Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
G-COE PICE International Symposium and IEEE EDS Minicolloquim onAdvanced Hybrid Nano Devices: Prospects by World’s Leading Scinetists
Tokyo Tech., October 4 and 5, 2011
Challenges of Heterogeneous Integration on CMOS
益 一 哉 Kazuya Masu異種機能集積研究センター
東京工業大学
ICE cube CenterTokyo Institute of Technology
[email protected] http://masu-www.pi.titech.ac.jp
Outline
1 Introduction Why RF CMOS?1. Introduction Why RF CMOS?
2 Our RF CMOS development2. Our RF CMOS development
Why do we expect heterogeneous y p gintegration on CMOS ?
3. Our approach to heterogeneous integration: Novel wafer shuttle technique.g q
4. Summary
Recent mobile phone
Freq and wavelength
freq
Voice, Packets
FM TxOne seg. TV
Lower band Higher band
Courtesy of Hideyuki Saso, Vice President, Fujitsu
WL
Mobile phone 4
Wideband RF frontend that covers multiple wireless applications withmultiple wireless applications with only one chip is in highly required.
[1] OpenMoko
PA : Power AmplifierMIX : MixerLPF : Low Pass FilterLNA : Low Noise Amplifier
L and C limit operational frequency
5Mutiband/multimode transceiver
Many wireless standards (400MHz – 6GHz) Mobile phone 800MHz 1 5GHz 1 9GHz 2GHz Mobile phone 800MHz, 1.5GHz, 1.9GHz, 2GHz
(+700MHz, 900MHz, 1.7GHz for the new system)(+800MHz, 900MHz, 1.8GHz, 1.9GHz for GSM)
WLAN 802 11b/ Bl t th 2 4GH WLAN 802.11b/g, Bluetooth 2.4GHz WLAN 802.11a/n 4.9GHz – 5.875GHz GPS 1.2GHz/1.5GHz DTV 440MHz – 770MHz
User's viewpoint User wants to connect network whenever wherever whomever
One terminal User wants to connect network whenever, wherever, whomever,
and whatever. System viewpointy p
Improvement of frequency usage efficiencyMultiband/multimode wireless communication is
indispensable.
Miniaturization of MOSFET/CMOS
1T
Frequency [Hz]10
size[m]
e [V
]
1T
Volta
geft (MOSFET) THz Application
100G 1 6
5Millimeter application
10G 100n 4
3MOSFET generation
ft (bipolar)
1G 10n
3
2
100M 1n
1
0Frequency for personal wireless communication
Supply voltage100M
‘85 ‘90‘75 ‘80 ‘05 ‘10‘95 ‘00 ‘15 ‘20 ‘25
Year
0
Miniaturization and Diversification
Digital vs. Analog/RC LSI
What is difference?
Scaling 9
CMOS device miniaturization has brought High-speed/high-frequency, Low consumption power, andLow consumption power, and Chip area reduction.
Chi d ti i di tl l t d tChip area reduction is directly related to lowering cost. If there is not area reduction (= cost
reduction) miniaturization is meaninglessreduction), miniaturization is meaningless.Area reduction of circuit using miniaturized
devices is essential!
RF CMOS
RLId LL
Id
vout
D
GC vo t
D
GCvout
Svin CL
voutS
CL
Restive load Typical LNA using
Gain of R-load LNA is degraded at high freq
30
Restive load Typical LNA using LC resonance
Restive loadLC g g q
because of RC component. LNA has sufficient gain at
high freq using LCQ1-
drai
n / d
B
10
20
n (d
B)
LC
high freq using LC resonance.
dbV
@ Q
-10
0
Gai
n
Frequency / Hertz
100M 200M 400M 1G 2G 4G 10G 20G 40G 100G
f (Hz)
Digital vs. RF CMOS circuit 11
RF CMOS
m 800 m
RF CMOS
540 800 m
LNA(Low Noise Amp) VCO(Voltage Controlled Oscillator
Area reduction is essential in CMOS scaling. Passive devices such
Many Core108Tr/3mm2
as inductor, resistor (including wire) and capacitors consume large area. CMOS devices are miniaturized, however the passives are not miniaturized!
