Принципы уголовного права

  • View
    216

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

(- ) / .. // . 2008. 4. .27-30.

Transcript

  • . . 7726168 17.11.2007. .

    42008

    : , ,

    : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , : , , , : , , , , : , , , , , , , , , , (-) ..: .., .../.: (495) 9539108Email: avtor@ibb.ru : .../.: (495) 9539120 : 36922; 99629. : 125057, . , / 15 19.11.2008 .

    .., ..-. ..............3 M. ...............16

    .., .. , : ...................19 .., .. - : - ............22 .. - .................24

    .. (- ) ..............27 .. ...........31 .. - ...............................33

    ...................................36

    , 2008 . .................39

  • 2 4 2008

    , - . -, -, - , , , - , - , , . , , - : - , , - , - - , -- . , - .

    , , , -

    -, - - .

    ..,

    1 , , - 1999 ., 2001 .

    2 .: .., .., .., - .., .. (-). ., 2002. . 60.

    3 .: -: . . 2. ., 2000. . 7588.

    4 .: - 17 2001 . 1 // - . ., 2003. . 201.

    5 .: .. // - : . . 1. ., 1993. . 9.

    (- )

    ThE PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAw (COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALySIS)

    The article deals with the comparative legal analysis of the principles of criminal law. The principles of criminal law are guidances and foundations that form the branch of criminal law and influence the policy of the state in the sphere of criminal law. Their comparative analysis is necessary to find out similarities and differences that exist in the systems of criminal law of different countries. Such analysis can be used for classification of systems of criminal law and for studying of peculiarities of criminal law of a certain historic period.

    , , , - . - , -- 1. -- , - , .

    - - , - - 2. , - , , - 2 (1935 .) . 16 (1926 .), (, - ), -

    - - 3.

    -. - :

    pa e, poena ee ee - pa e, poena ee ee - pa e, poena ee ee -pa e, poena ee ee - e, poena ee ee -e, poena ee ee -, poena ee ee - poena ee ee - poena ee ee -poena ee ee - ee ee -ee ee - ee -ee - -, ;

    ream orpore non a n men rea -ream orpore non a n men rea - orpore non a n men rea -orpore non a n men rea - non a n men rea -non a n men rea - a n men rea -a n men rea - n men rea -n men rea - men rea -men rea - rea -rea - -, ;

    non n em -non n em - n em - n em - n em -n em - em -em - - ;

    nemo e exr -nemo e exr - e exr -e exr - exr -exr - - ;

    poena onr n emenaonem omnm -- ; ; ; ; ; ;;;

    pro menra e e on enm e -pro menra e e on enm e - menra e e on enm e -menra e e on enm e - e e on enm e -e e on enm e - e on enm e -e on enm e - on enm e -on enm e - enm e -enm e - e -e - - -4.

    - . - , - . -

  • 2

    3 (1998 .), - . - - , . .

    , - - (nm rmen, n poena ne ee), -nm rmen, n poena ne ee), - rmen, n poena ne ee), -rmen, n poena ne ee), -, n poena ne ee), -n poena ne ee), - poena ne ee), -poena ne ee), - ne ee), -ne ee), - ee), -ee), -), - . , , , - , , - -. , - -. ( , , , ) , , , . , , , - .

    , , - - , - .

    , ( -- ) . , . , . 287 , . , - - - ( ), (40 . ). - . 48 , , - . - , . , , , . .

    . 276 - , , - . - , , .

    - - . , - 1973 . , , , -

    , , - (. 7). , - . . 18 , - , , - , .

    , - - , - (nm rmen, na poena nenm rmen, na poena ne rmen, na poena nermen, na poena ne, na poena nena poena ne poena nepoena ne nene pa). (-). (-) , .

    - , .. - , - . - (, , , , -) , - , - . - . - . - - ( , , - ), . - .

    6 , . . - , - () - , . , - . - - .

    - 15.10 -, - - ( ), - . - - - , -. -

  • 2 4 2008

    , - .

    , - - . , , - , , - , , - , , .

