Upload
vanhuong
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 1
13
, , )
1.
1.
(tax base) ,
, , , ,
(1)
,
(2)
(, , )
( 1913)
( )
(3)
( )
,
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 2
2.
(1)
(2) : ,
(3) : ,
(4) :
(5) :
(6) :
2.
(benefit principle) : ()
(ability-to-pay principle) :
1.
(Wicksell)
,
( )
,
2.
,
A. Smith(), Mill( , )
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 3
(1) (horizontal equity)
but,
(2) (Vertical equity)
,
,
500 20 200
30
3.
1.
(1)
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 4
( )
(2) ()
(3)
( = )
( )
(4)
( )
(5)
(stock)
(cash flow)
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 5
2.
(1)
(realization concept)
but, () (accretion)
( ,
)
(2)
(3)
,
(4)
(imputed income) , ,
,
( )
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 6
(5)
4.
1.
(1)
(loophole)
(2)
( )
(3)
(but, )
2. ( )
(1) :
(2) :
,
(3)
(Rawls)
(4)
.
3.
(1)
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 7
( )
( )
( ) 1
(= 1% 1% )
(2)
(
)
(3)
but, () ,
5.
1.
, , ,
()
(annoncement effect)
,
13 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 8
.
2. (lump-sum tax)
(1)
(2)
3.
,
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 9
14
1. :
(incidence)
1.
(1)
:
:
(shifting)
(2)
= - (
)
(forward shifting) :
(backward shifting) :
()
(transformation) :
2.
,
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 10
(1) (functional)
: , ,
(2) (size)
:
3.
(RDI)
(-)
(1)
: ()
:
:
(input effect): ,
(2)
(
)
4.
(1)
,
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 11
(2)
(3)
5.
(1)
(2)
:
:
(3)
: , () ( )
2. :
1.
(1)
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 12
:
(2)
,
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 13
100%
2.
(1)
( )
( )
,
(2)
(openness)
( )
(3) (tax capitalization)
( )
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 14
(: , : , : )
(
)
3. :
1.
(L), (K)
, (X), (Y)
1, (linearly homogeneous)
, (X) (Y)
(CRS) , (X)
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 15
2.
(1) :
(2)
,
(X)
(3)
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 16
(factor intensity)
:
:
, ,
3.
(X)
(K)
X
X
(w/r)
14 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 17
1. 2, 2 X
-(r/w) ?
r/w .
r/w .
r/w
r/w
r/w
2. X Y (L) (K) X
? (X
)
X .
.
.
.
.
3. X
? (, )
. (r/w )
r/w , r/w
r/w , r/w
r/w , r/w
r/w , r/w
r/w
4. X Y X , Y
, (CRS),
, .
, . X
?
X X .
.
- .
.
.
15 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 18
15
1.
1.
(excess burden) = -
(deadweight loss), (welfare cost)
2.
(1)
(X) (Y)
(2) ()
(X)
15 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 19
)
(3)
2.
(excise tax)
1.
(1)
,
15 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 20
.
(,
)
0 ()
(t)
(coefficient of inefficiency) :
(2)
,
()
, ,
2.
(equivalent variation)
(ME' = LN) (LE') E'N
15 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 21
( )
L
= 0 ( )
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 22
16
= + +
1.
1.
(optimal tax structure)
+
,
2.
(UPF)
UPF
2
,
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 23
2.
1.
(1)
.
.
but,
( )
(2)
(screening theory)
-(Atkinson and Stiglitz, 1980)
: ,
(proxy) , ,
: , ,
2.
(=)
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 24
(saving)
(1)
(intertemporal resource allocation)
:
but,
but,
(2)
(Kaldor, 1955)
:
(but, )
3.
1. (Ramsey rule)
(1)
(Ramsey)
(MEB: Marginal Excess Burden)
MEB 1
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 25
(2)
( )
2.
(1)
,
(2)
( )
3. -
(1)
(Corlett and Hague, 1953) ,
(2)
() ()
,
( )
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 26
4.
4.
:
( )
1.
(progressive)'
,
2.
(1)
( )
( )
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 27
(2)
(t) , (S)
.
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 28
(Stern, 1976)
,
( )
5.
