MODERN TECHNOLOGIES IN LEARNING; NEW PEDAGOGY – NEW EVALUATION Jarmo Ritalahti Principal lecturer HAAGA-HELIA UAS IEFE 2013, 20 February 2013
LIST OF CONTENT 1. HAAGA-HELIA UAS 2. PORVOO CAMPUS
1. General 2. Development project 3. Campus concept 4. Campus competences
3. PEDAGOGY 4. EVALUATION
1. HAAGA-HELIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
Business university with over 40 degree programmes Bachelor and master programmes In three languages (Finnish, Swedish and English) Over 10 000 students, and 700 staff members Over 1 000 international students in degree programme 190 partner universities all over the world Four units in Helsinki, and two in the metropolitan area
1. HAAGA-HELIA UNOVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
2. PORVOO CAMPUS 2.1 General
1 000 students, and 60 staff members Business and tourism programmes in three languages (Finnish, Swedish and English) Sales and services in tourism, business tarvel and travel management, accounting, export mana- ment 100 international students in degree programmes
2.2 Devolopment project – the need
Regional developent,
town development, industry co-
operation
Porvoo unit’s own
profile
Need for new
space
2.2 Development project – three parallel and linked development processes in Porvoo
Porvoo Campus
Artfactory
Western riverbank
2.2 Development project – Campus vision
Living Lab for Creavity, Learning and Innovatons
Workshop
1
Workshop
3
Workshop
2
2.2 Deveolpment project – internal projects at HAAGA-HELIA UAS in Porvoo
Porvoo Campus
Campus vision
Campus building
Campus CV and learning
2.2 Development project – Constructive research Working group -
research
Academic and supportive staff
Trend analysis, brainstorming, learning cafés,
industry interviews, etc.
Working group - analysis
New curriculum and tools to
enhance learning
2.2 Development process – basic concepts
HH’s basic values
Inquiry learning
Perception of know-ledge, man and learning
HH’s strategies
Mega-trends
Lear-ning in the future
CV- con-cept
Compe-tences
Visions (HH & Campus)
2.2 Megatrends in development work Ageing population Economics of global knowledge Changing networks Sustainable development Lifelong learning Information flood Are they valid in Saudi Arabia as well?
2.3 Campus concept
Porvoo Campus
Campus vision
Pedagogical approach and competences
Campus architecture and design
Lear-ning for the future
2.3 Campus concept New curricula for six degree programmes in business and tourism in three languages based on joint meta- and procfessional competences Real life projects where co-operation focuses on the fields of tourism, wellbeing, KIBS, and creative sector All the stakeholders are learners (students, members of the academic staff, and commissioners
2.3 Campus concept Semester projects Personal lap-tops Focus on learning New methods to enhance learning Operational environment includes inhabitants and visitors > in the near future also volontary work
2.4 Campus competences Meta-competences (i.e.)
Learn to
learn Net-
working
Inter-action
Commit-ment
Attitude Respon-sibility
2.4 Campus competences Business competences (i.e.)
Communication skills
Operational environment
Production and selling services
Social and collaboration
skills
Business and entrepreneurial
skills
2.4 Campus competences Students develop their professional skills and the generic meta-competences needed in work life through the following three phases:
1. Adaption 2. Application’ 3. Development
The competences and skills of the students develop in an integrated way when they work in projects that provide increasing challenges as the studies advance
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
19
3 Campus pedagogy – inquiry learning
Learning
1. Defining the development
task and problem
2. Constructing the aims and
content for the implementation
plan
3. Agreeing on the theoretical
framework
4. Working together to
build knowledge
5. Reflection
6. Knowledge sharing
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
20
3 Campus pedagogy – steps in inquiry learning First step: Defining the development task and problem:
Preliminary plan to implement the semester (tasks, courses, resources, partners, etc.) discussed by the teacher team Second step: Constructing the aims and content of the implementation plan:
Commission and preliminary project plan is introduced to students Structured students discussions in small groups Collecting and filtering data (literature, interviews, brainstorming, benchmarking, etc.) Result workshop Final development task and aims
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
21
3 Campus pedagogy – steps in inquiry learning Step three: Agreeing on theoretical framework
Lectures, guest lectures, company visit, literature lists and reading, literature circles, essays, theory presentations, final implementation plan
Step four: Working together to build knowledge
Workshops, consultations, clinics, lectures, team meetings, commissioner meetings, stakeholder meetings, diaries, documentation, imolementation
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
22
3 Campus Pedagogy – Inquiry learning Step five: Reflection
Written self and team reflection Feedback meetings (critical, giving and receiving) Future developments
Step six: Knowledge sharing
Final reports, projects serminars, skills demontrations, articles and publications, conference participation, open doors
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
23
4 Evaluation Students are evaluated in business and meta- competences Teachers are evaluated in course (HAAGA-HELIA) and semester feedbacks (Porvoo Campus) Commissioners get also polite feedback in final discussions
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
24
4 Evaluation In general, students are evaluated by teachers, peers, and themselves in
- attendendance - participation, activity - success in project roles - performance in i.e. exams, essays, and presentations (teachers)
at course and semester levels
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
25
4 Evaluation
Learning and assessment portfolio (a tool to follow learning and archive/collect results of semester work)
- Built/collected by individual student - Includes samples of learning experiences - Collection of learning products for further use - Encourages for more organised learning - Visualises learning - Improves knowledge, social skills and personal and professional identities - Portfolio is assessed in scale 1 - 5
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
26
4 Evaluation Feedback session (about one hour per group)
- Description of learning process by learning modules - Experiences in the commissioned project and learning - Description of own learning motivation - Self and peer assessment - Development suggestions for the semester concerned
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
27
4 Evaluation Evaluation criteria for peer-to-peer assessment (two examples):
- Grade and rationalise you and your team members in scale 1 – 5 according your work, participation and contribution for the success of your task - Grade you and your team members in the project in scale 1 – 5; name positive sides, and development targets
10.11.2006 Malli kalvopohjasta
28
THANK YOU! QUESTIONS?
Recommended