Challenge of analog/RF circuit design is to reduce the area penalty of passives; ideally elimination of passives.
Challenges in RF CMOS 12
RF CMOS has sufficiently high ft and fmax No need of scaled MOS. 0.18m/0.13m
CMOS is enough for GHz application.g pp Requirement of monolithic integration digital
modulation/demodulation and analog/RFmodulation/demodulation and analog/RF signal processing. Passives such as inductor prevent the chip area from reduction.prevent the chip area from reduction.
Challenges in RF CMOS 13
Two approaches
MiniaturizationHeterogeneous integ MiniaturizationScalingMore Moore
Heterogeneous integInteg with diverse
functionalities More MoorefunctionalitiesMore than Moore
RF using mature (0.35, 0.18m) CMOS RF/Analog/Digital one CMOS
Performance enhancement with other technologies such as MEMS
chip (SoC) Area reduction of RF is
MEMS. Integ with digital by SiP, 3D, etc. indispensable.
Our research style using shuttle service 14
Design-B
Design-C Shuttle serviceDesign-A
D i d i CMOS i it i PDK Designers design CMOS circuit using PDK (Process Design Kit) supplied from foundry.
Foundry fabricates CMOS circuit. Designer receive CMOS chip.
Designers evaluates CMOS circuits.
Worldwide Service Institutes
CMP: 1990
Europractice: 1989
CMC
MOSIS(USA)
(Canada)
VDECIDEC(Korea)
(Japan)ICC
imec Europractice
(EU) CMP(France)
(USA) VDEC
CIC (Taiwan)
(Japan)ICC(China)
MOSIS: 1980 DARPA ProjectMOSIS: 1980 DARPA Project1994 Self-supported
CMC Microsystems: 1984 IDEC (Integrated Circuit Design Education Center): 1995
VDEC (VLSI D i d Ed ti C t ) 1996
CIC (Chip Implementation Center): 1993, Hsinchu
VDEC (VLSI Design and Education Center): 1996University of Tokyo
ICC (IC Technology and Industry): 2000, Shanghai
Major IC Design and Chip Implementation Service Institutes
Worldwide Service Organizations 16
Country USA Canada France Japan China Korea Taiwan
Institutes MOSIS CMC CMP VDEC ICC IDEC CICEstablished
19801994 1984 1990 1996 2000 1995 1993
EDA Tool Ⅹ NA 7 9 5 16 17EDA Tool
Vendors Ⅹ NA 7 9 5 16 17
Fabricated Chips (#) NA 380 391 254 120+176 250 1621p
Processes Provided (#)
26 6 15 8 15 8 14
Advanced Process 40nm 65nm 40nm 40nm 90nm 40nm 40nm Packaging Packaging
Testing Ⅹ Ⅹ
Training Training Coursed Ⅹ NA Ⅹ NA
Source: 2009 CMP Annual ReportRemark: :Fair Service; :Excellent Service ;Ⅹ :No Service。
Outline
1 Introduction1. Introduction
2 Our RF CMOS development2. Our RF CMOS development
Why do we expect heterogeneous y p gintegration on CMOS ?
3. Our approach to heterogeneous integration: Novel wafer shuttle technique.g q
4. Summary
Challenges in RF CMOS 18
Two approaches
MiniaturizationHeterogeneous integ MiniaturizationScalingMore Moore
Heterogeneous integInteg with diverse
functionalities More MoorefunctionalitiesMore than Moore
RF using mature (0.35, 0.18m) CMOS RF/Analog/Digital one CMOS
Performance enhancement with other technologies such as MEMS
chip (SoC) Area reduction of RF is
MEMS. Integ with digital by SiP, 3D, etc. indispensable.
