Upload
seekly
View
631
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2008. 5
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
,
( ) 2003 1 .
10
, -
,
.
.
.
, (
) .
.
2008 5
iii
. 1.
,
(, ) 2003 1 .
- ,
.
10
-
,
2. 1910
, 195060
. 2 ,
,
1969 1981
iv
.
(T.J. Kent, Jr.) 1955
,
(land classification plan)
(policy plan)
(development management plan)
1990
1909 (The Housing, Town Planning
etc Act) (planning scheme) 1932
, .
1968 (structure plan)
(local plan)
, 1980
,
.
v
(2003)
,
,
, ,
.
3. 2000 4 (20002020) 2002
-
. 10
.
,
,
,
,
, ,
.
vi
,
,
,
4. 2008 5 , 10
,
()
90.0% ,
, TF
3
,
vii
52.7%(136) ,
10
,
(62%)
(59.5%) (56.2%)
30.3% 24.3% ,
62.1%
(44.8%) ,
(11.7%)
,
,
,
,
viii
, ,
, ,
, 7
5.
,
,
. ,
, SWOT .
, . ,
.
. ,
.
ix
,
.
,
SWOT .
.
.
.
(Key Man) , ()()
()() ,
.
xi
1 1 1 3 2 3 3 4
2 5 1 7 1. 8 2 16 1. 16 2. 17
3 19 1 21 2 22 1. 22 2. 24 3. 25 4. 26 3 27 1. 27 2. 29 3. 31
xii
4 33 1 35 1. 35 2 40 1. 40 2. 40 3 52
5 55 1 57 2 59 3 65
6 69
75 79
xiii
(2- 1) 8(2- 2) 13(3- 1) 23(3- 2) 31(4- 1) 35(4- 2) 35(4- 3) 37(4- 4) 37(4- 5) 37(4- 6) 39(4- 7) 41(4- 8) 45(4- 9) 46(4-10) 47(4-11) 48(4-12) 48(4-13) 49(4-14) 50(4-15) 51(5- 1) 57(5- 2) 59
(1- 1) 4(3- 1) 21(3- 2) 24(4- 1) 36
xiv
(4- 2) 36(4- 3) 38(4- 4) 38(4- 5) 41(4- 6) 42(4- 7) 42(4- 8) 43(4- 9) 43(4-10) 44(4-11) 45(4-12) 47(4-13) 47
1
1 2
3
1 3
1
1
, 2002 2
1) (, )
2003 1 .
- , -
,
(, 2004).
, 20 2002
, 10
.
(, 2006.12.). 10
-
.
2
.
,
1) 2000 1 28 6243 , .
4
.
3 1-1 .
(1-1)
2
1 2
2 7
2
1 ,
.
. , (T.J.Kent)
.
.2)
1920 (amenity)(convenience)
(safety)(sanitation)
.
3). 1990
(livable city)
.
,
,
2), 1997. 3) , 2005.
8
4),
.
,
.
.5)
(2-1)
/
) , 2005.
1. 6) 1910
, 195060
. 2 ,
.
4), 2000.5), 2000, p.21.6), , 2002.12. .
2 9
1969 1981 .
1)
.
.
7) ,
.
,8)
701 1960 .9)
.
701
.
, (circulation facilities)
, (public utilities) ,
(community facilities) .
1950
7) , . , (, , p.24).
8) the federal Standard City Planning Enabling Act of 1928, shaped enabling acts passed by many states. however, the Act left many planners and public officials confused about the difference between a master plan and a zoning ordinance, so the that hundreds of communities adopted zoning plans without having created comprehensive plans as the basis for zoning.(Black, Alan. The comprehensive plan, in Principles and Peactice of Urban Planning, edited by William I. Coodman and Eric C. Freund, Washington, DC: ICMA, p.353)
9)Today, more than half a century later, City Planners continually refer to the general plan, but they rarely define it or explain its purposes and uses. Although there are certain basic similarities in most of the published general plan documents, these similarities result from practices handed down from one city planner to another, rather than from the existence of any widely accepted conceptual basis.(T.J. Kent, Jr., , p.12).
10
.
(T.J. Kent, Jr.) 1955
. , ,
, ,
(statements) . (F. Stuart Chapin, Jr.)
, ,
,
.
(Chapin, 1957:275
388).
