Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IINNSSPPIIRRIINNGG WWOOMMEENN:: CCOORRPPOORRAATTEE BBEESSTT PPRRAACCTTIICCEE IINN
EEUURROOPPEE
EELLIISSAABBEETTHH KKEELLAANN LLEEHHMMAANN BBRROOTTHHEERRSS CCEENNTTRREE FFOORR WWOOMMEENN IINN BBUUSSIINNEESSSS..
LLOONNDDOONN BBUUSSIINNEESSSS SSCCHHOOOOLL
ELISABETH KELAN
Forma parte del equipo de investigación del centro internacional
Lehman Brothers Centre for Women in Business de la London
Business School. Este centro desarrolla programas dirigidos a
mejorar y potenciar el liderazgo de las mujeres directivas. Entre las
empresas a las que se ofrecen estos servicios encontramos
compañías internacionales como Nortel, Kraft, Philips, Hewlett
Packard o Unilever. También es coautora, junto con Lynda Gratton,
de documentos como “Innovative Potencial Men and Women in
Teams” o “Inspiring Women: Corporate Best Practice in Europe”.
Por último, cabe destacar que posee su propia consultaría -Athena
associates- que asesora en temas de género y management.
http://www.london.edu/womeninbusiness/theteam.html
http://portalcontent.london.edu:8080/faculty/search.do?uid=ekelan
http://www.elisabeth-kelan.net/
Inspiring Women:Corporate Best Practice in Europe
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
The organisations we studied By industry
Industry Sector CompaniesAutomotive Daimler Chrysler; Volkswagen; Volvo CarsB2B CargillBiotech GSK BiologicalsConsulting Accenture; PA ConsultingEducation London Business SchoolEnergy Shell; TOTALFinancial Services AIB; Barclays; DSM; Fortis Bank; Lehman Brothers; Lloyds; London Stock Exchange;
Merrill Lynch; Nomura; Société Générale; Standard Chartered BankFinancial Services (Audit) BDO Stoy Hayward; Ernst & Young; KPMG; PwCFMCG Coca Cola; L’Oréal; Sara LeeInsurance AXA PPP; AXA Ireland; Swiss ReMedia Creative Reuters; Royal Opera House; ?What if!; WPPLaw Allen & Overy; Denton Wilde Sapte; White & CaseManufacturing CorningNot for Profit Dyslexia Action; International Trade CentreProperty Jones Lang LasallePublic Sector CAA; Govt: GCHQ, GSI; Police: Met (London) TransportPublishing Economist; Pearson; PenguinRetail TescoTechnology Fujitsu; Hewlett Packard; IBM; Microsoft; SymantecTelco BT; Nortel; Orange; SwisscomTransport Prologis; Transport for LondonUtility Royal Mail
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
What is it these organisations focus on with regard to women?The Four Waves of Intervention
Measurement & Reporting
Enabling women to be wives, mothers & carers
Creating supportive networks
Preparing women to be leaders
1
2
3
4
1 2 3 4
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
The Four Waves
Wave 1 Measurement & Reporting Representation at different levels of management Targets and accountability Uptake of flexible work options
Enabling women to be wives, mothers & carers
Wave 2 Work-family responsiveness Flexible work options Leave programmes Re-entry programmes
Wave 3 Creating supportive networks Mentoring Coaching Formal networking programmes
Wave 4 Preparing women to be leaders Training Talent management Stretch assignments
– Lead important projects – Lead business critical projects – Overseas assignments
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
Wave 1Measurement & Reporting
Examples of current activity Recruitment, induction and progression Demographics on women in managerial roles Targets and accountability of senior managers
Reporting
Targets: Shortlist women for senior roles
Experience
Actuals
23%Targets: Senior Executive – gender ratios
16%Women turnover rates
59%
Measuring salary differences between men and women
66%Measuring proportion of women at key job levels
72%
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
Wave 2Enabling women to be wives, mothers & carers
Examples of current activity Work-family responsiveness Flexible work options Leave programmes Re-entry programmes
Reporting
Experience
Actuals
Flexible working Manager (43%)0-10%
Part time Manager & Senior Executive (80%)
20%
Having access
Flexible working
89%Part time working
95%Job share
77%
Job share Manager (65%)
0-10%Less than
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
Wave 3Creating supportive networks
Examples of current activity Induction networking Formal networks
Reporting
Experience
Actuals
Within: Induction networking – Men & Women
78%Within & outside: Women’s networks
76%
Having access
Support network within company
66%Support network outside company
64%
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
Wave 4Preparing women to be leaders
Examples of current activity Stretch assignments Involved in / leading important or business critical projects Overseas assignments
Reporting
Experience
Actuals
Women: Leading business critical projects (43%)
20%Women: Leading important projects (52%)
20%
Having access
Policy – Women leading business critical projects
36%Targets – Number of women on business critical projects
7%Targets – Number of women on overseas assignments
2%
On overseas assignments (52%)
10%Less thanLess than Less than
Corporate Best Practice in Europe / The Experience of 61 Organisations
What are organisations measuring and targeting?