RF CMOS
RLId LL
Id Id
vout
D
GC vo t
D
GC
DG
vivoutS
vin CLvout
SCL
Restive load
voutS
vin
Typical LNA using
Gain of R-load LNA is degraded at high freq
30
Restive load Typical LNA using LC resonance
Restive loadLC g g q
because of RC component. LNA has sufficient gain at
high freq using LCQ1-
drai
n / d
B
10
20
n (d
B)
LC
high freq using LC resonance.
Our approach: CMOS-inverter base circuit
dbV
@ Q
-10
0
Gai
n
inverter base circuit components.
Frequency / Hertz
100M 200M 400M 1G 2G 4G 10G 20G 40G 100G
f (Hz)
Breakthroughs 20Scalable, Multi-band, Wide-band,
Digitally Controllable, Universal Discrete time processingWide-band
LPF AGC A/DLNA
Zo=50Ω?
S/H
Discrete time processingWide band
LPF AGC A/D
nd L
SILNA
ADBPF DCO
ADPLL
PD Count
I QBPFS/H
Bas
ebanAD
PLLBPF SW
DUPDCO
FN
PD
BPF B
PABPF
Low loss(MEMS?)
MOD
Digital enhanced self-compensation circuit
(MEMS?) Frequency → Time base processingDA function
(bias control, characteristics tuning, yield enhancement, linearity control, etc. )
Our recent work of scalable RF CMOS in 2008-201021
Scalability Discussion of scalability of the conventional topology
① LNA Wid b d i Ch H & ti f d b k① LNA Wideband using Cherry-Hooper & active feed-back
② LNA+VGA High-gain LNA+VGA by multi-stage inverterGain control using MOS-SW
③ Ring-VCO Low phase technique using Injection-lock and latched inverter
PLL using ring④
PLL using ring-VCO Freq synthesizer using PLL combination
⑤ PA Stacked CMOS for high-power output
⑥RF modulation block
RF signal generation using time-to-analog conversionQPSK signal generation using phase selection and
injection lock techniques
⑦RF demodulation block Passive mixer (on going)
⑧ Power supply On-chip LDO
Inverter base LNA 22
mfgofr
Active feedback for wideband
1mg 2mg1fR
r3mg 4mg
2fR
vvin
1or 2or
~sv
sr3or 3or
Cherry Hooper configuration Output buffer
voutSupply voltage: 1.1 VArea: 40 x 26 m2
20
10
0
-10利得
S21
(dB)
Vdd=1.30V
Vdd=1.25V
Vdd=1.20V
Vdd 1 15V
NF
(dB)
Vdd=1 30V
Vdd=1.10V
Vdd=1.20V
-20
利
Vdd=1.10V
Vdd=1.15V Vdd 1.30V
周波数 (GHz)1 10 202 3 5
周波数 (GHz)1 5 10 202 3
Performance of Scalable RF CMOS LNA
Injection locked differential VCO 24
Features (180nm CMOS process) 4-satage Ring-VCO
I/Q signal generation (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°) Half Integral subharmonic Injection locking
High freq resolution (40MHz)High freq resolution (40MHz)Low-phase noise (comparable to LC-VCO)(120dBc/Hz@1MHz offset)
Current controlWideband operation (1-2GHz)
Injection lock performance of D-VCO 25 Chip photo
Ring-VCO performanceOsc freq (free running):1.0G - 2.2GPower: less than 62mWPhase noise@1MHz offset
: 102dBc/Hz @1 44GHz
Freq performance (ref:80MHz)
:-102dBc/Hz @1.44GHz
Ref: 200MHz
整数倍×fREF
q p
z)
2.1
2.3
250ps
80M×23.52.2
2.4
(GH
z)
Free running250ps
半整数倍
×fuenc
y (G
Hz
Free running1 5
1.7
1.9 12.5nsinjection signal80M×24
80M×23
80M×22.5
1 6
1.8
2.0
Freq
uenc
y
g5ns
injection signal200M×10
200M×9
200M×9.5
200M×8.5
×fREF
Freq
u
Injection-locked
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.2
1.4
1.6O
scill
atio
n Injection locked
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8
Control Voltage (V)
0.90 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
1.0
Control Voltage (V)
Phase noise of injection locked D-VCO 26 PN@1MHz [email protected]
-121dBc/Hz ( input pulse width:250ps 40MHz ): 20MHz resolution127dBc/Hz (input pulse width 250ps 80MHz) 40MHz resolution
−40-127dBc/Hz (input pulse width: 250ps 80MHz): 40MHz resolution
Lowering PN by injection-locking
−80
−60
se GH
z)
Lowering PN by injection locking
−100
ase
nois
z @
1.44
G
Free running
80MHz meas 40MH
25dB
−140
−120
Pha
(dB
c/H
z 80MHz meas. 40MHz meas.