(land classification
plan)10), (policy plan)11),
(development management plan)12)
10) , . , . , . . , (Edward J. Kaiser and David R. Godschalk, wentieth Century Land Use Planning-A Stalwart Family Tree, JAPA, Vol.61, No.3, Summer 1995, p.365385).
11) (policy frame plan) , (statewide planning goals) (Edward J. kaiser and David R. Godschalk, , p.365385).
12) . - . -
2 11
1990
. ,
,
.
2) 20 ,
(zoning) . 1909 (The
Housing, Town Planning etc Act) (planning scheme)13)
.
. 1919 2
, 1932 .
,
.
, .
(,
1998:37).
.
. 1937 () 3 5
(, 2000. 5).
1947 .
,
. . (Edward J. Kaiser and David R. Godschalk, , p.365385).
13)scheme zoning planning scheme zoning plan .
12
.
,
(planning permission) .
. ,
.
.
.
1968 (structure
plan)14) (local plan)15)
.
,
. , 1960
,
(, 2006.).
3) 1888
1990
. , 1968
16) 17), 1992
14) , .
15) , .
2 13
(
18) ) .
(2-2)
, () 10 2010
1. 2.
1. ( )2. ()
( )
), 1996.
1968 .
.
16) . () (). , .
17) 1969 .
18)1992 .
14
.
,
.
.
. 1970
, (1976)(1977)
(1979)(1989) (1990)
(1991) .
, 1980
.
. ,
.19)
,
, .
,
1992 .
1993
9120) . ,
19) ( ) . , 1970 .
20)() ,
2 15
.
, 1998 5 2,025
343 .
. ,
. ,
. ,
.
, 1980
.
4) 21) 1981
.
.
.
, . (1993 6 25 91 ).
21), , 2006. 11. .
16
. ,
,
. ,
,
. ,
(,
1974:817).
,
(, 1993:2).
,
.
.
2
1. 22)
. ,
,
. 1947
, (Green
Belt) .
1980
22), 2006. 11. .
2 17
.
,
, .
.
,
.
2. 23)
1981 ,
,
3 .
.
1995 4 ,
, ,
. 1990
. 1999
,
,
. 1994
23), 21, 2006. 11. .
18
.
.
2003 3 .
,
,
, ,
.
.
2007 ,
10%
,
. , 5% 10%
.
.
,
1999
2
.
(Development plan) (Comprehensive
plan) (Development management plan)
(Hybrid Design-Policy-Management Plan)
.
3
1 2 3
3 21
3
1 2000 4 (20002020) 2002
-
. --
,
.
( 63) -
- . 10
.(3-1 )
()
()
( )
()- ----
()
), 2006.
(3-1)
22
2 24) ,
.
10
( 18 1).
. ,
.
5 ()
.
( 36). () 16 625)
.
,
(
, 2002:45).
1. ,
. 4 , 4
9 . ,
.
26),
24), , 2002. 12. .25) 6 .
3 23
.
, ,
. 2
.
(3-1)
(%) (%) (%) (%)
() 70 700 () 70 500() 90 1,500 () 90 1,500() 70 400 () 70 400() 20 200 () 20 100
60 200 40 0 20 80
40 80 20 80 60 400 20 80
40 80 20 80), 2002. 12.
, ,
, ()
,
( 777879). ,
( 181920).
.
26) , .
24
. 4
9
.
2. 27 3 ,
(3-2 ).
: : : : :
), 2002.
(3-2)
27 4 , ,
3 25
.
1994
.
.
,
.
.
3. 2000 1 28
( 46). ,
.
.
.
.
,
,
,
3
( 49).
,
, ,
,
26
( 58).
,
, ,
,
3 ( 63).27)
,
. ,
. ,
.
.
4.
, ,
(
2).
50% ,
. ( )
,
27) 1 2 ( 63 2).
3 27
( 6667).
.
(, 2002:13). ,
.
.
.
.
.
3
1. 28)
1981
2000 1 28
. -
2003
.
,
, ,
, ,
28), , , 2002. .
28
.
2003 1
1 .
6
,
,
.
, .
,
.
(, 2002).
, ,
,
. ,
,
.
, .
,
.
,
3 29
.
.
, .
.
.
.
,
,
NGO .
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
. ,
.
2. 29)
29), , 2007 , 10. 27.
30
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3 31
,
.
3. .
(2006)(2004) (2006) (2007)
(3-2 ).