0
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
27%
23%22%
18%
16%
10%
7%
3%2%
Senior Exec roles
Shortlists for senior roles
Rep on Exec board
Graduate recruitment
Gender ratios – Perf targets for Senior Exec
Participating in internal training
Participating in external training
Leading important projects
In business critical projects
On overseas assignments
2%
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Our study comprises 21 cross-sector organisations ranging in size and maturity, featuring:
Profile: Participating organisations
Specifications for teams were:
i. Knowledge-based workersii. Either virtual or centrally locatediii. Worked together for minimum 3 monthsiv. Under direction of project leader
More than
100teams surveyed
60+teams complete responses
Over
850survey respondents
17countries spanned globally
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Participating companies By industry
Industry Sector Companies
Automotive Volvo Cars
B2B Cargill
Biotech GSK Biologicals
Consulting Accenture; IBM Consulting
Education London Business School
Financial Services AIB; Fortis Bank; Lehman Brothers; Lloyds; Société Générale
Financial Services (Audit) BDO Stoy Hayward; KPMG
FMCG L’Oréal
Insurance AXA PPP; AXA Ireland
Manufacturing Corning
Media Reuters
Technology Symantec
Telco Nortel; Orange
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Are Men from Mars and Women from Venus?
We looked at possible differences in a wide variety of individual criteria at work
NO significant differences between industry sectors
NO significant differences between Men and Women
The Individual Criteria we studied:Self-confidencePersonal initiativeSensitivity to others’ viewsPositive moodNegative moodInclusiveness
Life satisfactionCareer satisfactionPerceptions of task significanceOrganisational commitmentIntention to leave
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
We did find differences in what happens out of work
Planet Earth 1
Men Team Members earn more than their Partners
Income – More than my Partner 33% 69%Income – Less than my Partner 31% 11%
Women Men
Key FindingsTeam Members: At Home
Women Team Members carry most of the domestic burden at home
Most domestic labour – By me 47% 14%Most domestic labour – By my partner 6% 44%
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Men and Women Team Leaders showed differences in our sample, in their Life Experiences at Home
Planet Earth 2
Women Team Leaders are less likely to have children
Without Children 52% 4%
Women Men
Key FindingsTeam Leaders: Life Experience
Men Team Leaders are more likely to have younger children
Youngest Child in Pre-School 23% 46%
Women Team Leaders are six times more likely to carry the domestic burden
Most domestic labour – By me 31% 5%
Men Team Leaders earn more than their Partners
Income – More than my Partner 65% 96%
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Boundary Spanning
Psychological Safety Self-Confidence
Knowledge Transfer Experimentation Task
Performance
Innovation
Innovative Potential What Drives Innovation?
