Upload
truonghanh
View
218
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Improvements in Concrete Constructions
Presented by:Anwar Antouncivil engineer - managing partner
Table of Content
• Introduction
• History of Concrete
• Reasons for the low level of innovation in the concrete construction
• Improvement Factors
• Three Case Studies:
– Optimized Design.
– Precast Walls.
– Cut & Bend Reinforcement
Introduction
• Concrete:
– Most widely used construction material.
– 10 billion m3 per year.
– Second consumed product after the water.
• Objective of the presentation:
– Make an overview of the different stages of concrete construction.
– Highlight areas with potential for improvement.
History of Concrete
• 753 BC–476 AD: Ancient Romans were the earliest large-scale users of concrete.
• Pantheon’s concrete dome is the world's largest unreinforced concrete dome (118-128 AD).
• Roman’s concrete technique was than forgotten for more than 1,000 years.
• 1793: Modern usage of concrete started with the third EddystoneLighthouse – England.
• 1936 : First large scale concrete project (Hoover Dam) - 2.5 Mm3
• 1980s/90s (50 yrs ): Significant expand of concrete industry.
History of Concrete
• Although this progress in the technology and the supply of concrete:
– “The level of innovation within the concrete construction industry is considered, by many, to be too low” (Atkin et al. 2003).
– In Sweden, the productivity increase in construction industry has been around 3% during the period 1995-2005, which should be compared with an almost 90% increase for other industries (Byfors, J and Jäderholm, B - 2006).
Reasons for the low level of innovation in the concrete construction
• Lack of Cooperation, Communication, Coordination and sharing experience between the project’s main actors: Formal communications by Letters, Emails, RFI’s, Submittals, etc….
• Clients usually hire the designer with the lowest design fees; neglecting the experience and the skills.
• Clients usually search for the contractor with the lowest bidding sum; neglecting the quality, skills and the overall project time.
Reasons for the low level of innovation in the concrete construction
• Contractors usually consider every project as an individual project:
– Difficulty to invest in new production solutions that could have an important benefit in next projects.
– Example: Buying a formwork system.
Think Macro not Micro
Improvement Factors1- Work Together:
• Greater collaboration between different actors will help to improve this sector.
Traditional Organization
For the past 150 years owners hire Architects and Contractors separately
Improvement Factors1- Work Together:
• Greater collaboration between different actors will help to improve this sector.
Required Organization
Improvement Factors1- Work Together:
• Greater collaboration could be achieved by using the Building Information Modeling (BIM) platform.
BIM Process
Improvement Factors2- Change the way we design:
• Management decisions should be based on long term philosophy, even at the expense of short term financial goals.
Today’s designers spend more than 75% of their time in Non-designed tasks.(Patrick MacLeamy; HOK Chairman and Chief Executive Officer )
Improvement Factors2- Change the way we design:
• Management decisions should be based on long term philosophy, even at the expense of short term financial goals.
Today’s designers spend more than 75% of their time in Non-designed tasks.(Patrick MacLeamy; HOK Chairman and Chief Executive Officer )
Improvement Factors2- Change the way we design:
• Management decisions should be based on long term philosophy, even at the expense of short term financial goals.
Today’s designers spend more than 75% of their time in Non-designed tasks.(Patrick MacLeamy; HOK Chairman and Chief Executive Officer )
Improvement Factors2- Change the way we design:
• Management decisions should be based on long term philosophy, even at the expense of short term financial goals.
Today’s designers spend more than 75% of their time in Non-designed tasks.(Patrick MacLeamy; HOK Chairman and Chief Executive Officer )
Improvement Factors3- Make an optimized design:
• Quotes:
– "Design can add value faster than it adds cost." (Thomas Gale)
– Good Design may returns 75% on your investment (Architect Dennis Davey, AIA).
Case study for a raft foundation
Extract from the Soil Report
Improvement Factors3- Make an optimized design:
Soil Pressure under service loads Displacement under service loads
K = 2,250 T/m3
The Structural Engineer requested that
S = 321 KPa
Improvement Factors3- Make an optimized design:
Soil Pressure under service loads Displacement under service loads
After making an optimized analysis we found that:There is NO NEED for piles and even no need for soil improvement.
K = 1,500 T/m3
S = 297 KPa
Improvement Factors4- Planning and Scheduling:
• Planning is the highest influencing factor for improving the construction productivity.
• Planning could be also connected to the BIM
Improvement Factors
5- Improve Construction Methods:
• Formwork, reinforcing and placing of concrete are the main factors dominating the consumption of time and money in the concrete construction projects.
• Improvements may include:
– Formwork system: (Climbing, etc…).
– Cut & bent reinforcement.
– Self-compacting concrete (SCC): Increase workability.
– Precast elements / Post-Tensioned construction.
5- Improve Construction Methods - Precast Concrete Walls:
Case Study:
• Area = 1,200 m2• Perimeter = 150 m• Height = 6 m
5- Improve Construction Methods - Cut & Bent Reinforcement:
• Main advantages:
– No storage is required (material is ordered & supplied per need).
– Safe & Operational (No handling of 12m bars).
– Saving in labor cost.
– Time saving.
– Avoiding wastage (Efficiency).
5- Improve Construction Methods - Cut & Bent Reinforcement:
Wastage Examples: Beams
5- Improve Construction Methods - Cut & Bent Reinforcement:
Walls & Columns
Finally, One of the common wastage is when the contractor install reinforcement more than required by design (storage reason)
Wastage Examples:
Case Study – Cut & BendHazmieh Restaurants Project:
• Project’s Description:
– Built-up area = 15,000 m2.
– Designed Concrete Volume = 7,000 m3.
– Designed Steel Weight = 800 Tons (≈ 115 Kg/m3).
The project was designed using the BIM technology (Thanks to the Architect’s efforts ).
Case Study – Cut & BendHazmieh Restaurants Project:
Detailed shop drawings with BBS were prepared, taking into consideration the optimal arrangement of reinforcement.
Case Study – Cut & BendHazmieh Restaurants Project
Bar Bending Schedules were sent to the supplier. The bars were arriving on site divided into bundles with the related tags attached to them.
Case Study – Cut & BendHazmieh Restaurants Project:
• Poured Concrete Volume ≈ 7,000 m3
• Steel Weight reduced from 800Tons to 600 Tons
• Steel Ratio ≈ 90 Kg/m3
• Saving was estimated to be around 150,000$ (after deducting the shop drawings with cut & bent fees)
Thank You