Upload
hemantdurgawale
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/20/2019 WJ_1974_02_s59
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wj197402s59 1/7
Strength of Transverse Fillet W elded Jo ints
Analysis yields a design formu la that is more rational
than the method of treating all fillets as though loaded
in the weakest direction
B Y B E N K A T O A N D KOJI M O R I T A
S U M M A R Y . T h e r e su l t a n t f o r ce o n a
f i l l e t w e l d m a y b e t r a n sve r se t o t h e
ax is o f the
w e l d ,
i n c l i ned to the ax is
o r pa ra l le l to the ax is . The s t ress d i s
t r i bu t ion in the we ld and i t s s ta t i c re
s i s t a n ce va r y m a t e r i a l l y w i t h t h e r e l a
t i ve o r ien ta t ion o f l oad and we ld ax is .
M o s t o f t h e b a s i c in ve s t i g a t i o n s o n
t h e s t a t i c s t r e n g t h a n d b e h a v i o r o f f i l
l e t w e l d s w e r e co n d u c t e d d u r i n g
1920's a n d 1930's (Ref. 1). I t h as
been sh ow n tha t b reak ing loads fo r
t r a n sve r se l y - l o a d e d f i ll e t s w e r e o f
the o rde r o f 40 % g rea te r th an th ose
fo r long i tud ina l l y - lo aded f i l l e ts o f the
sam e s ize and leng th . In th i s pape r
the te r m t ransv e rse f i l l e t w i l l be used
t o d e sc r i b e t h e f o r m e r , w h i l e l o n g i t u
d in a l f i l le t w i l l be used fo r th e la t te r .
A f e w d e s i g n sp e c i f i ca t i o n s (e .g . ,
Ref . 2 ) and des ign m e th ods take
t h e se d i f f e r e n ce s i n t o a cco u n t , b u t
mo st do no t , t rea t ing a l l f i l l e t we lds
a s t h o u g h o r i e n t e d i n t h e w e a ke s t
d i r e c t i o n .
T h e m a i n r e a so n s f o r
n e g l e c t i n g t h e g r e a t e r s t r e n g t h o f
t r a n sve r se f i l l e t w e l d s a r e p r o b a b l y
a n i n t e r e s t i n s i m p l i f y i n g d e s i g n a n d
BEN KATO is Professor and KOJI MORITA
is Assistant Professor in the Faculty of
Engineering, Department of Architecture,
University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
t h e f a c t t h a t t h e p e r f o r m a n ce o f a
t r a n s v e r s e f i l let w e l d i s co m p l e x .
Recen t l y , i n recogn i t i on o f the re
m a r ka b l e i m p r o v e m e n t i n q u a l i t y o f
s t e e l , e l e c t r o d e a n d w e l d i n g t e c h
n i q u e s , e x t e n s i ve i n ve s t i g a t i o n s o n
f i l l e t w e l d e d j o i n t s w e r e co n d u c t e d t o
o b t a i n m o r e r a t i o n a l d e s i g n f o r m u l a s
(Re fs .
3,4).
Rega rd less o f wh e t he r o r no t one
d i s t i n g u i sh e s b e t w e e n t h e d i f f e r e n t
types o f f i l l e t we ld loads in des ig n , i t
i s des i ra b le to make a s tudy o f the i r
p e r f o r m a n ce . It sh o u l d a i d i n a sse ss
i n g t h e t r u e e f f e c t i ve n e ss o f co n n e c
t i o n s p r o p o r t i o n e d b y co n ve n t i o n a l
m e t h o d s .
In th i s repo r t , the s ta t i c s t r eng th
a n d b e h a v i o r o f t r a n sve r se f i l l e t
w e l d s a r e s t u d i e d t h e o r e t i ca l l y . A n
a p p r o x i m a t e so l u t i o n b a se d o n t h e
theo ry o f e las t i c i t y i s rev iewed and
su p p l e m e n t e d by a n e l a s t i c - p l a s t i c -
s t r a i n h a r d e n i n g a n a l ys i s p e r f o r m e d
n u m e r i ca l l y u s i n g t h e f i n i t e e l e m e n t
t e ch n i q u e . T h e r e su l t s a r e co m p a r e d
w i th ava i lab le tes t resu l ts .
A n A p p r o x i m a t e A p p r o a c h f r o m
t h e T h e o r y o f E l a s t i c i t y
A n a p p r o x i m a t e t h e o r y o n t h e
s t r e n g t h o f t r a n sve r se f i l l e t w e l d s
w as p resen te d by a sen io r w r i te r (Re f .
5), b a se d o n t h e f o l l o w i n g a ssu m p
t ions: :
1 . T he d i rec t s t ress (q ) on the tens i le
face o f the we ld i s un i fo r m ly
d ist r ibu ted (F ig . 1 ) .
2 . The pa t te rn o f the e las t i c s t res s
d i s t r i b u t i o n r e m a i n s u n ch a n g e d
un t i l the b reak ing o f the
w e l d .
3 . B r e a k i n g w i l l o ccu r w h e n t h e
shea r s t re ss a t a po in t o f the f i l l e t
reaches
Cmax.= <*>/£
where <7
T
= the tens i le s t re ng t h o f
th e w e l d m e t a l .
