-
- 71 -
*1)2)
**
.
.
1.
2.
. ,
1.
2. - 3. . -
, .
, , . () ,
( )
.
. .
() ,
* 2007 () (KRF-2007-361
-AM0046) .
** HK
-
72 54
- 72 -
()
. .
, . ,
. , .
.
.
, , , , , .
-
73
- 73 -
.
( ) 100 ,
. 6 7
,
1)
(
) ,
2)
.
2-30
. ( ),
,
3) (?535?)
(?508515?)
.
.
,
.
1) , 2- : , , 2009, p.29, p.64 93) . (5, 1974) , . (p.75) .
.(p.87) . (), , .
, , .(, 77, p.826) .2) 1938 () ,pp.2847 .
3) ,
.
-
74 54
- 74 -
, .
.
. ,
,
.
. 2
.
.
,4) . , .
. , .
.
3 . ,
. ,
.
4) , , 22, 2004.
-
75
- 75 -
.
1.
, .
1981 5) ,
1 2 2 . , ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
,
, .
2-30
6)
5) , -, , 1981.6) .(.
[1990(A)]
.)
, ,, , 1990(A)., , 29, 1990(B)., -, 1993(A)., , 37, 1993(B)., ,
32-1, 1983., , 33-2, 1985(A).
-
76 54
- 76 -
,
.
(, 1985) 1990 .
.
7)
, , (
) , , .
[1993(B)]
8)
. , , .
9)
. [1994]
10)
,, , 1985(B)., , 72, 1986., , , , , 1990. , , 102, 2001(A). , ,
44/1, 2001(B). , , 20, 2002. , , 21, 2003. , , 22, 2004. , , ,
2005., , , 1994., : NGSM , 52-1, 2003., - , () , , 2004., , 45-1,
2002., -- , , , 2000.
7) [1990], p.363.
8) [1993(B)], p.43.
9) , p.44.
10) [1994] , p.295.
-
77
- 77 -
, -
-
.
11)
. 12) , .
NGSM , , , ,
.
13)
14)
. ,
.
,
,
11) [2004].
12) , [2002][2004]. 2008 3
. ,
.
13) 2005 , , ) p.64 .( 1 .) [2004].
14) [2000], pp.154155.
-
78 54
- 78 -
.
.
,
.
2.
,
.
.
.
, .
.
,
. .
,
. ,
.
. .
-
79
- 79 -
.
,
15)
, .
,
.
, .
,
, .
.
.
. ,
.
.
.
,
. .
15) [2002], p.60.
-
80 54
- 80 -
,
.
1.
(711782)
.
. ,
.
. .
, .
.
16)
,()
.
.
17)
(499569) (602664)
, 18) . , .
19)
,
16) , , 33, p.942, . , , . , , . , , .
, , . , , .
17) , ,2, , 1988, pp.95105., , 93, , 1997.18) , 46, p.54, , . ,
. , , . . , .
.
-
81
- 81 -
, .
20)
.
(538597) 21) 22) . ,
, 1
, ,
.
23)
24)
,
.
25)
.
. .
, . , , ,
. , , . ,
. , , , . .
26)
, ,
19) , 33, p.792, , , ,.20) [1988], p.117.
21) , 38, p.528, , , . , . , .. .
22) 18 .
23) [1997], pp.3031.
24) , , ,
. .( , p.528)
, .
25) [1997].
26) 38, p.549.
-
82 54
- 82 -
.
27)
,
.
.
, .
, (523592) 28) .
.
. ,
,
.
,
. ,
.
.
2. -
.
a) ! .
, ,
. , .
29)
27) [1997].
28) 85, p.237 1-71-2, p.145.29) , 16, p.556c, . , . , , . , ,
.
-
83
- 83 -
b) ,
.
30)
c) ! .
, .
31)
d) ! , ,
() .
32)
e) ,
.
33)
a) b) .
. a)
, , b)
.
, a)
.
c) ,
.
. 7 , 8
. d)
c) .
e) .
,
.
,
.
. 8
30) , , . , , .
31) , . , . , , .
32) , p.522, , . , .
33) , p.556, , , .
-
84 54
- 84 -
, 7 (7)
34)
, .
.
,
, , .
, .
,
35)
. ,
. [1997]
(557-581) . .
. . . . , ,
. . , . , , .
36)
,
. , ,
.
