2
S-Theorem (On Regularization): Green’s Function-induced Distributed Elementary Sources - Second Kind Alireza Baghai-Wadji Electrical Engineering Department University of Cape Town Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa [email protected] Abstract—Standard singular dyadic Green’s functions (DGFs) in computational electromagnetics are responses to idealized dipoles - Dirac’s delta functions. The latter are generalized symbolic functions defined as the limit of a sequence of (η-)parametrized functions. Any member of the sequence, with non-vanishing η, is a function in ordinary sense having finite (non-zero) or infinite support. Utilization of such distributed source functions, rather than symbolic distributions, renormalizes singularities automatically and results in regularized DGFs. In this work a novel physics-inspired distributed elementary source function has been constructed for the first time. Maxwell’s equations in general media can be split into two comple- mentary systems of partial differential equations: diagonalized- and supplementary forms, D- form and S- form, respectively. Given a boundary value problem, the D-form with respect to a distinguished direction in space allows directly determining field components transversal to the distinguished direction. The remaining two field components (parallel to the distinguished direction) can be determined a posteriori from the transversal components by employing the S-form. Using the S-form, a novel distributed elementary source has been constructed leading to self-consistently regularizing DGFs. The results have been firmly established by providing the complete proof of a theorem. I. PREPARATORY CONSIDERATIONS A. D- and S-Forms Consider Maxwell’s equations in an bi-anisotroic medium and a distinguished direction in space, say, z. Then, the following D- and S-Forms are equivalent with Maxwell’s equations Maxwell’s equations [1]. 1) The D- Form: The form associated with the DIAGONALIZATION of Maxwell’s equations with respect to, say, z-direction is LΨ = z Ψ with Ψ = E 1 , E 2 , H 1 , H 2 . 2) The S- Form: The SUPPLEMENTARY set of differential equations associated with Maxwell’s equations, and comple- menting the diagonalized form with respect to the assumed z-direction, is AΨ=Φ with Φ= E 3 , H 3 . The 4 × 4 and 2 × 4 differential operators L and A, respectively, depend on (possibly dispersive) material parameters. II. DYADIC GREENS FUNCTIONS For illustrating the trust of the method it should suffice to consider the simplest possible three dimensional problem; i.e., electromagnetic wave in free space induced by a dipole directed along the x-axis: J 1 = J 1 e 1 δ(x - x 0 ,y - y 0 ,z - z 0 ). Subdividing entire space by a fictitious plane z = z 0 into regions z>z 0 and z<z 0 , using the D- Form and proceeding along the lines outlined in [1] the components of Ψ can be determined. Using the S- Form the components of Φ; i.e., E 3 and H 3 , can be determined a posteriori. Note that the latter field components do not play any role in satisfying Sommerfeld’s radiation conditions, nor the conditions on the ‘‘fictitious’’ interface z = z 0 . Consequently, the fact that H 3 shall satisfy the required jump discontinuity across y = y 0 is a testimony for the self-consistency of the overall formulation. III. A NOVEL PHYSICS- INSPIRED DISTRIBUTED SOURCE FUNCTION Let H 3 (x|x 0 ), being calculated a posteriori via the S- Form, denote the magnetic field response at the point x due to an electric dipole located at x 0 and oriented parallel to the x- axis. The following integral representation is valid: H 3 (x|x 0 ) = Z -∞ Z -∞ dk 1 2π dk 2 2π - 1 2 jk 2 W × e jk1(x-x 0 ) e jk2(y-y 0 ) e -W|z-z 0 | (1) with W = p k 2 - k 2 0 if k 2 - k 2 0 > 0, and W = -j p k 2 0 - k 2 if k 2 0 - k 2 > 0. Here, k 0 = ω/c 0 , with c 0 being speed of light in free space, and ω the angular frequency. Denote H 3 (x|x 0 ) in region y -y 0 > 0(y -y 0 = |y -y 0 |) by H y>y 0 3 (x|x 0 ). Likewise, denote H 3 (x|x 0 ) in region y - y 0 < 0(y - y 0 = -|y - y 0 |) by H y<y 0 3 (x|x 0 ). Then, consistency with Maxwell’s equations requires that the following relationship holds true: lim |y-y 0 |→0 H y>y 0 3 (x|x 0 ) - lim |y-y 0 |→0 H y<y 0 3 (x|x 0 ) = δ(x - x 0 ,z - z 0 ) (2) It should be noted that the limiting process acts on the variable in the oscillating rather than the decaying exponential, thus making this formula exceptionally interesting and important. Replacing |y - y 0 | by η and substituting the resulting ex- pressions for H y>y 0 3 (x|x 0 ) and H y<y 0 3 (x|x 0 ) into (2) yields the 2174 978-1-4799-3540-6/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE AP-S 2014

[IEEE 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting - Memphis, TN, USA (2014.7.6-2014.7.11)] 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation

  • Upload
    alireza

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: [IEEE 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting - Memphis, TN, USA (2014.7.6-2014.7.11)] 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation

S-Theorem (On Regularization):Green’s Function-induced

Distributed Elementary Sources − Second KindAlireza Baghai-Wadji

Electrical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Cape Town

Rondebosch, Western Cape, South [email protected]

Abstract—Standard singular dyadic Green’s functions (DGFs)in computational electromagnetics are responses to idealizeddipoles - Dirac’s delta functions. The latter are generalizedsymbolic functions defined as the limit of a sequence of(η−)parametrized functions. Any member of the sequence, withnon-vanishing η, is a function in ordinary sense having finite(non-zero) or infinite support. Utilization of such distributedsource functions, rather than symbolic distributions, renormalizessingularities automatically and results in regularized DGFs. Inthis work a novel physics-inspired distributed elementary sourcefunction has been constructed for the first time. Maxwell’sequations in general media can be split into two comple-mentary systems of partial differential equations: diagonalized-and supplementary forms, D- form and S- form, respectively.Given a boundary value problem, the D-form with respect toa distinguished direction in space allows directly determiningfield components transversal to the distinguished direction. Theremaining two field components (parallel to the distinguisheddirection) can be determined a posteriori from the transversalcomponents by employing the S-form. Using the S-form, a noveldistributed elementary source has been constructed leading toself-consistently regularizing DGFs. The results have been firmlyestablished by providing the complete proof of a theorem.

I. PREPARATORY CONSIDERATIONS

A. D− and S−Forms

Consider Maxwell’s equations in an bi-anisotroic mediumand a distinguished direction in space, say, z. Then, thefollowing D− and S−Forms are equivalent with Maxwell’sequations Maxwell’s equations [1].

1) The D− Form: The form associated with theDIAGONALIZATION of Maxwell’s equations with respectto, say, z−direction is LΨ = ∂zΨ with Ψ =[E1, E2, H1, H2

].

2) The S− Form: The SUPPLEMENTARY set of differentialequations associated with Maxwell’s equations, and comple-menting the diagonalized form with respect to the assumedz−direction, is AΨ = Φ with Φ =

[E3, H3

]. The 4× 4

and 2× 4 differential operators L and A, respectively, dependon (possibly dispersive) material parameters.

II. DYADIC GREEN’S FUNCTIONS

For illustrating the trust of the method it should sufficeto consider the simplest possible three dimensional problem;

i.e., electromagnetic wave in free space induced by a dipoledirected along the x−axis: J1 = J1e1δ(x−x′, y− y′, z− z′).

Subdividing entire space by a fictitious plane z = z′ intoregions z > z′ and z < z′, using the D− Form and proceedingalong the lines outlined in [1] the components of Ψ can bedetermined. Using the S− Form the components of Φ; i.e.,E3 and H3, can be determined a posteriori. Note that thelatter field components do not play any role in satisfyingSommerfeld’s radiation conditions, nor the conditions on the‘‘fictitious’’ interface z = z′. Consequently, the fact that H3

shall satisfy the required jump discontinuity across y = y′ is atestimony for the self-consistency of the overall formulation.

III. A NOVEL PHYSICS-INSPIRED DISTRIBUTED SOURCEFUNCTION

Let H3(x|x′), being calculated a posteriori via the S−Form, denote the magnetic field response at the point x dueto an electric dipole located at x′ and oriented parallel to thex− axis. The following integral representation is valid:

H3(x|x′) =

∞∫−∞

∞∫−∞

dk12π

dk22π

{−1

2

jk2W

}× ejk1(x−x

′)ejk2(y−y′)e−W |z−z

′| (1)

with W =√k2 − k20 if k2− k20 > 0, and W = −j

√k20 − k2

if k20 −k2 > 0. Here, k0 = ω/c0, with c0 being speed of lightin free space, and ω the angular frequency. Denote H3(x|x′) inregion y−y′ > 0 (y−y′ = |y−y′|) by Hy>y′

3 (x|x′). Likewise,denote H3(x|x′) in region y − y′ < 0 (y − y′ = −|y − y′|)by Hy<y′

3 (x|x′). Then, consistency with Maxwell’s equationsrequires that the following relationship holds true:

lim|y−y′|→0

Hy>y′

3 (x|x′)− lim|y−y′|→0

Hy<y′

3 (x|x′)

= δ(x− x′, z − z′) (2)

It should be noted that the limiting process acts on the variablein the oscillating rather than the decaying exponential, thusmaking this formula exceptionally interesting and important.

Replacing |y − y′| by η and substituting the resulting ex-pressions for Hy>y′

3 (x|x′) and Hy<y′

3 (x|x′) into (2) yields the

2174978-1-4799-3540-6/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE AP-S 2014

Page 2: [IEEE 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting - Memphis, TN, USA (2014.7.6-2014.7.11)] 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation

desired distributed source function, a relationship the validityof which will be established in virtue of the S-Theorem:

δ(x− x′, z − z′) = limη→0

δη(x− x′, z − z′)

= limη→0

∞∫−∞

∞∫−∞

dk12π

dk22π

{−1

2

jk2W

}×ejk1(x−x

′)ejk2ηe−W |z−z′|

− limη→0

∞∫−∞

∞∫−∞

dk12π

dk22π

{−1

2

jk2W

}×ejk1(x−x

′)e−jk2ηe−W |z−z′| (3)

Remarks: (i) It is claimed that the above procedure forconstructing ‘‘physics-inspired’’ delta functions has been over-looked in literature. (ii) For η finite, however small, (3)defines the distributed source function δη(x−x′, z−z′) whichsmoothly approaches the symbolic δ(x−x′, z−z′) (refer to [2],[3] regarding intricate details of the regularization process).

