View
242
Download
5
Category
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
يسيس
Citation preview
2011( 2) ( 1)
205
( )
/ / . .. / / . ..
/ / .
,
, ,
, , ,
,
.
Factors Forwarding Performance Level For theUniversity Instructor
( An Applied Statistical Study For Sample of Iraqi
University Instructors )
Abstract:
This study deals with the topic of performance for the university
instructors and fortification him from corruption status, which may results
from exceptional circumstances to pass onto the country and how virtuous
of performance affect by many such factors. Where virtuous instructor
contribute to setup virtuous university which adopt educative and
administrative system to fortification it's students and stuffs against any
type or forms of corruption , this idea came from it's responsibility feeling
2011( 2) ( 1)
206
in creating capable virtuous governmental stuff .In this study the above
idea was applied to a sample of instructors taken from Baghdad, Kirkuk
and Al-Torath natives university college, for this purposes the
questionnaire designed containing some factors by following up may keep
instructor's virtuous. The most important results of the study is that in spite
of exceptional circumstance, Iraqi instructors still keeping their
performance , and this may be forwarding through out following up
concerning officials and applying special criteria concerning with scientific
performance and encouraging field of activity in addition to providing
some standard living requirements that may keeping sociality status for the
Iraqi university instructors.
:
. (. 2)
(. 5)
,
.
(. 4)
.
2011( 2) ( 1)
207
.
, 50 150 , ,
.
MINITAB . . Excel
. . : ":
, , ,
, . ,
, . (5) :,
, ,
. , , ,
, .
, .
,.
2011( 2) ( 1)
208
, ,
, , .
, ,
. . ,
, .
. ,
(. 6)
, ,
,
, . ,
, ,
, . ,
2011( 2) ( 1)
209
: ":
.
, ,
50 150 .
, 50 , 50
.
.
chi-square Minitab Excel
(1 .)
. ( 1)
. . Chi-square
( 1) " .
.% 50
2011( 2) ( 1)
210
15,360 Chi-square %. 5 12
( 1) ,
.
(:1)
- 5 10 6 2 18 5 10 9 24 15 4 11 30 72 6-10 2 5 9 16 7 1 3 11 4 0 2 6 33
11-15 5 2 3 10 3 0 1 4 2 1 0 3 17 16-20 3 1 0 4 6 0 2 8 1 0 0 1 13 21-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 26-30 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 3 1 1 5 9 31 -0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 4
150 50 15 7 28 50 15 11 24 50 14 14 22 % 30% 14% 56 % 30% 22% 48 % 28% 28% 44)%(
Chi-sq.= 15.360 d.f.=12
2011( 2) ( 1)
211
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
-5 6--10 11--15 16--20 21--25 26--30 31--
)1(:
( 2)
% 78
. Chi-square % 5
. 12 12,792 ( 2)
, .
2011( 2) ( 1)
212
( 2)
. .. . . .. . . .. .
%
1 5 4 1 1 11 2 0 1 0 3 10 4 2 0 16 30 20 %2 13 7 3 2 25 10 2 2 0 14 9 6 1 2 18 57 38 %3 3 3 2 1 9 9 1 3 0 13 7 0 1 0 8 30 20 %4 2 2 1 0 5 7 6 2 0 15 3 1 2 0 6 26 17.3 %
% 4.7 7 2 0 0 0 2 5 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 150 50 2 6 11 31 50 0 11 9 30 50 4 7 16 23
Chi-sq.= 12,792 d.f.=12
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
)2(:
( 3)
% 37
2011( 2) ( 1)
213
, % 20% 21 Chi-square , "
% 5 . 4 2,818
( 3)( 4) ,
.
(:3) )%(
1 3 8 11 1 2 3 1 15 16 30 20 %2 9 16 25 4 10 14 3 13 16 55 37 %3 1 8 9 6 7 13 2 8 10 32 21 %4 0 5 5 5 10 15 3 3 6 26 17 %5 -0 0 0 3 2 5 0 2 2 7 5 %
150 50 41 9 50 31 19 50 37 13
%26 %74 % 38 %62 % 18 %82 %
Chi-sq.= 2,818 d.f.=4
2011( 2) ( 1)
214
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
)3(:
( 4)
1 0 0 1
4 0 3 1 10 3 4 3 8 2 2 4 5 1 2 2 11 3 6 2 3 0 3 0 42 9 20 13
( 5)
% 78
2011( 2) ( 1)
215
% 11,3 % 22 % 10,7
,
. Chi-square 5 % 2,030
( 4) .1.
