hultgren4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 hultgren4

    1/3

    Arland J. Hultgren, Pauls Letter to the Romans: A Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,

    2011.

    Chapter Four

    5:1-8:39 is exegeted in this long chapter, of which materials Hultgren observes

    in each of the four chapters, Paul affirms the freedom of the

    believer at some point: freedom from the wrath of God in chapter

    5; freedom from the power of sin in chapter 6; freedom from the

    law in chapter 7; and freedom from death in chapter 8. (p. 197).

    Hultgrens careful work continues, as, for instance, his exegesis of 5:12-21 demonstrates. Of the

    section he notes

    The following section (5:12-21) opens with

    (therefore), which has no clear antecedent. [But Paul] doesnot merely continue the previous discussion, he uses therefore to

    mark a transition, drawing consequences from what has been said

    but moving on to another topic that turns out to be a discussion

    of the effects of Adam and Christ upon humanity (p. 219).

    This is a good place, I suppose, to mention one of the real strengths of Hultgren s work, and that

    is, that he keeps the big picture in mind when he works on even the smallest pericopae. Manycommentators get lost in the woods and forget that the discrete units which so engage them

    with various minutia are part of a whole. Its all well and good to examine the smallest particles

    of information but if they arent integrated into an examination of the whole they serve no

    purpose. Theyre little more than pieces of a puzzle that are never fitted into their proper spaceso that the whole image can be seen.

    Hultgren assembles the entire puzzle even in the smallest sections so that the reader knowswhats going on throughout. In this regard, Hultgren is a master commentator.

    Also very good is his work on the classic text, 6:1-11. He assembles a lot of material from other

    commentators but he nicely weaves them together. Ill not spoil the fun for you, reader of thisreview. Ill just urge you to see for yourself.

    I will, however, spoil the fun for those interested in how Hultgren takes 7:1-6. Of this importantCrux he writes

    It is not immediately obvious why Paul now (in chapter 7 as a

    whole) turns to the topic of the law. But in fact it is incumbentupon him to do so. But all of this begs a question. How does a

    believer in Christ live in righteousness and in opposition to sin?

  • 8/6/2019 hultgren4

    2/3

    The simplest response is, If one is a Jewish Christian, one

    should continue observing the ancestral law. If one is a GentileChristian, one should adopt the law (at least its moral teachings) as

    the basis for a life of righteousness. The quick and easy answer,

    however, is not Pauls. [Pauls answer to the problem is] to

    maintain that the law has had an important function in the historyof salvation and that the law is holy, and the commandment is

    holy, just, and good (p. 268).

    And the second Crux of the chapter (and the more interesting really) has to do with the subject of

    the I sayings in 7:14-25.

    The issues surrounding the identity of the first person singular used in this passage ... are discussed in an appendix (The Identity

    of the I in Romans 7). The viewpoint taken here is that 7:7-25

    as a whole, in spite of the differences cited between 7:7-13 and

    7:14-25, Paul speaks of what it means to live under the law inorder to be righteous, taking insights from his own life experience

    in the past under the law as paradigmatic, and seeing all from theperspective of one who is now in Christ (p. 285).

    So, he continues, chapter 8 follows chapter 7 logically because sin really has been overcome.

    So, in chapter 8

    [Paul] speaks forthrightly to the suffering that comes from ones

    incorporation into Christ through baptism and the consequences ofit as one lives in union with Christ (p. 312).

    Hultgrens interpretation of 8:18-30 is simply tremendous. It, like several other passages in the

    commentary, has to be experienced first hand for the full pleasure to be feld. Of 8:31-39Hultgren could not be more correct, suggesting

    The message of Paul in this entire section is that God is for us (p.336).

    The chapter closes with this intriguing remark

    The bond between God and believers is so great that it can never

    be broken. But what, then, can one say about persons who are not

    in Christ? Paul takes up that issue in the next three chapters (p.342).

    And so shall we.

    Jim West

  • 8/6/2019 hultgren4

    3/3

    Quartz Hill School of Theology