A. S−Theorem

The relationships in (3) are valid.Proof: Symmetry considerations in (1) followed by taking

the lim|y−y′|→0

gives

lim|y−y′|→0

H3(x|x′) =1

2π2lim

|y−y′|→0

∞∫0

∞∫0

dk1dk2

{k2W

}× cos[k1(x− x′)] sin[k2(y − y′)]e−W |z−z

′| (4)

Observe that the term lim|y−y′|→0

sin[k2(y − y′)] is non-zero

only for k2 → ∞ (and thus for k =√k21 + k22 → ∞).

Consequently, with limk→∞

W ∝ k, (4) is equivalent with

lim|y−y′|→0

H3(x|x′) =1

2π2lim

|y−y′|→0

∞∫0

∞∫0

dk1dk2 (5)

× cos[k1(x− x′)] {k2 sin[k2(y − y′)]}

{e−k|z−z

′|

k

}

With k2 sin[k2(y − y′)] = −∂/∂y cos[k2(y − y′)] ande−k|z−z

′|/k = −sgn(z − z′)∫dze−k|z−z

′| (5) takes the form

lim|y−y′|→0

H3(x|x′) =1

2π2lim

|y−y′|→0

∞∫0

∞∫0

dk1dk2

× cos[k1(x− x′)]{∂

∂ycos[k2(y − y′)]

}×{

sgn(z − z′)∫dze−k|z−z

′|}

(6)

Exchanging the order of integral- and differential operators

∞∫0

∞∫0

dk1dk2∂∂y

∫dz =⇒ ∂

∂y

∫dz∞∫0

∞∫0

dk1dk2 yields:

lim|y−y′|→0

H3(x|x′) = lim|y−y′|→0

∂ysgn(z − z′)

∫dz

× 1

2π2

∞∫0

∞∫0

dk1dk2 cos[k1(x− x′)] cos[k2(y − y′)]

×e−k|z−z′| (7)

The double integral can be calculated in closed form:

lim|y−y′|→0

H3(x|x′) = lim|y−y′|→0

∂ysgn(z − z′)

∫dz

× 1

|z − z′|[(x− x′)2 + (y − y′)2 + (z − z′)2]3/2

(8)

Absorbing sgn(z − z′) into |z − z′| yields:

lim|y−y′|→0

H3(x|x′) = lim|y−y′|→0

∂y(9)

× 1

∫dz

z − z′

[(x− x′)2 + (y − y′)2 + (z − z′)2]3/2

The following calculation is a delicate interplay of terms,essentially replacing z−z′ in the numerator in (9) by |y−y′|,which is crucially important for further arguments.

The integral in (9) can also be calculated in closed form:

lim|y−y′|→0

H3(x|x′) = lim|y−y′|→0

∂y(10)

× 1

{−[(x− x′)2 + (y − y′)2 + (z − z′)2

]−1/2}Carrying out the differentiation with respect to y and using

y−y′ = |y−y′| and y−y′ = −|y−y′| for y > y′ and y < y′,respectively, in the numerators of the resulting expressions,result in:

lim|y−y′|→0

Hy>y′

3 (x|x′)− lim|y−y′|→0

Hy<y′

3 (x|x′) (11)

= lim|y−y′|→0

1

|y − y′|[(x− x′)2 + (y − y′)2 + (z − z′)2]

3/2

Identifying the limits at the RHS as δ(x− x′, z − z′), (seereferences in [3]) the claim in the Theorem is immediate(validity of (2), respectively, (3) ). 4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work is based on the research supported in part by the

National Research Foundation (UID: 85889). The initial stageof the work was carried out under an Australian ResearchCouncil (ARC) Linkage Grant: LP0775463.

REFERENCES

[1] A. R. Baghai-Wadji, ‘‘Theory and Applications of Green’s Functions,’’Selected Topics in Electronics and Systems,Vol. 20: Advances in SurfaceAcoustic Wave Technology, Systems and Applications, Editors: C. Ruppeland T. Fjeldly, World Scientific, vol. 2, pp. 83–149, 2001.

[2] A. R. Baghai-Wadji, ‘‘Self-consistent Physics-based δη−RegularizedGreens Function for 2D Poissons Equation in Anisotropic DielectricMedia,’’ Proceedings ACES, Florida, USA March, 2014 (submitted).

[3] A. R. Baghai-Wadji, ‘‘Self-consistent Physics-based δη−RegularizedGreens Function for 3D Poissons Equation in Anisotropic DielectricMedia,’’ Proceedings ACES, Florida, USA March, 2014 (submitted).

2175