Upload
suzana-radovic
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
1/18
773
UDK: 347.925(497.11:4-672EU)
: 01.09.2014. : 01.12.2014.
**
,
( 179046).
,*
,
()
**
: ()
. , ,
: ,
,
, ,
. ,
( ,
) . ,
; ;
.
,
,
,
,
,
.
: , , , , ,
, .
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
2/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
774
1.
2006. 1
.
, ,
:
. , ,
,
20132018. (. ),2
, :
;
, ,
;
. , ,3 ,
, .
()
, ,
. ,
,
,
. (De Palo, Harley, 2005: 469479)
: , , . , ,
.
2.
2.1.
() (, ,
2012: 710) - , 2002. . ,
1 : http://ww w.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_sekcija.
php?id=45678
2 : http://ww w.mpravde.gov.rs/files/Nacionalna%20
Strategija%20reforme%20pravosudja%20za%20period%202013.-2018.%20godine.pdf
3 2013. : http://www.mpravde.
gov.rs/sekcija/53/radne-verzije-propisa.php
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
3/18
. | . 773-790
775
-. ,
, (,
), , : , .
, :
(IFC) (ABA/CEELI).
, .
.
. 2005. 4( : ),
. ,
, (, ) (
IFC). , ,
.
- , , -
,
, ,
! , ,
2006. 2013. , 3.500 .5
. ,6 2012. ,7
4 , . , 18/05.
5 : http://novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html:460347-
Gasi-se-Centar-za-medijaciju, : 10. 2014. .
6 : http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/statist ika_2012.pdf
7
2011. (2.742.772 ). ,
2010. , ,
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
4/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
776
, ,
. :
?
.
2.2.
,
-
, , .
, ,
, .
,
2005. . , (
),
!
( ),
( )
?
, ,
. , (,
, 2011: 11) : ;
;
;
;
, , . ,
(, 2014: 103245)
, ,
: ,
;
,
. : http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/aktuelno/
statistika_o_radu_sudova_za_2011.pdf, http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/
godisnji_izvestaj_o_radu_2010.pdf
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
5/18
. | . 773-790
777
;
;
, , .
, ,
, ,
. ,
.
2008.
,
. (, 2014)
pro futuro ,
2013., .
( ) ,
.
(, 2014: 236245)
() :
, ;
;
;
,
, . , , ,
, , (, 2014).
, .
3.
3.1.
. ,
, 20. . ,
, ,
1.300 , ,
,
(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 351). , ()
( 2010.
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
6/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
778
) (Jean, Jorry, 2013:
34), , , 493
() ,
() ( 110%). ,
,
2010. , ,
(.tax on incoming ca-
ses). (De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 352)
:
, , .
(
)
.
,
.
,
(Bruni, Sitzia, 2013: 4950). , 1991. ,
(. Justice of the Peace; . Giudice di Pace);
, 1993. , . 580,
; , . 281,
; , 2003. . 5
( ); 2006.
. 55 ,
; 2007. , . 179
,
; 2010. , . 183
, . ,
2009. , . 69,
,
28/2010.
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
7/18
. | . 773-790
779
. ,
, .
3.2.
. 580, 1993. ,
,
,
. (De Palo, 2007: 2):
1999. 2005. , ,
, 327 ,
277 , 45
,
.
(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 352)
. ,
,
2001. , 98%
, 2001.
4%
(De Palo, Harley, 2005: 472). ,
(De Palo, Harley, 2005:
473475) (, )
,
. , ,
, (De Palo, Harley,
2005: 476478) :
;
( , ); , , , ,
;
, .
. (Gabellini,
2010: 6465) :
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
8/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
780
() ,
(
28/2010), ,
.
(Morek, 2013), 2011.
( ) 2012.
215.689 ,
12%. ,
, 50%.
, 2011. 2012. ,
,
(
). (De Berti, 2012)
. ,
,
, ,
,
0,5% (Colombo, 2012: 79). ,
, .
, 2008. 37 ,
843 2012. ; 35309
(De Berti, 2012). , (Colombo,
2012: 78) ( ) :
?
, ,
; ,
,
.
4.
4.1.
,
, ().
, ,
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
9/18
. | . 773-790
781
. , :
(. justice of the peace),
(Schlichtungsbehrden) ( ) . ,
.
,
40%(Meier, 2006: 45).