Fo r s im p l i c i t y , a f i l l e t we ld w i t h equa l
legs i s cons ide red .
T h e e l a s t i c s t r e ss co m p o n e n t s i n a
f i l l e t a re exp ressed in a po la r coo rd i
n a t e sys t e m w i t h t h e o r i g i n 0 a t t h e
toe o f the f i l l e t , as shown in F ig . 1 .
The com pa t i b i l i t y e qua t ion i s (Re f. 6 ) .
( f W a 7 * r ^ ) ( ^ T e T ^ l £ ) = 0
(D
T h e g e n e r a l so l u t i o n f o r t h i s e q u a t i o n
is
I =
a
0
log
r +
b
0
r
2
<-c
0
r
2
log
r •
d
0
r
2
e
* a^e
• ( a , r e s i n e ) / 2 ' ( b , r
3
* a ; r-Ub,'r logr)cos9
- (c , re cose ) /2+(d , r
3
tc, ' r- ' .d, ' r log r)sin 9
•
£,( a„r%
b
n
r
n
-
2
•
a '
r
•
b; r- -
2
)cos
ne
• S (c
n
r
n
*d
n
r
n
*
2
-.Cnr-
n
*dnr-
n, 2
)sin ne
n
»2
(2)
W E L D I N G R E S E A R C H S U P P L E M E N T I 5 9 - s
8/20/2019 WJ_1974_02_s59
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wj197402s59 2/7
Tak ing in to acco un t the boun da ry
co n d i t i o n s , s t r e ss co m p o n e n t s a r e o b
t a i n e d f r o m E q . (2) as
=
I S i , i aft
(3)
1
-»M
(y2sinecos(e-t/4)t(e-7r/A))
l i t
sr*
(4 ) q * —
9 — [J2 c o s e s in (e -» /4 ) - (8 - * /4 ) ] « —
j . 3 i .1 d x
r9
~ r
2
36 rarae
- q
(5)
1 -v/A
/2 sin9sin(e-n:/4))
T h e co o r d i n a t e 9 w h i c h y i e l d s m a x i
m u m s h e a r
T
0.
m
ax i s ob ta ined as
f o l
l o w s :
From Eq. (5 ) ,
f^=
:
T
L
£T(
sin6cos
(
6
-'
r
'
A
)
6 1 -* /A
4-cose
sin(e-»/4))=
o
F r o m w h i c h ,
0
= " 7 8 . I n t r o d u c i n g d
-
TT/Q in to Eq. (5).
•^rs max.=/2q(1-t/A) 'sin
2
f/8
The exp ress ion in te rm s o f the ex te r
nal l oadT , pe r one f i l l e t we ld i s
-<=re
max. =
<
1
* /4)- ' (
s in
2
* /8
)( T,/A
w
)
(6)
T h e m a x i m u m s t r e n g t h o f a t r a n s
ve rse f i l l e t we ld i s ob ta in ed by in t ro
duc ing
T
r
0.max.=
ff
T
/ / 3 i n E q . ( 6 ) :
h
m a
x . =
(1 - '
r
^ ) fe in -
2
* /8 )A
v v
f f
T
/ /3
(7)
The ob l ique p lane RP in F ig . 1 wh ich
is no rm a l to the coo rd ina te l i ne
$
=
n
/8 th ro ugh the roo t o f the we ld c an
b e co n s i d e r e d t h e f r a c t u r e p l a n e , t h a t
is , b reak ing w i l l occu r a long the p lane
RP mak ing the ang le 6
- f / 8
w i t h
the shea r face .
Fig. 1
—
Transverse fillet weld
For the case o f the long i tud in a l
f i l l e t we ld the c r i t i ca l sec t ion i s c lea r
ly the th roa t (RQ in F ig . 1 ) . Th en th e
m a x i m u m s t r e n g t h o f a l o n g i t u d i n a l
f i l l e t we ld o f the same s ize and leng th
is
T
l .max. A
w
0-
T
/73
From Eqs. (7 ) and (8),
T,max.
= ( 1 - * / 4 ) ( s i n -
2
* / 8 ) T , .
= 1.46 T,
m
„
(8)
(9)
T h u s , t h e p r e se n t m e t h o d p r e d i c t s
t h a t t r a n sve r se f i l l e t w e l d s a r e 4 6 %
s t r o n g e r t h a n l o n g i t u d i n a l f i l l e t w e l d s
o f the sam e s ize and le ng t h .
Tsrr
1
sxq
^£
^C
JSL
~
AQQ
flhfl
4 0 0
r_d
(a ) TEST SPECIMENS Cin mm.
Fig. 2— Test specimens (Test No. 1)
Compar ison wi th Test Resu l ts
T h e t h e o r e t i ca l p r e d i c t i o n o b t a i n e d
i n t h e p r e v i o u s se c t i o n i s n o w co m
pa red w i t h ava i lab le tes t resu l ts .
O n e t e s t w a s p e r f o r m e d u s i n g sp e c
imens o f the fo rm shown in F ig . 2 (a ) ,
w h e r e s l i ce - cu t sp e c i m e n s w i t h l a r g e
s ize f i l l e ts we re adop ted (Re f . 5 ) .
