Marco Anghileri Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano Italy
of 35/35
Marco Anghileri Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano Italy Robust: “Road Upgrade of Standards” GRD1-2002-70021 Second year meeting. Copenhagen March 1 – 2 2005 WP3: “Instrumentation and measurement”
Marco Anghileri Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano Italy
Robust: “Road Upgrade of Standards” GRD1-2002-70021 Second year meeting. Copenhagen March 1 – 2 2005 WP3: “ Instrumentation and measurement”. Marco Anghileri Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano Italy. Composite mounting block activity report. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Text of Marco Anghileri Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale Politecnico di Milano Italy
Nessun titolo diapositivaWP3: “Instrumentation and
measurement”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Test at TRL.
Tests at Polimi.
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Scope of this activity
Acceleration recorded on CG contains components introduced by the
oscillation of the floor.
The structure of the accelerometers mounting block can modify these
frequencies shifting them at lower regions where our severity
indices work.
To investigate the influence on the acceleration time histories of
mounting block mass, a carbon fiber mounting block has been
designed constructed and used during a TB11 test and several
deceleration tests.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Strength (able to sustain several crash test).
10 blocks produced.
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
TRL TB11 test
TRL performed a Round Robin II test installing the new
structure.
The fixing to the floor structure was obtained with 4 bolts
upper plate to fix accelerometers
White Fiberglass plates
lower fiberglass plate to fix the structure to the car
4 Bolts
Car floor
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Ford Fiesta:
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Structural behaviour:
The structure of the mounting did not show any damage during the
test.
Frequency behaviour:
Not satisfactory. Presence of oscillation.
A first numerical acitivty has been conducted to investigate these
problems
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Frequency analysis:
During the test two set of accelerometers have been mounted on the
car. The first on the new mounting and the second on the floor of
the car.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
TRL TB11 results
The frequency content at lower frequency (below 20 hz) is lower for
the new mounting than for the second set of accelerometers.
The frequency content at higher frequency is lower for the new
mounting than for the second set of accelerometers.
The new mounting block shows a strong resonance peak at 50 hz (any
contribution from AC supply has been excluded).
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Time analisys:
Time analysis shows that acceleration measured on the new mounting
are always lower than the acceleration measured on the second set.
Different accelerometers location should be taken into account.
This is clearly shown in the following figures with unfiltered
results:
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Same behaviour if a 20 hz filtering is applied.
Accelerations time history measured on the tunnel does not show the
typical second peak related to the impact of the rear part of the
vehicle while composite acceleration shows this second impact. A
correction should be applied for the different location.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
The previous results show interesting aspects that should be
further investigated.
Preliminary analysis showed a basic success but the mechanical
noise affecting acceleration measurement must be investigated and
eliminated.
A new activity was planned at Polimi to investigate this
problem.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Composite mounting fixing.
To better understand the results of the test carried at TRL on
November 17 2004 some basic experiments has been performed.
The composite mounting block has been installed on a Peugeot 106
tunnel to reproduce the resonance problems shown by TRL data.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Composite mounting fixing.
A first series of tests have been conducted using the installation
procedures agreed by the consortium. The structure has been fixed
on the tunnel of the vehicle using 4 bolts (8 mm diameter).
To measure the frequency behaviour a standard technique for modal
analysis has been adopted impacting the structure with a small
hammer and measuring the output with piezoelectric accelerometers
with high sensitivity
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
A triaxial accelerometer has been installed on the structure.
The output of these accelerometers, together with the spectrum
response showed a behaviour similar to the one seen at TRL even if
the main frequency is here at about 85 hz.
The difference between this frequency and the one measured at TRL
(50 hz) is probably due to the different placement of the structure
and the presence, at TRL, of the heavy structure used to release
the cable that lowers all the natural frequency increasing the mass
of the adjacent structure.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
This figures show these important results:
The behaviour shown during TRL tests has been reproduced even if
the resonance frequency is at 85 hz
This is the only frequency present and if we are able to shift this
frequency where severity indices don’t work all the possible
concerns related with these oscillation are removed.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Composite mounting new fixing.
To overcome the above shown problem we simply added four more bolts
and introduced spacers to fix the structure on a wider part of the
floor.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Composite mounting new fixing.
The first natural frequency of the system is above 105 hz (y
direction) ad 140 Hz (x direction) . These frequencies are far from
the relevant for the severity indices evaluation.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Deceleration tests.
Having solved the problems related to the mechanical oscillation a
new activity started installing the car on the deceleration sled at
Polimi.
Purpose:
To apply known deceleration triangular pulses comparing measures
obtained with the composite structure and an aluminium
structure.
Same pulse to different mounting structures.
To have results avoiding any cotribution from barrier, ground
condition or suspension system.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Weigth: 4.7 kg
Car installed with two directions respect to the applied
acceleration.
20°
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Acceleration pulses:
Peaks: 5 to 25 g (imposed ASI from .45 to 1.9)
Rise time: 0.1 to 0.15 s.
Data analisys not completed but interesting results.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Differences also at lower frequencies
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
lower oscillation amplitude
higher natural frequency
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Severity indices. ASI
No differences during first part of the deceleration pulse due to
the strong slope of the acceleration pulse.
After the peak differences between mounting blocks is
relevant.
Better agreement between sled and mounting with composite
solution.
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Robust. GRD1-2002-70021
Composite mounting block. Conclusion
The activity showed the influence of the mass of the mounting block
on the results.
Ferquency response can be modified with a light structure.
The composite solution could be not the proper solution but some
specification on the frequecy response should be added to EN
1317.
Autostrade will test next week the N2 barrier with the composite
block
Politecnico di Milano - “Analisi numeriche”
TRAINING A/C
Aluminium
Composite
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Aluminium
Composite
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
1.95
2
2.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8