80MHz est.40MHz est.
−160
(
80MHz ref.
40MHz ref
102 103 104 105 106 107−180
Offset frequency (Hz)
40MHz ref.
PLL using ring-VCO 27
PLL using injection-locked ring-VCO
(a) 2ステージPLL回路の構成 (b) 90nmCMOSによる試作チップ
fo = 6.1 GHz fo = 9.5 GHz
(c) 6.1 GHz 発振時 (d) 9.5 GHz 発振時 (e) 位相雑音特性(6.1 GHz)
Challenges in RF CMOS 28
Two approaches
MiniaturizationHeterogeneous integ MiniaturizationScalingMore Moore
Heterogeneous integInteg with diverse
functionalities More MoorefunctionalitiesMore than Moore
RF using mature (0.35, 0.18m) CMOS RF/Analog/Digital one CMOS
Performance enhancement with other technologies such as MEMS
chip (SoC) Area reduction of RF is
MEMS. Integ with digital by SiP, 3D, etc. indispensable.
Purpose 29
Zout = 5Ω of PA matching with 50Ω of antenna required L and C tuning range at 0 8~6GHzrequired L and C tuning range at 0.8~6GHz
freq (GHz) L (nH) C (pF)
Impedance
freq (GHz) L (nH) C (pF)0.8 3.0 12.06 0 0 4 1 6
P V i bl i d t f id b d RF f t d
matching6.0 0.4 1.6
Purpose: Variable inductor for wideband RF-frontend
Variable inductor requirementsVariable inductor requirements・Wide inductance tunable range for wideband operation ・High Q factor to reduce loss・High Q factor to reduce loss・High self resonant frequency for higher available frequency
N-bit control variable inductor 30
Controlling inductance with N switches Decreasing inductance by switching onDecreasing inductance by switching onSwitch type variable inductor can easily improve tunabilityHigh resolution with fewer switches eg) 8 value with 3 switchesHigh resolution with fewer switches eg) 8 value with 3 switches
CMOS process can realize this but loss is large
Switches and inductors with lower loss can be achieved by using MEMSy g
Thick metal and movable structure
Planar solenoidal inductor 31
space:16μm
Width:20μm
thickness:15μm
metal2viametal1
This shape hasCapability of attaching switch depending on number of turn Large L+mutual and small L-mutual to improve Q-factor
Fabricated test inductors 32
Metal (Au)MEMS processMetal (Au)Two metal layersSubstrate:1kΩ・cmSubstrate:1kΩ・cm
2 bit control2-bit controlFour test inductorswere fabricatedwere fabricated
Measurement results of inductance 33
1
Tunability is 230%
4-turns 3-turns 1-turn2-turns
Measurement results of Q-factor 34
4-turns 3-turns 1-turn2-turns
Comparison with other works 35
[1]: K Okada TED 2006 [2]: D H Choi Transducers 2009 [3]: P Park LED 2004[1]: K. Okada, TED, 2006. [2]: D. H. Choi, Transducers, 2009. [3]: P. Park, LED, 2004.[4]: J. Kim, TMTT, 2009. [5]: M. Rais-Zadeh, JMEMS, 2008. [6]: A. Shirane, JJAP, 2011.[7]: I. E. Gmati, mnl, 2010. [8]: S. Chang, LED, 2006. [9]: V. M. Lubecke, TMTT, 2001.
