73
CHAPTER III ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 3.0 INTRODUCTION In this chapter, the data collected have been analyzed and interpreted using simple percentage only. 3.1 Framework of Analysis Collected data has been analyzed by making use of Simple percentage 3.1.1 Simple Percentage Method Simple percentage analysis refers to a special kind of ratio with the help of obsolete figures it will be difficult to interpret any meaning from .the collected data but when percentages are find out it becomes easy to find the relative difference between two or more attributes No. of respondents Percentage = ----------------------- *100 Total no. of respondents 1

votaphone

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: votaphone

CHAPTER III

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

3.0 INTRODUCTION

In this chapter, the data collected have been analyzed and interpreted using simple

percentage only.

3.1 Framework of Analysis

Collected data has been analyzed by making use of

Simple percentage

3.1.1 Simple Percentage Method

Simple percentage analysis refers to a special kind of ratio with the help of obsolete

figures it will be difficult to interpret any meaning from .the collected data but when percentages

are find out it becomes easy to find the relative difference between two or more attributes

No. of respondents

Percentage = ----------------------- *100

Total no. of respondents

1

Page 2: votaphone

3.2 AREA OF RESIDENCE

The respondents are classified on the basis of their area of residence. The area of

residence is classified into three categories namely Urban, Semi urban, and Rural and is shown

below.

TABLE 3.1

AREA OF RESIDENCE

Place of Residence No. of Residence Percentage (%)

Urban 30 27

Semi urban 30 27

Rural 50 46

Total 110 100

Table 3.1 shows that out of 110 respondents 30(27 %) respondents are reside from Urban

Area, 30 (27 %) respondents are from Semi-Urban and 50 (46 %) respondents reside in rural

area. Hence, the majority of the respondents are residing in rural area.

2

Page 3: votaphone

CHAPTER 3.1

AREA OF RESIDENCE

Urban Semi-Urban Rural0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

27 27

46

3

Page 4: votaphone

3.3 GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their gender in

order to know the number of male and female respondents.

TABLE 3.2

GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION

Gender No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Male 50 45.5

Female 60 54.5

Total 110 100

Table 3.2 shows that out of 110 respondents, 50 (45.5 %) are male and 60 (54.5 %) are

female.

Hence, it is found out that majority of the respondents are female.

4

Page 5: votaphone

CHAPTER 3.2

GENDER

45.5

54.5

MaleFemale

5

Page 6: votaphone

3.4 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION

The age of the respondents has been classified into three categories as less than 15 years,

16to 20 years, 21 to 25 year and More than 26 years and it is shown in the table below.

TABLE 3.3

AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION

Age No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Less than 15 years 10 9

16 to 20 years 15 14

21 to 25 years 70 64

More than 26 years 15 14

Total 110 100

Form the above table, out of 110 respondents, 10 (9 %) respondents of the age Group less

than 15 years,15 (14 %) respondents of the age 16 to 20 years, 70 (64 %) respondents 21 to 25

years, 15 (14 %) of the respondents are group more than 26 years.

Hence, it is found that majority of the respondent’s age group ranges between 21 to 25

years.

6

Page 7: votaphone

CHART 3.3

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Less than 15 years 16 to 20 years 21 to 25 years more than 260

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

914

64

14

7

Page 8: votaphone

3.5 MARITAL STATUS:

The respondents are classified on the basis of their marital status and shown in the below

table.

TABLE 3.4

MARITAL STATUS

Marital Status No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Married 25 23

Unmarried 85 77

Total 110 100

Table 3.4 shows that, out of the 110 respondents, 25 (23 %) respondents are married and

85 (77 %) respondents are Unmarried.

Hence, it could be observed that most of the respondents are Unmarried.

8

Page 9: votaphone

CHART 3.4

MARITAL STATUS

23

77

MarriedUnmarried

9

Page 10: votaphone

3.6 EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

The respondents are classified on the basis of their educational qualification and shown

below.