,
.
37)
,
.
,
. ,
. ,
.
34) [1997], p.32.
35) , [1997],
(75, 1987) (, 2000) - (-, 2004) .
36) 56, pp.331332.37) [1997], p.37.
-
85
- 85 -
()
, .
,
.
,
.
, .
,
.
.
. , ,
. ,
,
. .
3.
?
38)
.
38)
-
86 54
- 86 -
, . , , , .
, .
39)
,
. ,
. a)
b) .
, ,
.
40)
.
. .
, .
.41) .
,
, ,
.
? ,
, .
, ()
.( , 81, 2002) .
39) , 32, p.576.40) , (44, p.182), , . , . . , . , .
, (44, p.208), , , , ., . , , ,
. , , , . , .
, (44, p.254), , , . , . , , , ,
. , .
41) [2002] .
-
87
- 87 -
. ,
.
, ,
, ,
, ,
. ?
.
, () . ,
, .
42)
( ) .
43)
,
.
. ,
, .
,
,
44)
.()
.()
42) , 32, p.580, , , , ,, , . ?
, . , ,
, , . , , ,
. , , , , , ,
, , . . ,
. , . ,
.
43) [2004], p.60.
44) 40 .
-
88 54
- 88 -
,
. ,
.
.
. -
.
. .
,
.
.
.
.
,
.
, .
,
.
-
89
- 89 -
, , 16. , , 32. , , , 2009., , 44., , 44., , 44., -, , 1981., ,
, 1938., , , 1994.
, ,, , 1990(A)., , 29, 1990(B)., -,1993(A)., , 37, 1993(B)., ,
32-1, 1983., , 33-2, 1985(A).,, , 1985(B)., , 72, 1986., , , , ,
1990., ,93, , 1997., -- , , , 2000., , 2, , 1988., , 81, 2002. , ,
102, 2001(A). , , 44/1, 2001(B). , , 20, 2002.
-
90 54
- 90 -
, , 21, 2003. , , 22, 2004. , , , 2005., :NGSM , 52-1., - ,( ) ,
, 2004.
, , 5, 1974., , 45-1, 2002.
-
91
- 91 -
Abstract
An Objection to the Argument of the Composition of the Awakening
of Faith in Mahayana within the
Dilun School
Seok, Gil-Am
It is not easy to make clear the relation between the Awakening
of Faith in
Mahayana (abridged into the Awakening below) and the other
sutras and shastras
translated by Bodhiruci and Ratnamati in the Dilun school.
However, according to
some results from recent philological approaches in Japanese
academia, the terms
and styles of sentences in their translation show many cases of
comparability
beyond similarity. This appears to evidence very strongly the
writing of the
Awakening by Bodhiruci or someone, near to him, belonging to the
northern
school of the Dilun, dissolving the previous argument of its
writing by the
southern school of Dilun.
Nevertheless, the doctrinal discrepancies between the Awakening
of Faith in
Mahayana and the Dilun school make it uncomfortable for us to
agree with the
above observation. Here, the writer examines the cases of
contrast, unlike the
previous researches focused upon the cases of similarity,
between the Awakening
of Faith in Mahayana and the Dilun school.
First of all, unlike the accepted theory that the theories of
consciousness are
different between the southern and the northern school of the
Dilun, the theory of
consciousness in the southern school turns out to be rather
based upon the sutras
and shastras translated by Bodhiruci who is the originator of
the northern school.
According to this result, the passages of the Awakening asserted
previously to be
similar to the corresponding passages of the texts translated by
Bodhiruci turns
out not to be so, but to be attempts to exclude any possibility
of doctrinal
misinterpretation in those corresponding passages. In addition,
unlike The
-
92 54
- 92 -
Awakening's strong intention to comprehend the Mahayana, the
texts of the
school of the Dilun have no such intention, whose clearness also
shows the
doctrinal gap between them.
Therefore, the terminological accordance between the Awakening
and the Dilun
school does not lead necessarily into their doctrinal
accordance, which requires
more comprehensive comparative analysis of their doctrines,
including Sanskrit
Yogacara texts.
Key WordsAwakening of Faith in Mahayana , the Dilun school ,
tathgatagarbha , Alya-Consciousness, Bodhiruci , Ratnamati .
: 2010 1 25, : 2010 2 5,
: 2010 2 10.
