799
ВАРНЕНСКИ СВОБОДЕН УНИВЕРСИТЕТ ЧЕРНОРИЗЕЦ ХРАБЪРПРИЛОЖНА ПСИХОЛОГИЯ И СОЦИАЛНА ПРАКТИКА XII Международна научна конференция Университетско издателство 2013

ПРИЛОЖНА ПСИХОЛОГИЯ И СОЦИАЛНА ПРАКТИКАvfu.bg/dokladi_ot_konferentsii/files/Psihologia-2013.pdf · 5 УЧИЛИЩНА ПСИХОЛОГИЯ И ПСИХОЛОГИЯ

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • XII

    2013

  • 2

    - , . , . , - .

    -, 2013 , , 2013 , , 2013

    ISSN 13140507

  • 3

    2013 . .................... 10

    ( ) . ... ............................................................ 22

    . - ................................. 33

    , ,

    ................ 44

    ................................... 55

    PR- PR : ..................................................... 64

    .............................. 73

    - ................................................................... 84

    ........................................................ 91

    , , ....................... 101

  • 4

    ................................................. 109

    .......................................................... 121

    ................................. 131

    , ................................................................................... 141

    ........... 150

    ..................................................................................... 163

    , ..................................... 173

    ..................................................................................... 189

    , ........................................... 204

    ( ) ............................................................................ 213

    .......................................................................... 220

    ................................................................... 226

    - ( - ) ................................................................................... 234

  • 5

    ,

    ................................................................. 286

    ..................................................................... 296

    ...................................... 305

    - ........................................................................................ 320

    ........................................................................... 337

    ................................................. 342

    , . ................................ 357

    ......................... 364

    ......................................................... 380

    e ............................................. 389

    .................................................................................... 399

    ......................................................................... 409

  • 6

    , ...................................................... 422

    , , , ..................................................... 432

    ..................... 447

    - ............... 461

    -, , ............................................................................ 478

    -, , ............................................. 484

    . . ................. 491

    .................. 518

    ( , ) .................... 547

    . () . . ...................... 561

    . ... -, . . ... 569

    ............... 579

  • 7

    , , PR,

    - , , ..................... 588

    Authenticity Scale (AS) Authenticity Inventory (AI-3) , ................................................... 607

    : , , ................................................... 623

    -............. 639

    , .................................................................................. 654

    , .......................... 666

    Where do youth violence prevention needs and services meet in Nashville? Implementing spatial analysis to a social and policy issue Nikolay Mihaylov...................................................................... 675

    .................................................................................. 688

    - .................................................................... 701

  • 8

    : .............................................................................. 709

    . , . ............. 725

    ................................................................................. 737

    The special features of work of the psychologists of the Ministry of Emergencies of Ukraine during the liquidation of the house explosion consequences in Dniepropetrovsk Onishchenko Natalia Viktorovna.......................................................... 746

    Peculiarities of rendering emergency psychological help to the employees of the Ukraine State Service of Emergencies, taking into consideration professional superstitions Borisova Natalia................................................................................... 754

    Modeling of the psychological safety of the personality of the specialist of extreme activity using psycho semantic method Prykhodko Ihor ..................................................................................... 761

    - - ................................ 770

    .................................... 780

    -, , ............................................. 785

    -, , ............................................................................ 793

  • 9

  • 10

    2013 .

    Abstract: The paper is an attempt at social-psychological analysis of the happenings of self-immolations in the country in the period February to March 2013. It advocates that they were suicide attempts in the cluster. Due to the specific expression of the effect of Werther and the particular socio-psychological situation due to the protests and their media coverage. Emphasis is placed on some media suggestions and statements of politicians and experts, leading to increased emotional reactivity, subjective perception of social problems and their impact on the mass activity part of which are the said suicide attempts.

    Keywords: Effect of Werther, social problem, suicide, mass cluster, emulation suicide , mob, media,

    ,

    . , , - , - , . - , 1. , , - 2. - , , - , .

    , , . ? , . , ,

    1 11.04.2013 . : . 2 , . . .

  • 11

    3. - - , , . , - . - - , , . , , , . - , . .

    4? :

    , , , . 18.02.2013 . 26- - . 20.02.2013 . 36- , . . 26 . 53- . 15 , . . 51- , . 20 40- . , . - . 24 73- ,

    3 , - , , - , -, , , -. 4 . , .

  • 12

    , 5. 27.03. 48- , - .

    . , , , .. . - point cluster, mass cluster- 6. , . - . , . . 1962 ., - , 12 % (200 .). 1978 79 . - 80 , . - , 2010 . .. .

    (cpycat) - . , 70- 20. - -. , , 7.

    , .

    5 ( ) 27.03, , , - , . 6 The Cultural Dynamics of copycat suicide. Alex Mesoudi 2009. www.plosone.org 7 , . , , , . . . ., 2005, . 241.

  • 13

    , ( ) , 8. .

    ? 2013 2009. , , . , 200 , - - , - 243. , - . - , . , , . , ... .10 -, . - 11. , . , , copycat . 12. , - , . , , , . , , 13

    8 . . , . 244. 9 - . 03.04.2013 . 10 . . . . , 2005, . 240. 11 - , . . . 12 , , . . . 13 Mesoudi, . The Cultural Dynamics of copycat suicide. PLOS ONE.2009.

  • 14

    . 14 , , .

    , - . 15 , , , , - . - , acting out .16

    ? e , .

    - , . , , . - . , - 17. 14 , , , , , . 15 , , , , 47 () , - , . . Sisosk, M. Varnik, D. Media Roles in Suicide Prevention. A systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 123-138. , 6 . , . 16 , - . . . 17 , , . . .

  • 15

    , ? , - . - 18 . - , . 19, - , . , - , . , , -, , . , , , - . ? 20 - . , - 21. , 22 - . - , . . ,

    18 . . . . , 1995, . 14-22. 19 , . .. 20 . . . ., . 225. 21 , , , , . . . 22 . . . ., . 225.

  • 16

    . - , , , . , 23 - .

    24. , , , , , . . , .

    , , - . , - . - . 25. , . , . - , ,

    23 , , . . . . ., . 237. 24 . , . , , , . . . . 25 , , . . .

  • 17

    26. , , . , 27. , , . , , . . , - . - , , - - 28. . - , , , -. , , - . , , - , - . -, , . .

    , - . ,

    26 , . , . .. . 27 , . . . 28 . - , - , , , . . .

  • 18

    , 29. - , , 30 .

    . , 31. . , , .

    , , , , , - . - . , . - , .

    , , , - . - , 32. :

    1. . , .

    2. , . 29 . . . ., . 230. 30 . . . 31 . . . 32 - , . . .

  • 19

    , 33.

    3. -. - . , .

    4. - . , . , - , -. , - . , - - , , , .34

    5. , - . , - . , , . , .35

    6. . .

    33 - . , , . 34 , . , , ... . .. . ., 1993, . 72. 35 , . , . , , .

  • 20

    , .

    7. , , , . , , , , , , - . - .

    , - -. , - , . - , , . , , - . - , - .