TABLE 3.5

EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

Educational Qualification No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

SSLC 12 11

HSC 7 6

DIPLOMA 9 8

UG 15 14

PG 67 61

Total 110 100

From the above Table 3.5, out of the 110 respondents, 12(11 %) respondents are

computed SSLC and 7(6 per cent) respondents have completed HSC respectively. 9(8 per cent)

respondents are diploma holder, 15(14 per cent) respondents are under graduate holders and

67(61 per cent) respondents have post graduate holder.

Hence, it is observed from the above table that most of the respondents are post

graduates.

10

Page 11: votaphone

CHART 3.5

EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION

sslc hsc diploma ug pg0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

116 8

14

61

11

Page 12: votaphone

3.7OCCUPATION

The respondents are classified on the basis of their occupation and shown in the table

below.

TABLE 3.6

OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

Occupation No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Agriculture 14 13

Business 21 19

Government employee 8 7

Private employee 17 16

Student 46 42

Profession 4 4

Total 110 100

Table 3.6 observed from out of 110 respondents, 14 (13%) are agriculture, 21 (19 %) are

business person, 8 (7 %) are government employee, 17 (16 %) are private employee, 46(42 %)

are students and 4(4 %) are profession.

Hence, it inferred that majority of the respondents are students.

CHART 3.6

12

Page 13: votaphone

OCCUPATION

13

19

716

42

4

AgricultureBusinessGovernment employeePrivate employeeStudentsProfession

3.8 TYPE OF FAMILY

13

Page 14: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of their type of family and shown in the table

below.

TABLE 3.7

TYPE OF FAMILY

Family No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Joint 30 27.3

Nuclear 80 72.7

Total 110 100

From the table (3.7) shows that, out of the 110 respondents, 30 (27.3 %) respondents are

joint family and 80 (72.7 %) respondents are nuclear family.

Hence, it could be observed that most of the respondents are nuclear family.

CHART 3.7

14

Page 15: votaphone

TYPE OF FAMILY

27.3

72.7

JointNuclear

3.9 INCOME PER MONTH WISE CLASSIFICATION

15

Page 16: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of their income per month and shown in the

table below.

TABLE 3.9

INCOME PER MONTH WISE CLASSIFICATION

Income Per Month No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Below Rs. 10,000 7 6

Rs.10, 001 to Rs. 30,000 50 46

Rs.30, 001 to Rs. 50,000 40 36

Rs.50, 001 to Rs. 70,000 11 10

Above Rs. 70,000 2 2

Total 110 100

The table (3.9) shows that, out of 110 respondents, 7(6 %) respondents income per month

is below Rs. 10,000, 50 (46 %) respondents income per month range between Rs.10,001 to

Rs.30,000 and the 40 (36 %) respondents income per month range between Rs.30,001 to

Rs.50,000 and 11 (10 %) respondents income per month range between Rs.50,001 to Rs.70,000

and the rest 2(2 %) respondents income per month is above Rs.70,000.

Hence, majority of the respondent’s per month ranges between Rs.10, 001 to Rs. 30, 000.

CHART 3.9

16

Page 17: votaphone

INCOME PER MONTH

Below Rs.10,000 Rs.10,001 to Rs.30,000

Rs.30,001 to Rs.50,000

Rs.50,001 to Rs.70,000

Above Rs.70,0000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

6

46

36

10

2

3.11 VODAFONE SERVICE

17

Page 18: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of the selected service provider, and the

classification is shown for the following table.

TABLE 3.12

VODAFONE SERVICE

Service No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Speed Process 36 33

Good Network 48 44

Cheaper Cost 20 18

Others 6 6

Total 110 100

Table 3.12 shows that among the 110 respondents, 36 (33 %) are choosing vodafone for

Speed Process, 48 (44 %) are choosing vodafone for Good Network and 20 (18 %) are choosing

vodafone for Cheaper Cost and the remaining 6 (6 %) are using others category.

