Upload
putri-pratiwi
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 tq409
1/44
Finite Square Well: Potential
V(x) =
V0 x 0 region I0 0 < x < L region II
V0 x
L region III
cL.Frommhold. p.44/44
7/27/2019 tq409
2/44
Finite Square Well: Schrdinger Eq.
2
2m
d2
dx2+ V0 = E (regions I and III)
2
2m
d2
dx2= E (region II)
For E < V0, that is
+ k2 = 0 (region II)
2 = 0 (regions I and III)
with k2 = 2mE/2 and 2 = 2m(V0 E)/2.
cL.Frommhold. p.43/44
7/27/2019 tq409
3/44
Valid Wave Functions(x, t), (x)
Remember: Not every solution
of the Schrdinger equation is a wave function
must be finite everywhere
must be single valued everywhere
and /x must be continuous
must be square integrablecL.Frommhold
. p.42/44
7/27/2019 tq409
4/44
Finite Square Well: Solutions
General (mathematical) solution
(x) = A ex + B ex regions I and III
(x) = C cos kx + D sin kx region II
Wave function (x)I(x) = A e
x in region I
II(x) = B cos kx + C sin kx in region II
III(x) = D ex in region III
Require continuity of and at x = 0 and x = L
cL.Frommhold. p.41/44
7/27/2019 tq409
5/44
Finite Square Well: Wave Functions
cL.Frommhold. p.40/44
7/27/2019 tq409
6/44
and Finite Square Well
Question:
Why lowerenergies forfinite well ?
cL.Frommhold. p.39/44
7/27/2019 tq409
7/44
Bound States: Finite and
Well
Compare wave functions for n = 1 state
cL.Frommhold. p.38/44
7/27/2019 tq409
8/44
Bound States: Finite and
Well
Compare wave functions for n = 2 state
cL.Frommhold. p.37/44
7/27/2019 tq409
9/44
Bound States: Finite and
Well
Compare wave functions for n = 3 state
cL.Frommhold. p.36/44
7/27/2019 tq409
10/44
Bound States: Finite and
Well
Compare wave functions for n = 4 state
cL.Frommhold. p.35/44
7/27/2019 tq409
11/44
Correspondence Principle (n = 20)
|
20
(x,
t)|
2
For n clas-sical bahavior ?
What isclassical
behavior ?
probability
= constto find particle at
x, dx
cL.Frommhold. p.34/44
7/27/2019 tq409
12/44
Schrdinger Eqn. in 3 Dimensions
Time-dependent equation it = H(r, t)
with notation according to
H = 2
2m
2 + V(r)
2
2m2
=p2x +p
2y +p
2z
/2m
px = i x
, etc.
Time-independent equation H(r) = E (r)
with (r, t) = (r) exp(
Et/)
cL.Frommhold. p.33/44
7/27/2019 tq409
13/44
Particle in 3-Dim. Infinite Box
V(x,y,z ) =
0 if 0 < x < Lx; 0 < y < Ly; 0 < z < Lz elsewhere
Schrdinger eq.:
2
2m
2(r) = E (r)
Ansatz:
(r) = u(x) v(y) w(z)
cL.Frommhold. p.32/44
7/27/2019 tq409
14/44
3-D Infinite Box II
2
2m uv w + u vw + u v w = E u v w
Divide both sides by u v w
2
2mu
u
+v
v
+w
w = E = Eu + Ev + Ew
Separate variables to get
2
2m u = Eu u, with u(0) = u(Lx) = 0
22m v = Ev v, with v(0) = v(Lv) = 0
2
2m w = Ew w, with w(0) = w(Lw) = 0
cL.Frommhold. p.31/44
7/27/2019 tq409
15/44
3-D Infinite Box III
Solution:
(r) = A sin kx,n x sin ky,m y sin kz, z
with kx,n = n/Lx, ky,m = m/Ly, kz, = /Lz,
A =
8/(Lx Ly Lz) and
Emn =22
2m n2
L2x+
m2
L2y+
2
L2zIn three dimensions, we have three quantum numbers
,m,n = 1, 2, 3
cL.Frommhold. p.30/44
7/27/2019 tq409
16/44
Harmonic Oscillator Classical
F = m a becomes x = m d2x/dt2
(Note that this is the same DEq. as y
+2
y = 0)
Solution: x(t) = A cos t + B sin t, with =/m = classical oscillator frequency.
Potential energy P E = 12x2 (parabolic well)
Kinetic energy KE =12mx
2
Total energy E = P E+ KE is a continuum,somewhere between 0 and
J.
cL.Frommhold. p.29/44
7/27/2019 tq409
17/44
Harmonic Oscillator Quantal
Schrdinger equation 2
2m d
2
dx2 + 12x2
= E
Solution n(x) = m1
4 12nn!