,, ( ) - , 1980.
, ,
. ,
, , : , ,
, ,
, . 2005. ;
. ,
, .
, 2007. , . (.Swiss Mediation Rules)
. , 1. 2011. ,
, (),
.
.8 ,
,
. ,
. , ; , .
. ( ),
(Baizeau, Kunz, 2013: 93, 95).
8 2008/52/. ,
.
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
10/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
782
4.2.
(Baizeau, Kunz, 2013: 93, 95). ,
; , ,
, , ,
. ,
,
, . ,
,
; ,
. ,
() . , (
), , .
() . , ,
. , ,
. ,
(
) (
40%), .
: [ ] (Meier, 2006: 18). ,
, ,
,
,
.
( , ),
, ,
. ,
(Meier, 2006: 19)
,
!
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
11/18
. | . 773-790
783
5.
5.1. :
(De Roo, Jagtenberg, 2002:
128133) 16. Leidse Vredema-
kers(.Layden Peacemakers), ,
,
Bereaux de Paix, Juges de Paix.
, ,
( )
. , 19. ,
, (
), , .
. , 20. ,
, , ,
(
),
, , ,
,
. ,
20. , ( , ),
,
, , . ,
,
,
, . ,
,
,
. 1993.
(. ),
.
. ,
,
. (De Roo, Jagtenberg,
2002: 130) , , (19962001),
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
12/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
784
1.222 , ,
(, 1993. 2002.
2.000, ),
, , , . ,
(CEPEJ, 2012: 139)
: 100.000
, : 4.015,
.
. 1996. ,
. , 2000. 2003.
, :
,
, ,
.
,
(, Journal
for Mediation),
,
, .
5.2.
, . ,
(Pel, 2012)
2008/52/., . ,
, - 1995.
, 2000. .
, , ,
- 1980. :9 )
, ) ,
) .
9 : Art. 2, 7, 14, 20 of UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, A/RES/35/52, 10.12.1980.
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
13/18
. | . 773-790
785
,
, , , ;
,
, , (De
Roo, Jagtenberg, 2002:135, 145). ,
, .
, ,
, , ,
, .
, ,
, 2011. 52.000 ,
(17.058 33%)
(12.922 25%) (Pel: 2012). , 2010.
(Vogels, van der Zeijden, 2010: 47) (,
69% ) ( )
,
(36,7%, 34,4%). ,
(Vogels, van der Zeijden, 2010: 49)
-, ( )
.
, , ,
,
. ,
(. -
) condition sine qua non ,
. , , . ,
.
, ,
,
(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 349). ,
2012. , (CEPEJ, 2012: 132141)
, ,
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
14/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
786
. , ,
,
. ,
, . (. ), .
.
6.
(, ,
, )
,
, . , ,
-, . ,
(
). ,
,
, . ,
,
.
2010. , ,
, ,
.
,
( ) . ,
,
, .
. ,
() , ()
, .
: . ,
(
) .
, ,
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
15/18
. | . 773-790
787
, , ,
, , ,
.
,
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
( , ) . , .
Baizeau, D., Kunz, A. C. (2013). Switzerland. U Renate Dendorfer-Ditges (Prir.),
Mediation in 16 jurisdictions worldwide 2013. London: Law Business Research Ltd.
Bruni, A., Sitzia, M. (2013). Italy. U Renate Dendorfer-Ditges (Prir.), Mediation in
16 jurisdictions worldwide 2013. London: Law Business Research Ltd.
Colombo, F. G. (2012). Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Italy: European
Inspiration and National Problems. Ritsumeikan Law Review. 29. 7180
De Berti, G. (2012). Mandatory mediation: the Italian experience, two years on.
[Electronic version]. Retrieved 21, April 2014, from http://www.internationa-
llawofice.com
De Palo, G. (2007). Cross-Border Commercial Mediation: How Legislation Affects
Mediation Use. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 7, May 2014, from http://www.
europarl.europa.eu/comparl/juri/hearings/20071004/depalo5_en.pdf
De Palo, G., Carmeli, S. (2005). Mediation in Continental Europe: A Meande-
ring Path Toward Eficient Regulation. U C. Newmark i A. Monaghan (Prir.),
Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Prac-
tice of Commercial Mediation. Manchester: Tottel Publishing
De Palo, G., Harley, P. (2005).Mediation in Italy: Exploring the Contradictions.