Hence, it is inferred that most of the respondents are the reason of choosing vodafone for

Good Network.

CHART 3.12

18

Page 19: votaphone

USING VODAFONE SERVICE

Speed ProcessGood

Network Cheaper CostOthers

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

33

44

18

6

3.12 AWARE ABOUT VODAFONE

19

Page 20: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of their awareness about Vodafone and their

use and the classification is shown below.

TABLE 3.13

AWARE ABOUT VODAFONE

Aware About Vodafone No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Yes 110 100

No 0 0

Total 110 100

From the above table out of 110 respondents, 110(100 %) respondents are saying yes.

Hence, it is found that all the respondents are aware the Vodafone service.

CHART 3.13

20

Page 21: votaphone

ARE YOU AWARE ABOUT VODAFONE

YesNo

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

100

0

Series3

3.13 WHICH SOURCE YOU CAME TO KNOW ABOUT VODAFONE

21

Page 22: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of the source you came to know about the

Vodafone service provider and are shown in the table below.

TABLE 3.14

SOURCE OF VODAFONE

Source of Vodafone No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Advertisement 50 46

Hoardings 20 18

Newspapers 25 23

Mouth Publicity 15 14

Total 110 100

Table (3.14) shows that out of 110 respondents, 50 (46 %) respondents have to know

about the Vodafone service provider by their advertisement, 20(18 %) of reason to know the

vodafone service by hoardings, 25(23 %) to know the vodafone service through newspaper, 15

(14 %) by their mouth publicity.

Hence, it is found that majority of the respondents have been aware about the service

provider by their advertisement.

CHART 3.14

SOURCE OF VODAFONE

22

Page 23: votaphone

Advertisement Hoardings Newspaper Mouth Publicity0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

46

1823

14

0

3.14 HOW LONG USE VODAFONE SERVICE

23

Page 24: votaphone

The period of using Vodafone service provider by the respondents have been classified

into four categories as Less than 1 month, 2-6 month, 6-12 month, more than 1 years and is

shows below.

TABLE 3.15

HOW LONG USE VODAFONE SERVICE

Period of using No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Less than 1 month 18 16

2-6 month 36 33

6-12 month 30 27

More than 1 year 26 24

Total 110 100

From the above table 3.15 shows that out of 110 respondents, 18 (16 %) respondents are

using vodafone service for less than 1 month, 36(33 %) respondents are using vodafone service

for 2-6 month, 30 (27 %) respondents are using vodafone service for 6-12 month, and 26 (24 %)

respondents are using vodafone service for more than 1 year.

Hence, it is found that majority of the respondents are using the Vodafone service for a

period of 2-6 month.

CHART 3.15

24

Page 25: votaphone

HOW LONG USE VODAFONE SERVICE

Less than 1 month 2-6 month 6-12 month More than 1 year0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

16

33

27

24

3.15 KIND OF SERVICE USED BY THE RESPONDENTS

25

Page 26: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of the kind of service used by the service

provider and are shown in the below.

TABLE 3.16

KIND OF SERVICE USED BY THE RESPONDENTS

Kind of Service No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Post-paid 18 16

Pre-paid 92 84

Total 110 100

Table 3.16 shows that, out of 110 respondents, 18(16 %) are using post-paid service, 92

(84 %) are using pre-paid service.

Hence, it is inferred that majority of the respondents using pre-paid service.

CHART 3.16

26

Page 27: votaphone

KIND OF SERVICE USED BY THE RESPONDENTS

16

84

Post-paidPre-paid

3.16.1 POST-PAID USERS AVERAGE MONTHILY BILL

27

Page 28: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of post-paid user’s average monthly bill.