    * * *

    , .

    , , , post factum, . , , - . . - . , .

  • 21

    -36, .

    , .

    1. , . . ., 1993. 2. , . . ., 1995. 3. , . . . ., 2005. 4. , . . ,

    2012. 5. Mesoudi, . The Cultural Dynamics of copycat suicide. 2009.

    www.plosone.org 6. Sisosk, M. Varnik, D. Media Roles in Suicide Prevention. A systematic

    Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2012.

    36 ... - , -. . . . . , 2012, . 91.

  • 22

    ( )

    . ...

    . , , , ,

    -mail: [email protected]

    METHODOLOGICAL REFLECTIONS OF THE CRITICAL PSYCHOLOGY (Essay on the Psychological Paradoxes)

    Prof. Ludmil Georgiev, PhD

    Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridsky Varna Free University

    Abstract: This paper is devoted to the theoretical perspectives of the

    formulated by the author Critical Psychology. The idea is that precisely on the basis of its methodological reflexivity the traditional psychology of the Western civilization can become a complete science. Here, the Critique of the Critical psychology refers to the traditional history and the fundamental paradigm of this psychology. The necessity to know the mutuality between the universal and the specific in the human psychical experiences is outlined.

    Key words: Critical psychology, Reflexivity, History of Psychology, Psychological Paradigm, Universal and Specific

    , -

    . /. 6, 19/ . -, - , - /. 3, 4 5/. .

    - - , - - .

  • 23

    , - - . - , .

    , , - -. , - . , , - . , - , , - , - . , , , , , . - , - - . , , , , , .

    , , /1/. , , .. , , , . , -

  • 24

    : , . , , . , , - , , .

    , - /. 21/. -, , , , . , , , , , - , . , - , - , /. 23/. , , - - , - . - - , , . , /. 5/. , , , -. , -, , - , ,

  • 25

    /. 3, 4 5/.

    , , /11, . 97; . 12 13/. , , , . , -, , . - , , , - .

    - , . -, - . - , . , - - -, /7/, /2; . 10/, /9/, - /14/, - /22/, /21/, /15/ , , . , , , - , . , , . - ,

  • 26

    , . , , - , . , , . , , , /20/. , - , - , -. , . - , . , - , , , . , . - .

    - -. , , - . - , - ; -, , . , , , - - ,

  • 27

    , 1879 . -. , , I , - , /17/.

    , , , . , - , , - , . - - , , . - ? - . , -, , , . , , , , , . - , , -, -

  • 28

    . , , .

    , , - . , , - . - , , . , - - , . --, - , - , , /. 16/.

    , , - /. 24/ , . , - , , . , . , - . , , , , , - /. 18/.

  • 29

    , , /. 23, 24/. , - - , - . , , , - , , , -- /. 16/.

    , - , . , , , . , , /. 8/. , - , , . , - , - . , , , . , ,

  • 30

    . , - , , .

    , - , , . -, , - - , , , . - - , , , . , , , , , . , , - - , . , ,

  • 31

    .

    , , , , - . , , . , , 23 , - . , .. , , , . , , .

    , , , , . - , , /. 22/. - , . , . , , . , , , .

    !

  • 32

    1. , ., , .. /1993/.

    , ; 2. , . /2001/. , ,

    ; 3. , . /2013/. ,

    . , ; 4. , . /2013/. ,

    . , ; 5. , . /2013/. ,

    . , ; 6. , . /2012/. , ; 7. , . /1985/. , ; 8. /2007/. , ; 9. , . /1998/. ,

    ; 10. , . /2005/. , ; 11. , . /1967/. , ; 12. , . /1974/. , ; 13. , . /1978/. , ; 14. -, . /1994/. -

    , ; 15. , . /1995/. , ; 16. --, . /1993/. , . 2, ; 17. , . /2007/. , ; 18. , . . /2002/. , ; 19. , . /1992/. , ; 20. , . . /2012/. ,

    ; 21. , . . /1993/. , . 1, 2 3, ; 22. Freud, S. /1981/. Odobrani dela, Novi Sad; 23. Matsumoto, D., Juange, L. /2007/. Culture and Psychology, Belmont,

    London; 24. Vos, J. /2012/. Psychologisation in times of globalization, London and

    New York.

  • 33

    . -

    " " , , e-mail: [email protected]

    :

    , , . -.

    : , , - , .

    - - . , , - .

    .

    - - [13]. - [9].

    - .

    - "" , . .

    . (

  • 34

    ).

    , , , - , , , , , .. , - , , , , , , . . - , . [7].

    . - . - , .

    . - , , , . . . , . . [7].

    . : ; . . . . . , . -, - . , , , [18], [16], [7].

    -

  • 35

    [19], [20]. , - , .

    . . , , . - (). . . , , , .

    . [22]. - , , , , . - - . , , . ., , , , [22].

    : . - . . . - . - . - . . , ., [22]. . , . , . , , - -, ,

  • 36

    . , ( -, ) , , . [18].

    , , . . - . . - . (insight) , . , . , , -, ( , ), . , .

    - . . , [6].

    , . () - . , .

    , , - .

    : (1) , , (2) , . . , [10].

    , , [1], [5], [12], [13], [21]. -, , .

    . , [8]. , ,

  • 37

    , , -. - - . , . , -, , - , . . , - , .

    . , (.. ), . , [2].

    - , , , , , . , [15]. - : ; ; ; -, , ; ; (); ; . , ; , ; , -; ; - ; ; ; - ; ; ; , ; , -; ; ; -; ; ; ("") ;

  • 38

    ; , ; " "; ; , ; , ; , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ""; ; , , .

    . , - , ( , -) [12]. , , . , - . , . , , [10].

    -, , - () . , , ( ), [10].

    , , , [4].

    (, ) - [14].

  • 39

    , . - . - , .

    , , . , -, . , .

    , . . , (Fluency) -, . - [10]:

    , , ;

    , , ;

    ;

    - ;

    (, ) - ;

    - - , ;

    - , , . ( ) ;

  • 40

    - . , , ().

    , , . [10].

    , . , , , , .

    .

    -, , .

    . - : . . ( . ). SPSS.

    . (31 ), 15-18 . , - , - .

  • 41

    .

    . ( .) .

    Correlations

    -

    -

    -

    -

    Pearson Correlation 1,000 ,238 ,564(**) ,223

    - Sig.

    (2-tailed) , ,206 ,001 ,236

    Pearson Correlation ,238 1,000 ,532(**) ,486(**)

    - - Sig.

    (2-tailed) ,206 , ,002 ,007

    Pearson Correlation ,564(**) ,532(**) 1,000 ,659(**)

    - --

    Sig. (2-tailed) ,001 ,002 , ,000

    Pearson Correlation ,223 ,486(**) ,659(**) 1,000 -

    Sig.

    (2-tailed) ,236 ,007 ,000 ,

    ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

    . - .

    -. , . .

  • 42

    - - .

    [1] , . (1991). , . [2] , . (1998).

    . . [3] , ., .. (1985). , . [4] , . (1976). . . [5] -, . (2010). . . [6] , . (1998). . . [7] , . (2001).

