Upload
vdg777
View
873
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ForestCarbonPartnershipFacility
Ken Andrasko World Bank/Environment Dept./FCPF program
At TNC REDD eX conference, Cancun, Mexico July 13-16, 2010
www.forestcarbonpartnership.org
PathwaystoSuccessonREDD+:CountriesLearningfromEachOther
REDD+is...apolicyrocketwithbroadsupport:
Nowwhat??
TheGoodNews:• REDD+islikelytohappen.• Seriousdiscussionofup‐scalingandfunding.
• WeareslowlyinvenJnghowtodoREDD+,atprojectandnaJonalscales.
TheOtherNews:
• Butweneedtoharvestlessonsfaster,&applythematlargerscales.
• Weneedtoshareexperience&rapidlydevelopavisionofwhatnaJonalREDD+lookslike.
Achieving REDD+ is a learning-by-doing endeavor for countries
CountriesStartFromDifferentPoints,andLoseForestasTheyDevelop.CanREDD+alterthispath?
North Amazon Basin
South Amazon Basin Europe
North America
North East Asia South Asia
Time
Nat
iona
l for
est c
over
Atlantic forest
South East Asia
Oceania
West Africa
Source: Zarin, 2009
ForestTransiJonCurve
Congo Basin Conservation
REDD
Enhancement
REDD+ bridge ?
4
Threemajorleversofforestbasedmi2ga2on,eachwithdifferentcharacteris2cs
ProjectCatalystslide,Copenhagen2009Reduced deforestation and forest degradation (REDD)
LARGEST
Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks & A/R
MEDIUM
Conservation & Sustainable Management of Forests
SMALLEST
3
2015
2
6
2020 1
8
2030
Source: McKinsey Global GHG Abatement Cost Curve v2.0; Project Catalyst analysis
Forest-based abatement potential Gt CO2e / yr
5
Only30countriescover90percentofdeforestaJonand80percentofcarbonstock.(ForestaJonismoreconcentrated)
ProjectCatalystslide,Copenhagen,2009
Source: Houghton; FAO FRA 2005; Hooijer, A. et al., PEAT-CO2, Delft Hydraulics report Q3943 (2006); Project Catalyst analysis
Brazil Indonesia Other top 20 deforestation countries
0.1
Remaining 9 with >1% of total ABG carbon stock
0.5
Next (54) high/medium deforestation countries
0
China and India
0
Rest of S. hemisphere developing countries
Total
90%
4 4 12
3V
80%
Emissions from deforestation
Gt CO2e
ABG Carbon stock
FRA 2005, % of total
...whileintegraJngREDD+intonaJonaldevelopmentplans,and
alteringlanduseincenJvesandbehavior
…forlasJngtransformaJontolow‐carbondevelopmentpaths?
6
Challenge: How to rapidly build REDD+ capacity in countries ..
FCPF:37REDDCountryExperiences.
15ReadinessPreparaJonProposals(R‐PPs).
7
Guyana: Absolute deforestation: 20 – 30,000 ha, Deforestation rate (DR: 0.1 – 0.3%)
Indonesia: 1,800,000 ha DR: 1.5 – 2%)
Panama: 48,000 ha DR: 0.8 – 1.1%)
Relative Forest cover
Time
CountriesStartFromDisJnctSituaJons:LandUseTrends,DeforestaJonDrivers,Governance
The countries on the transitional curve…
Suriname: 2000 – 3000 ha DR: 0%)
Ghana: 120,000 ha DR: 1.6 – 2.0 %)
8
Disclaimer: maps are for illustrative purposes only. World Bank has no views on national boundaries
Courtesy of Juergen Blaser, of FCPF Technical Advisory panel
ContentsofReadinessPreparaJonProposal(R‐PP):Component1:OrganizeandConsult
1a.Na2onalReadinessManagementArrangements
1b.StakeholderConsulta2onandPar2cipa2on
Component2:PreparetheREDDplusStrategy2a.AssessmentofLandUse,ForestPolicyandGovernance
2b.REDDStrategyOp2ons
2c.REDDImplementa2onFramework
2d.SocialandEnvironmentalImpacts
Component3:DevelopaReferenceScenario
Component4:DesignaMonitoringSystem4a.EmissionsandRemovals
4b.OtherBenefitsandImpacts
Component5:ScheduleandBudget
Component6:Monitoring&EvaluaJonofprogram9
REDDReadinessAcJviJes(perFCPF)
10
AssessmentofDeforestaJonDrivers+Governance
Establishreferencescenario
REDD+Strategy
andPrograms
MRVSystemDesign:
Measureandreportonchange
overJme
REDD+requiresstronglyinterrelatedprogramcomponents.Inadequatedesignofoneleadstounsustainable
orunmarketableREDD
StakeholderConsulta2ons
High quality MRV may be required for participation in global REDD markets & avoidance of REDD tonne price discounting.