(3-2)
,
,
,
,
,
32
, 2007 30)
.
,
(
)
30)2007 12 17 13 6 .
4
1 2 3
4 35
4
1
1. 1) 2008 5 , 10 1
3 18 , 5 131
10 .
(4-1)
/ - - - - -
(4-2)
1 1 10 1 1 3
13 2 18 1 - 135 3 7 - - -5 6 13 1 - 4
36
0
2
46
8
10
12
1416
18
20
1 1~3 3~5 5
(4-1)
2)
10 ,
.
.
10.0%
20.0%
20.0%
50.0%
(4-2)
4 37
30.0%( 10.0%
+ 20.0%) 20.0% (4-2 ).
3)
50.0%
. ,
, 577 .
(4-3)
(%) 5(50.0)
5(50.0)
(4-4)
() () 280 650 398 834
400 873 600 -
4) 10
36.4% ,
(22.7%) .
(4-5)
(%), 3(13.6)
8(36.4) 5(22.7)
3(13.6) 3(13.6)
38
5) ()
90.0% , ()
10.0% .
10 8
.
, TF
.
(45.5%) , (31.8%)
(18.2%) , TF
.
.18.2%
TF
.4.5%
,
.31.8%
.
45.5%
40%
30%
30%
(4-3) (4-4)
,
(36.4%)
(18.2%) .
,
4 39
.
,
3 .
,
.
6) 5
,
(40%) (30%)
(20%) . 4-6
10 3 ,
.
(4-6)
, 10
(33.3%) (25.0%) ,
.
.
40
2
1. 2003 ,
2003 1
10
. ( )
10
.
2. 1)
52.7%(136) , (20.5%)
(10.5%) .
10.1%
. ,
. ,
, 70%
. ,
, ,
(4-5 ).
4 41
10.1%
20.5%
6.2%
,
10.5%
,
52.7%
,
30.0%
40.0%
30%
(258) (10)
(4-5)
,
, 4-7 .
(4-7)
% % % % %
36 13.9 118 45.6 85 32.8 16 6.2 4 1.5 259
1 10.0 7 70.0 2 20.0 0 0 0 0 10
22 8.6 110 42.8 91 35.4 28 10.9 6 2.3 257
1 10.0 4 40.0 3 30.0 2 20.0 0 0 10 //
34 13.2 126 48.8 78 30.2 15 5.8 5 1.9 258
3 30.0 5 50.0 1 10.0 1 10.0 0 0 10
.
27 10.5 111 43.0 105 40.7 14 5.4 1 0.4 258
1 10.0 8 80.0 1 10.0 0 0 0 0 10
.
24 9.3 103 39.9 111 43.0 18 7.0 2 0.8 258
0 0 7 70.0 2 20.0 1 10.0 0 0 10
.
28 10.9 117 45.3 92 35.7 17 6.6 4 1.6 258
0 0 6 60.0 2 20.0 2 20.0 0 0 10
,
(62%:+)
(59.5%)
42
(56.2%) . ,
(90%)
80%
(70%)
.
.
2)
.
, 21
.
(1)
86.4%
13.3%
4 6.2%
2~34.1%
9.1%
12.1%
3.0%
3.0%
72.7%
(4-6) (4-7)
77.0%(187) 16.5%(40) 4.1%(10
4 43
) ,
(86.4%)4 (6.2%)23(4.1%)1(3.3%) . ,
72.7%
, 12.1% 9.1%
(4-67 ).
(77.4%)
4 (13.0%)23(6.7%)1(2.9%) .
(86.4%)
(8.9%)
(4.7%) (4-8 ). /
(88.7%)
(8.4%)
(2.9%) .
30.3%( 21.2%+ 9.1%) 24.3%( 9.1%+ 15.2%)
.
(4-9 ).
86.4%
8.9%
4.7%
9.1%
15.2%
21.2%
9.1%
45.5%
(4-8) (4-9)
44
(2) .
62.1%( 16.5%+ 45.6%)
2.1%
.
35.9%
2.1%
45.6%
16.5%
0
10
20
30
40
50
%
(4-10)
(3)
.
(44.8%)
, (26.0%)
(11.7%)
3.6% ,
.