Negotiation Journal, 21(4). 469-479
De Roo, A., Jagtenberg, R. (2002). Mediation in the Netherlands: Past Present
Future. Electronic journal of comparative law. [Electronic version]. Retrieved
28, April 2014, from http://www.ejcl.org/64/art64-8.pdf
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
16/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
788
2008/52/ 21. 2008.
European Commission for the Eficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Council of Europe.European judicial systems, Edition 2012 (data 2010): Eficiency and quality of
justice. (2012)
Gabellini, R. (2010). The Italian Mediation Law Reform(ADR Bulletin, 12(3), Ar-
ticle 4). [Electronic version]. Retrieved 1, May 2014, from http://epublications.
bond.edu.au/adr/vol12/iss3/4
2012. , http://www.
vk.sud.rs/assets/iles/o_sudu/izvestaji/statistika_2012.pdf
2011. , http://www.
vk.sud.rs/assets/iles/aktuelno/statistika_o_radu_sudova_za_2011.pdf
2010. http://www.
vk.sud.rs/assets/iles/o_sudu/izvestaji/godisnji_izvestaj_o_radu_2010.pdf
Jean, J., Jorry, H. (2013).Judicial systems of the European Union countries:Analysis
of data by the European Commission for the Eficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Council
of Europe
Meier, I. (2006). Mediation and Conciliation in Switzerland. [Electronic version].
Retrieved 27, April 2014, from http://www.175jahre.uzh.ch
, . (2014). : -
. :
, . (2014).
.
. 66
, . (2014). () :
, mimeo
Morek, R. (2013). Mandatory Mediation in Italy Reloaded. [Electronic version].
Retrieved 23, April 2014, from http://kluwermediationblog.com/2013/10/09/
mandatory-mediation-in-italy-reloaded/
a a 2006. , http://www.
srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_sekcija.php?id=45678
a a 20132018. ,
http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/iles/Nacionalna%20Strategija%20reforme%20
pravosudja%20za%20period%202013.-2018.%20godine.pdf
, ., , . (2011). .
: (IFC).
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
17/18
. | . 773-790
789
, ., , . (2012). :
. :
Pel, M. (2012). [Electronic version]. Retrieved 28, April 2014, from http://kluwer-
mediationblog.com/2012/03/07/promotion-and-legislation-on-mediation-in-thenetherlands/
2013.
. : http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/sekcija/53/radne-verzije-
propisa.php
UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, A/RES/35/52, 10.12.1980
Vogels, R.J.M., van der Zeijden, P.Th. (2010). The Situation Regarding Mediation
in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: The Netherlands Mediation Institute
. . . 18(2005).
http://novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html:460347-Gasi-se-
Centar-za-medijaciju
7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji
18/18
| 68 | LIII | 2014
790
Aleksandar Mojaevi, LL.D.
Assistant Professor,
Faculty of Law, University of Ni
Eficiency of (Judicial) Mediation in Serbiaas
Compared to some European Countries
Summary
Analysis of eficiency of (judicial) mediation in Serbia and other European coun-
tries (Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Denmark) illuminates the causes of
poor representation of this legal institution in our country. Analysis of mediation
in Italy, culturally most closely resembling country to Serbia, indicates that alegalistic approach to the promotion and implementation of mediation, especi-
ally if it is heterogeneous, is not eficient. On the other hand, countries that have
implemented a bottom-up approach (irst applied, and then regulate), such
as the Netherlands and Denmark, have developed eficient mediation system.
Switzerland, a country that relied on an approach based on the promotion of
culture of mediation, has a mediation system that has not been developed to the
extent to the developed system of conciliation. In any case, the Italian experience
has taught us that the regulation of mediation is not a sure path to success in the
implementation of this legal institution; Swiss experience highlights the impor-
tance of developing a culture of peaceful settlement of disputes; Dutch and Da-
nish experience emphasizes pragmatism in the promotion and implementation
of mediation. Since Serbia lacks an eficient regulatory framework of mediation,
culture of peaceful dispute settlement and pragmatism in implementation of
this legal institution, it seems that the experiences, for the purpose of analysis,
observed countries are more than useful.
Key words: eficiency, mediation, Serbia, the Netherlands, Denmark, Italy,
Switzerland.