• ContentsofReadinessPrepara2onProposal(R‐PP):Component1:OrganizeandConsult
1a.Na2onalReadinessManagementArrangements
1b.StakeholderConsulta2onandPar2cipa2on
Component2:PreparetheREDDplusStrategy2a.AssessmentofLandUse,ForestPolicyandGovernance
2b.REDDStrategyOp2ons
2c.REDDImplementa2onFramework
2d.SocialandEnvironmentalImpacts
Component3:DevelopaReferenceScenario
Component4:DesignaMonitoringSystem4a.EmissionsandRemovals
4b.OtherBenefitsandImpacts
Component5:ScheduleandBudget
Component6:Monitoring&EvaluaJonofprogram
REDDReadinessAcJviJes(perFCPF)
Examples:
• PanamaincludedIPleadersinformulaJonofR‐PP,andinnaJonaldelegaJontoCOP14Poznan,2008
• Ghana,Nepal,DRCofferdetailedmulJ‐stakeholderconsultaJonplans. 1412
INSIGHT: Transparent early consultations with major stakeholders offers promise of REDD+ becoming more inclusive than previous land use dialogues.
• Consultations will require new openness from governments and stakeholders… and need to broaden over time.
InclusiveconsultaJonsonREDD+arecriJcalearlyneedtoforgeacommonvisiononREDD+
• IssueofREDDsystemdesigncaninheritpre‐exisJngfailures,unresolvedgovernance,landtenureuncertainty.
• Or,befreshstart.
ParJcipaJoninREDDDesignCanChallengeTradiJonalRelaJonshipsBetweenGovernments&Stakeholders
• MapsoeenhavebeendrawninGeorgetown,withminimalconsultaJonorfieldwork
Guyana’slandtenure:State(86%ofareaesJmated);Amerindianlands;private.MiningclaimsoverlapAmerindianreservaJons.
Consultations in Preparation and Refinement of DRC’s R-PP: Seeking a Consensual Plan
Since April 2009, National REDD
Coordination consulted > 700 people.
Since January 2010, >100 people refined R-PP via
4 consultation workshops.
R-PP validation workshop
had 80 participants
• ContentsofReadinessPrepara2onProposal(R‐PP):Component1:OrganizeandConsult
1a.Na2onalReadinessManagementArrangements
1b.StakeholderConsulta2onandPar2cipa2on
Component2:PreparetheREDDplusStrategy2a.AssessmentofLandUse,ForestPolicyandGovernance
2b.REDDStrategyOp2ons
2c.REDDImplementa2onFramework
2d.SocialandEnvironmentalImpacts
Component3:DevelopaReferenceScenario
Component4:DesignaMonitoringSystem4a.EmissionsandRemovals
4b.OtherBenefitsandImpacts
Component5:ScheduleandBudget
16
REDDReadinessAcJviJes(perFCPF)
National Baseline, Accounting &
monitoring
Inter-regional strategy and
policies
REGION 1: baseline & policies
REGION 2: baseline & policies
REGION 3: baseline & policies
ISSUESTORESOLVE:
• Harmonizingreferencescenarios&MRVbetween:
• NaJonalscale,• SubnaJonalregions,• REDDprojects.
• UseregistryofacJviJes?
• WhoownsemissionsreducJons?
• Howrevenueswouldbeshared?
• HowacJviJesareregulated? Adapted from: Andrea Cattaneo, Woods Hole Research Center
LinkingSubnaJonalPilotProjectstoNaJonalREDD:e.g.,Indonesia(e.g.,Berau),DRC,Brazil,Mexico
Examples:
• DRCCongo’sREDDunitusingitsR‐PPtocoordinateacrossministries,donors,andFCPFandUN‐REDDprograms.
• GuyanadevelopingLowCarbonDevelopmentStrategyledbyitsPresident.18
Requires integrated vision of how REDD+ fits into emerging national, low-carbon development strategy.
• Mainstreaming REDD+ may require putting REDD at the center of national development policy
• . . . elevated to highest levels of government.
REDD+requiresunprecedentednaJonalplanningacrosssectors.