Hn() e2/2
with = m/x; n = 0, 1, 2 ; = /m; andHn(x) = Hermite polynomials; H0 = 1, H1 = 2x, . . .Energy En = (n + 12) quantized !
cL.Frommhold. p.28/44
7/27/2019 tq409
18/44
HO Results I
cL.Frommhold. p.27/44
7/27/2019 tq409
19/44
HO Results II
Wave functions
Note: a n = 0 state exists(groundstate)
Also shown are the
n = 1, 2, 3 state wave functions
cL.Frommhold. p.26/44
7/27/2019 tq409
20/44
HO Some Basic Facts
Re-appearance of the classical oscillator frequency
transitions n n 1; En =
Quantization of energy En nRemember freezing of vibrational states ?
Zero point energy E0 = 12 = 0 (Heisenberg !)Even and odd wave functions:even n
even n; odd n
odd n
Corresponence principle as n (next viewgraph)
cL.Frommhold. p.25/44
7/27/2019 tq409
21/44
HO Correspondence Principle
Classical harmonic oscillator: x(t) = A cos t;
velocity x = A sin t = A2
x2
Time spent between x and x + dx: dt = dx/|x|
Classical probability of finding particle at dx:
dP= dtT /2
=2
T
dxA2 x2 =
1
dxA2 x2
Compare with QM (n = 10):cL.Frommhold
. p.24/44
7/27/2019 tq409
22/44
Correspondence Principle (n = 100)
. p.23/44
7/27/2019 tq409
23/44
Short Summary
Definition: On =
n(x) O n(x) dx
Hn = En ; H2n = E2n ; En = H2n H2n = 0En is sharp, no uncertainty; a constant of motion
Infinite square well: xn = L/2x2n = L
2
3 1 3
2n22 (x)2 =
L2
12 1 6
n22pn = 0 p2n = 2 k2n (p)n = kn
x p
(L/
12) n/L = n/
12 > /2
cL.Frommhold. p.22/44
7/27/2019 tq409
24/44
Square Barriers Classical
Kinetic particle energyexceeds barrier height
KE > V0Classical result:
100% transmission0% reflection
Kinetic particle energyless than barrier height
KE < V0Classical result:
0% transmission100% reflection
cL.Frommhold. p.21/44
7/27/2019 tq409
25/44
Square Wells and Free States
Kinetic energy > 0Same case as KE
exceeds barrier height
when V0 < 0
Classical result:
100% transmission0% reflection
cL.Frommhold. p.20/44
7/27/2019 tq409
26/44
Wave Picture of Square Barrier
Expect1. an incident wave2. a transmitted wave
3. a reflected wave
Divide up space into
Region I: < x 0 Region II: 0 < x < L Region III: L x <
and solve the Schrdinger equationscL.Frommhold
. p.19/44
7/27/2019 tq409
27/44
Free Particle Schrdinger Eq.
For V0 = const, the Schrdinger eq. may be written
2
2m
d2
dx2 + V0
(x) = E (x) or
k2 = 0
with the (positive !) constant k2 given by
k2 =
(E V0) /(2m2) if E > V0 (upper sign)
(V0
E) /(2m2) if E < V0 (lower sign)
Wave functions oscillatory (+ sign) or evanescent
( sign)cL.Frommhold
. p.18/44
7/27/2019 tq409
28/44
Difference of a Sign
For V0 = const, the Schrdinger equation is of theform k2 = 0, with solutions
+(x) = A ekx + B ekx or = C cos kx + D sin kx
(x) = F ex + G ex or = H cosh x + I sinh x
For the + sign we get oscillatory solutionsso that k2 = (E V0)/2m2 and k = 2/
For the sign we get exponentials
so that k2 = 2 = (V0 E)/2m2 and is thereciprocal penetration depth, d = 1/
The sign of the constant k2 is important !
cL.Frommhold. p.17/44
7/27/2019 tq409
29/44
Beams as Propagating Waves
Remember: (x, t) = (x) exp(E t/).
If (x) = exp(kx), (x, t) = exp (kx t) is awave traveling in the positive x-direction
If (x) = exp(kx), (x, t) = exp (kx + t) is awave traveling in the negative x-direction
cL.Frommhold. p.16/44
7/27/2019 tq409
30/44
Square Barriers
Region I: I(x) = A exp(kx) + B exp(kx)
= incident + reflected wave
Region II, if E > V0: II(x) = Cexp(kx) + D exp(kx)
Region II, if E < V0: II(x) = Cexp(x) + D exp(x)
Region III: III(x) = F exp(kx)no backward wave exists !
k2 = 2mE/2
(k)2 = 2m(E V0)/22 = 2m(V0 E)/2
cL.Frommhold. p.15/44
7/27/2019 tq409
31/44
Reflection and Transmission
Continuity of (x) at x = 0 and x = L
Continuity of d/dx at x = 0 and x = L
This gives 4 linear Equations for the 5 unknownsA,B,C,D, and F that must be solved,
which leaves a scaling parameter free.
