tq409

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    1/44

    Finite Square Well: Potential

    V(x) =

    V0 x 0 region I0 0 < x < L region II

    V0 x

    L region III

    cL.Frommhold. p.44/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    2/44

    Finite Square Well: Schrdinger Eq.

    2

    2m

    d2

    dx2+ V0 = E (regions I and III)

    2

    2m

    d2

    dx2= E (region II)

    For E < V0, that is

    + k2 = 0 (region II)

    2 = 0 (regions I and III)

    with k2 = 2mE/2 and 2 = 2m(V0 E)/2.

    cL.Frommhold. p.43/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    3/44

    Valid Wave Functions(x, t), (x)

    Remember: Not every solution

    of the Schrdinger equation is a wave function

    must be finite everywhere

    must be single valued everywhere

    and /x must be continuous

    must be square integrablecL.Frommhold

    . p.42/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    4/44

    Finite Square Well: Solutions

    General (mathematical) solution

    (x) = A ex + B ex regions I and III

    (x) = C cos kx + D sin kx region II

    Wave function (x)I(x) = A e

    x in region I

    II(x) = B cos kx + C sin kx in region II

    III(x) = D ex in region III

    Require continuity of and at x = 0 and x = L

    cL.Frommhold. p.41/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    5/44

    Finite Square Well: Wave Functions

    cL.Frommhold. p.40/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    6/44

    and Finite Square Well

    Question:

    Why lowerenergies forfinite well ?

    cL.Frommhold. p.39/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    7/44

    Bound States: Finite and

    Well

    Compare wave functions for n = 1 state

    cL.Frommhold. p.38/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    8/44

    Bound States: Finite and

    Well

    Compare wave functions for n = 2 state

    cL.Frommhold. p.37/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    9/44

    Bound States: Finite and

    Well

    Compare wave functions for n = 3 state

    cL.Frommhold. p.36/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    10/44

    Bound States: Finite and

    Well

    Compare wave functions for n = 4 state

    cL.Frommhold. p.35/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    11/44

    Correspondence Principle (n = 20)

    |

    20

    (x,

    t)|

    2

    For n clas-sical bahavior ?

    What isclassical

    behavior ?

    probability

    = constto find particle at

    x, dx

    cL.Frommhold. p.34/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    12/44

    Schrdinger Eqn. in 3 Dimensions

    Time-dependent equation it = H(r, t)

    with notation according to

    H = 2

    2m

    2 + V(r)

    2

    2m2

    =p2x +p

    2y +p

    2z

    /2m

    px = i x

    , etc.

    Time-independent equation H(r) = E (r)

    with (r, t) = (r) exp(

    Et/)

    cL.Frommhold. p.33/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    13/44

    Particle in 3-Dim. Infinite Box

    V(x,y,z ) =

    0 if 0 < x < Lx; 0 < y < Ly; 0 < z < Lz elsewhere

    Schrdinger eq.:

    2

    2m

    2(r) = E (r)

    Ansatz:

    (r) = u(x) v(y) w(z)

    cL.Frommhold. p.32/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    14/44

    3-D Infinite Box II

    2

    2m uv w + u vw + u v w = E u v w

    Divide both sides by u v w

    2

    2mu

    u

    +v

    v

    +w

    w = E = Eu + Ev + Ew

    Separate variables to get

    2

    2m u = Eu u, with u(0) = u(Lx) = 0

    22m v = Ev v, with v(0) = v(Lv) = 0

    2

    2m w = Ew w, with w(0) = w(Lw) = 0

    cL.Frommhold. p.31/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    15/44

    3-D Infinite Box III

    Solution:

    (r) = A sin kx,n x sin ky,m y sin kz, z

    with kx,n = n/Lx, ky,m = m/Ly, kz, = /Lz,

    A =

    8/(Lx Ly Lz) and

    Emn =22

    2m n2

    L2x+

    m2

    L2y+

    2

    L2zIn three dimensions, we have three quantum numbers

    ,m,n = 1, 2, 3

    cL.Frommhold. p.30/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    16/44

    Harmonic Oscillator Classical

    F = m a becomes x = m d2x/dt2

    (Note that this is the same DEq. as y

    +2

    y = 0)

    Solution: x(t) = A cos t + B sin t, with =/m = classical oscillator frequency.

    Potential energy P E = 12x2 (parabolic well)

    Kinetic energy KE =12mx

    2

    Total energy E = P E+ KE is a continuum,somewhere between 0 and

    J.

    cL.Frommhold. p.29/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    17/44

    Harmonic Oscillator Quantal

    Schrdinger equation 2

    2m d

    2

    dx2 + 12x2

    = E

    Solution n(x) = m1

    4 12nn!