CoordinaJngNaJonalREDDAcJviJes:DemocraJcRepublicofCongoexample
REDD Activities and Funding Coordinated via Single Country
Readiness Preparation Proposal: (R-PP)
ManagementofReadiness
REDDImplementaJonFramework
REDDStrategyOpJons
ReferenceScenario
NaJonalMonitoringSystem
Harmonized Components of Readiness
(UN-REDD / FFCPF) In Country’s FCPF R-PP:
DRC’snaJonalprocessand
workplan
UN‐REDD
FCPF
OtherDonors
Total Area: 147,181 Sq. Km. Population: 24 M
NEPAL
WhatREDDStrategyMakesSenseforEachRegion&ItsDeforestaJonDrivers&GovernanceStatus??
Himalaya Mountains: Exploitation for fuelwood
Terai Lowland Forest: Larger-scale agriculture; immigration; recent conflict
Siliwak and Middle Hills: Community forestry innovation
SubsistenceAgriculture
CommercialAgriculture(extensive)
IrrigatedAgriculture
FuelwoodforFossilFuel
IntensifiedAgriculture
AfforestaJon
Sca
le o
f GH
G
Miti
gatio
n
Low Feasibility of REDD Option
otherother
Linking REDD to Low Carbon Development Strategy: Finding Feasible Options (DRC example)
From: “Democratic Republic of Congo’s REDD+ Potential,” December 2009
High
High
Guyana’sLowCarbonDevelopmentStrategy:UsingREDDtoCreateAlternaJvestoDeforestaJon
• ContentsofReadinessPrepara2onProposal(R‐PP):Component1:OrganizeandConsult
1a.Na2onalReadinessManagementArrangements
1b.StakeholderConsulta2onandPar2cipa2on
Component2:PreparetheREDDplusStrategy2a.AssessmentofLandUse,ForestPolicyandGovernance
2b.REDDStrategyOp2ons
2c.REDDImplementa2onFramework
2d.SocialandEnvironmentalImpacts
Component3:DevelopaReferenceScenario
Component4:DesignaMonitoringSystem4a.EmissionsandRemovals
4b.OtherBenefitsandImpacts
Component5:ScheduleandBudget
23
REDDReadinessAcJviJes(perFCPF)
24
REDDAcJviJesSelectedVaryinTiming,&AffectReferenceCase&MRVDesign.DegradaJonisMoreComplex
ReferenceCase:GlobalRequirements&GuidanceLikelyDifferentfromNaJonal&ProjectNeeds.HarmonizaJonisChallenging.
National Implementation
Reference Case ??: - To implement
global case
Subna;onalReferenceCase
GlobalTargetReference
Case?:‐ Vianego2a2ons?‐ ‐viaanaly2cmethod?
Issues:
- National scale probably key for REDD and FCPF
- Policy discussion focusing on global scale to date
- How resolve relation between global, national & project??
Subna;onalReference
Case
RegionalReferenceCase:4‐5countries
Global Objective Reference Case ??
(independent, via remote sensing?)
Brazil:AmazonFund.ExampleofOneApproachforaHistoricReferenceScenarioUsingAnnual+DefaultData.
Carbon density data limited, so use conservative 100tC/ha as default.
≅ 47 billions of tons of Carbon
≅ 172.3 billions of tons of CO2e
Subnational Reference Case, Driven by Development Plans: Brazilian Amazon Baseline GHG emissions 2007-2050
225 tC/ha
Carbon Stock
0 tC/ha Saatchi et al., 2007
Amazon Basin Business as Usual Deforestation Scenario = 2.6 million km2 deforested by 2050
Soares-Filho et al. 2006
Issues: - How find project in national refer. case? - Use project or large-scale resolution & data?
Custo de oportunidade
deforested
Cerrado biome Paved road
Unpaved road
US$ 3-0 per ton
US$ 0 per ton
US$ 8-13 per ton
US$ 3-8 per ton
> US$ 13 per ton
SimAmazonia Model Results: Opportunity Cost of Land for Soy, Logging, Cattle (Soares-Filho et al. 2006)
Cerrado
Amazônia
Pantanal
Pampa
Mata Atlântica
Caatinga
ExpandingSimAmazoniaModeltoAllofBrazil: Low Carbon Country Case Study, World Bank et al.