TABLE 3.17

POST-PAID USERS AVERAGE MONTHILY BILL

Average Monthly Bill No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Less than Rs.100 2 9

Rs. 101 to Rs.200 6 27.3

Rs.201 to Rs.300 6 27.3

More than Rs.300 8 36.4

Total 22 100

From the above table (3.17) shows out of 22 respondents, 2(9 %) respondents average

monthly bill is less than Rs.100, and 6(27.3 %) respondents average monthly bill is Rs.101 to

Rs.200, and 6(27.3 %) respondents average monthly bill is Rs.201 to Rs.300, and 8(36.4 %)

respondents average monthly bill is more than Rs.100.

Hence, majority of the respondent’s average monthly bill is more than Rs.300.

CHART 3.17

28

Page 29: votaphone

POST-PAID USERS AVERAGE MONTHLY BILL

Less than Rs.100Rs.101 to Rs.200

Rs.201 to Rs.300More than Rs.300

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

9

27.327.3

36.4

3.16.2 KINDS OF PACKAGE IN POST-PAID SERVICE

29

Page 30: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of their package in post-paid service.

TABLE 3.17

KINDS OF PACKAGE IN POST-PAID

Kinds of Package No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Internet Package 6 27

Family Package 10 45.5

Sms Package 5 23

Others 1 4.5

Total 22 100

From that above table 3.17 shows that out of 22 respondents, 6(27 %) respondents

package is for internet package, 10(45.5 %) respondents package it for family package, 5(23 %)

respondents package it for Sms package, and 1 (4.5 %) respondents package it for others.

Hence, majority of the respondent’s package is family packages.

TABLE 3.17

30

Page 31: votaphone

KINDS OF PACKAGE IN POST-PAID

Internet package Family package Sms package Others0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

27

45.5

23

4.5

3.17.1 PRE-PAID USERS DURATION OF RECHARGE

31

Page 32: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of duration of recharge.

TABLE 3.18

PRE-PAID USERS DURATION OF RECHARGE

Duration of Recharge No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Daily 10 11

Weekly 33 38

2Weeks once 10 11

Monthly 20 23

Anytime 5 6

Per month 10 11

Total 88 100

From above the table shows that out 88 respondents, 10(11 %) respondents duration of

recharge is daily, 33(38 %) respondents duration of recharge is weekly, 10(11 %) respondents

duration of recharge is 2weeks once, 20(23 %) respondents duration of recharge is monthly, 5(6

%) respondents duration of recharge is anytime, 10(111 %) respondents duration of recharge is

per month.

Hence, majority of the respondent’s recharge is weekly.

CHART 3.18

32

Page 33: votaphone

PRE-PAID USERS DURATION OF RECHARGE

DailyWeekly

2Weeks onceMonthly

AnytimePer month

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

11

38

11

23

6

11

3.17.2 PRE-PAID USERS AVERAGE RECHARGE AMOUNT

33

Page 34: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of their average monthly bill.

TABLE 3.18

PRE-PAID USERS AVERAGE RECHARGE AMOUNT

Average Monthly Bill No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Less than Rs.200 40 46

Rs.201 to Rs.400 30 34

Rs.401 to Rs.600 10 11

More than Rs.600 8 9

Total 88 100

From the above table shows that out of 88 respondents, 40(46 %) respondents average

recharge amount is less than Rs.200, 30(34 %) respondents average recharge amount is Rs.201 to

Rs.400, 10(11 %) respondents average recharge amount is Rs.401 to Rs.600, and 8(9 %)

respondents average recharge amount is more than Rs.600.

Hence, majority of the respondent’s recharge amount is less than Rs.200.

CHART 3.18

34

Page 35: votaphone

PRE-PAID USERS AVERAGE RECHARGE AMOUNT

Less than Rs.200Rs.201 to Rs.400

Rs.401 to Rs.600More than Rs.600

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50 46

34

11

9

3.17.3 KINDS OF PACKAGE IN PRE-PAID

35

Page 36: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of their Pre-paid package.