    . . . [8] , . (1960). . . [9] , . (2013).

    . . , . [10] , . (2007). -

    . . , . [11] , . (2000). . . , . [12] , . (2012). ,

    . . . . , . [13] , . (2006).

    . .. . . [14] , . (1981). -

    . .: . .. . ., . 42-82.

    [15] , . (1976) . . [16] , .. (1995). . .

    , . [17] Dennett, D.C. (1988). Quining qualia. In A.J. Marsel and E.Bisiach

    (Eds.) Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [18] Marsel, A.J. (1988). Phenomenal experience and functionalism. In

    A.J. Marsel & E.Bisiach (Eds.) Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    [19] Maslow, A.H. (1969). Notes on Being Psychology. -In: Readings in Humanistic Psychology (Ed. by A. Sutich and M. A. Vich). - N.Y., Free Press.

    [20] Rogers, K.R. (1965). A Theory of Therapy, Personality and Interpersonal Relatioships as Developed in the Client-Centered Frame-Work - In: Lindzey G., Hall C.(Ed.) Theories of Personality. N.Y.

    [21] Stoyanova, S. (2010) Emotional Intelligence-Measurment and Related Constructs. Adaptation of a questionnaire. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing

    [22] Wilkes, K.W. (1988).Yishi, duh, um, and consciousness. In A.J. Marsel and E.Bisiach (Eds.) Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • 43

    , ,

  • 44

    , ,

    e-mail: [email protected] :

    , . , - , . , , , . - , .

    : , , , , , , -, ;

    , , , , . - , . - , , , . ! , : , ?!. , , , . - .

  • 45

    , , - . : , , - : . - . . , . .

    ,

    , - . - , . - [4]:

    , - .

    .

    -, .

    , :

    , - -

  • 46

    , , . . - , - - , - - .

    , , . , ! , , . - . , , , . , , , - .

    - , . , -, . - . , , , - , , - , , .

  • 47

    : .

    ,

    [4]. ( , ) :

    , . , - . : , , , , , , .

    , , - , . . : , , , - , - , , , . - - .

  • 48

    - , . , : , , - . , - . : - , , , , . , , , .

    : ,

    -, - . .

    . -

    - , - . :

    , . , , - , , . [2]

  • 49

    , - , - , - , , . , , . . , ( ) , , , - , 1 ( ). , , . , , , , . , - , - . , - , . - .

    1 : , , , , ..

  • 50

    - , , . , , , , , . , . [2]

    , , - , , - , , (, ), , , - .. - , .

    -

    . , , -. - . . ( ) , ( -) , . , - . . - , . -

  • 51

    , :

    2 , , . , . , . , , . [3]

    , , , ( ), . ( ) , , ( ) . , . - , - , .

    - .

    2 .

  • 52

    , , . - , (, 1977) , , (, 1975) , . - , - , -. , . , - , , - - . , , . , .

    [5] ,

    , -. , . , , , , - :

    , , , . [5]

    - ,

  • 53

    , . , -, , . , :

    , , , , - . - . - , - . , , -, . [5]

    , , - . / , , - , . , , , - , .

    1. , . : , . .

    . " ", , 2011 2. , . : , . : , .

    , . . . 2006 3. , . , . . .

    , , 1985 4. , . (), : , .,

    , ., , ., , . . , , 2008

  • 54

    5. , . -, . . . , , 2000

    6. , . . . . " ", 2012

    7. , . " " - 1995 8. , . : , . . .

    , , 2001 9. , . , . . . " - 3",

  • 55

    - ,

    Bulgaria adopted this sentence at the end of 1998 to replace the death

    penalty. Because of this its regulation is where the legal order of the death penalty used to be - Article 37, paragraph 2 and Article 38 of the Criminal Code. It represents the worst of all punishments, the humanity of which is highly disputed. Unlike life imprisonment, the death sentence eliminatesany possibility of commutation. Thus, the convicted may never lawfully regain his freedom, unless granted amnesty or pardon.

    , Homo erectus, Homo sapiens sapiens - , , , , , . - . , , , . , , - . , . (. ).

    , Homo sapiens sapiens , . , , e . . 21 . ( , ) , , , . , :

    :

    - - , !

  • 56

    : , , ,

    ( )!..., ,

    , ? ?

    , . - , , , , . 21 ., , , - , , , . , , , . .

    - , . , , , ( ) , - - , . , , - , - . , , , , , , . , , . . , , , ( -) , , , , , , .. ,

  • 57

    , . , , . , , (.. ), , - , .

    2012 . , - , . - . . , , . - , , -. , . , - . -, , . - . , , -, , . , . .

    , , - , , .. . - . , . 5 , ,

  • 58

    - . : , . 15 20 (. 409 ) , , , , , - . - 10 20 (. 416, . 1, . ). : , . 10 20 (. 417, . ).

    - :

    1. - .

    2. , 1998 , , . 342, .3, . ( , - , . 2, 2010 ., )

    . 1896 . - " (. 15 . 1 ). 1921 . . :

    , - , -, ...

  • 59

    - . 37 , . . .

    , , . . - . . - . -, . , . - , (, ) , . . , 7-8 -. . - - . . - , - . . - , , . , , , 150 . - ,

  • 60

    . , 600 . , . , . , , . - , . , 30 , . - 20 , . - , 20- . , 10 . -. . -, 30 , , . 20 , - , . , - . , . , - . - , . - , , , , . - -

  • 61

    . - . -, . , . , , . , , , , . , , , . , - . .

    , . , , .

    - : , , , - , , , . (), - , , () , . , , ?!

    1999 . 2008 . :

  • 62

    1:

    2:

    , - ( 2010)

    1.

    2.

    3. , .

  • 63

    4. Rec(2003)23 .

    5. .

    6. , - .

    ,

    , , . . . , - , - . -, . . . , - .

    , . . . . . .

    , , 1998 , . . 2006, , , . : !,

    ; 2005, Edizione IRC-Press, Lugano, ISBN 978-954-91867-2-7

    ; 2010

  • 64

    PR- PR :

    , e-mail: [email protected]

    Abstract: The report analyses the theoretical and practical problems of

    PR in the field of psychological knowledge. It investigates the basic aspects of PR that during the period of crisis, represent the relationship between PR - as a technology for effective communication and psychological characteristics of the individual subject - both as an individual and as a group. The report outlines key issues and trends in the intertwining of the two research areas - PR and psychology.

    Key words: PR, crisis, psychological efficiency, communication structuring, psychological reflection

    PR. [7] PR

    , / . , , - PR . PR - .

    PR , - , , , . :

    ; ,

    ; . PR,

    , (- , - ) : PR?; PR?;

  • 65

    PR ( )? . , , - , PR.

    PR , , , , .. PR - - , - . [2] - , .

    PR, , , : , - , ; , . [1] - , , , PR - - , -: ; ; - ; , . , , , PR .

    , - PR , ( ) PR : .

    , , PR . - , . PR

  • 66

    [5], , . -, -. PR , - ?