1x1 km = 4500x4500 = 20 M cells
772
Scenarios of carbon emissions from expanding crops for biofuels
772 units
Source: Britaldo Soares Filho
EvolvingMexicoMRV:Combines22,000‐plotforestinventory+highresoluJonremotesensing+naJonalecologicalprocessmodel
• Forest Inventory
• Landsat
• AVHRR
• MODIS
• SPOT
CCIGuyanaProposal:Transparent,NaJonallySustainable,AndInternaJonallyAcceptableMRVSystem
ReporJngNaJonalAccounts
TomeetinternaJonalobligaJonsunderUNFCCC
(EmissionsEsJmatesandProjecJons)&
toenterCarbonMarkets
NaJonalMeasurementSystemforForestCarbon
OutputsModelsData
CollecJon
SatelliteData
GroundData
ClimateData
ForestClassificaJon
LandManagementInformaJon
ManagementPracJces
Algorithms
DataFusion
RasterEnvironment
SpaJalAnalysis
Emissions
Removals
MappingandVisuals
NaJonalEconomicDevelopment
StrategyPolicy
ReporJng
ReporJng:
Components of RED Readiness
FCPF 2010 Estimates in 9 National R-PPs
(‘000)
FCPF 2008 Estimate
(Average, in ‘000)
Eliasch Estimate: High
(in ‘000)
REDD management and consultations
$3,530 $525 + 365 $2,000
Develop REDD strategy $1,920 $450 $1,000
Environmental and social impacts assessment of REDD strategy
$1,440 $50 -
REDD implementation framework
$1,200 $341 $1,500
Develop reference scenario $2,020 $ 516 $4,000 Design REDD MRV system $6,960 $1,008 -
TOTAL (without annual MRV costs)
$17,260 $3,250 $8,500
Budget:EsJmatedCostofREDD+,EarlyEsJmates(Sathaye,Andraskoetal.,inpress)
Source: TNC, 2010 (average of 9 submitted country Readiness Preparation Proposals, on www.forestcarbonpartners.org); FCPF, 2008; Eliasch, 2008 as summarized in FCPF, 2008.
• REDD Opportunities Vary by Opportunity Cost (OC) of Land, Carbon Density, and Threat of Deforestation
• Can we identify high priority interventions, with low barriers to implementation?
• What are priority governance concerns with these targeted lands and REDD strategies?
• What are the capacity building and investment needs?
• What are the potential risks, environmental and social, and economic?
Gibbs, H. and S. Brown. 2007. Geographical Distribution of Biomass Carbon in Tropical Southeast Asian Forests: A Database. ORNL/CDIAC.
Deforestation Threat & C Density Class, for East Kalimantan (Gibbs and Brown, 2007)
REDDTargeJng&ModelingTask:OverlayingDynamicLandUse,Benefits,&GovernanceIssues
• ProvidebestpracJcesforstakeholderconsultaJonandparJcipaJon
• Encouragecross‐sectoralnaJonalREDDmanagementstructure.
• ShareearlymethodsforreferencescenariosekngforforestcoverchangeoverJme:historicandfutureforecasJng
• SharedesignforMRV(measurement,reporJngandverificaJon)ofREDD+withinLCDScontext;– Helpencouragehigh‐quality,internaJonallyconsistentMRV– Helpcountriesproducecompliance‐gradeREDD+carbonassets.
• NestREDD+withinabroadervisionofnaJonaldevelopment,reachedviaconsensusprocess–insteadofcarboncowboydeals.
• ProvideglobalplamormforexperimentaJon,pilotmethodsdevelopment,andcarbonfinancepilots–leadingtoconfidenceinREDD+overJme.
HowCanFCPFandREDD+ContributetoLowCarbonDevelopmentStrategies?
35
FCPFprovidesausefulplamormforsharingknowledgeandexperience
Bonom‐line:MajornewREDD+ideasandpilotsareemergingfromthecountries–nottop‐down.
FCPFexample:• BrazilissharingAmazonFundexperiencewith
FCPFcountries,inc.Indonesia&DRC.
• Vietnam+MekongBasincountries,andCongoBasincountries,exploringregionalcooperaJononreferencescenarios+MRV.
• IndonesiaissuednaJonalregulaJonsmanagingREDDprocess,followedbyDRCandothers.
36
Lesson:REDDcountriesarelearningbydoingandsharing.Butneed:
• Technicalassistancetobuildin‐countrycapacitytoplanandimplementREDD+acJviJes
• Clearer internaJonalpolicyandmethodsguidance,toscaleupREDD+Readiness.
Summary:FCPFpartnershipexperimentisdemonstraJngthepoweroftransparentsharingofexperience–butneedsacceleraJon
TheRoadAheadShallBeInteresJng…