Mechan ica l p rope r t ies o f s tee l p la tes
a n d w e l d m e t a l a r e sh o w n i n T a b l e 1;
t h o se o f w e l d m e t a l w e r e o b t a i n e d
f r o m sm a l l t e n s i l e t e s t p i e ce s m a
ch ined ou t o f the ac tua l f i l l e ts as
sh ow n in F ig . 2 (b ). The exp e r im en ta l
m a x i m u m s t r e n g t h o f j o i n t s i s co m
p a r e d w i t h t h e t h e o r e t i ca l p r e d i c t i o n
in Tab le 2 . F igu re 3 com pare s theo re t
i ca l and tes t resu l ts fo r the ang le the
b r e a k i n g p l a n e m a ke s w i t h t h e sh e a r
f ace .
A d d i t i o n a l t e s t s w e r e p e r f o r m e d
u s i n g sp e c i m e n s of t h e f o r m sh o w n
in F ig . 4 , cons is t ing o f seve ra l s i zes o f
f i l l e ts and a l im i ted f i l l e t l eng th (Re f .
7). M e ch a n i c a l p r o p e r t i e s of p l a t e s
a n d w e l d m e t a l s a r e sh o w n i n T a b l e
3 . Tes t resu l ts a re com pare d w i t h the
theo re t i c a l p red ic t ions in F ig . 5 and
Tab le 4 . F igu re 5 com par es the max
i m u m s t r e n g t h w h i l e t h e a n g l e o f
b reak ing p lane i s com pare d in Tab le
4 .
In bo th cases , the co r re la t ion be
tw ee n tes ts and theo ry i s qu i te good .
T h e a p p r o x i m a t e t h e o r y a l so se e m s
to be ab le to g ive a good exp lana t ion
fo r the resu l ts o f g roup tes ts c i ted
ear l ie r (Refs. 3 , 4 ) . The resu l ts o f tests
ca r r ied ou t by the task commi t tee o f
A W S S t ru c t u r a l W e l d i n g C o m m i t t e e
shows tha t fo r tes t spec imens o f A
4 4 1 s t e e l w e l d e d w i t h E 7 0 X X t yp e
( b ) T E S T P I E C E S M I L L E D O U T
OF THE WELD METAL (in mm. )
N o t a t i o n „ .
A
W
= I * a = t h r o a t a r e a
a = s / / 2 = t h r o a t
D
P
= e l a s t i c - p l a s t i c m a t e r i a l
s t i f f n e ss m a t r i x
E = Young 's modu lus
H ' = s t r a i n h a r d e n i n g m o d u l u s
I
= len gth o f a f i l l e t
q = u n i f o r m l y d i s t r i b u t e d s t r e ss o n
the ten s i le face o f a f i l l e t
s = size o f a f i l le t
T,
= ex te rna l l oad pe r one long i tu
d ina l f i l l e t we ld
T t = ex te rna l l oad pe r one t ra ns
ve rse f i l l e t w e ld
Af = i n c r e m e n t o f s t r a i n ve c t o r
A* = equ iv a len t p las t i c s t ra in i n
c r e m e n t
<• = Po iss on 's ra t io
rj,,o"
8
,o~
x
'Cfy
=
n o r m a l s t r ess co m p o
nen ts
o-
x
,<r
y
= dev ia to r i c s t ress
a = equ iv a len t s t ress
o-
T
= t e n s i l e s t r e n g t h o f t h e w e l d
me ta l
?
=
i n c rem en t o f s t ress vec to r
T ,r
r8
i
r
xv
= sh e a r s t re ss co m p o n e n t s
<E> = s t ress func t ion de f ined by Eq . (2 )
6 0 - s I F E B R U A R Y 1 9 7 4
8/20/2019 WJ_1974_02_s59
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wj197402s59 3/7
e l e c t r o d e s ,
t he
a v e r a g e r a t i o
of th e
s t r e n g t h o f t r a n s v e r s e f i l le t w e l d s t o
t h a t o f l o n g i t u d i n a l f i l le t w e l d s is 1.56
a n d f o r s p e c i m e n s o f A 5 1 4 s t e e l
w e l d e d w i t h E 1 1 0 X t y p e e l e c t r o d e ' s ,
t h e a v e r a g e r a t i o is 1.45 (F i e f . 3 ). It
h a s a l s o b e e n f o u n d t h a t t he r e s u l t s
o f t he i n t e r n a t i o n a l t e s t s c o n d u c t e d
u n d e r t he a e g i s of the I n t e r n a t i o n a l
I n s t i t u t e
o f
W e l d i n g , i n c o r p o r a t i n g
r e s u l t s f r o m m o r e t h a n t e n c o u n t r i e s ,
c o u l d
b e
w e l l i n t e r p r e t e d
o n the
b a s i s
o f t h i s t h e o r y ( R e f s . 4 , 8) .