TABLE 3.18

KINDS OF PACKAGE IN PRE-PAID

Kinds of Package No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Internet Package 30 34

Family Package 28 32

Sms Package 30 34

Total 88 100

From that above table 3.18 shows that out of 88 respondents, 30(34 %) respondent’s

package is for internet package, 28(32 %) respondents package it for family package, 30(34 %)

respondents package it for Sms package.

Hence, majority of the respondent’s package is internet packages, and Sms package.

TABLE 3.18

36

Page 37: votaphone

KINDS OF PACKAGE IN PRE-PAID

34

32

34

Internet PackageFamily PackageSms Package

3.18 WHICH SERVICE ARE MORE HELPFUL TO VODAFONE SERVICE

37

Page 38: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of which services are more helpful to

Vodafone service.

TABLE 3.19

USING VODAFONE SERVICE

Service No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Call rates 22 20

Sms service 30 27.3

Network 40 36.4

Value added service 18 16.3

Total 110 100

Form the table 3.19 shows that 110 respondents, shows that, 22 (20 %) respondents are

using Call rates service, 30 (27.3 %) respondents are using Sms service and 40 (36.4 %)

respondents are using Network service and the remaining 18 (16.3 %) respondents are using

Value added service category.

Thus, it is inferred that most of the respondents are using Network service.

CHART 3.19

38

Page 39: votaphone

USING VODAFONE SERVICE

Call rateSms service

NetworkValue added service

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

20

27.3

36.4

16.3

3.19 CUSTOMER CARE SERVICE

39

Page 40: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their customer

care service.

TABLE 3.20

CUSTOMER CARE SERVICE

Customer care No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Yes 95 86.4

No 15 13.6

Total 110 100

Table 3.20 shows that out of 110 respondents, 95 (86.4 %) respondents are using

customer care service and 15 (13.6 %) respondents are not using customer care service.

Thus, it is found out that majority of the respondents are using customer care service.

CHAPTER 3.20

40

Page 41: votaphone

CUSTOMER CARE

86.4

13.6

YesNo

3.20 IF YES, HOW OFTEN YOU CALL TO CUSTOMER CARE

41

Page 42: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their call to

customer care.

TABLE 3.21

CALL CUSTOMER CARE

Call to Customer care No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Daily 10 10.5

Once a week 20 21

Once a month 30 31.5

Occasionally 35 37

Total 95 100

Table 3.21 shows that out of 95 respondents, 10 (10.5 %) respondents are call daily and

20 (21 %) respondents are call once a week and 30 (31.5 %) respondents are call once a month,

35(37 %) respondents are call to customer care occasionally.

Thus, it is found out that majority of the respondents are call customer care occasionally.

CHAPTER 3.21

42

Page 43: votaphone

CALL CUSTOMER CARE

DailyOnce a week

Once a monthOccasionally

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10.5

21

31.5

37

3.21 WHAT PURPOSE YOU CALL TO CUSTOMER CARE

43

Page 44: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their what

purpose you call to customer care in order to know the value added service, information

regarding new schemes, other queries, complaining, roaming facilities, and good network

coverage, free internet facilities.

TABLE 3.22

WHAT PURPOSE YOU CALL TO CUSTOMER CARE

Purpose No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Value Added Service 10 10.5

Information regarding new schemes 20 21

Other queries 15 16

Complaining 15 16

Roaming facilities 13 14

Good network coverage 12 13

Free internet facilities 10 10.5

Total 95 100

Form the above table 3.22 shows that out of 95 respondents, 10 (10.5 per cent)

respondents are speaking about customer care for value added service, 20(21 per cent)

respondents are speaking about customer care for information regarding new schemes, 15(16 per

cent) respondents are speaking about customer care for other queries, 15(16 per cent)

respondents are speaking about customer care for complaining, and 13(14 per cent) respondents

are speaking about customer care for roaming facilities, 12(13 per cent) respondents are speaking

about customer care for good network coverage and 10 (10.5 per cent) respondents are speaking

about customer care for free internet facilities.