    PR, , , , ( , , , ), - . , - , - , , , - . [6]

    PR - -, PR , , / . , , .. - PR, . - PR- , - , - , /.

    , PR - ( , , , - .) - , / ,

  • 67

    , , , , -. () , : PR , , -.[8]

    PR, , , PR , :

    1. , . ( , , ), , , - , - . .. , - , - .

    2. - . - , . , - , - , .

    3. () : PR , - , . , , , - . [3] - -,

  • 68

    , -, .

    4. ( ) , issues. , , . , , ( , , , , , ).

    5. PR , , - , .. , . -, , , - - , , , .

    6. , - PR . . -[4], , , -. , -, - , , , , .

    7. PR , , - , - . , , . -

  • 69

    , - PR , - - PR .

    8. PR, , -, . - -, . , - , , .

    9. PR PR , ( ). , PR , : - , , , , , .. - ; - , - , , - .

    10. , PR. , ( ) PR. , PR, - PR - .

    11. . , , , -

  • 70

    /- (), .

    PR :

    PR- , ;

    PR- , - ;

    PR- -- , - , - .

    PR . , , , , . - PR, , , , -. PR, (community managers), , PR. PR ( , , . ). :

    ; ; ; PR; ; ; ; ; ; .

  • 71

    , PR , :

    1. PR - ;

    2. PR - ;

    3. ( ) - , PR - , .

    , PR, . , , , , , - , . , - , PR - ( ), PR . [9]

    , -, , , PR- , , , , , . , , PR.

  • 72

    1. , .

    . : , . - , , 2008, . 62.

    2. , ., . , . . , . , ., 2007, . 6.

    3. , .18. 4. , . : . :

    , ., (). , ., , 2004, .47. 5. , . PR, www.capital.bg, 27.04.2012. 6. , . , . , ., 2011, . 175. 7. , . PR, . , ., 2013, .9. 8. , . 45. 9. Mansell, R. Crossing Boundaries with New Media. Introductory

    remarks for the panel on the responsibility of the media, UNG Assembly Third Informal Thematic Debate on Civilizations and the Challenge for Peace: Obstacles and Opportunities, New York, 10-11 May, 2007.

  • 73

    . - , ,

    e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The article is a short review of some of the main points of view

    on social attitudes and their influence on peoples behaviour; on attitude strength and its relation to other constructs; the relationship between affect and attitude, etc. Leading research in the area of social attitudes was examined. The article is part of a large-scale research of social attitudes towards the fiscal policy in Bulgaria, the results of which will be presented after its final analysis.

    Key words: social attitudes, behaviour, fiscal policy. ,

    , - , . (). - ; , , [1, . 542].

    : , -, , . : ( ); ( -); ( ) [3, . 548]

    [5, p.367]. - , , . Greenwald ( ) , ,

  • 74

    . [11, p.8] , , .

    . - , , , . -, , , , , , , , , - .[14] () - . - :

    , - (- ).

    , ( ) , .

    , (), ( ).

    , . [14, p. 1133]

    , .

    .

    - , , .

    , , - .

    - ,

  • 75

    ; , , -. - , .

    - - .

    , , -, . . , - , -, , -- -, . , , . . , : , , . [14, p.1133]

    , - , - , - . , . , - - , - , . , , , . [14, p.1132]

    - , , , . ..., -, , - . [16]

    , . ,

  • 76

    , . . , , , - . , , . [16]

    - - - , , - . [6] , . , , , - . , : ) ) . , , - .

    , . - (), -. , - . [9], , , , , .

    , , , , , , . ,

  • 77

    , - . [9, p. 25]. , , - - - - . - , . , - .[9, p. 17]

    . , , . -, , , - - . - . [7] , . , , - - . , , , .[7]

    [4] , - , -, , -. -, - , - . -

  • 78

    , . , . , . [4, p.27]

    - [5] , , . . , ; - , . , - - . , , - , . , - , - . [5, p.367]

    .[12] , - , - . 106 . ( - , , , - ) , - . : 1) - -, , -

  • 79

    ; 2) , , , . , - , .

    155 , , 1980 . , , . , - -, . - , , -. : , - --, , - . [8, p. 426] - .

    [13], - , -, , . , - ( ) . , , - , . - , 1980 . 1984 . - , , -, , ,

  • 80

    .

    - , , - , - , - - . , , . [13] , - , , 1968, 1980 1984 . , - , . , : 1) , , - ; 2) - , . [13,p.196]

    , [10], , . . . , - , - . [10, p. 912]

    , - -. ( ) . . - -

  • 81

    . . , , . , - , , 80% . , .[15] - , [15, p. 171]. , [15, p. 171]. , - , , . , , , .[15, p. 176]

    , , , .[2] 77/2012 . - . - . . ,

  • 82

    , . , , , .

    1. , ., . ., 1999 2. , ., ,

    . , , 2010 3. , ., (.)., ,

    , , 1989 4. Ajzen, I., Nature and operation of attitudes, Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001.

    52:2758 5. Ajzen, I., Attitude and Persuasion in K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.),

    The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, pp. 367-393. New York: Oxford University Press

    6. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M., Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research, Psychological Bulletin, 1977, Vol. 84, No. 5, pp. 888-918

    7. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M., Attitudes and the AttitudeBehavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, 2000, pp. 1-28

    8. Ajzen, I., Timko, C. & White, J., Self-Monitoring and Attitude-Behavior relation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, Vol. 42, No. 3, 426-435

    9. Bodur, H. Onur, Brinberg, D. & Coupey, E., Psychology Belief, Affect, and Attitude: Alternative Models of the Determinants of Attitude, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2000, pp. 17-28

    10. Dalton, R., Citizen attitudes and political behavior, Comparative political studies, Vol. 33 No. 6/7, August/September 2000, pp. 912-940

    11. Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27

    12. Holland, W., Verplanken, B. & van Knippenberg, A., On the nature of attitudebehavior relations: the strong guide, the weak follow, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 32,2002, pp. 869876

    13. Krosnick, J., The Role of Attitude Importance in Social Evaluation: A Study of Policy Preferences, Presidential Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 196-210

    14. Krosnick, J., Boninger, D., Chuang, Y., Berent, M. & Carnot, C., Attitude strength: One Construct or many related constructs?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, Vol. 65, No. 6, pp. 1132-1151

  • 83

    15. Markovik, M., Political Attitude and Personality in a Democratic Society, The Western Balkans Policy Review, Volume 1, Issue 168 1, January/June 2010, pp. 168-184

    16. Miller, J. & Peterson, D., Theoretical and Empirical Implications of Attitude Strength, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 3, August 2004, pp. 847867

  • 84

    - , , , [email protected]

    : - -, , . - SPSS-16.

    : , -

    . , , [11]. . . - (Dennis Organ), , , - [13, 15]. - [4]. - .

    (Van Dyne, Graham, Dienesch, 1994), C. 4. 48 ,

  • 85

    - : , , -, .

    - : : ; - , , - , , .: , , , . , , , . : , , : , , .

    : -, , , . , .: , . : , -, , , .: , , , .

    623 , 20112012 . . 100 , : , , , , -.

    SPSS-16.

