Upload
ellen-greer
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget
Braun, S. A., 2006: High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 43-64.
演講人 :陳登舜
Outline Introduction Simulation and analysis description a.Simulation description b.Simulated structure and validation Budget formulation Budget results a.Water vapor budget b.Condesed water budget c.Volume–integrated budget d.The artificial water source Conclusions
Introduction The water vapor budget a.the condensation in the eyewall occurs hot convective hot t
owers b.outside of the eyewall the condensation occurs in weaker u
pdrafts, indicative of a larger role of stratiform precipitation processes.
Horizontal advection tended to transport drier air into the core in the boundary layer and moist air from the eye to the eyewall within the low-level outflow above the boundary layer (Zhang et al. 2002).
In this study, we compute budgets of both water vapor and total condensed water (cloud condensate, and precipitation) from a high-resolution simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998).
Simulation and analysis description a. Simulation descriptionCoarse-resolution:Started at 1200 UTC 22/08/1998 (36 hrs) 36 km: 91× 97
12 km: 160×160
High-resolution:Started at 1800 UTC 22/08/1998 (30 hrs) 6 km: 225×225 2 km: 226×226
Vertical: 27 levels
1800 UTC 22 Aug. TRMM
1050 UTC 24 Aug. TRMM
1200 UTC 23 Aug MM5
Radar Reflectivity CFAD
1800 UTC 22 Aug.TRMM
1200 UTC 23 Aug.MM5
contoured frequency by altitude diagrams (CFADs)
40 m 2.7km
6.8km
12km
Vr’ (contour)
Vr’ (contour)
W (contour)
W (contour)
1-h Time Average(24-25 h)
dBZ (shading)W (contour)
Qc+Qi (shading)W (contour)
dBZ (shading)Vr’ (contour)
1-h Time Average(24-25 h)
dBZ + w
(qcl+qci) + w
dBZ + Vr
1-h Time Average(24-25 h)
tangential velocity radial velocity
vertical velocity qv
qcl + qci qrain, qsnow, qgr
56ms-1
Budget Formulation
qv is mixing ratio of water vapor;qc is the mixing ratio of cloud liquid water and ice;qp is the mixing ratio of rain, snow and graupel;V’ is the storm-relative horizontal air motion;w is the vertical air motion;VT is the hydrometeor motion;+ is source; - is sink;C is the condensation and deposition;E is the evaporation and sublimation;B is the contribution from the planetary boundary layer;D is the turbulent diffusion term;Z is the artificial source term associated with setting negative mixing ratios to zero.
the temporal and azimuthal mean:
the time-averaged and vertically integrated amount:
the time-averaged, volumetrically integrated amount:
(kg·m-3·h-1 )
(kg·m-2·h-1 )
(kg·h-1 )
Budget Formulation(con’t)
the azimuthally averaged horizontal advective flux is simply that associated with radial transport
Budget Formulation(con’t)Zx is artificial source terms associated with setting negative mixing ratios (caused by errors associated with the finite differencing of the advective terms) to zero, that is, mass is added to eliminate negative mixing ratios.
Budget results
condensation horizontal flux divergence,
evaporation vertical flux divergence,
Cond + Evap HF + VF divergence
divergence term boundary layer source term
1-h Average(24-25 h)
a. Water vapor budget
Melting layer
updraft condensation occurring in updraft
much of the eyewall condensation is associated with hot towers.
The smaller contribution of stronger updrafts is indicative of the larger role of stratiform precipitation processes outside of the eyewall.
eyewall region (30-70 km) outer region (70-200 km)
b. Condensed water budget
cloud sink horizontal flux divergence
net source vertical flux divergence
boundary layer source added water mass to offset negative mixing ratios
condensation (total source of cloud)
cloud budget
rain
graupel
snow
sinkSourcecloud budget
net microphysical source horizontal flux divergence
precipitation fallout andvertical flux divergence
added water mass to offsetnegative mixing ratios
precipitation budget
cloud sink
Horizontal distributioncondensation evaporation
precipitation falloutqv
Horizontal distributiontotal rain source warm rain source
cold rain source graupel source
Rain source
+
graupel sink
Graupel sink
c.Volume–integrated budget
d. The artificial water source
cloud liquid water
cloud ice
rain
snow
graupel
Cloud content Precipitation content
raincloud water
graupel
Conclusion A detailed water budget is performed using a high-resoluti
on simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). The simulation generally reproduces the track, intensity, and structure of the storm, but overpredicts the precipitation as inferred from comparison of model and TRMM radar reflectivities.
The water vapor budget confirms that the ocean source of vapor in the eyewall region is very small relative to the condensation and inward transport of vapor, with the ocean vapor source in the eyewall (0.7) being approximately 4% of the inward vapor transport into the eyewall (16.8) region.
In the eyewall, most of the condensation occurs within convective towers while in the outer regions condensation results from a mix of convective and stratiform precipitation processes, with the stratiform component tending to dominate.
Conclusion Precipitation processes acting outside of the eyewa
ll region are not very dependent on the condensate mass produced within and transported outward from the eyewall.
Although the artificial water mass source is very small at any given grid point, its cumulative impact over large areas and over time is more substantial, contributing an amount of water that is equivalent to 15%–20% of the total surface precipitation.