Upload
vokiet
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
!"#$%&'#()*+,-)%,.%/"*$)*0+1('*2,%34%5)**'
677,(1'8)%9*,.)77,*%,.%5:,*'(1(%/"*$)*0;#1<)*7180%,.%/',%9'"-,%3)21('-%/(:,,-
Disclosure
• Scientific Consultant/Advisory Board: Johnson&Johnson
• Educational grants:
– Medtronic
– Pfizer
GeneralObjectivesSurgeryforLungCancer
• Localtreatment– Tissueforpathology– Margins– Surgicalstaging
Outline
• RoleofofsurgeryinLungCancer:– Stage1and2– Stage3
• Technicalaspects– Typeofresection– Lymphadenectomy– Minimallyinvasivesurgery
! &'-1.,*#1'%&'#()*%+)$178*0
! CKLID%A'81)#87%/8'$)%M
! CNED%#,%8*)'8F)#8
&:)784%DIIL%O"-PCEDQCRBCKEGK4%
TherapeuticAlternatives
• Surgery
• Lobectomy
• Segmentectomy
• StereotaxicRadiotherapy
• PercutaneousAblation
!"#$ &'#()* /8'$) 1#%U*'V1- Q/', 9'"-,%+)$178*0R+)$178*,%W,7A18'-'*%2)%&X#()*%2,%J78'2,%2)%/Y,%9'"-,
DIII%'%DICI%Q#ZDI[\IR
]>/9H%DICE
9:;&4+/)(<)+'&84(-)(=
pN1/N2Stations8th Revision
Pathologic- R0
Pathologic- anyR
N1a vs N1b vs N2a1 vs N2a2 vs N2b Comparisons Adjusted for Histology (adeno vs others), Sex, Age
60+ , and Region. (Cox PH regression on R0 cases)
comparison HR PN1b vs N1a 1.39 0.0005
N2a1 (skip) vs N1b 0.89 0.2863N2a2 vs N2a1 (skip) 1.35 0.0007
N2b vs N2a2 1.26 0.0028N2a2 vs N1b 1.21 0.064
N1Single=N1aN1Multiple=N1bN2SingleN2(“skipmets”)=N2a1N2SingleN2+N1=N2a2N2MultipleN2=N2b
N1a vs N1b vs N2a1 vs N2a2 vs N2b Comparisons Adjusted for Histology (adeno vs others), Sex, Age
60+ , R0 Resection, and Region. (Cox PH regression on All cases)
comparison HR PN1b vs N1a 1.38 0.0005
N2a1 (skip) vs N1b 0.92 0.4331N2a2 vs N2a1 (skip) 1.37 0.0002
N2b vs N2a2 1.21 0.0117
N2a2 vs N1b 1.26 0.0197
Locat ion and Number of Pos Sta tions N1-N2 Any R
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 2 4 6YEARS AFTER RESECTION
1. N1 Si ngle2. N1 Multi ple3. N2 Si ngle4. N2 Si ngle+N15. N2 Multi ple N2
Events / N438 / 1135153 / 325261 / 602304 / 582462 / 796
MSTNR60.967 .043 .938 .0
60 Month 58% 50% 52% 41% 36%
Locat ion and Number of Pos Sta tions N1-N2 R0
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0 2 4 6YEARS AFTER RESECTION
1. N1 Si ngle2. N1 Multi ple3. N2 Si ngle4. N2 Si ngle+N15. N2 Multi ple N2
Events / N415 / 1089146 / 306230 / 549271 / 540403 / 711
MSTNR60.970 .946 .040 .0
60 Month 59% 50% 54% 43% 38%
Asamura Hetal.JThorac Oncol.2015
• Lobectomy is the gold-standard
• Segmentectomy (preferred) or wedge resection in patients with:
• Poor pulmonary reserve or major comorbidity• Peripheral nodule < 2cm and:
• AIS histology• >50% ground-glass appearance• Long doubling time >400 days
1++234*%5' ,6%$ .DD:EFGHF.:IF00
! &-1#1('-%8*1'-B%DNL%A'81)#87B
! 5C%^I%!"#$%&'#()*%Q1#8*',A)*'81<)%78'$1#$R
! 5e,%6*F7B
! !,?)(8,F0
! /"?-,?'* *)7)(81,#
!>"8(,F)7B
! !,('-%+)("**)#()
! _17)'7)G.*))%7"*<1<'-
1++234*%5' ,6%$ .DD:EFGHF.:IF00
!1F18)2%+)7)(81,#% !,?)(8,F0
J<)#8^,4%,.%9'81)#87
+'8)%QA)*%A)*7,#`0R
^,4%,.%9'81)#87
+'8)%QA)*%A)*7,#`0R% A%f'-")%
+)("**)#()%Q)T(-"21#$%7)(,#2%A*1F'*0R E[ I4CIC DE I4I\L I4ID?