1.
:
:
51 1%
but,
2.
(1)
(loophole)
: , ( ),
:
(2)
: ( )
: ( t)
1
16 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 29
: ()
( ) (V)
1
: t MB
: MC
, ,
() , ( ) .
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 30
17
, ()
.
1.
1. -
(1)
HC =
= + (net worth)
(capital gains)
.
(tax base)
(loophole)
:
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 31
,
,
, , ,
(2)
H-C
but,
,
()
, , , , ,
but,
(transfer payment, ) ,
(3)
A B
?
(but, )
(personal exemption) :
( 100 ,
100 )
:
( )
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 32
(deduction) :
.
(tax credit) : (
)
, (
) .
(4)
,
.
( )
2.
1.
(income bracket)
,
,
2. (flat rate income tax)
(1)
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 33
(2)
(3)
( )
(4)
( )
2.
(1)
,
(2)
:
(marriage neutrality) :
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 34
[]
,
(A) , (B)
A ( )
,
(income splitting)
but,
(
)
(3) :
( )
( )
)
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 35
3.
(value-added tax)
1. :
(multi-stage turnover tax)
/
( WTO (), )
:
2.
:
5 58
3
2
, ,
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 36
3.
( )
(1)
()
(2) (=NDP : Net Domestic Product)
( () )
(3) (=GDP)
,
(GDP)
(C) (In)
VAT
VAT
VAT
4.
: ,
(1) (addition method)
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 37
, , ,
(2) (subtraction method)
(= ) ,
8 5 3 10%
(=) 10%
8 8
5 3
8 ,
(tax invoice) 5
()
4.
(but, )
1.
(1)
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 38
,
,
(, )
,
()
10 10% ,
1
1 1 5
5 5
33
2
5
5 1
(2)
,
(, )
17 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 39
WTO :
(destination principle)
,
,
2.
:
( )
but,
( , )
18 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 40
18
1.
.
.
1.
(1)
:
:
(2)
:
( , )
( )
20%,
18 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 41
2.
( )
()
( )
2.
1.
(1) : ()
: ()
+
( )
18 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 42
(2)
(economic profit) = -
(imputed interest)
( .)
20% , , 0.8
(R:, d:, i : )
()
()
3.
(accelerated depreciation)
(immediate write-off or expending)
18 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 43
4.
( )
(replacement cost)
(FIFO)
5.
:
(1)
( )
( )
( )
18 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 44
BUT,
,
(, , , )
(2)
()
= +
( ) (gross-up)
19 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 45
19
1.
(design) :
(reform) :
:
2.
1.
2.
( , )
, ( )
3.
1.
(tax expenditure)
(hidden subsidies) :
19 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 46
,
(tax aides), (tax subsidy), (tax preference), (tax
incentives)
(,
Surrey, 1973)
:
?
? ( ?)
(upside-down subsidy)
2.
(1) (brachet creep)
:
(2) (/GDP)
(3) (inflation accounting)
3.
(1)
,
(comprehensive income tatxation)
19 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 47
-
(expenditure tax)
(single rate)
( )
(2)
( , )
( )
( )
4.
(1)
tax base tax rate ( )
( , )
, (standard deduction)
( )
EU
(social sevuriy tax)
: ,
19 (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 48
2.
1. ()
1974,
1977,
1993,
2.
( ,
)
, (zero base)
(tax expenditure budget)
:
( )
20 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 49
[]
(yse or no)
20
, , ,
1.
1.
(1)
() , but, ()
(2)
<
() (
)
20 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 50
(3)
t
() ,
: (L), (H)
(4)
( )
but
20 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 51
(5)
, ,
()
(6)
: ,
: ,
(1)
:
(2)
: , .
(3)
:
2.
1.
(life-cycle hypothesis)
:
:
20 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 52
2.
(1)
(2)
?
(3)
() t
(= )
() ()
20 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 53
: : ,
: ,
(4)
: (+)
( )
3.
1. -
,
,
20 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 54
2.
(1)
(2)
t ,
.
( )
21 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 55
21
, ()
1.
1. :
(1) (user cost of capital)
: ()
(2)
2. (marginal effective tax rate)
()
(-)
21 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 56
2.