    , : . ,

  • 86

    .

    :

    1. , . , , , - , . , , . , .

    2. , - , -, .

    : .

    .

    , . , . () . () , - - - -.

    . . -. - - . - . , R2 Adjusted R Square. .

  • 87

    - , , , , , - . , - , . - .

    (. .1), , . , . , , , , - , .

    - (=-0.207,

  • 88

    . 1

    .

    .

    =-0.207*, R2 =0.04

    . -=0.253*, R2 =0.07

    . - =-0.240*, R2 =0.11

    =0.212*, R2 =0.05

    =-0.252*, R2 =0.06

    ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p

  • 89

    - .

    . - - . , .

    , , , . .

    . -, , . - , - . -. .

    , . , , - . . . .

    - : , , .

  • 90

    1. , . . . : ,

    2004, 301. ISBN 954-775-387-7 2. , . . : .

    , 1998. . 171-174. 3. , . :

    . :.. . 2006, 269. ISBN 13: 978-954-07-2321-1

    4. , . . - : . . . . , 2006, 332. ISBN 10: 954-07-2480-5

    5. , . : .. . . , 2011, 375. ISBN 978-954-07-2964-0

    6. , . . : , 2011, 343. ISBN 978- 954-357-074-3

    7. , . . : , 2004. ISBN 954-9964-95-7

    8. , . . // . , . ., 86, 1995, . 245-268.

    9. , . .// . , . ., 87-88, 2000, . 313-336.

    10. , . . : , 2010, 246 . ISBN 978-954-449-499-5

    11. , . . , : , 1998. ISBN 954-02-0210-8

    12. , . / -. : , 2006. 550. ISBN 10: 954-9994-43-0

    13. , .., . . .: -., 2002

    14. , , , , , , -, , , , 2002, 3- . ISBN 5-93878-076-4

    15. Organ, D. W. Organizational Citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 1988 p.8.

    16. Smith, C., Organ, D., Near, J. rganizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and Antecedents. Jornal of Appied Psychology, 68: 653-663, 1983

    17. Van Dyne, L. Graham, J., Dienesch, R. rganizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Jornal, ISBN 37:765-802. 1994

    18. Meyer, J.P., Stanley, D.J., Herscovitch, L, Topolnytsky, L. (2001). Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior

  • 91

    , , ,

    ; E-mail: [email protected], :

    , , , - , - . , - . , III , . 64 . StatGrafWin. , .

    : , , ,

    2020 .

    , 18%. , - , - [6,7]. [3;65].

    12 2009 (Strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training 2020) (. 28.05.2009).

    . 2010 .

  • 92

    , - . , , - , .

    (), 8 , , . , [7].

    , . . , -, , - [8]. , 2008 . - , : . , [1].

    . 2020 , , , , , , , [2]. flexicurity 2020. (flexicurity) [8].

    -, -, - . [4].

  • 93

    119 : , - , , .

    64 - 51 : - 31 20 13 , (.1).

    . StatGraf.

    1. 1: ,

    , 1 4.

    . 2 3 . - (x2=8.96; =0.02) - .

  • 94

    47 (92%) , (.3). 21 (75%) 28 -. 8 (44%) 18- .

    2.

    3.

  • 95

    36 (71%) , 19 8 .

    - . 29 (57%) , 10 - (x2 = 8.45; = 0.03).

    , 22 (43%) , - .

    4.

    4 -

    . , , - .

    (55% ).

    , 58 (90%) . 38 (59%) , 7 (11%) , 7 (11%) 6 (9%)

  • 96

    . - (x2=11.84, p=0.05; Cramer=0.32, p=0.04).

    x2=12.16, p=0.05; Cramer=0.45, p=0.03. .

    5.

    2: ,

    , 1 4 (, , , , , - , , ).

    5 : .

    41 (80%) , (51%) . : . 39 (76%) 38 (75%) .

    35 (69%) - .

  • 97

    : , , , .

    , . Cramer=0.32, p=0.02, - .

    3: ( 1

    5, : , ; , ; , ; ; , , ; / ; , , /; ; ; )

    - - - 40 (78%) .

    , 34 (67%) - .

    32 (63%) , , .

    6 . , . , , .

  • 98

    6.

    7.

    . 7. 51 (80%)

    , 45 (70%) , 39 (61%). : ,

  • 99

    (58%), (55%) , (52%).

    17 (27%) , , , 17 (27%) - 20 (31%) , .

    : 46% - 27% - ( , ).

    -

    , : , . : , .

    , , : , , , , : , , . - .

    - , 80% , 70% 61% , . 61% .

    , , .

    (soft skills), -

  • 100

    . - , , .

    , , .

    , , , , , . ( ), . -, , , , -.

    1. , .

    20092013 . . . , 105, 2012, ISSN 08618291

    2. . , 2010-2012, N-010-1-BG1-LEO 05 03102

    3. , ., . . -. ., 2003, ISBN 954-8510-83-9

    4. , . . ., 2004, ISBN 954-02-0293-0 5. http://ec.europa.eu/education.htm 6. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-your-

    country/bulgaria/index_en.htm 7. www.minedu.government.bg 8. www.hrdc.bg, , .

    , . -

  • 101

    1, , 2

    , , ,

    , e-mail: [email protected], , , , III , [email protected]

    :

    . a , , - , , , . . 75 . - , : , , . Exsel StatGraf. , , -

    : , , ,

    -

    - , -. , , , , - , -- .

  • 102

    , , . . , , , , , , - , .

    . . 23 (1891) , , . , XIX . .

    , , , , : , , 2006-2010., / 20042007., , , , / , 1/23.01.2009 / .

    2008-2015 ., - (, , , , , ) .

    (200/2001- 2011/2012), , ,

  • 103

    ( ) . 13, 48, 4, - 4, , - 6.

    , -, - - .

    . 75 - 38 III , - 27 (16 - III 11- II ) 10 III (.1).

    . , 18 : 7 11 ( ). Exsel StatGraf.

    - , : , , .

    1.

  • 104

    . 2 .

    2.

    . 2 ,

    (51%) -, 23%, , . , (Cramer = 0.32, p= 0.01).

    37 (61%) 9 (64%), (Cramer = 0.30, p= 0.05).

    3. ,

  • 105

    3 , . . , 2% , .

    4. ( )

    39 (53%) ,

    , 20 (27%) - , 14 (19%) (. 4).

    1.

    ( %) %

    /

    26

    35

    ,

    31 41

    , -

    26 35

    32 43

  • 106

    ,

    20 27

    - -

    28 37

    ,

    33 44

    1

    % . , , 11 (. 1).

    , - :

    (3%) , . (4%) . 13 (17%) -, , - .

    , , .

    29 (76%) III , . 16 III 6 (38%) , : , , ; ; , ; ; , , , , .

    - II III 6 (60%) 10 . , .

    16 (21%) -; 15 (20%) ; 14 (19%) -

  • 107

    ( ); 13 (17%) 10 (13%) .

    5. -, , , ( )

    5

    , , . : 34 (45%), 31 (41%), 30 (40%), 28 (37%), 24 (32%).