Hence, it is majority of the respondents are speaking about customer care for Information

regarding new schemes.

CHART 3.22

WHAT PURPOSE YOU CALL TO CUSTOMER CARE

44

Page 45: votaphone

10.5

21

16

16

14

13

10.5

Value Added ServiceInformation Regarding New SchemesOther QueriesComplainingRoaming FacilitiesGood Network CoverageFree Internet Facilities

3.23 CLASSIFICATION BASED ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

45

Page 46: votaphone

The customers are classified on the basis of their level of satisfaction on the various

service providers by the Vodafone service provider. The satisfaction level is categorized as

Excellent, Very Good, Average, Poor.

3.23.1 NETWORK

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their network

coverage.

TABLE NO 3.24

NETWORK COVERAGE

Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Excellent 50 45.5

Very Good 40 36.4

Average 20 18.1

Poor 0 0

Total 110 100

Form the above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 50(45.5 %) respondents are told

network coverage is excellent, 40(36.4 %) respondents are told network coverage is very good

and 20(18.1 %) respondents are told network coverage is average.

Thus, it is observed that most of the respondents are told network coverage is excellent.

3.23.2 SMS RATE

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their Sms Rate.

46

Page 47: votaphone

TABLE NO 3.25

SMS RATE

Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Excellent 15 13.6

Very Good 45 40.9

Average 35 31.9

Poor 15 13.6

Total 110 100

Form the above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 15(13.6 %) respondents are told

Sms rate is excellent, 45(40.9 %) respondents are told Sms rate is very good and 35(31.9 %)

respondents are told Sms rate is average, 15(13.6 %) respondents are told Sms rate is poor.

Thus, it is observed that most of the respondents are told Sms rate is very good.

3.23.3 NEW SCHEMES OFFER

47

Page 48: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their New

Schemes Offer.

TABLE NO 3.26

NEW SCHEMES OFFER

Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Excellent 25 22.7

Very Good 45 40.9

Average 30 27.3

Poor 10 9.1

Total 110 100

Form the above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 25(22.7 %) respondents are told

new schemes offer is excellent, 45(40.9 %) respondents are told new schemes offer is very good

and 30(27.3 %) respondents are told new schemes offer average, 10(9.1 %) respondents are told

new schemes offer is poor.

Thus, it is observed that most of the respondents are told new schemes offer is Very

Good.

3.23.4CUSTOMER CARE

48

Page 49: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their Customer

Care.

TABLE NO 3.27

CUSTOMER CARE

Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Excellent 20 18.2

Very Good 50 45.5

Average 30 27.3

Poor 10 9

Total 110 100

Form the above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 20(18.2 %) respondents are told

customer care is excellent, 50(45.5 %) respondents are told customer care is very good and

30(27.3 %) respondents are told customer care is average, 10(9 %) respondents are told customer

care is poor.

Thus, it is observed that most of the respondents are told customer care is Very Good.

3.23.5 RESEARCH OUTLETS

49

Page 50: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their Research Outlets.

TABLE NO 3.28

RESEARCH OUTLETS

Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Excellent 10 9

Very Good 30 27.3

Average 30 27.3

Poor 40 36.4

Total 110 100

Form the above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 10(9 %) respondents are told

research outlets is excellent, 30(27.3 %) respondents are told research outlets is very good and

30(27.3 %) respondents are told research outlets is average, 40(36.4 %) respondents are told

research outlets is poor.

Thus, it is observed that most of the respondents are told research outlets is Poor.

3.23.6 CALL RATE

50

Page 51: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their Call Rate.

TABLE NO 3.29

CALL RATE

Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Excellent 20 18

Very Good 40 36.4

Average 35 32

Poor 15 13.6

Total 110 100

Form the above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 20(18 %) respondents are told

call rate is excellent, 40(36.4 %) respondents are told call rate is very good and 35(32 %)

respondents are told call rate is average, 15(13.6 %) respondents are told call rate is poor.