A n a l y s i s by t h e F i n i t e
E l e m e n t M e t h o d
T h e a s s u m p t i o n s m a d e
in the d e r i
v a t i o n of the m e n t i o n e d s o l u t i o n a r e
n o t p r e c i s e . In c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h
( 1 ) ,
i t
i s k n o w n t h a t t he d i r e c t s t r e s s o n th e
t e n s i l e f a c e o f th e w e l d v a r i e s a p p r o x
i m a t e l y l i n e a r l y f r o m the to e to the
r o o t . A s f o r t h e a s s u m p t i o n (2) , the
p e a k s t r e s s p r e d i c t e d b y e l a s t i c
t h e o r y s h o u l d b e r e l i e v e d b y p l a s t i c
d e f o r m a t i o n
a s
s o o n
as i t
e x c e e d s
the
y i e l d s t r e s s a n d t h u s a r e d i s t r i b u t i o n
o f t he s t r e s s w i l l o c c u r . W i t h r e s p e c t
t o the t h i r d a s s u m p t i o n , t he b r e a k i n g
s t r e s s s h o u l d b e e v a l u a t e d a c c o r d i n g
t o a n a p p r o p r i a t e f a i l u r e t h e o r y .
I n a d d i t i o n , t he s h e a r s t r e s s a l o n g
t h e a s s u m e d b r e a k i n g p l a n e RP is e x
p r e s s e d a s
-c =, _2i=_£L
s i n 2
r j _ t;
r e C
os 2(3
|3=
5 * / 8
- 9
10)
F r o m Eqs. ( 3 ) , ( 4 ) , (5) a n d
( 1 0 ) ,
t he d i s
t r i b u t i o n o f s h e a r s t r e s s a l o n g the
p l a n e RP is g i v e n a s s h o w n i n Fig. 6 .
T h i s m e a n s t h a t rr fl. ma x. is no t the
m a x i m u m s h e a r s t r e s s a l o n g the
o b l i q u e p l a n e RP. O b v i o u s l y t h i s
r e s u l t c o m e s m a i n l y f r o m the a s s u m p
t i o n
(1 )
m e n t i o n e d a b o v e .
I n s p i t e o f t h o s e s h o r t c o m i n g s , the
p r e d i c t i o n f r o m t h i s a p p r o x i m a t e
t h e o r y ha d s h o w n s a t i s f a c t o r y a g r e e
m e n t w i t h v a r i o u s t e s t s r e s u l t s . M o r e
p r e c i s e s t u d y on the p e r f o r m a n c e o f
t h e t r a n s v e r s e f i l l e t w e l d in e l a s t i c -
p l a s t i c r a n g e is d e s i r a b l e i n o r d e r to
k n o w
h o w
t h i s a p p r o x i m a t e s o l u t i o n
c a n p r e d i c t
t he
a c t u a l b e h a v i o r
a n d
to
a s s e r t the g e n e r a l i t y o f t h i s s o l u t i o n .
F o r t h i s p u r p o s e , a n u m e r i c a l
a n a l
y s i s by the f i n i t e e l e m e n t m e t h o d ,
e x t e n d e d to the e l a s t i c - p l a s t i c - s t r a i n
h a r d e n i n g r a n g e b y P o p e a n d o t h e r s
( R e f s . 9, 10) , is a p p l i e d h e r e i n . A n a l
y s i s is p e r f o r m e d o n the b a s i s o f i n
c r e m e n t a l s t r a i n t h e o r y a n d a n i s o
t r o p i c a n d d u c t i l e m a t e r i a l a s s u m e d
t o o b e y
the vo n
M i s e s y i e l d c o n d i t i o n
w i t h
P r a n d t l - R e u s s
l o a d i n g f u n c t i o n .
T h e p r i n c i p a l f e a t u r e o f t h i s p r o b l e m
l i e s in the e v a l u a t i o n of the e l a s t i c -
p l a s t i c m a t e r i a l s t i f f n e s s m a t r i x
D
p
w h i c h r e l a t e s
t he
s t r a i n i n c r e m e n t
to
t h e s t r e s s i n c r e m e n t of the m a t e r i a l .
D° is g i v e n in R e f s . 9, 1 0 , a s f o l l o w s :
D = - P -
m u l t i p l i e d
b y
( 1 1 )
°x •
r
r
J
.2c, - t f j ^ v e ,
- S f i ^ h :
cr ;
2
* 2 c ,
xy
r S t i - i S L y r -
(SYM.)