    8 (11%) -, 9 (12%) - . 6 (8%) - , , .

    (51%) -

    , 23% . , .

    27% , ; 20% ,

    ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

  • 108

    . 2% , . 31% , . - .

    39 (52%) , . 20 (27%) 14 (19%) .

    , 13 21% - , . , , , ( , , ) .

    , , - 33 (44%); - 32 (43%); - - 31 (41%).

    - , 13 (17%) , , - .

    , - () .

    : ; -, .

    , - -, .

    , , , .

  • 109

    -

    , [email protected] :

    . . . , .

    : , , ,

    . , . , , , , (, , 1994; , 1990; , 1989). , , . (, 1996).

    - , -, . - . (1987) , . - , . . , , , .

    . , - , ,

  • 110

    (, 2010; , 2001; Anderson, Bushman, 2002).

    . - . , - , ( , 2008). . (1994) , - , .

    . , : -, -; - .. . , . , . - , . , - , ( , 1987). , , -, , (, 2007).

    , . , (Shah, 2000; Cohen-Mansfield, Werner, 1998). . (2007) , , , . , . . Walker Richardson (1998) , . .

  • 111

    -, - .

    : , . , , . , . , . , - . , - . , , . . , , ( , , ..) (Malley-Morrison, Nolido, Chawla, 2006).

    , - . -, . , . , , , , (Cohen-Mansfield, Werner, 1998).

    : ,

    - : , , , , , .

    , - , 60 73 , 64.7 .

  • 112

    507, 243 264 , :

    1. 168 , (/ / ). 81 87 .

    2. 167 (/ / ). 86 81 .

    3. 172 (). 76 96 .

    - . . (2002). - . , ; ; ; .

    2011 . , - . , . . SPSS, 16.0, .

    : -

    1 1.

    - - (M=8,86), (M=8,01). -

  • 113

    (SD=3,526), (SD=2,884), - . (F=17,213), (Sig=,033).

    1.

    (M)

    (SD)

    F

    T

    Sig

    335

    8,01

    2,884

    172

    8,86

    3,526

    17,213

    2,145

    ,033

    1.

    (Sig=,026). -

  • 114

    - 253 75,5%. 58 17,3%. - 24 7,2% .

    117 68% , - . 30 17,4% , . - 25 14,5% , - .

    -

    2 2.

    2.

    (M)

    (SD)

    F

    T

    Sig

    167

    7,81

    2,354

    340

    8,45

    3,430

    42,076

    2,464

    ,014

    -

    (M=8,45), (M=7,81). (F=42,076), (Sig=,014). - (SD=2,354), (SD=3,430).

  • 115

    (Sig=,000). - 83,8% 140 . 12,6% 21 , - 3,6% 6 .

    , - 230 67,6% . - . , 67 19,7%. . - 43 12,6% .

    2.

    3.

  • 116

    3.

    (I) :

    (J) :

    (I-J)

    Sig.

    ,872 ,010

    ,466 ,168

    -,872 ,010

    -,406 ,234

    -,466 ,168

    ,406 ,234 -

    . - (I-J=,872) (Sig=,010). - (I-J=,466) (Sig=,168). - , (I-J=,406) (Sig=,234).

    20.

  • 117

    20.

    ()

    t

    Sig.

    1 (Constant)

    9,552

    -,466

    -,406

    ,533

    ,338

    ,340

    -,071

    -,061

    17,933

    -1,379

    -1,193

    ,000

    ,168

    ,234

    , , . - (=-,071) (Sig=,168). (=-,061) (Sig=,234). - .

    : , -

    (, 2013). (, 2010), , - , . - . - , -, . , .

    . , -

  • 118

    . , - .

    . - , - , , . , . , . - .

    - (, 2013). - - , . - , . . . . . , . - , , - .

    (Gergov, 2012). - , . - ,

  • 119

    . - , . .

    ( ) , . , . .

    , , , - . - . .

    , - . , - . , . . . .

    ,

    . - . , - , .

  • 120

    ( ) - .

    1. , . (2002)

    . . . , . 2. , ., , . (2001) . . ,

    . 3. , . (2013)

    . , .

    4. , . (2008) . . . , . , .

    5. , . (2001) . . , .

    6. , . (1987) . . , .

    7. , . (2007) - - . , . 54-74, . . , .

    8. , . (2007). . . . , .

    9. , . (2010) . . , .

    10. , . (1989) . . -, .

    11. , . (1996) . . . 12. , . (1990) :

    14 . . , . 13. , . (1994) . -

    , . 14. Anderson, C. (2002) Bushman, B., Human Aggression. Annual Revue

    of Psychology, Vol. 53, p. 27-51. 15. Cohen-Mansfield, J., Werner, P. (1998). Predictors of Aggressive

    Behaviors: A Longitudinal Study in Senior Day Care Centers. Journal of Gerontology: Vol. 53B, 5, p. 300-310.

    16. Gergov, T. (2012) Ageism as a predictor of negative mental tendencies in the third age. online magazine: Psychological thought, Vol. 5(1), p. 69-74.

    17. Malley-Morrison, K., Nolido, N., Chawla, S. (2006) International Perspectives on Elder Abuse: Five Case Studies. Educational Gerontology, Vol. 32, Issue 1, p. 1-11.

    18. Shah, A. (2000) Aggressive behavior and environmental characteristics in Australian nursing homes. Aging & Mental Health, Vol. 4, Issue 1, p. 43-48.

    19. Walker, S., Richardson, D. (1998) Aggression strategies among older adults: delivered but not seen. Aggr Violent Behav 3, . 287294.

  • 121

    e-mail: [email protected]

    : In the field of contemporary marketing, brand personification is

    considered great way to identify the customer with the brand and also to maintain long lasting emotional relationship of the companies with their customers. The existing socially accepted brand image reflects on the value of the brand and its products. The survey results among 240 respondents showed the degree of Toyota brand personification and validated the presence of such relationship.

    : , , , 1. -

    . , - . . , .

    -. , , -.

    , , , . , , - [2]. -

  • 122

    , , , , , ?

    , - , , - , . , , , .

    , - , . , , , , , . .

    . . , , - [1].

    , , - , - . , , - , - , , , . , , -, .

    ?

    ? , . 70- , , . ,

  • 123

    . . , -, , , .

    , . , , , , , , , - . , , - . , . -. -, . , . , .

    , . -, . - , . - , -, - . . .

    - . , , , - . -, .

  • 124

    Wheeler . , . , , , . [8].

    , ? .

    , , - , , . , , , , - [4].

    . , . , , , , [3].

    , , . - , . .

    , , - , , [6]. , .

    , - , -

  • 125

    , .

    2. -

    , - . , . , . - .

    - - Ford General Motors. 30- . - - . 1935 . . - . 1969 . . 1979 . 10 ., 1986 . 50 . - -.

    , . , - .

    , , . , , - - , , .

    - , , 240 ,

  • 126

    . . , . , , .

    -. . -- , , - . - , , . , - - .

    . -, , , .

    , , 61,51% 38,49 % .

    [3], , , , .