( 5)
%
% 78 117 41 14 27 38 13 25 38 17 21
3 0 3 7 3 10 3 0 3 16 10.7 %
7 2 9 2 0 2 3 3 6 17 11.3 %
150 50 17 33 50 16 34 50 19 31 Chi-sq.= 2,030 d.f.=1
2011( 2) ( 1)
216
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
)4(:
( 6) % 35 % 65
% 35
Chi-square . % 5
. 1 3,424
2011( 2) ( 1)
217
( 6)
%
% 64 32 14 13 1 18 8 10 % 36 18 12 11 1 6 5 1 50 26 24 2 24 13 11
% 66 33 20 17 3 13 6 7 % 34 17 12 10 2 5 2 3 50 32 27 5 18 8 10
% 68 34 21 16 5 13 3 10 % 32 16 10 9 1 6 3 3 50 31 25 6 19 6 13
150 89 76 13 61 27 34 )%(
Chi-sq.= 3,424 d.f.=1
( 7) % 77
% 80 % 23 % 5 % 15
Chi-square . . % 5
( 5) .2 6,574
. ,
2011( 2) ( 1)
218
.
( 7)
)%(
% 77 116 1 31 2 34 5 30 2 37 3 35 7 45
5 2
3 0 13 3 10 0 16 4 10 2 34 23 %
150 3 41 6 50 5 40 5 50 3 38 9 50 % 6% 82% 12 % 10% 80% 10 % 6% 76% 18 )%(
Chi-sq.= 6,574 d.f.=2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
)5(:
2011( 2) ( 1)
219
, ( 8) % 85
% 86 ,
15 .
Chi-square % 5
0,103 1,852 ( 7) ( 6) . 1 6
. : -
, ....
% 97 - % 3 ,
,
.
- ,
.
2011( 2) ( 1)
220
, - % 90
...
Data show % 10 .
,
. -
,
.
2011( 2) ( 1)
221
( 8)
- 5 14 4 18 0 0 0 18 36 %6-10 7 1 8 8 0 8 16 32 %11-15 4 0 4 5 0 5 9 18 %16-20 2 0 2 2 0 2 4 8 %21-25 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 4 %26-30 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 %
31 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 50 17 0 17 33 5 28
- 5 18 4 22 2 0 2 24 48 %6-10 5 4 9 2 0 2 11 22 %11-15 1 1 2 0 2 2 4 8 %16-20 0 1 1 6 1 7 8 16 %21-25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %26-30 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 4 %
31 -0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 % 50 16 3 13 34 10 24
- 5 26 1 27 1 1 2 29 58 %6-10 1 0 1 6 0 6 7 14 %11-15 1 0 1 3 0 3 4 8 %16-20 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 %21-25 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 %26-30 4 0 4 0 1 1 5 10 %
31 -0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 % 50 17 4 13 33 1 32
150 50 7 43 100 16 84 % 4% 29 % 11% 56 )%(
2011( 2) ( 1)
222
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
-5 5--10 11--15 16--20 21--25 26--30 31-
)6(:
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
)7(:
2011( 2) ( 1)
223
. ":
.
.
: -1 % 50 .1
% 35 .
. % 78 . 2
% 22 .
% 73 . 3
. % 22 . 4
. % 77 . 5
% 20 % 80 % 23 % 20% 23
. . 6
% 85 ,
2011( 2) ( 1)
224
. .
. 7. . 8
.
. 9
. .
-2:
. .
. .
. , , . 6
.
2011( 2) ( 1)
225
" " ,(2007) . , -1 ., ,
", (2010), ., -2. 25, , ,"
" . " , (2010), , -3 , , " " ,(2009),, -4
. . 21," .. : " , (2009), ., -5 ( " 2008), , -6
. 5, 2333 , "
Recommended