1.
(1)
0
1 ()
= (+)
= / ( +)
2.
(1)
= - (, ) -
:
:
= (+)
if,
,
(2)
( )
+
(
)
+
21 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 57
(3)
()
: ( )
(tax holidays)
:
3.
() = () = ()
() =
(cf) ()
4.
1. -
-
,
2.
(1)
()
but,
21 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 58
(2)
( )
:
: ,
:
(capital gain) :
1
(, : , :, :)
,
5.
1. -
(1)
,
= -
10 10
(, , )
21 - (http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 59
(2)
,
2.
(1)
,
(2)
, ()
but,
: -
,
, but
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 60
13
1. Adam Smith ?
1) 2) 3) 4) 5)
2. Wagner .
2. 200 300 50 90
. ?
1) 25% 30% .
2) 300 40%
.
3)
.
4) , 1
.
5) 40% 400 130
.
3. .
.
3. ?
1) .
2) .
3) Pareto .
4) .
5) .
3. .
4. ?
1) 2) 3)
4) 5)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 61
3. .
5.
?
1) 1 .
2) 1 .
3) 1 .
4) 1 .
5) 1 .
2. .
6.
?
1) 2) 3)
4) 5)
3.
.
7. ?
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
2.
.
.
8. (sacrifice) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 62
. 0.5.
. 1.0.
. 1.5.
. 0 .
4) .
5) .
4. .
.
9.
?
1) 1 .
2) 1 .
3) 1 .
4) 1 .
5) 1 .
1. .
10. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) 0 .
5) (0) .
2. .
.
11. ?
1) 2) 3) 4) 5)
3. .
1 .
12. ?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 63
. 1,000 100.
. 2,000 250.
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
5. .
.
13. ?
1) 10% 12.5% .
2) 2,000 15%.
3) .
4) 100% 100% .
5) (/) 1.5
.
4.
.
14. 5,000 1,000, 1 3,000 .
() ?
1) 3 .
2) 2 .
3) 1 .
4) 2.3 .
5) 2 .
2. 100% 200% 2 1
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 64
1 ?(2003 )
.
.
.
.
, .
5.. . ,
. (non-affection)
.
2 ?(2002 )
.
.
.
, , .
.
5. .
.
.
3 ?(2004 )
(comprehensive income tax)
.
(net wealth tax) .
(individual consumption tax) .
.
.
3.
() () .
4
. ?(2006 )
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 65
.
.
.
.
1.
.
.
.
.
. .
(Mieszkowski,P.) .
.
,
.
5 .
?(2006 )
.
.
.
.
.
5. . 1
.
() . ()
.
6A B . A
Q = 20 - P B Q = 20 - 2P .
1Km 20. A ? (, Q
Km )(2006 )
10/3 20/3 40/3 400/9 800/9
5. . (30-3/2Q)
20 20/3 .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 66
20/3 A 40/3 .(PA=20-Q
) A 800/9
.(20/3*40/3=800/9)
7 ? (2005 )
.
.
.
(Wicksell) .
.
1.
.
.
8(principle of equal sacrifice)
?(2007)
1
1. 1 (
) . 1
. .
9 (equal absolute sacrifice rule)
? , .(2005
)
1
1
1
0 1
0
1. 1 1 .
10 ? (2007)
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 67
1 .
.
1 .
.
2.
.
1 . .
11 ,
. (lump-sum tax),
(quantity tax, unit tax) , (ad valorem subsidy)
?(2007)
2. (m-g)
(p1+t)
(1-s) .
12 ?(2007)
.
.
.
.
.
4. .
. .
13(tax expenditure) ? (2003 )
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 68
.
.
, .
5 .
5. ()
.
14 .
? (2006 )
.
.
.
.
.
4. (tax expenditure) .
.
15 (built-in stabilizer)
?(2003 )
.
.
.
.
.
5.
.
.
16 6
?(2002 )
Q = 86 - P ()
Q = -10 + 1/2 P ()
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 69
100 120 132
156 180
2. (86-Q)=(20+2Q) 64, 22 .
(26+2Q) 66, 20 .
6 20 120 .
17 (well-being) .
1.0 10.0 .