    , . . , , , , -. , , .

  • 127

    , , , - . - . , . .

    [5] . , , , . 13 , .

    . 40,7% .

    , , 24,9% 22,9%. , , , .

    - x=1,28, x=1,02. , , . - , , .

    - . - , - . - , , , , , .

    , , ,

  • 128

    . , , . , . , , , - , [7].

    . , - R= 0,631, R= 0,580.

    , , . , , .

    , . - - , - , .

    . - 42% , . , .

    1/3 , , , , . - . , , ,

  • 129

    , .

    1/3 , , . , .

    x=0,25.

    . R= 0,651. , . . R=0,424, .. 42,4% -. , , .

    , . - , - - . , , , .

    , . , .

    1. , ., . . (2002) . , .

    ISBN 5-9693-0007-1 2. , . . (2002) . .

    ISBN: 954-90501-5-7 3. Aaker, J. L. (1997) Dimensions of Brand Personality, Journal of

    Marketing Research, Aug., ISSN: 1547- 7193.

  • 130

    4. Ekinci, J., S. Hosany. (2006) Destination Personality: An Application of Brand. Journal of Travel Research, Vol.45, pp. 127-139. ISSN: 0047-2875

    5. Hess, J.S. (1995). Construction and Assessment of a Scale to Measure Consumer Trust, In: B. B. Stern and G.M. Zinkhan (Eds.), 1995 AMA Educators Proceedings (Vol. 6, pp. 20-26). Chicago. ISSN 1833-3850

    6. Low, G. S., Ch. W. Lamb. (2000) The measurement and dimension-nality of brand associations. Journal of Product & Brand Management 9:350-370. ISSN: 1061-0421

    7. Steenkamp, J.-B., R. Batra and D. Alden. (2002) How perceived brand globalness creates brand value, Journal of International Business Studies 34.1, pp. 53-65. ISBN-10: 1781955603

    8. Wheeler, A. (2003) Designing Brand Identity. A Complete Guide to Creating, Building and Maintaining Strong Brands. John Wiuley&Sons, Inc. ISBN-10: 1118099206

  • 131

    . , , , [email protected]

    In this article are examined the ego states in connection to behavior and

    thoughts of the Bulgarian protesters during the so called Antitrust protests. The author is trying to enlight the group thinking of the Bulgarians and to critically examining the meaninglessness group thoughts about some aspects of economical status of Bulgaria before 1989 and after 1989.

    : , , ,

    . , . . , , , - . [1, p. 28]. 7 . , - , . . , . , - , . , .

  • 132

    , - . - - .

    2013 . - , . , , . 23 , , .. .. 2003 . , - , [2, p.28]. - , . 2004-2005[3, . 296-297]. . . ? , . ? ?

    , - . - , , , , , ( ). , - . . , , . [4, . 115] [4, . 116]. - , -

  • 133

    . , , - [5, . 231] [6, . 92] ( ). - , , , , , [7, . 38]. , - .

    , - . - , . , - , , , . , - , -, , , , , . . - , , , . , , , , . , . . -, . , , , , , -[8, . 101]. ,

  • 134

    . , . - , , , - ( ) [8, . 39]. , , , , , , , . , . , , - [9, . 53]. , . . , . 23 , , , , . , . , . - . , . - , , - .[10, . 19]. - , : , , [10, . 18-19]. , , . - 1989 , -, . 1990 .

  • 135

    36 (34,36 % 33,14 % )1 [11] , , . , , , . - , , . , , , . , . , , . - , , : , , , - , , , , , , , -- [12, . 444] , . , - . , [12, . 449]. , , , - . 45 1 Nohlen, D & Stver, P (2010) Elections in Europe: A data handbook, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010. p. 369, 1 903 567 1 836 050 .

  • 136

    , . , . , , , , , , , . . , 20-30 , , . , 30 , , . , , . , 90- , , , . , . , 80- , , - , , , . 1975 . . 5 : -, , , , -. , , , , , . -, , , , , , , . - 18-19 % 490 510 . , - - 15 % , . ,

  • 137

    , , [12, . 456-457]. , , . , . , , . , , , , . , , . , , , . - , 500 . 15 . , , 15 . . - , - , . , 80-, . , - , . ? , , , . , , , , -. , , . ,

  • 138

    , , . , , , . , , . , , , , , . , , , , . , , . , , . , - , - . , , . - , , . , , . - , , , 1989 . , , , , VN -, , , . , . , , . , . , , . , , , . -, -

  • 139

    , . , , , . , , - - , , , , . , , . . , , . . - , , , , . , - , . - , , . , , , , - , , . , . . , , , ,

  • 140

    . 1878-1944, 1944-1989, 1989 . , . , , .

    1. Steiner, C. Scripts People Live: Transactional Analysis of Life Scripts,

    Grove Press, NY, 1974 2. European Commission, Economic criteria 2003 Regular Report on

    Bulgarias progress towards accession, 2003, http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ archives/pdf/key_documents/2003/rr_bg_final_en.pdf, (10.04.2013)

    3. , . . . , 2010

    4. , . . . , 2004 5. , ., . . , , 1992 6. , ., . . ,

    , 2004 7. , . . . , 2008 8. , . " , ". , 1991 9. , . . .

    , 2003 10. , . (.) .

    , , 2009 11. . -

    . http://www.math.bas.bg/izbori/1991.html, (6.04.2013)

    12. , . , . : , . (.), , , , 2009, . 438-476

  • 141

    ,

    , ,

    [email protected]

    Abstract: This current report presents the theoretical background and the received empirical results from conducted procedures of standardization, reliability and validity on a new personality questionnaire, whose goal is to measure tendency toward neurotic behavior. These results are presented in the form of figures and charts. The final version of the questionnaire is presented at the end of the paper.

    Key words: useful side of life, useless side of life, neurotic behavior, personality questionnaire

    1.

    [1] , - . , , .

    2. -

    , , , . . , , , , .

  • 142

    , . . , , , , . , . . , - . , - , , - ( ) . , -, , . - , . , , , , , .

    3. 174 ,

    150 , 24 [2]. 26.4 , 8.732 , 34% 66%. 1.

  • 143

    1.

    % 51 34% 99 66% 150 100%

    19-29 110 73.3% 30-39 26 17.3% 40-49 5 3.3% 50-59 6 4%

    3 2%

    4. -

    , 64 , . , , : =1 =0. , , .

    5.

    (CATPCA), 12 . 0.708, . - ( PCA), , -. , 2-4, Scree plot 1.

  • 144

    2.

    Total Variance Explained

    Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings

    Rotation Sums of Squared

    Loadingsa Component

    Total % of Variance Cumulativ

    e % Total % of

    VarianceCumulativ

    e % Total

    1 2,852 23,769 23,769 2,852 23,769 23,769 2,069 2 1,466 12,216 35,984 1,466 12,216 35,984 1,535 3 1,289 10,738 46,722 1,289 10,738 46,722 1,701 4 1,031 8,591 55,313 1,031 8,591 55,313 1,980 5 ,970 8,082 63,395

    3. , Oblimin,

    , - 0.3

    Component

    Q9 ,802 Q11 ,767 Q3 ,479 ,440Q5 ,438 ,366Q1 ,828 Q7 ,769 Q2 ,763 Q4 ,636 Q10 ,628 Q8 ,667Q12 ,643Q6 ,563Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization a. Rotation converged in 15 iterations

  • 145

    1. Scree plot

    4.