A < T = D
P
A 6 , A O = { AO „,AO~y,,&Xxy}
A €
=
{ A €
X
, AGy ,Ar
X
y}
w h e r e ,
2H =2
T a b l e 1 — M e c h a n i c a l P r o p e r t i e s o f P l a t e a nd W e l d M e t a l ( T e s t No. 1)
W e l d m e t a l
P r o p e r t y
Y i e l d point
( UN / c m * )
1
T e n s i l e s t r e n g t h ,
( k N / c m
2
)
E l o n g a t i o n ,
%
Reduc t i on
o f
a rea (%)
S t e e l
p l a te
27.54
45.86
29.0
|_(b)
37.73
47.33
3 7 , 8
56 .1
D4316
T(b )
40.47
4 8 . 2 2
2 8 . 9
4 5 . 8
(a)
D5011
(a)
M e a n
3 9 . 1 0
4 7 8 2
3 3 . 4
5 1 . 0
L
4 0 . 6 7
5 1 . 7 4
3 2 . 9
4 1 . 2
T M e a n
3 9 . 4 9 4 0 . 0 8
5 0 . 2 7 51 .06
33.4 33.2
39.4
40.3
(a) Type of electrode;
D4316 :
low hydrogen type; D 5 0 1 1 ; high cellulose
type,
lb) L - long i tud ina l . T = t ransverse; see
Fig 2(b)
(c) 1 k N / c m
J
= 1 45
ksi
c
2
=
o
x
'
2
• 2
u c - ' o -
y
'
~y
2 ( 1
- l-
2
) (
<s; = 2 c r
x
- o -
y
) / 3
cr
y
'
= ( 2 c r
y
- < T
x
) / 3
d e v i a t o r i c s t r e s s
E = Y o u n g ' s m o d u l u s
= P o i s s o n ' s r a t i o
cr
= Jcr
x
2
• (5-
y
2 _ o-
x
cr
y
3 t
x y
2
= e q u i v a l e n t s t r e s s
H ' = A C T /
A £
P
= s t r a i n h a r d e n i n g m o d u l u s
A
g P
=
l i t ( ( c r
x
' t * o - y ' ) A e
x
* ( o - ^ * < 5 -
x
Hey
3
c
2
• ( 1 - > ) t
x y
A l '
x y
)
= e q u i v a l e n t p l a s t i c s t r a i n i n c r e
m e n t .
T h e c o m p u t a t i o n a l p r o c e d u r e of th e
p r o b l e m is o u t l i n e d in the f l o w c h a r t
o f F ig . 7 . The d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n o f
t h e a n a l y t i c a l p r o c e s s fo r the s i m i l a r
p r o b l e m
is
g i v e n e l s e w h e r e ( R e f.
1 1 ) .
Fig. 3 — Breaking planes, theory and tests
T a b l e 2 — M a x i m u m L o ad s b y T e s t s a nd T h e o r y ( T e s t No . 1)
Tes ts
T h e o r y
M a x i m u m
load,
kN
L1 L2 L3 M e a n H I H2 H3 M e a n L H
3 0 1 . 8 4 2 8 6 1 6 3 1 9 .4 8 3 02 8 2 3 4 3 . 0 3 1 1 . 6 4 3 3 8 . 1 3 3 1 . 2 4 3 0 7 . 7 2 3 2 9 . 2 8
W E L D I N G R E S E A R C H S U P P L E M E N T 6 1 - s
8/20/2019 WJ_1974_02_s59
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wj197402s59 4/7
r b 1
f
-nSi*
T^
K»
2t
JL.
40
4.
s
b
t
S 5B
S 5 R
5
2 7
9
S 1 0 B
1 0
49.5
16 .5
5 1 5 B
S 1 5 R
1 5
7 2
2U
B:
Basic type elec trod e
,
R:
b=4.5(s*1) . t = 1.5(s*1), s,b
S 2 0 B
2 0
9 4 .5
31 .5
S30B
3 0
13 9.5
4 6.5
S 4 0 B
S 4 0 R
4 0
18 4.5
61.5
fut i le
type electrode
. t. in mm.
Fig. 4
—
Test specimens (Test No. 2)
2.0 +
r a l ' - C m a x .
1.5
. 1 . 0 -
m
— B -—re gres sion curve
o — R f r o m Eq.(4)
a —throat
I — l e n g t h o f w e l d
10 2 0 3 0
a
( m m )
Table 4 — Ang le of Breaking Plane w it h
Shear Face
Speci
men
S5 B
S5 R
S1 B
S15B
S15R
Angle,
deg
21.0
20.5
20.5
21.9
21 8
Speci
men
S2 B
S3 B
S4 B
S4 R
Theory
Angle,
deg
22.0
21.5
21.0
20.5
22.5
Fig. 5
—
Comp arison betwe en tests and theory (Test No. 2)
T h e sp e c i m e n i s m o d e l e d b y
t r i a n
gular e lemen ts as shown in F ig . 8 .
The imp o r ta n t resu l ts ob ta ined a re
co m p a r e d w i t h e xp e r i m e n t a l r e su l t s
a n d w i t h p r e v i o u s a p p r o x i m a t e
s o l u
t i o n i n t h e f o l l o w i n g .
Elastic Behavior
T h e d i s t r i b u t i o n o f p r i n c i p a l
s t resses in the f i l l e t and i t s v i c in i t y in
the e las t i c range i s shown in F ig . 9 .
M e a su r e d s t r e sse s a n d t h o se ca l cu
l a t ed b y t h e f i n i t e e l e m e n t m e t h o d
a r e co m p a r e d i n t h i s f i g u r e . M e a
su red s t resses a re ob ta ined f rom e lec
t r i c r e s i s t a n ce w i r e s t r a i n g a g e s i n
s t a l l e d o n t h e t e s t sp e c i m e n S 4 0 B
men t ioned ea r l i e r (Re f . 12 ) . In the
a c t u a l sp e c i m e n , so m e f r i c t i o n b e
tw ee n the inne r p la te and ou te r p la te
is inev i ta b le , w h i le in the ana ly t i ca l
m o d e l n o f r i c t i o n b e t w e e n t h e m i s
a s s u m e d .