Outline
1 Introduction1. Introduction
2 Our RF CMOS development2. Our RF CMOS development
Why do we expect heterogeneous y p gintegration on CMOS ?
3. Our approach to heterogeneous integration: Novel wafer shuttle technique.g q
4. Summary
How to fabricate functionalities on CMOS 37
Issues Do we prepare process equipment? If we have process ability, can we fabricateIf we have process ability, can we fabricate
the functionalities on CMOS chip ? Chip sizes are several mm2.sizes are several mm .
How do we collaborate ? (from the viewpoint of circuit design researcher)of circuit design researcher)
Pre-CMOS and Intermediate- CMOS
Intermediate- CMOSPre- CMOS (MEMS first)
CMOS Movable CMOS Movable
ure
SiStru
ctu
Si Poly-SiS
・Sealing/Packaging・Low Voltage
・LSI Multilevel Interconnection・Large Chip Sizem
ents
g・MOS Reliability・Sacrificial Film Etching
g p
equi
rem
g(SiO2 or SiGe etc.)R
e
Post- CMOS (CMOS-first and MEMS last)
CMOS MovableEtching from Surface
CMOS MovableEtching from Back Side
CMOS Movable CMOS Movable
uctu
re
SiStru
Dielectric & bulk etch Bulk etch
tsre
men
t
・Sealing/Packaging・Low Voltage
・Plasma Damage・Large Chip Size
Req
uir
・MOS Reliability
Toward open collaboration
Novel wafer shuttle service for heterogeneous integration 40
Design-BDesign-C
Design-C
Design-A
Designers receive their own
Design-A Design-B
Designers receive their own circuit as chips.Another functions such as
sensor MEMS photonics fsensor, MEMS, photonics etc. cannot be fabricated on the chip. So far, CMOS processed
With novel masking technique, wafers can be provided to each designer. In wafer-A, another designer’s area are maskedp
wafer cannot be provided because another designer’s area cannot be masked.
masked. Sensor, MEMS, and photonics can be
fabricated or implemented on CMOS wafers!
Conventional shuttle service The novel wafer shuttle has been developed by
Tokyo Tech/NTT-AT collaboration.
Post CMOS 41
MEMS(functionalities)-first is suitable for mass-production type device such as acceleration sensor, pressure sensor, , p ,DMD, etc. cf. DRAM, Flash, MPUPost process can open the door to variousPost process can open the door to various
field researchers: circuit, process, bio engineers.New wafer shuttle technologyNew wafer shuttle technology
Detail of wafer shuttle
0.35μm standard CMOS with 20-V MOSFET, 6 inch waferArea designed by another designer isArea designed by another designer is
completely masking by the blind process.D i d i t ti ltiDesign and process integration consulting is available thru Tokyo Tech. Standard MEMS is also available.PDK is distributed thru VDEC UnivPDK is distributed thru VDEC, Univ.
Tokyo
CMOS/MEMS standard process
CMOS-MEMS
MEMS
Poly-SiN+
Poly-SiP+N+ P+ N+ P+ N+ N+
ゲート ゲート
NMOS PMOS Bipolar
BiCMOS
Example of CMOS-MEMS
10 µmLower electrode
Upper electrodesealing MEMS
protuberance
Si基板
space
CMOSLSI
MEMS
Si基板
Integrated finger print sensor. Photo: Courtesy of NTT Micro integration Lab.
First wafer shuttle
Contributors More than 5 universities More than 3 research group in Tokyo Tech.
Fields Photonics MEMS RF MEMS Sensors (bio, Hall effect)
Tape out in Sept, 2011. Wafer will be delivered Tape out in Sept, 2011. Wafer will be delivered in Dec. 2011
Circuit designer provided IPsCircuit designer provided IPs.
Summary
RF CMOS developments: Scalable RF CMOS using miniaturized
CMOS Use of functionalities such as RF MEMS
inductorinductorWafer shuttle technology First wafer will be delivered in Dec. 2011. Fundamental circuit IPs will be handle by ICE
cube center, Tokyo Tech. These IPs will helpful for collaboration of different field researchers.