28
Improved sampling Geir Nævdal and Kristin M. Flornes*

Improved sampling

  • Upload
    ceri

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Geir Nævdal and Kristin M. Flornes*. Improved sampling. EnKF with improved sampling of the initial ensemble. Goal: Improve the performance of the EnKF without increasing the ensemble size Different resampling techniques for the initial ensemble have been proposed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Improved sampling

Improved sampling

Geir Nævdal and Kristin M. Flornes*

Page 2: Improved sampling

EnKF with improved sampling of the initial ensembleGoal: Improve the performance of the EnKF

without increasing the ensemble size

• Different resampling techniques for the initial ensemble have been proposed

• In this work we have looked more closely at the effect of using Geir Evensen's resampling scheme (2004)

Page 3: Improved sampling

Outline• Evensen’s resampling scheme

• Does resampling preserve the variogram?

• Description of test case

• Results

• Conclusion

Page 4: Improved sampling

Evensen’s improved sampling schemeAim

Introduce a maximum rank and conditioning of the ensemble matrix for a given ensemble size.

Based on ideas from Singular Evolution Interpolated Kalman (SEIK) Filters

(Pham, 2001).

Page 5: Improved sampling

Evensen’s improved sampling schemeTo generate an ensemble of size N do the following: Generate a large ensemble of size β*N. Do a SVD of the ensemble matrix A and retain only

the N largest singular values.

Create a new ensemble of size N based on these singular values.

TVUA

Page 6: Improved sampling

Does Evensen’s resampling scheme preserve the variogram?• Is the variogram the same for a resampled

ensemble of N members as for the large initial ensemble with β*N members?

• We used the analytical covariance matrix in 1-D for Gaussian, spherical and exponential variogram to study theeffect of removing

singular values

Page 7: Improved sampling

Does resampling preserve the

variogram? • For the Gaussian model the elements in the covariance matrix

are

• Relationship between variogram and covariance

2

23exp

a

ipi

ii pp 0

Page 8: Improved sampling

Effect of retaining only ½ of the singular values

Gaussian Spherical Exponential

Analytical model variogram

Evensen’s algorithm

Evensen’s algorithm

Evensen’s algorithm

Page 9: Improved sampling

Effect of retaining 1/8 of the singular values

Gaussian Spherical Exponential

This shows that the variograms will be influenced by resampling if we truncate a large portion of the singular values, leading to smoother fields.

Evensen’s algorithm

Analytical model variogram

Evensen’s algorithm Evensen’s algorithm

Page 10: Improved sampling

Test Case - Description• Synthetic 2D case (50 X 50)• 3 producers (corners),1 injector (in the

middle)• Fields are generated using sgsim2

– Spherical variogram– Variogram range: 10 grid cells

• Static variables: PORO and PERMX• PERMY=PERMX• Measurement errors

– OPR, WPR, GPR: 10 % – BHP: 1%

Page 11: Improved sampling

True static fields

Injector in the middle, producers in the upper left and right corners and lower left corner

PERMX PORO

Page 12: Improved sampling

Test Case - Resampling setupStarted with 500 ensemble members.

Resampled down to 100 members

1. 100 random ensemble members • Used the 100 first of the 500 ensemble

members

2. Generate 100 ensemble members using Evensen’s improved sampling scheme

Page 13: Improved sampling

Example of initial porosity fields I

Ordinary ensemble member

Ensemble member generated fromresampling

Page 14: Improved sampling

Example of initial porosity fields II

Ordinary ensemble member

Ensemble member generated fromresampling

Page 15: Improved sampling

Example of initial porosity fields III

Ordinary ensemble member

Ensemble member generated fromresampling

Page 16: Improved sampling

Effect of resampling on initial

fields • The resampled ensemble members are smoother

• This is an effect of removing singular values

• Permeability fields are generated independently from porosity fields, and also resampled independently

Page 17: Improved sampling

Injection pressure Forecast AnalyzedMeasurement

Page 18: Improved sampling

Data for PROD1Forecast AnalyzedMeasurement

Page 19: Improved sampling

Data for PROD2Forecast AnalyzedMeasurement

Page 20: Improved sampling

Data for PROD3Forecast AnalyzedMeasurement

Page 21: Improved sampling

Performance measures• For a field m we use the formula

Compared results of 30 runs

e mN

i

N

j

truej

ij

me

mmNN

mR1 1

21)(

Page 22: Improved sampling

Effect on estimated water saturation

Page 23: Improved sampling

Effect on estimated pressure

Page 24: Improved sampling

Effect on estimated porosity

Page 25: Improved sampling

Effect on estimated permeability

Page 26: Improved sampling

Summary and conclusion• The dynamic variables are better

estimated using ordinary ensembles compared to resampled– Holds in particular for water saturation

• Small effects on static variables

• No argument for resampling

Page 27: Improved sampling

Acknowledgement This work was done with financial

support from the ROAW project, funded by the Research Council of Norway (PETROMAKS) and industrial sponsors. Licenses to the Eclipse simulator were provided by Schlumberger.

Page 28: Improved sampling

Literature• Evensen (Ocean Dynamics 2004)

“Sampling strategies and square root analysis schemes for the EnKF”

• Zafari et. al., SPE95750 (RMS measure)

• G. Nævdal, K.M. Flornes SPE118729 “Using ensemble Kalman filter with improved sampling of the initial ensemble” Submitted