C o n s i d e r i n g t h i s d i f f e r e n c e
o f co n d i t i o n , t h e co r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n
tes t and theo ry seems to be good .
A n o t h e r co m p a r i so n o f e xp e r i
me n ta l and ca lcu la ted s t resse s i s
g iven in F ig . 1 0 . The c i ted tes t resu l ts
a re take n f rom Re fe rence B . Th is
tes t cons is ts o f tw o types o f spec
i m e n ; one has s l i t s a long the con tac t
faces o f j o ined p la tes as seen in F ig .
10(a) ,
the o the r has jo in ed p la tes
c lose ly in con tac t as seen in F ig .
10(b) .
S t res ses g iven in the f igu re a re
a lso those
at
the load leve l
T=441
kN .
S t r e ss m e a su r e m e n t s w e r e ca r
r ied ou t us ing an ex tenso me te r .
P r inc ipa l s t resses a re shown in the
r i g h t s id e of e a ch f i g u r e , w h e r e m a g -
Table 3
Steel )
platesf
used t
with '
Weld
metals
— Mechanical Properties
B-type
(a
>
electrode
R-type
(a)
electrode
S5 B
S10B
S15B
S20B
S30B
S40B
S5 R
S15R
S40R
of Plates a
Yield
point,
k N / c m
2
33.22
34.30
44.88
44.39
44.59
47.04
47.04
47.04
46.35
44.59
45.77
nd Weld Metals (Test No.
Tensile
st rength,
k N / c m
2
56.25
55.17
57.62
58.80
58.31
59.49
59.49
59.49
56.35
54.19
54.59
2 )
Elonga
t ion,
%
32.4
37.4
21.0
21.0
21.7
19.3
19.3
19.3
17.5
18.5
16.4
\ \
ty
\
\
v
x/8
s^v
§H
{a) B = basic; R = rutile
R
Fig.
6—Shear
stress distribution by Eq.(10)
6 2 - s F E B R U A R Y 1 9 7 4
8/20/2019 WJ_1974_02_s59
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wj197402s59 5/7
n i tudes a re g iven i r respe ct i ve o f the i r
o r i e n t a t i o n .a
x
,
<r
y
a n d T ^ in the
le f t s ide of each f igu re a re the no r ma l
s t r e ss co m p o n e n t p e r p e n d i cu l a r t o
the tens i le face , the no r ma l s t res s
co m p o n e n t p e r p e n d i cu l a r t o t h e
shea r face , and the shea r s t ress
a long tens i le face and shea r face ,
respect i ve ly .
In tes t spec ime n (b) , f r i c t io na l
f o r ce s w i l l b e i n d u ce d w h e n t h e sp e c
im en i s sub jec t to ten s io n ; no f r i c t i on
w i l l appea r in sp ec i me n (a) , bu t som e
a d d i t i o n a l b e n d i n g d u e t o e cce n t r i c i t y
w i l l appea r in th i s case . In the ana ly t
i ca l m o d e l f o r t h e f i n i t e e l e m e n t
ca l cu l a t i o n , h o w e ve r , t h e co n d i t i o n o f
n o g ap b ut n o f r i c t i o n b e t w e e n
con ta c t faces i s assum ed , as seen in
Fig. 8 . The resu l t f rom the f in i te
e lem en t me tho d , F ig . 10 (c ), sh ow s a n
i n t e r m e d i a t e f e a t u r e b e t w e e n t e s t
resu l ts o f (a ) an d (b) , and ta ki ng in to
a cco u n t a b o ve m e n t i o n e d s i t u a t i o n ,
the theo re t i c a l bas is o f the f in i te
e l e m e n t co m p u t a t i o n se e m s t o b e
r e a so n a b l e .
Plastic Behavior
F igu re
11
sh o w s t h e sp r e a d o f t h e
p las t i c zone fo r inc r eas ing load ing
s teps . W he n a ce r ta in load leve l
(T=849 kN) i s exceed ed th e sp rea d o f
t h e y i e l d - f l o w r e g i o n e xp a n d s n o f u r
the r , wh i le the rap id p rog ress o f p las
t i c d e f o r m a t i o n i n t o s t r a i n h a r d e n i n g
range i s obse rved a long a loca l i zed
a r e a ,
w h i ch a p p r o x i m a t e l y co i n c i d e s
w i t h t h e f o r m e r l y p r e d i c t e d b r e a k i n g
p lane .
D is t r ibu t ions o f shea r s t ress a long
the assumed b reak ing p lane RP a re
sh o w n i n F i g . 12 fo r va r iou s load ing
s teps . R
vsults frorr
t h e f i n i t e
:
^ment
method a re g iven in so l id
l i nes ,
fhese
a re d i f fe r en t f ro m the pa t te rn g ive n in
Fig. 6 th e resu l t f ro m the e las t i c
theo ry , and p resen t no s t ress peaks
a t the ends. Ra the r , the y sh ow good
a g r e e m e n t u p t o t h e u l t i m a t e s t a g e
w i th the p red ic t ion g iven by Eq .