4 45
(4-8)
(%)
8( 3.6)
16( 7.2)
58(26.0)
100(44.8)
26(11.7)
15( 6.7)
(4) 53.4%(
16.1%+ 37.3%) 18.7%( 5.1%+ 13.6%)
.
5.1
16.5%
45.6%
2.1%
35.9%
0
10
20
30
40
50
%
(4-11)
65.2%( 11.8%+ 53.4%)
46
13.9%( 3.4%+ 10.5%) .
,
.
,
45.9%
, ,
(20.5%)
(19.0%) (4-9 ).
(4-9)
(%)
19( 9.3)
39(19.0)
, 42(20.5)
94(45.9)
11( 5.4)
11.8%
53.4%
3.4%
10.5%
21.0%
7.8%
47.4%
3.4%
12.1%
29.3%
(4-12)
(4-13)
, ()
45.2%( 7.8%+
4 47
47.4%) 15.5%( 3.4%+ 12.1%)
. ,
,
(42.6%) , (21.8%)
(17.3%)
(4-10 ).
34.3%( 4.3%+ 30.0%)
22.8%( 3.8%+ 19.0%) .
(4-10)
(%)
35(17.3)
, 86(42.6)
, 44(21.8)
() () 29(14.4)
8( 4.0)
(5) .
(
) (
), (
) 4-11 .
( 20.6%+ 4.3%) 24.9%
( 3.0%+ 12.9%) 15.9% ,
( 26.8%+ 4.3%) 31.1% (
1.7%+ 10.4%) 12.1% .
48
(4-11)
% % % % % 7 3.0 30 12.9 138 59.2 48 20.6 10 4.3 233
4 1.7 24 10.4 131 56.7 62 26.8 10 4.3 231
1 0.4 21 9.1 138 60.0 63 27.4 7 3.0 230
( 27.4%+ 3.0%)
30.4% ( 0.4%+ 9.1%) 9.5%
,
, ,
.
(6) (4-12)
% % % % %
21 9.2 76 33.2 91 39.7 37 16.2 4 1.7 229
27 11.7 78 33.9 83 36.1 32 13.9 10 4.3 230
22 9.5 77 33.3 104 45.0 25 10.8 3 1.3 231
38 16.5 80 34.8 85 37.0 22 9.6 5 2.2 230
. 17 7.4 70 30.3 102 44.2 32 13.9 10 4.3 231
23 10.1 68 29.8 100 43.9 30 13.2 7 3.1 228
19 8.3 66 28.9 105 46.1 28 12.3 10 4.4 228
12 5.3 53 23.2 137 60.1 17 7.5 9 3.9 228
39 17.0 69 30.0 90 39.1 23 10.0 9 3.9 230
4-12
.
4 49
(7) 4-13
.
.
(4-13)
% % % % %
31 13.5 79 34.3 86 37.4 25 10.9 9 3.9
NGO 30 13.0 68 29.6 92 40.0 30 13.0 10 4.3
31 13.5 86 37.6 87 38.0 21 9.2 4 1.7
45 19.5 67 29.0 87 37.7 24 10.4 8 3.5
31 13.5 74 32.3 86 37.6 28 12.2 10 4.4
36 15.6 70 30.3 93 40.3 26 11.3 6 2.6
23 10.2 84 37.2 92 40.7 20 8.8 7 3.1
23 10.0 58 25.2 94 40.9 42 18.3 13 5.7
30 13.2 66 28.9 99 43.4 21 9.2 12 5.3
() 32 13.9 65 28.3 91 39.6 29 12.6 13 5.7
,
52.4%
, (30.7%)
(11.1%)
(4-14 ).
50
(4-14)
(%) . 10( 4.4)
69(30.7)
118(52.4)
25(11.1)
3( 1.3)
,
.
.
,
.
.
4-15
7 .
4 51
(4-15)
()
. () , (, )
,
- . -
,
- , ,
-
, . (, ) , . ,
. (, ). (: (. ) )
, . . , . . .
,
1 .
52
(4-15) ()
. . .
,
. . ,
3 .
, . 100 .
. .
( )
3 10
,
.
, .
, .
4 53
. ,
.
, .
. ,
.
,
.
, .
, ()
, ,
.
, .
. , ,
.
, .
, .
, .
. 62.1%
.
,
.
, .
.
.
54
, .
, (, )
. 10 7
, 7
. (90%)
.
.
, .
(30.4%) (9.5%)
,
.
,
, .