    Hn() e2/2

    with = m/x; n = 0, 1, 2 ; = /m; andHn(x) = Hermite polynomials; H0 = 1, H1 = 2x, . . .Energy En = (n + 12) quantized !

    cL.Frommhold. p.28/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    18/44

    HO Results I

    cL.Frommhold. p.27/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    19/44

    HO Results II

    Wave functions

    Note: a n = 0 state exists(groundstate)

    Also shown are the

    n = 1, 2, 3 state wave functions

    cL.Frommhold. p.26/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    20/44

    HO Some Basic Facts

    Re-appearance of the classical oscillator frequency

    transitions n n 1; En =

    Quantization of energy En nRemember freezing of vibrational states ?

    Zero point energy E0 = 12 = 0 (Heisenberg !)Even and odd wave functions:even n

    even n; odd n

    odd n

    Corresponence principle as n (next viewgraph)

    cL.Frommhold. p.25/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    21/44

    HO Correspondence Principle

    Classical harmonic oscillator: x(t) = A cos t;

    velocity x = A sin t = A2

    x2

    Time spent between x and x + dx: dt = dx/|x|

    Classical probability of finding particle at dx:

    dP= dtT /2

    =2

    T

    dxA2 x2 =

    1

    dxA2 x2

    Compare with QM (n = 10):cL.Frommhold

    . p.24/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    22/44

    Correspondence Principle (n = 100)

    . p.23/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    23/44

    Short Summary

    Definition: On =

    n(x) O n(x) dx

    Hn = En ; H2n = E2n ; En = H2n H2n = 0En is sharp, no uncertainty; a constant of motion

    Infinite square well: xn = L/2x2n = L

    2

    3 1 3

    2n22 (x)2 =

    L2

    12 1 6

    n22pn = 0 p2n = 2 k2n (p)n = kn

    x p

    (L/

    12) n/L = n/

    12 > /2

    cL.Frommhold. p.22/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    24/44

    Square Barriers Classical

    Kinetic particle energyexceeds barrier height

    KE > V0Classical result:

    100% transmission0% reflection

    Kinetic particle energyless than barrier height

    KE < V0Classical result:

    0% transmission100% reflection

    cL.Frommhold. p.21/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    25/44

    Square Wells and Free States

    Kinetic energy > 0Same case as KE

    exceeds barrier height

    when V0 < 0

    Classical result:

    100% transmission0% reflection

    cL.Frommhold. p.20/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    26/44

    Wave Picture of Square Barrier

    Expect1. an incident wave2. a transmitted wave

    3. a reflected wave

    Divide up space into

    Region I: < x 0 Region II: 0 < x < L Region III: L x <

    and solve the Schrdinger equationscL.Frommhold

    . p.19/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    27/44

    Free Particle Schrdinger Eq.

    For V0 = const, the Schrdinger eq. may be written

    2

    2m

    d2

    dx2 + V0

    (x) = E (x) or

    k2 = 0

    with the (positive !) constant k2 given by

    k2 =

    (E V0) /(2m2) if E > V0 (upper sign)

    (V0

    E) /(2m2) if E < V0 (lower sign)

    Wave functions oscillatory (+ sign) or evanescent

    ( sign)cL.Frommhold

    . p.18/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    28/44

    Difference of a Sign

    For V0 = const, the Schrdinger equation is of theform k2 = 0, with solutions

    +(x) = A ekx + B ekx or = C cos kx + D sin kx

    (x) = F ex + G ex or = H cosh x + I sinh x

    For the + sign we get oscillatory solutionsso that k2 = (E V0)/2m2 and k = 2/

    For the sign we get exponentials

    so that k2 = 2 = (V0 E)/2m2 and is thereciprocal penetration depth, d = 1/

    The sign of the constant k2 is important !

    cL.Frommhold. p.17/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    29/44

    Beams as Propagating Waves

    Remember: (x, t) = (x) exp(E t/).

    If (x) = exp(kx), (x, t) = exp (kx t) is awave traveling in the positive x-direction

    If (x) = exp(kx), (x, t) = exp (kx + t) is awave traveling in the negative x-direction

    cL.Frommhold. p.16/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    30/44

    Square Barriers

    Region I: I(x) = A exp(kx) + B exp(kx)

    = incident + reflected wave

    Region II, if E > V0: II(x) = Cexp(kx) + D exp(kx)

    Region II, if E < V0: II(x) = Cexp(x) + D exp(x)

    Region III: III(x) = F exp(kx)no backward wave exists !

    k2 = 2mE/2

    (k)2 = 2m(E V0)/22 = 2m(V0 E)/2

    cL.Frommhold. p.15/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    31/44

    Reflection and Transmission

    Continuity of (x) at x = 0 and x = L

    Continuity of d/dx at x = 0 and x = L

    This gives 4 linear Equations for the 5 unknownsA,B,C,D, and F that must be solved,

    which leaves a scaling parameter free.