(6),
sh ow n by dash ed l i nes in the f igu re .
T h e a b o ve o b se r va t i o n s se e m t o e x
p l a i n t h e r e a so n w h y t h e a p p r o x i m a t e
so lu t io n g iven by Eq . (7 ) can p r ov ide a
sa t i s f a c t o r y e s t i m a t i o n o f t h e a c t u a l
s t r e n g t h o f t h e t r a n sve r se f i l l e t
w e l d e d j o i n t s .
Conclusion
I t h a s b e e n sh o w n t h a t t h e s t r e n g t h
o f t r a n sve r s e f i l l e t w e l d e d j o i n t s
cou ld be es t ima ted by Eq . (7 ) sa t i s fac
to r i l y i n sp i te o f theo re t i c a l sho r t
com ings inv o lved in the bas is o f i t s a r
g u m e n t . A n e l a s t i c - p l a s t i c a n a l ys i s b y
t h e f i n i t e e l e m e n t t e ch n i q u e m a d e
he re in seems to exp la in the reason
w hy the p re d ic t i on by Eq . (7 ) ag rees
w i th tes ts resu l ts and thus to suppo r t
the va l id i t y o f Eq . (7 ) f ro m th e the o re t
ica l s ide .
y>
Start)
fpata
I n p u t
I
—
] P r in t InputJ jataJ
S e t u p Overall S t i f f n e ss
Ma t r i x K
T
4_
Setu p Load Vector F.
Modify
K
T
by Su ppo r t
I C o n d i t i o n
T
S o lve S t i f f n e ss E q u a t i o n
K T - * *
= F
Calcu la te £ . a<T
Determ ine Load Incr em ent — •
Factor,
U
Subrou t ine Inpu t
Subrout ine
D£M(Calculate
D* )
Subrout ine DPM (Ca lcu la te D* )
•Sub rou t ine
QSRM
(Ca lcu la te e lem en t
s t i f f n e ss m a t r i x
K e (
e m
s u p e r p o s e
K
e l e m .
o n K
i )
Subrout ine SOLVE
S u b r o u t i n e LDINCR
Determine Stress, Str a in ,
D isp lac eme nt, e tc . a t th is S tep
<r=<r» ( j * f f ' .
t = E» |j «e
• s
=
s \ i S.
etc. ,
1
Output ResuJisJ Subrout ine PRINT
£ " <r
« » ^ - ~ ~
t
y
e s
1
jt_——
. yes
Stop
Step2>>
' yes
no
..
\
n o ,
— ^ N
<
Output Data Cards
fo r the Next Run
y e s
H 1
N o t a t i o n s .
€
p
= equivalen1 p las t i c s t ra in
e^s p las t i c s t ra in a t the
b e g i n n i n g o f n e c k i n g
f = e q u i va l e n t s t r e s s
0~,
= t ru e s t re ss a t the be g in n in g
o f n e ck i n g
S = d i sp l a c e m e n t ve c t o r
Fig. 7 — Flow chart for computational procedure
T/8
Fig. 8 — Subdivision of the
spec/men
into triangular elements
W E L D I N G R E S E A R C H S U P P L E M E N T l 6 3 - s
8/20/2019 WJ_1974_02_s59
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wj197402s59 6/7
0 t(
20
^ T
Elast ic Range
( T=44t kN )
«-
-->
tens ion
>- -^compression
observed
by Fini te Element M ethod
Fig. 9
—
Distribution of principal stress
L .
J
I ;
(a) Slits Along Contact Faces (b) Plates Closely Contacted (c) Calc ulate d by Finite Elem ent Method
Fig.
10 —
Comparison of stress distributions
985kN
T = 7 7 8 k N
T=840 k N
Ta 849 kN
3 Y i e l d - f l o w R e g i o n
Fig. 11 — Spread of plastic region in a fillet
64-s I F E B R U A R Y 1 9 7 4
Sirain-hardening
Region
6A8kN
5 3 0 k N
319 kN
from Finite Element Method
from Eq.(6)
i
Fig.
12 —
Shear stress distribution ob
tained
by
finite element method
References
1. S p r a r a g e n , W. and Claussen , G. E . ,
S ta t i c Tes ts o f F i l l e t and P lug W e ld s , a
Re v i e w o f L i t e r a t u r e f r o m 1932 t o J a n u a r y
1, 1 9 4 0 , Welding Journal, A p r i l , 1 9 4 2 .
2 . A m e r i c a n W a t e r w o r k s A s s o c i a t i o n
S t a n d a r d f o r S t e e l T a n k s , S t a n d a r d P i p e s ,
Re s e r v o i r s a n d E l e v a t e d T a n k s f o r W a t e r
S t o r a g e , 1 9 5 9
ed . ,
(fo r exam p le ) .
3 . H ig g ins , T . R. an d Preece , F . R., " P r o
p o s e d W o r k i n g S t r e s s f o r F i l le t W e l d s i n
B u i l d i n g C o n s t r u c t i o n , " Engineering Jour
nal,
A I S C , V o l . 6 , No .
1, 1 9 6 9 .
4 .