    KMO and Bartlett's Test Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,676

    Approx. Chi-Square 270,597

    df 66

    Bartlett's Test of Sphericity

    Sig. ,000 ,

    =0.05, >0.5 . , 55.313 % , . ,

  • 146

    , . . , 5 - , 2.

    5.

    Statistics

    Valid 150N

    Missing 0Mean 3,3933

    Std. Error of Mean ,18870

    Median 3,0000

    Mode 2,00

    Std. Deviation 2,31104

    Variance 5,341

    Skewness ,823

    Std. Error of Skewness ,198

    Kurtosis ,400

    Std. Error of Kurtosis ,394

    Range 11,00

    Minimum ,00

    Maximum 11,00

    Sum 509,00

  • 147

    2.

    - , -

    Skewness Kurtosis 1. 6. .

    , , . , - , - .

    7. , -

    - -

  • 148

    .

    8.

    , , . , . !

    1. , .

    . : . .. . , 2012. . 644-655.

    2. , . . . , 2008. 3. , . . .

    . . 4. , . . . , 2009. 5. , . . . , 2010. 6. , . . . , 2007 7. , . . . , 1993. 8. , . . . /. . , 2006. 9. Howell, D. Treatment of missing data part 1. http://www.uvm.edu/

    ~dhowell/StatPages/More_Stuff/ Missing_Data/Missing.html (12/9/2012) 10. Starkweather, J., Herrington, R. Categorical Principal Components

    Analysis (CATPCA) with Optimal Scaling. http://www.unt.edu/rss/class/ Jon/SPSS_SC/Module9/M9_CATPCA/SPSS_M9_CATPCA.htm (05/11/12)

    11. Zhao, N. The minimum sample size in factor analysis. http://www. encorewiki.org/display/ ~nzhao/The+Minimum+Sample+Size+in+Factor+ Analysis (23/03/2009)

  • 149

    12 ,

    . , . .

    1 *

    ? 2

    ? 3 *

    ? 4 ,

    ? 5 */

    ? 6 ,

    ? 7 * , ,

    ? 8 * , - ,

    ? 9 * ? 10 ,

    ? 11 * , ? 12 * ,

    ? *

  • 150

    , e-mail: [email protected]

    :

    . , . .

    : , , , , .

    Synthesis between Mathematics and Psychology

    Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov

    Summary: The decision-making process is at the heart of any purposeful

    human activity. In principle, the decision making of the people is a process that by its nature and complexity comparable to the thinking process as a whole. The theory of decision-making is a kind of synthesis between mathematically and psychological knowledge.

    Keywords: mathematics, psychology, decision-making, model, theory. 1.

    . , . - .

    , - : ( ), . , . , -

  • 151

    , . [1] [2] [4]. , - - .

    , , . , ( ), , (, , ). , -, [3] [4] [8] [13].

    2. -

    , , , - . , , . , , [2].

    , :

    (1)

    . - ( , , ), . , - , - .

    , , . , -

  • 152

    . , - . .

    (2) -

    . . - . , , , , [4] [9].

    .

    , , , :

    (1)

    , . , . , , .

    (2) ,

    (, ). , . . , .

    , , . - , , -.

  • 153

    , . , . , .

    . , . - , , - - .

    , . , - . , , . , , [5] [7] [10].

    , , . , . .

    . , , , . , . , . , .. [9] [10]. , - , . - .

  • 154

    , -, , .

    3.

    . :

    (1) , , , , , , , , , -, . - . - .

    (2) , , ( ), , -, . .

    (3) .

    , , -. .

    , .. , , . , , . , .

    , . - , .

  • 155

    , , - . . - , - .

    , . , , , - [8].

    , , ( ) . . , - .

    (4) , , , , , .

    , - , .. , . , . , , , .

    4. -

    , . . -, , -

  • 156

    , , . , .

    1. ,

    . , . , , . . , : , . : , - . : , .

    . , (, , ) , , . , , ( , , -). , , .

    , , . .

    . - , , . . , , [2].

    2. .

    , , . . . ,

  • 157

    , . , ( , -). - .

    500 . - 1697 . , . , - . , , . , .

    3.

    . - , - , . . , . . ( ), .

    , , . . , , . .

    , , , ( ) . 1 , , . , . 2 , ,

  • 158

    , .. . 3, , - .

    , - , , -, , . - , .. , . , , - . .

    5. ,

    . , . , , , , -. 1944 . Theory of Game and Economic Behavior . . , [12] [14] [15].

    , VI , , , . :

    (1) 507 .

    .

  • 159

    (- 6000 , 10 % ) .

    (2)

    , . . - . - , , .

    , (, ), . , , , - . . , .

    6.

    ,

    , , . - - ( ) - ( ) [11]. -.

    - - . - , , , . 1781 . - (Jean-Charles de Borda, 1733-1799),

  • 160

    . - 1785 . (Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Caritat, Marquis de Condorcet, 1743-1794), , . , , ( ), . [6] [11].

    . :

    (1) , ?

    (2) - ?

    , .

    . - . , - . , .

    . - . , . - . , - . . , - .

    , . -

  • 161

    , - .

    , , . , , . , , . .

    - . , . :

    (1) , . , .

    (2) -. - - .

    (3) , , . , .

    (4) , . .

    . , .

    1. , . :

    . , -, 2009. 2. , ., . . :

    . , LOCUS, 2010.

  • 162

    3. , . . , 2003. 4. , ., . . . ,

    , 2008. 5. , . .

    45, 2010. 6. , .

    , , , 14-16 2004, 194-203.

    7. , . . ( 7), 2009, 109-118.

    8. , . , - . (1) 2011, 140-145.

    9. , . . XI , 22 24 2011, 704-716.

    10. , . . , , 1987.

    11. , . . , , , , 2005, 444-458.

    12. Aliprantis, C., S. Chakrabarti. Games and Decision Making. Oxford University Press, 2000.

    13. French, S. Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality. Ellis Norwood, 1993.

    14. Luce D., H. Raiffa. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. John Wiley and Sons, 1957.

    15. Von Newman, J., O. Morgenstern. Theory of Game and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, 1953. (First publication in 1944)

  • 163

    . - . . .

    -

    . - : : 1. - ; 2. ; 3. - ; 4. --; 5. ; 6. ; 7. - , ; 8. - . , .

    , . , - . - - . , , . . - , . , . , - (sense-making, meaning-construction). -: ? - ? ? , -.

    , , ,

  • 164

    -, -. , . - , , , - . - , - .

    . . () . , . , . , :

    1. - . - , , , , . . , . - , .

    2. . (, 2009)1. - 1 (, 2009) 40 - . .

  • 165

    . - - . . , . . . , , (, 2013, . 186). , ( )2 , - , ,