Upload
stanislav-ivanov
View
119
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Students’ involvement in real business projects – challenges and opportunities, IUC experience
Citation preview
Miroslava Dimitrova Ph.D
Stanislav Ivanov Ph.D
International University College, Bulgaria
1
Content Project management as a part of students’ curriculum
Trans Tour Net
Enterprise project – a good example
2
Project management as a part of students’ curriculum
Compulsory subject for all students
2 ECTS credits
Part of Entrepreneurship module
Linkages with Enterprise project
Opportunities for students to participate in EU
projects in rural tourism and regional development
3
Trans Tour Net
4
Trans-border destination as a concept
5
Dobrudzha as a trans-border tourist destination
ca. 23000 sq. km
Divided between Bulgaria and Romania
Bordering Danube river and Black sea
4 administrative regions – Dobrich and Silistra (in Bulgaria), Constanta and Tulcea (in Romania)
6
Development of five tourist routes around 50 most attractive sites
Cultural/historical route
Traditional crafts route
Culinary route
Eco route
Festival route
7
Students involved in Trans Tour Net 70 third year students from two streams:
Students from Marketing and Management of Hospitality and Tourism
Students from Marketing and Management
Date of involvement: 06.12.10 – 20.01.11
Type of involvement: Coursework in Marketing and Management of Tourist Destination (MMTD)
Group assignment: 7 groups of 8-11 students
8
Description of the assignment in MMTD
Development of three themed package tours for each of the following special interest types of tourism: cultural, eco, festival, culinary, traditional crafts
Assessment and selection of most important tourist sites
Recommendations for improvement
Lecturers in MMTD: Miroslava Dimitrova, Ph.D and Stanislav Ivanov, Ph.D
9
Main objectives of the assignment To carry out a research of the most important tourist sites in Bulgarian
and Rumanian parts of Dobrudzha (total of 100 – 150 sites) To evaluate the sites according to previously elaborated assessment
model approved by the lecturers To select the 50 most attractive tourist sites To make site visits (if possible) To evaluate the existing infra- and super- structure (roads condition,
accessibility, accommodation etc) To prepare three alternative package tours for each of the five routes,
targeting various groups of tourists (including analysis of the marketing mix of the packages and calculations)
To give recommendations for improvement of the sites management and marketing
To prepare coursework: word file (10 000 words and photos of the sites) and Power Point Presentation (20-30 slides)
10
Criteria for assessment of prospective sites
Site attractiveness, image and uniqueness
Site condition (maintenance)
Opportunity for sustainable tourism development
Site’s contribution to cross-border cooperation
Accessibility (roads condition, accommodation in the vicinity, tourist information centers etc)
Students determine the weights and values of each criterion
11
Assignment Schedule № Task Deadline
1 Presentation of the assignment, explanation, discussion 06.12.10
2 Teams of students to be presented before the lecturers 07.12.10
3. Development of assessment criteria and model of evaluation for the
sites' attractiveness
10.12.10
4. Preliminary research and presentation of the selected sites (20-30 per
group)
13.12.10
5. Presentation of the selected sites and three alternative routes per
group (including Marketing Mix of the packages and calculation)
20.12.10
6. Sites visits, photos, visits of prospective accommodation sites, tourist
information sites etc
20.12.10-16.01.11
7. Development of coursework assignment in two formats: text file and
PPT presentation
20.12.10-16.01.11
8. Consultation on the Project 03-14.01.11
9. Submission of the assignment 17.01.11
9. Defense of the assignment before a jury of experts from Tourism and
Projects departments
20.01.11
12
Assignment assessment
№ Element for assessment Type of
assessment
% of total
mark
date
1. Preliminary research of the
tourist sites
group 10 13.12.10
2. Presentation of the
preliminary selected tourist
routes
group 10 20.12.10
3. Coursework – text file group 50 20.01.11
4. PPT presentation group 10 20.01.11
5. Defense (oral presentation) individual 20 20.01.11
6. Total 100 13
Outcomes of students’ involvement in the project
Seven courseworks were presented
Three group site visits were conducted
More than 25 different routes were suggested and formed as package tours (some of the teams have elaborated more than three packages)
More than 120 sites were researched through site visits, interviews, secondary research of printed materials, web-sites, textbooks and articles
Marks varied from 3.50 – 5.50 out of 6.00
14
Evaluation of the students' involvement
Survey was conducted in April 2011
67 students completed questionnaires (in Bulgarian)
Results show: The majority of students (78%) fully support the idea of
students’ involvement in real business projects
students find that their involvement in project was very useful (rating it 3.9 out of 5)
marking was fair and marking criteria was clear (rating it 3,5 out of 5)
MMTD course contributed to their overall proficiency (rating it 3,7 out of 5 with a standard deviation of 1,2)
15
Evaluation of the students' involvement
Obstacles before the students during their involvement in the project (results from the survey):
not enough time for assignment completion (39 / 58%)
budget restrictions (33 / 49%)
unfavorable weather conditions (32 / 48%)
gaps in communication between students – lecturers – Projects department (23 / 34%)
language barrier (11 / 16%)
16
Benefits for the students from their involvement:
better knowledge of Dobrudzha region and its tourist resources (57 / 85%)
team building (28 / 42%)
having fun (27 / 40%)
project management expertise (21 / 31%)
improvement of presentation skills (19 / 28%)
travel opportunity (12 / 18%)
Evaluation of the students' involvement
17
The students’ perspective (recapitulation)
The Project Department’s perspective (based on interview with Project’s coordinator Gergana Dimitrova)
The lecturers’ perspective
Evaluation of the students' involvement
18
Enterprise project – a good example Krasnodar Karakashev, Tatarski Khan, Onogur village
19
Thank you for the attention!
20