    - - , - . , , , . , - - . 1930 . - . - , -- , , . -, . - , , - 5.

    , -, . - . , ( , ) . - -- .

    , , , ( , , , ) () , , .

    20.20 - - -, :

    , ;

    , (, - .);

    , -, , - -, .

    , , - . , - . - ,

    .

    (norao non exe) -norao non exe) - non exe) -non exe) - exe) -exe) -) - . - . (, , , -) , , , -, . - - . , . 122-3 - , , - , , , - . , (- , ) - -. , , -, 6.

    - . . : - , , -... , - , -, . - , , -, . , - , - , - 7.

    - , - . , , - , -- . , - , - , , - . - . , , - , . - , - , - , , -, - , -, - 8.

    .

  • 0

    . , , .. - - -, - . - . , , -, (, ) . -, , , -9.

    - , - -, - .

    (nonnon n em) n em) n em) em) em) ) . ( - ) - . - . . 10 , , - - , - , ; - -, - . , , - .

    () - . 3 , - , .

    , , - -, non n em, non n em, n em, n em, n em, n em, em, em, , - - .

    , -- - -, - . -- - - , .

    .., ,

    () ,

    1 . : or . rnpe o rmna a. xor, 2003; .. .. , - : - . ., 2003.

    2 ., : ., ., . . ., 2001.

    3 .: .. - : // - . 2008. 3. . 1419.

    4 . : .. . ., 2003.

    5 .: .. . ., 2000. . 141.6 . : : // --

    . 1995. 38. . 83.

    7 ., .. . ., 1998. . 381.

    8 . : .. en rea - . ., 2003. . 390394.

    9 remona . rmna a. onon, 1989. . 220.

  • 2

    , - , .

    - , - . , - - -. , , - , - . , , - , -, .

    , , - , e ao - ao -ao - - , - .

    , , - . , - , , . - (-), - , 30 ( -, , ..). , - .

    , , 23, - , , , -.

    , - , -, - (-), , - .

    , , - - , , , - 30 .

    - . 285 - , - , . - 21.01.1999 . - . -

    - - , - , - .

    .. , -, - , , - . , , , -, , 30 .

    , , - , - ( - . 285 ), , - 30 , , -, .

    ..,

    1 .: .. -: 2 . 1: . ., 2004. . 110.

    2 ., : .. : - . ., 1974. . 5865; : / . .. , .. . ., 1994. . 190.

    3 .. - . ., 2006. . 1213.

    4 .. - - // : : -- / . . .. . ., 2006; (19632007 .). ., 2008. . 689.

  • 4 2008

    - , , - . - , - . , . 2 . 1 -: . - , , - - , . , - -, () . , - , - - . - - . , -. -, rmen repenarm (rmen repenarm ( repenarm (repenarm ( ( ). : 1) - - ; 2) , ; 3) , , -- .

    - -: 1) exoron, .. -exoron, .. -, .. -

    ; 2) anae -anae - - - ; 3) onon, .. -onon, .. -, .. - ; 4) menae -menae - - - 1. - , . - , , , 2.

    , , - , . , 2 1 - 2 ; - 23 , - , , , 3. , -, . -- , .

    - - . , . 312-1 , - - , -, , 4. -- , - , -. , - : ) , , - ; ) -

    -

    COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALySIS OF REGULATION OF RESPONSIBILITy FOR ExTORTION AND BLACkMAIL IN ThE FOREIGN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION

    oreign states have gained considerable experience in the field of prosecution of extortion and blackmail. The analysis of this experience is necessary for Russian criminal law, because integration processes have made Russia part of international legal field. In the given article the author analyses peculiarities of regulation of responsibility for extortion and blackmail in the criminal legislation in some foreign states such as rance, Germany, Holland and others.

  • , - ; ) , ; ) ; ) -, , . - . , , - - . 1 . 317 , : , - , -, - , , - , , , - . - . 196 -, . 156 , . 249 , . 282 5 .

    , -: ) ; ) - ( ); ) . -