1
7/24/2019 20151016094117 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/20151016094117 1/1 Table 2.17 Energy Absorption Efficiency of Tires and Shock Absorbers Element: Energy Abso rption Efficiency; Tires: = 0.47 Shock absorbers: ai r springs ti =0 .6 0 to 0.65 s metal springs with o i l damping = 0.70 liquid spr ing s = 0.75 to 0.85 oleo-pne umatic = 0. 80 canti lever spring = 0.50 Table 2.18 Suggested Landing Gear Load Factors Certification Base: Landing Gear Load Fac tor, N FAR 23 N = 3.0 g FAR 25 Ng =1 .5 to 2.0 Fighters and Trainers N = 3.0 - 8. 0: See Fig.2.26 for more details Military transports = 1.5 - 2 .0 Part IV Chapter 2 Page 5 4 load per leg to the maximum st at ic load per leg . ^ is the tire energy absorption efficiency. is the energy absorption efficiency of the shock absorber. s is th e maximum al lo wab le tire defl ect ion as de termined from Eqn.(2.4). s_ is the stroke of the shock absorber, s Eqn.( 2.9) may be used to compute the required shock absorber length: Sg = [{0.5 Wj^/g) (w^)^/(ngP^Ng)} -n^s^l ig (? i U It i s suggested to add one inch to this length: s ^s •'•^^^ (2.12) design Table 2.18 shows the values f or landing gear load factors which may be used i n pr el imin ar y design. How these landing gear load factors are related to design touchdown rate and to shock absorber str oke is shown i n Figure 2.26 for some example air pla nes . The diameter of the shock absorber (s tr ut ) may be estimated from: d = 0.041 + 0.0025(P )^^^ (2.13) s m Note that Eqn.(2.9) tacitly assumes that the main gear reaction load is transferred directly into the shock absorber. This condition is not satisfied for gears where the reaction load is not in line with the shock absorber. A land ing gear where the reactio n load is a- ligned with the shock absorber i s given in Fig.(2.7). Examples of landing gears where this alignment is absent, are given in Pig .( 2. 24 ). For the la tt er type gears, the required value for shock absorber stroke (and thus s tr ut length) must be determined for the particular landing gear geometry at hand. No gene ral r ul es can be given. For main gears where the design ca ll s f or a siirple cantilever (leaf or tube) spr ing , Ref .8 contai ns an example siz in g cal cu la ti on . Figure 2.27 shows an example application, seen mostly in light airplanes. Part IV Chapter 2 Page 5 5

20151016094117

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 20151016094117

7/24/2019 20151016094117

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/20151016094117 1/1

Table 2.17 Energy Absorption E ff i c i ency of Tires and

Shock Absorbers

Element: Energy Abso rpt ion Eff ic iency;

Tires: = 0.47

Shock absorbers:

ai r springs ti =0 .6 0 to 0.65

smetal springs

w i t h o i l damping = 0.70

l i q u i d spr ing s = 0.75 to 0.85

oleo-pne umatic = 0. 80

canti lever spring = 0.50

Table 2.18 Suggested Landin g Gear Load Fact ors

C e r t i f i c a t i o n Base: Landin g Gear Load Fac to r, N

FAR 23 N = 3.0g

FAR 25 Ng =1 .5 to 2.0

Fighters and Trainers N = 3.0 - 8.0: See Fig.2.26for more details

M i l i t a r y t ransports = 1.5 - 2 .0

Part IV Chapter 2 Page 5 4

load per l eg to th e maximum st at i c load per l eg .

^ is the t i r e energy absorption e f f i c i enc y.

is the energy absorption e f f i c i e n c y of theshock absorber.

s is th e maximum al lo wab le t i r e d ef l ect ion as determined f r o m Eqn.(2.4) .

s_ is the stroke of the shock absorber,s

Eqn.( 2.9) may be used to compute the r equ ire d shockabsorber length:

S g = [ { 0 . 5 W j ^ / g ) (w^)^/(ngP^Ng)} - n ^ s ^ l i g (? i U

I t i s suggested to add one inch to this length:

s s •'• ^ (2.12)design

Table 2.18 shows the values f or land ing gear loadfac to r s which may be used i n pr el im in ar y des ign . Howthese landing gear load factors are related to designtouchdown rat e and to shock absorber str oke is shown i nFigure 2.26 for some example air pla nes .

The diameter of the shock absorber (s tr ut ) may beestimated f r o m :

d = 0.041 + 0.0025(P ) ^ ^ (2.13)s m

Note that Eqn.(2.9) t a c i t l y assumes that the maingear react ion load is t ransferred d i r e c t l y i n to the shockabsorber. This condi t ion i s no t s a t i s f i ed fo r gearswhere the reac tio n load is not i n l i n e w i t h the shockabsorber. A land ing gear where the re ac tio n load is a-ligned w i t h the shock absorber i s given i n F i g . (2 .7 ) .Examples of landing gears where this alignment is absent,are given in Pig .( 2. 24 ). For the la tt er type gears, therequire d value f or shock absorber str oke (and thus s tr utlength) must be determined for the particular landinggear geometry at hand. No gene ral r ul es can be gi ve n.

For main gears where the design ca ll s f or a siirplecanti lever ( leaf or tube) spr ing , Ref .8 contai ns anexample siz in g cal cu la ti on . Figure 2.27 shows an exampleapplicat ion, seen mostly in l i g h t a i rplanes.

Part IV Chapter 2 Page 5 5