Thus, it is observed that most of the respondents are told call rate is Very Good.

.

3.23.7 VALUE ADDED SERVICE

51

Page 52: votaphone

The table below shows the classification of respondents on the basis of their Value Added

Service.

TABLE NO 3.30

VALUE ADDED SERVICE

Level of Satisfaction No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Excellent 20 18

Very Good 35 32

Average 40 36.4

Poor 15 13.6

Total 110 100

Form the above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 20(18 %) respondents are told

value added service is excellent, 35(32 %) respondents are told value added service is very good

and 40(36.4 %) respondents are told value added service is average, 15(13.6 %) respondents are

told value added service is poor.

Thus, it is observed that most of the respondents are told value added service is Average.

3.24 SATISFIED WITH VODAFONE SERVICE

52

Page 53: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basic of their usage of satisfied with Vodafone

service.

TABLE 3.31

SATISFIED WITH VODAFONE SERVICE

Satisfied This Service No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Yes 98 89.1

No 12 10.9

Total 110 100

The above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 98(89.1 %) are satisfied Vodafone

service and 12(10.9 %) are not satisfied Vodafone service.

Thus, it is inferred that majority of the respondents utilize Vodafone service provider.

CHART 3.31

53

Page 54: votaphone

SATISFIED WITH VODAFONE SERVICE

YesNo

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

89.1

10.9

Chart Title

3.25 OTHER VODAFONE SERVICE PROVIDER UTILIZED BY RESPONDENTS

54

Page 55: votaphone

The respondents are classified on the basis of their usage of other service provider.

CHART 3.32

OTHER VODAFONE SERVICE PROVIDER UTILIZED BY RESPONDENTS

Utilized Other Service Provider No. of Respondents Percentage (%)

Yes 70 63.6

No 40 36.4

Total 110 100

The above table shows that, out of 110 respondents, 70(63.6 per cent) are using other

Vodafone service and 40 (36.4 per cent) are not using other Vodafone service.

Thus, it is inferred that majority of the respondents utilize other Vodafone service.

CHART 3.32

55

Page 56: votaphone

OTHER VODAFONE SERVICE PROVIDER UTILIZED BY RESPONDENTS

YesNo

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70 63.6

36.4

56

Page 57: votaphone

3.22 RANK THE REASON GIVEN BY THE CUSTOMERS WHEN CHOOSING THEIR

SERVICE PROVIDER:

In order to find out the priority of different customers towards the obvious reasons for

availing Vodafone service provider, the simple average analysis is applied by consolidating

customer’s opinion and final rank is arrived based on the criterion, “Lower the value, higher the

priority”. These results are presented in the following table.

TABLE. 3.33

Factor influencing to take up the Vodafone service provider

Simple average

Reasons No. of respondents Percentage (%)

Good Network Coverage 37 33.6

Beneficial Call Tariffs 8 7

Free Sms 13 11.8

Free Dialogue 15 13.6

Good Customer Care 10 9

Roaming Facilities 7 6

Less Formalities 2 2

Quick Activation 6 6

Value Added Service 3 3

Free Internet Facilities 9 8

Total 110 100

From the above table, it is observed that among the various reasons, the customers have

ranked good network coverage as 1st rank while selecting the vodafone service provider, then

followed by Free SMS, Good customer care, Call Tariffs, Roaming Facilities, Less Formalities,

Free dialogue, Quick Activation, Free internet Facilities, Value added service are the order of

their preference while choosing their service provider.

CONCLUSION

57

Page 58: votaphone

Majority of the respondents satisfied with the roaming facilities, Call rate, SMS charge,

internet facilities and dialer tunes. The most of respondent highly satisfied with the network

coverage and customer care.

58