L i g t e n b e r g , F. K ., I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e s t
S e r i e s , F i n a l Re p o r t , Do c . X V - 2 4 2 - 6 8 ,
I.I.W.,
1 9 6 8 .
5 . K a t o , B . a n d Na k a , T . , " De f o r m a t i o n
a n d S t r e n g t h o f E n d F i l l e t W e l d s , " Jour,
of
the Faculty of Engineering, Un i v e r s i t y o f
T o k y o , V o l . X X V I I I , No . 3 , 1 9 6 6 .
6 . T i m o s h e n k o , S . ,
Theory of Elasticity,
M c G r a w - H i l l Book Co .
7 . Ka to , B . , e t a l . , " U l t i m a t e S t r e n g t h o f
F i l le t W e l d e d J o i n t s , " T r a n s , o f A r c h i t e c
t u r a l I n s t i t u t e o f J a p a n , O c t . 1 9 6 8 , ( i n J a p
anese) .
8 . K a t o , B . a n d M o r i t a , K „ T h e S t r e n g t h
o f F i l l e t W e l d e d J o i n t s , Do c . X V - 2 6 7 - 6 9 ,
I.I.W., 1 9 6 9 .
9 . Pope , G. G. , "T he App l i ca t i o n o f the
M a t r i x D i s p l a c e m e n t M e t h o d i n P l a n e
E las to -P las t i c P rob lems , " P roc . o f the C o n
f e r e n c e h e l d a t W r i g h t - P a t t e r s o n A i r
Fo rce Base , Oh io , Oc t . 19 65 .
1 0 . Y a m a d a , Y „ e t a l , "P l a s t i c S t r e s s -
S t r a i n M a t r i x a n d i t s A p p l i c a t i o n f o r t h e
So lu t i on o f E las t i c -P las t i c P rob lems by the
F i n i te E l e m e n t M e t h o d , International Jour
nal of Mechanical Sciences, Vo l . 10 , No .
5 , M a y , 1 9 6 8 .
1 1 . K a t o , B . a n d A o k i , H . , "D e f o r m a t i o n
Ca p a c i t y o f S t e e l P l a t e E l e m e n t s , " P u b l i c a
t i o n s o f I A B S E , V o l . 3 0 - I , Z u r i c h ,
1 9 7 0 .
1 2 . K a t o , B . , e t a l , "U l t i m a t e S t r e n g t h o f
T r a n s v e r s e F i l l e t W e l d e d J o i n t s , " Trans,
of Architectural Institute of Japan, A u g u s t ,
1 9 6 9 ,
( i n Japanese ) .
1 3 .
B i e r e t t , G . a n d G r i i n i n g , G . , " S p a n -
n u n g s z u s t a n d u n d F e s t i g k e i t v o n S t i r n -
k e h l n a h t v e r b i n d u n g e n ,
Stahlbau,
1 0 ,
1 9 3 3 .
8/20/2019 WJ_1974_02_s59
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/wj197402s59 7/7
WRC Bul le t in
No. 184
Ju n e
1973
" S u b m e r g e d - A r c - W e l d H a r dn e s s a n d
Crack ing in W et Sul f ide Se rv ice "
by D. J. Kotecki and D. G. How den
This s tudy was under taken to dete rmine:
(1) The causes of higher-than-normal hardness in submerged-arc welds in p la in-
carbon steels
(2) The levels of st rength or hardness which will not be susceptible to sulf ide-
cor rosion c racking
(3) Welding proc edur es whic h will ass ur e tha t nonsusc eptible welds will be
produced.
Concent ra t ion i s p r imar i ly on weld metal , though some considera t ion to the
weld heat-affected zone is given. The study covered a two-year period. The f i rst
year was concerned wi th a macroscopic v iew of the weldments . In that f i r s t -year
s tudy, some inhomogenei t ies were observed in weldments which a re not obvious
in a macroscopic view of the weldment. It appeared l ikely that these
inhomogeneit ies could affect the behavior of the weldment in aqueous hydrogen-
sulf ide serv i ce . Ac cor dingly , thei r p r esenc e and effec ts w ere invest igated dur in g
the second year .
The price of WRC Bullet in 184 is $3.50 per copy. Orders should be sent to the
Welding Researc h Counc il , 345 Ea st 47th Stree t , New York, N.Y. 10017.
WRC Bul le t in
No.
185
July
1973
" I m p r o v e d D i s c o n t in u i t y D e t e c t i o n U s in g
Computer-
Aided U l t rasonic Pulse -Echo Techniques"
by
J.
R. Frederick an d J. A. Seydel
The purpose of th is p ro jec t , sponsored by the Pressure Vessel Research Com
mit tee of the Welding Research Counci l , was to invest igate means fo r obta in ing
improved charac te r izat ion of the s ize , shape and locat ion of subsurface d is
cont inui t ies in metals . This objec t ive was met by applying computer ized data-
processing techniques to the s ignal obta ined in convent ional u l t rasonic pulse-
echo sy stems. The pr inc ipal benef i t s w ere improved s ignal- to-noise ra t io and
resolution.
The price of WRC Bullet in 185 is $3.50 per copy. Orders should be sent to the
Welding Resear ch Counc il , 345 E as t 47th Str eet , New York, N.Y. 10017.