5
1 2
3
5 57
5
1 5-1 .
(5-1)
58
(5-1) ()
2
.
,
.
5 59
.
2 5-2 .
(5-2)
( ()) 3.4 1.6 0.1 23.0 2.0 - 0.2 0.0 2.5 26.4
):+ , :+ , :.
60
(5-2) ()
2
):+ , :+ , :.
. 5-2
, 10 .
2008 10
5 61
, 2005
. , 10
.
10 , 2006
37 2006 33.5 10(9606)
-0.48% , (0425
) 0.24% 3.4 .
,
. 2005
11.4, 13 1.6
, 51.8, 2005 51.7 1
. 2016 2006 65
, 42 23 .
,
. 10 (26.4)
.
2006 13.4
15.5
2 .
2010 .
, , 2020 2005
16 , 15.8,
2005 44.9 10
(204) .
2016 2006 22.6,
62
20.1 2.5 .
(4,600)
(51,400) .
2016 610,000
. 2006 49.4 23
10 26.4 .
. ,
,
. SWOT
.
.
,
, .
,
5 63
,
.
.
.
, SWOT
. ,
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
,
.
64
.
,
.
. ,
,
,
.
.
,
,
.
,
.
,
5 65
.
,
.
3
. .
, .
20
, .
, .
.
, SWOT
.
, .
.
,
.
,
. ,
. 20 .
66
.
.
,
.
, .
, .
.
6
6 69
6
10
.
, 3 ,
,
3
. , ,
, ,
,
,
, ,
,
NGO , ,
.
,
(4). ,
. ,
. ,
.
, .
.
.
70
,
. , .
. ,
. ,
. ,
.
. 62.1%
.
, . ,
.
.
. ,
,
, . ,
.
,
,
.
,
(5) . ,
,
. ,
.
, SWOT . ,
6 71
,
. ,
,
. , .
.
, . ,
.
, (Key Man)
. ()()()()
,
.
10
.
, 10
,
.
75
[]
, ,
, , 39 5, 2004.10.
, ,
, , 32 3, 1997.6.
, , 2006.12.
, ,
, 13 2, 2000. 12.
, ,
21 11, 2005. 11.
, 21 , , 2000, p.21.
, , , 2002.12.
, , 9 5, 8-17, .
1974.
, , , 1993.
, , , 1985.
, 21, , 2006. 11.
, , 2006. 6.
p.7.
, , ,
2002. 10.
, ,
2006 , 2006. 11.
,
, 2007 , 2007. 10.
, , , 2000.,
, 1996.
76
, , , 1998.
Chapin, F. Stuart, Jr., Urban Land Use Planning, New York: harper and Brothers
Publishers, 1957.
1 2
79
1
: ,
.
1) .
2) 18 .
1. .
/
18 .
2. .( )
1
1~3 3~5 5
3. ?
4. ? ( 7. )
5. ?
6. 5. .
80
7. ? ( )
8. () ? ( )
9. ? ( )
, ( )
10. ? TF . () . () . . ( )
11. ? ( / )
12. . . TF . . , . ( )
13. ? ( )
81
14. ? . . . . . ( )
15. 5 , ?
. , . . . ( )
16. ? . ( )
17. .
18 .
18. ? . . , . , . ( )
82
19. .
. . // . .
. .
20. ? .
.
83
2
?
,
.
(,
, , 500)
.
, 13( )
.
.
2008. 04.
239-0109
239-0154
: 055-266-2079 E-mail : [email protected]
: , .
1. ?
()
2. ? ( 5. ) 1 2~3 4 3. .( ) ( )
84
4. . ( )5. ? . 1 2~3 4
6. ? . . .
7. / ?
. . .
8. (4 ) ?
9. ?
10. ?
11. ? . . . , . , . ( )
12. // ?
85
13. ? . . , . , , , . ( )
14. (//) ?
15. ?
. , . , . () () . ( )
16. (:, , ) ?
17. .
( , ) ( ) ( )
18. . .
86
19. . .
NGO ()
20. , . ?
. . , ,
. . ( )
21. , , . .
.
2008 5 25 2008 5 31
152(:641-060) 152 Joongang-ro, Changwon, Gyeongnam 641-060 Tel(055)239-0109. Fax(055)266-2079 Homepage : www.gndi.re.kr ISBN 978-89-8351-180-5-9330
. . .