitro, predicted based on the uptake clearance in SCHH (CLH,vitro; B).
(A)
CLH,P
(mL/min/kg) RB CLH,vivo
(mL/min/kg)
Taurocholate 0.6a 20.7b
Rosuvastatin 4.83d 0.6a 8.06d
(B)
fB CLH,vitro (5 h) (mL/min/kg)
CLH,vitro (96 h) (mL/min/kg)
HH lot KQG HH190 Hu0930 KQG HH190 Hu0930
Taurocholate 0.4c 9.50 (0.459)
8.58 (0.415)
10.9 (0.529)
8.66 (0.418)
10.4 (0.502)
7.14 (0.345)
Rosuvastatin 0.18d 2.65 (0.329)
2.99 (0.372)
3.23 (0.401)
2.74 (0.341)
2.71 (0.337)
1.99 (0.247)
CLH,P: the hepatic clearance in vivo based on the plasma concentration was assessed as
the difference between the total plasma clearance and the renal plasma clearance for each
compound; RB: blood-to-plasma concentration ratio of each compound; fB: unbound
fraction of each compound in the total blood
The CLH,vitro/CLH,vivo ratio is described in parentheses under the CLH,vitro values in
Table 2 (B)
a Blood-to-plasma concentration ratio of these compounds in humans was assumed to
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
DMD # 38968
40
be 0.6
b Biliary clearance of taurocholate was assumed to be the same as the hepatic blood
flow rate
c There are no data for the blood unbound fraction of taurocholate in humans, so we
used the value for rats (Inoue et al., 1985)
d These data were obtained from the interview form of CRESTOR®.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 14, 2011 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPE
T Journals on D
ecember 30, 2020
dmd.aspetjournals.org
Dow
nloaded from
Fig.1
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on June 14, 2011 as DO
I: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPET Journals on December 30, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
Fig.2
0 5 10 150
50100150200250300350
(A)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
0 5 10 150
10
20
30
(B)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
0 5 10 150
25
50
75
100
(C)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
0 5 10 150
100
200
300
400
500
(D)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on June 14, 2011 as DO
I: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPET Journals on December 30, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
Fig.3
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on June 14, 2011 as DO
I: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPET Journals on December 30, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
Oatp1a4
Oatp1a1
Oatp1b2
actin
75 kDa
43 kDa
Fig.4
Times in culture 5h 24h 96h
75 kDa
75 kDa
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on June 14, 2011 as DO
I: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPET Journals on December 30, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
Ca2+(+) Ca2+(-)0
255075
100125150175
*(A)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
Ca2+(+) Ca2+(-)0.02.55.07.5
10.012.515.017.5
(B)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
Fig.5
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on June 14, 2011 as DO
I: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPET Journals on December 30, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
0 1 2 3 4 50
20406080
100120
(A)
time(min)U
pta
ke(μ
l/mg
pro
tein
)
0 1 2 3 4 50
10203040506070
(D)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
0 1 2 3 4 50
20406080
100120
(B)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
0 1 2 3 4 50
10203040506070
(E)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
0 1 2 3 4 50
20406080
100120
(C)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
0 1 2 3 4 50
10203040506070
(F)
time(min)
Up
take
(μl/m
g p
rote
in)
Fig.6
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on June 14, 2011 as DO
I: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPET Journals on December 30, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from
Fig.7
This article has not been copyedited and form
atted. The final version m
ay differ from this version.
DM
D Fast Forw
ard. Published on June 14, 2011 as DO
I: 10.1124/dmd.111.038968
at ASPET Journals on December 30, 2020 dmd.aspetjournals.org Downloaded from