    Reflection and transmission coefficients:R =

    |I(reflected)|2

    |I(incident)|2=

    BB

    A

    A

    T =|III(transmitted)|2

    |I(incident)

    |2

    =FF

    AA

    cL.Frommhold. p.14/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    32/44

    Transmission and Reflection Coeffs.

    Make and continuous at x = 0 and x = L !

    Compute transmission coefficientT =

    F F

    A A

    Compute reflection coefficientR =

    B B

    A

    ANote thatT + R = 1

    cL.Frommhold. p.13/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    33/44

    Wave Functions(x) fromy(x)

    Square Barrier, if E > V0: continuity of and atboundaries, x = 0 and x = L

    Region I: (x) = A exp kx + B exp

    kx

    (incident and reflected wave)

    Region II: (x) = Cexp kx + D exp kx

    Region III: (x) = F exp kx (no reflected wave)with 2k2 = 2mE and 2k2 = 2m(E V0).

    Solving for A, B, and F, with E > V0, we get

    T =F F

    A A=

    1

    1 +V20sin2 kL

    4E(EV0)

    and T + R = 1

    cL.Frommhold. p.12/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    34/44

    Square Barriers withE > V0

    Note: the sign of V0 does not matter

    100% transmission if k2L = n

    anti-reflection coating of optical lensescL.Frommhold

    . p.11/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    35/44

    (x) fromy(x), The Other Case

    Square Barrier, if E < V0: continuity of and atboundaries, x = 0 and x = L

    Region I: (x) = A exp kx + B exp

    kx

    (incident and reflected wave)

    Region II: (x) = Cexp x + D exp x

    Region III: (x) = F exp kx (no reflected wave)with 2k2 = 2mE and 22 = 2m(V0 E).

    Solving for A, B, and F, we get

    T =F F

    A A=

    1

    1 +V20sinh2 L

    4E(V0E)

    and T + R = 1

    cL.Frommhold. p.10/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    36/44

    Square Barrier withE < V0

    Note that (sinh x)2

    > 0Tunneling is unheard of in classical physics !But it is well known in wave optics

    cL.Frommhold. p.9/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    37/44

    Alpha-Decay

    Radioactivity: -decay,e.g., 241Am 237Np +or generally

    AZ

    A4(Z

    2) +

    strong force overcomesCoulomb repulsion;

    binding the nucleons

    and particles.But, if E() > 0, the particle will tunnel rays !(nuclei stable if E() < 0)

    cL.Frommhold. p.8/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    38/44

    Energy from Nuclear Fusion

    D + D 3

    He + n + 3.27 MeVD + D T + H + 4.05 MeV,D + T

    4He + n + 17.6 MeV

    D + 3He 4He + H + 18.3 MeV, etc.

    But strong Coulomb repulsion tends to oppose fusion:

    Need high temperatures ( 107 K) and tunneling

    cL.Frommhold. p.7/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    39/44

    Molecular Physics: NH3

    nitrogen wavefunctions: tunneling!

    cL.Frommhold. p.6/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    40/44

    Tunneling of e.m. Waves

    Total Reflection

    an evanescent (nonpropagating)wave exists

    Pick up transmitted wave,employing a second prism:

    tunneling of e.m. waves

    cL.Frommhold. p.5/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    41/44

    Field Emission

    Field emission:tunneling

    V(x) = W e ExScanningtunneling

    microscope:

    cL.Frommhold. p.4/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    42/44

    Square Wells/Barriers: Summarizing

    Why do we study square wells/barriers?

    Because math is simple when V = const.

    Sinusoidal/exponential wave functionsKnow wave functions, know everything!

    Simple models of complex systems

    for intuitive understanding of quantum phenomena

    Free and bound states:

    Bound states: standing waves; energies quantized

    Free particles: no energy quantizationBut angular momentum is always quantized,

    as we will see.cL.Frommhold. p.3/44

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    43/44

    Barriers and Wells

    Tunneling impossible in classical physicsradioactivity, nuclear fusion, tunneling microscopes,

    semiconductor devices,. . .

    Transmission and reflection properties

    resemble closely those of e.m. radiation(but not predictions of classical mechanics)

    Physical meaning of quantum number nn counts nodesenergies increase with number of nodes

    cL.Frommhold. p.2/44

    R l d C d A i i

  • 7/27/2019 tq409

    44/44

    Related Cases and Approximations

    The piecewise constant potential function can be usedto approximate arbitrary potential functions:

    Construct overall wave function with any desired precision !

    cL.Frommhold. p.1/44