1,000 2.0 , 2,000 6.0
, 3,000 7.0 .
? (, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 )(2007)
.
.
.
, .
, .
5. 1,000 2, 2,000 6. 3,000 7
.
. 1,000 1,000 4(6-2) 2,000 1,000
1(7-6).
18X Y Px = 10(),
Py = 1() . 110, X Y
. X x, Y y U( x, y) = 3xy . 20% X 10%
. ?
(, X Y .)(2003
)
(MRS) y/x . x = 5.5, y = 55. 88 X 11 .
X 1, Y 10 .
26 .
4. MUX=3/2X-1/2Y1/2, MUY=3/2X1/2Y-1/2.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 70
(MRS) (MUX/MUY) Y/X. (PX/PY) 10
Y=10X, 10X+Y=110 20X=110 X=5.5, Y=55 .
X 10% 11 20% 110
88 . X, Y Y=11X, 11X+Y=88 . 22X=88
X=4, Y=44. X 1.5, Y 11 .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 71
14
1. 200 .
120 80 . ?
1) 2, 3 .
2) 3, 2 .
3) 2, 2 .
4) 3, 3 .
5) 1, 4 .
1. .
. [(/)=(/)]
2. P=1,000-4Q, P=Q 100
?
1) 20 2) 40 3) 60
4) 80 5) 100
4. 200, 200 280, 180
.
3. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4)
.
5)
.
4. .
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 72
4.
?
1) .
2)
3)
4)
5)
3. ,
.
5. ?
1)
2)
3)
4)
5) (0)
4.
.
.
6. (MC) 200 2
. 20%
?
1) 40 2) 80 3) 100
4) 200 5) 240
2.
. MR, P, E
MR=P(1-1/E) 200 400. 40
240 480 .
80 .
7. P=1,000-4Q (MC) 200 100
?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 73
1) 100 .
2) 100 .
3) 100 .
4) 100 .
5) 50 .
5. (MC) 50%
.
8. P=500-4Q (MC) 100 .
50 ?
1) . 2) .
3) 50 .
4) 50 .
5) .
3. 50%
.
9.
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
4.
(50%) , ( )
(100% ) .
10.
. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 74
4) .
5) .
1. .
.
11. 50% .
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
4. .
.
12. 1 .
?
1) .
2) .
3) ()
(capitalization) .
4) , 1 .
5) .
5. , () .
13. .
.
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 75
4.
, .
.
14. .
. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
4. .
15. ,
. ?
1) . 2) .
3) . 4) .
5) .
5. .
.
16.
. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
5. ,
.
17.
?(, .)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 76
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
5.
.
.
18. ?
1) .
2)
.
3) .
4)
.
5)
.
5.
. .
19.
. ?
1) .
2) .
3)
.
4) .
5) .
3.
.
20. ,
?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 77
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. .
.
21. 1 .
?
1) .
2) .
3) ()
(capitalization) .
4) , 1 .
5) .
5. , () .
1 ?(2002 )
1
1
4.
.
2 (shifting) (incidence) ? (2007)
.
,
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 78
.
(forward shifting) (backward shifting)
.
.
2.
.
.
3 ?(2005 )
.
(forward shifting) .
(transformation) .
.
.
4. .
.
4 .
. 1 10
?(2003 )
2. .
5 ?(2007)
.
.
.
.
.
4. .
1) ( ) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 79
2) .
3) .
.
4) ( , )
. .
5) ,
.
6 10% .
,
?(, .)(2007)
.
.
.
.
.
4. .
.
7 X
. X 30
? (2005 )
P = 200 - 3Q, MC = 30
(, P X , Q , MC .)
10 15 20 30 50
2. 50% .
30 15 .
8 .
X = P - 2 , X (), P () 50 . 10
?(2004 )
10 20 30 40 50
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 121
2. (MR), (P), (E) MR=P(1-1/E)
. 2
MC=MR=50 100 10 MC=MR=60
120 . 20.
9 (excise tax)
?(2005 )
.
.
.
.
1 .
5.
.
10 ?(2006 )
.
.
.
.
.
2. .
.
.
.
11 ?(2004 )
.
.
.
.
.
2. , .