+)("**)#()%Q1#(-"21#$%7)(,#2%A*1F'*0R ND I4CCD ED I4ILK I4ILK?
!,(,*)$1,#'-%*)("**)#()2 DC I4IgI [ I4IDI I4II[(
^,#-,('-%*)("**)#()2 CL I4IN[ C\ I4IEL I4gLD%Q^/R(
_)'8:%Qe18:%('#()*R EI I4ILE DC I4INK I4IKN?
_)'8:%Q'--%('"7)7R N[ I4CCL E[ I4I[K I4I[[?
!,(,*)$1,#'-%*)("**)#()2 DC I4IgI [ I4IDI I4II[(
^,#-,('-%*)("**)#()2 I4gLD%Q^/R
1++234*%5' ,6%$ .DD:EFGHF.:IF00
/"?-,?'* *)7)(81,#%17%'77,(1'8)2%e18:%'%25-2)(&($')&"?&%"#$%&()#4(()+#)
&,#(-"71,#
!,?)(8,F0%17%8:)%$,-2G78'#2'*2
^)e%(:'--)#$)7
! /F'--%#,2"-)7
! J-2)*-0%A'81)#87
! =*,"#2G$-'77%,A'(181)7
J8&%"B)#'"*=&()$%%=&+)#)88$(=C
! N%O'A'#)7)%M#7818"81,#7! +)8*,7A)(81<)%DII\GDICI! /8'$)%M6%Q)T(-"2)2%+C`D%)%F"-81A-)%8"F,*7R
! ==>%A*)2,F1#'#()%Qh\IiR
RandomizedclinicaltrialLinfadenectomy XSamplingResectable TNMc I-IIIAN=471ResectedLy:
SND:9.45MLS:3.63
VATSLobectomy:BrazilianExperience(VATSBrazil)
RicardoMingarini TerraDarcyRibeiroPintoFilhoSergioTadeuPereiraThamaraKazantzis
PauloManuelPego-Fernandes
InstitutionsSociedadeBrasileiradeCirurgiaTorácica
FaculdadedeMedicinadaUniversidadedeSãoPaulo- DisciplinadeCirurgiaTorácica
9'81)#87
><)*'--%#ZL[g
M#(-"2)2 A'81)#87ZgNKEIG2'0%F,*8'-180
#ZNK\
JT(-"2)2 2") 8,F1771#$ 2'8'
#ZCEL
C[%7"*$),#7CN%M#7818"81,#7
5)**'%+3H%DICg
DemographyAge (n=646), mean ± DP(mín-max)
61,7 ± 14,7(3-87)
Gender (n=649), n (%)MaleFemale
295 (45,5)354 (54,5)
Diagnosis (n=631), n (%)NeoplasiaBenign
522 (82,7)111 (17,3)
Smoking (n=648), n(%)Non-smokerSmokerEx-smoker
191 (29,5)269 (41,5)188 (29,0)
Comorbidities, nCOPDCAD CHFDM
(n= 628)(n=649)(n=649)(n=602)
234 (37,2)70 (10,8)22 (3,4)85 (14,2)
Resultados VATS Brasil
ESTS STS SID Premier
Mortalidade em 30 dias, %
2,0 1,0 0,94 1,1 2,7
Complicações pós operatórias, %
19,1 29,1 26,23 43,6 9,47
Tempo int, Mediana Média (DP)
4
6,75 (23,4)
6
7,8 (5,8)
4
5
4
5,83 (5,03) !
30-dayMortality
Complications
Admissiontime
Results
TerraRM,2016
Lung lobectomy in lung cancer patients VATS vs. Robotics: Randomized study
Ricardo Mingarini Terra, Pedro Henrique Xavier Nabuco de Araujo, Leticia Leone Lauricella, Alberto Jorge Monteiro Del Vega, Paulo Manuel Pego-Fernandes, Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica do Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - ICESPDisciplina de Cirurgia Torácica - Departamento de Cardiopneumologia – Faculdade de Medicina da USP