Reflection and transmission coefficients:R =
|I(reflected)|2
|I(incident)|2=
BB
A
A
T =|III(transmitted)|2
|I(incident)
|2
=FF
AA
cL.Frommhold. p.14/44
7/27/2019 tq409
32/44
Transmission and Reflection Coeffs.
Make and continuous at x = 0 and x = L !
Compute transmission coefficientT =
F F
A A
Compute reflection coefficientR =
B B
A
ANote thatT + R = 1
cL.Frommhold. p.13/44
7/27/2019 tq409
33/44
Wave Functions(x) fromy(x)
Square Barrier, if E > V0: continuity of and atboundaries, x = 0 and x = L
Region I: (x) = A exp kx + B exp
kx
(incident and reflected wave)
Region II: (x) = Cexp kx + D exp kx
Region III: (x) = F exp kx (no reflected wave)with 2k2 = 2mE and 2k2 = 2m(E V0).
Solving for A, B, and F, with E > V0, we get
T =F F
A A=
1
1 +V20sin2 kL
4E(EV0)
and T + R = 1
cL.Frommhold. p.12/44
7/27/2019 tq409
34/44
Square Barriers withE > V0
Note: the sign of V0 does not matter
100% transmission if k2L = n
anti-reflection coating of optical lensescL.Frommhold
. p.11/44
7/27/2019 tq409
35/44
(x) fromy(x), The Other Case
Square Barrier, if E < V0: continuity of and atboundaries, x = 0 and x = L
Region I: (x) = A exp kx + B exp
kx
(incident and reflected wave)
Region II: (x) = Cexp x + D exp x
Region III: (x) = F exp kx (no reflected wave)with 2k2 = 2mE and 22 = 2m(V0 E).
Solving for A, B, and F, we get
T =F F
A A=
1
1 +V20sinh2 L
4E(V0E)
and T + R = 1
cL.Frommhold. p.10/44
7/27/2019 tq409
36/44
Square Barrier withE < V0
Note that (sinh x)2
> 0Tunneling is unheard of in classical physics !But it is well known in wave optics
cL.Frommhold. p.9/44
7/27/2019 tq409
37/44
Alpha-Decay
Radioactivity: -decay,e.g., 241Am 237Np +or generally
AZ
A4(Z
2) +
strong force overcomesCoulomb repulsion;
binding the nucleons
and particles.But, if E() > 0, the particle will tunnel rays !(nuclei stable if E() < 0)
cL.Frommhold. p.8/44
7/27/2019 tq409
38/44
Energy from Nuclear Fusion
D + D 3
He + n + 3.27 MeVD + D T + H + 4.05 MeV,D + T
4He + n + 17.6 MeV
D + 3He 4He + H + 18.3 MeV, etc.
But strong Coulomb repulsion tends to oppose fusion:
Need high temperatures ( 107 K) and tunneling
cL.Frommhold. p.7/44
7/27/2019 tq409
39/44
Molecular Physics: NH3
nitrogen wavefunctions: tunneling!
cL.Frommhold. p.6/44
7/27/2019 tq409
40/44
Tunneling of e.m. Waves
Total Reflection
an evanescent (nonpropagating)wave exists
Pick up transmitted wave,employing a second prism:
tunneling of e.m. waves
cL.Frommhold. p.5/44
7/27/2019 tq409
41/44
Field Emission
Field emission:tunneling
V(x) = W e ExScanningtunneling
microscope:
cL.Frommhold. p.4/44
7/27/2019 tq409
42/44
Square Wells/Barriers: Summarizing
Why do we study square wells/barriers?
Because math is simple when V = const.
Sinusoidal/exponential wave functionsKnow wave functions, know everything!
Simple models of complex systems
for intuitive understanding of quantum phenomena
Free and bound states:
Bound states: standing waves; energies quantized
Free particles: no energy quantizationBut angular momentum is always quantized,
as we will see.cL.Frommhold. p.3/44
7/27/2019 tq409
43/44
Barriers and Wells
Tunneling impossible in classical physicsradioactivity, nuclear fusion, tunneling microscopes,
semiconductor devices,. . .
Transmission and reflection properties
resemble closely those of e.m. radiation(but not predictions of classical mechanics)
Physical meaning of quantum number nn counts nodesenergies increase with number of nodes
cL.Frommhold. p.2/44
R l d C d A i i
7/27/2019 tq409
44/44
Related Cases and Approximations
The piecewise constant potential function can be usedto approximate arbitrary potential functions:
Construct overall wave function with any desired precision !
cL.Frommhold. p.1/44