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
80
60
40
20
0
Per
cent
age
of W
omen
in T
eam
s
Percentage of Men in Teams
100
120
100
75
50
25
0
100
75
25
0
We Studied Teams with Different Proportions of Men and Women
100 Teams with Different proportions of Men and Women
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
4,50
4,00
3,50
3,00
2,50
Mem
ber
Psy
chol
ogic
ally
Saf
e Com
m. C
limat
e
0,000 0,200 0,400 0,600 0,800 1,000
Proportion of Women
R Sq Quadratic = 0,042
Proportions of Men and Women in Teams Psychological Safety
Psychological safety is optimal with 50:50 proportions of Men and Women
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Proportions of Men and Women in Teams Self-confidence
Self-confidence of team members is optimal with 60:40 proportions of Women and Men
4,75
4,25
4,00
3,75
3,50
Mem
ber
Mea
n Sel
f Con
fiden
ce
0,000 0,200 0,400 0,600 0,800 1,000
Proportion of Women
R Sq Quadratic = 0,111
4,50
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Proportions of Men and Women in Teams Experimentation
Experimentation is optimal with 50:50 proportions of Men and Women
5,00
4,00
3,50
3,00
2,00
Lead
er T
eam
Exp
erim
enta
tion
0,000 0,200 0,400 0,600 0,800 1,000
Proportion of Women
R Sq Quadratic = 0,114
2,50
4,50
Innovative Potential: Men and Women in Teams / Bi-annual Forum
Proportions of Men and Women in Teams Efficiency
Efficiency is optimal with 50:50 proportions of Men and Women
5,00
4,00
3,00
2,00
1,00
Lead
er V
alue
App
ropr
iatio
n
0,000 0,200 0,400 0,600 0,800 1,000
Proportion of Women
R Sq Quadratic = 0,088
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. Do you?
Bound by Stereotypes?Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. Do you?
© Jebens Design and London Business School
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. Do you?
Pink Mobile Phones
n Emergence of ‘pinked up’ technologyn Lady Geek research shows that only 9% of women like pink mobile phonesn By not creating consumer technology which women would buy, £600 million are lost per year in the UK alone
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. Do you?
Saatchi & Saatchi and Ladygeek.org.uk
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. Do you?
Organisational Pitfalls
Assumption: women want flexible workingn Our research found that only 48% of female leaders have childrenn 96% of the male leaders are fathers and they experience a higher spill over from work to life and vice versan Many - not just working mothers - would like to use flexible working options
Assumption: women do not want a careern Women narrate their careers as being a result of coincidence, serendipity and luckn Men narrate their careers as rationally planned actionn Double bind when it comes to negotiation and promotion
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. Do you?
What are Gender Stereotypes?
Gender stereotypes are commonly held beliefs about men and women as mutually exclusive groupsn Descriptive (how men and women are) and prescriptive (how men and women are supposed to be)n Conscious and unconscious categorisation of people to simplify complex reality
Strong beliefs in gender difference n BUT few differences hold up under analysis (e.g. throwing objects)
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. about working women – and men. about working women – and men. Do you?Do you?Do you?
Why are Gender Stereotypes Problematic?
Stereotype threatn The risk of proving the stereotype right n This has detrimental affects on performance
Stereotypes construct reality and leave alternative explanations out of sightn ‘Mompreneurs’ instead of changing organisations
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. about working women – and men. about working women – and men. Do you?Do you?Do you?
The Iceberg
n Stereotypes are like an icebergn Gender stereotypes are often invisible and unconsciousn The importance of turning the unconscious conscious
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. about working women – and men. about working women – and men. Do you?Do you?Do you?
Changing Gender Stereotypes
Make gender stereotypes visible n Bring stereotypes from the unconscious to conscious level n Stereotype reactance: performing better when the stereotype is fl agged up
Reprogram stereotypesn Attach different meaningsn Role models
Question assumptionsn Focus on aspects you can changen Change takes time
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. about working women – and men. about working women – and men. Do you?Do you?Do you?
Contact Details
Dr Elisabeth Kelan [email protected]
Website and Newsletter: www.london.edu/womeninbusiness.html
Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions Bound by Stereotypes? Elisabeth Kelan shows that many organisations make sweeping assumptions about working women – and men. about working women – and men. about working women – and men. Do you?Do you?Do you?