, .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 122
.
12 ?(2007)
2 .
.
,
.
.
.
3. .
1) MC 50% .
2) MC .
MC .
3) X Y 100%
. 100%
.
4)
. .
5) . ,
. ,
. , 50%
. ,
. 100% .
13 .
?(2003 )
.
.
.
.
.
5.
.
14 ? (2007)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 123
.
.
.
.
.
3. , ()
.
15 X Y (Harberger)
X , Y , (CRS),
,
. ,
. X (partial factor tax)
?(2003
)
X X .
.
- .
.
.
3.
. - .
16
. .
?(2006 )
.
.
.
.
.
4.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 124
. .
, .
.
, . ,
.
17 ,
(Harberger) ?(2005
)
.
.
.
.
.
5. .
-
.
18 X Y (L) (K)
(Harberger model) X
? (X )(2002 )
X .
.
.
.
.
4. .
.
19 A. C. Harberger(1962) X
? , (,
) . (r/w
)(2004 )
r/w , r/w
r/w , r/w
r/w , r/w
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 125
r/w , r/w
r/w
1 .
. r/w
.
20 ?
(2006 )
()
5. .
. .
( )
.
21
? , , ,
. (2005 )
.
.
.
.
.
2.
.
22
.
?(2004 )
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 126
.
.
( )/()
.
, .
5. .
.
23 ?
(2002 )
. .
. .
.
5. . .
.
24 1 X ,
n ? (
r, )(2002 )
X(1+r)r .
X(1+r)r .
Xr .
Xr .
X(1+r)r .
3.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 127
15
1. (excess burden) ?
1)
.
2) () .
3)
.
4)
.
5)
.
3.
. .
2. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
2. .
.
.
3.
?
1) .
2)
.
3) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 128
4) .
5)
.
5. ()
.
.
4. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
5. .
.
5. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) 2 4 .
5) 1/4 .
5. ,
. 1/2 ,
1/4 .
6. ?
1) .
2) 10% 20% 4 .
3) .
4) .
5)
.
1. .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 129
7. ( ) . 1,000,
100. 20% 1 .
() ?
1) 10% 2) 12.5% 3) 20% 4) 22.5% 5) 25%
2.
. 16,000 2,000
1/8.
8. . .
?
1) .
2)
.
3)
.
4)
.
5)
.
2. .
. .
9. (equivalent variation) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4)
.
5)
.
1. .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 130
. .
10. ?
1) .
2)
.
3) .
4) .
5)
.
2. .
.
11. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
4.
.
.
.
12. (lump-sum tax) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) (, poll tax) .
5) .
1. . .
.
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 131
13. ?
1) .
2) ,
.
3) .
4) .
5) .
2. .
.
. .
.
14. (inferior goods) .
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. .
. .
15. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5)
.
3. , .
.
16. ?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 132
1) .
2) .
3)
.
4) .
5) .
3.
. .
17. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5)
.
1.
. .
.
18. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
1. 1 .
.
19. Ramsey Rule" ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 133
2.
. .
20. ?
1) .
2) .
3) ()
.
4) (0) .
5) .
5. .
.
.
.
21. ?
1) .
2) .
3)
.
4)
.
5) .
3. .
.
22. ?
1) .
2) .
3)
.
4)
.
5) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 134
5. .
.
.
1 ? (2003 )
.
.
(compliance cost) .
(tax avoidance) .
(tax evasion) .
4. . ,
() .
.
2 600 . Q = 3000 + 5P
Q = 4800 P , (deadweight loss) ?(2006 )
10 15 20 25 30
2. 4,500 4,000 500
600 1/2(600)(500)=150,000 .
3 Qd = 10 - P Qs = P .
(t = 2) . (deadweight loss)
?(2002 )
1 2 3 4 5
1. 5 5 P=Q+2
6 4 . 2*1*(1/2)=1 .
4 X . X
10 ? (, X
.)(2005 )
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 135
P = 130 - 2Q, P = 20
(, P X , Q .)
0 25 500 525 2500
2. 20 55 30 50 .
10*5*(1/2)=25 .
5 . 30
?(2004 )
P = 120-X P = 2X
, P () X (1 )
50 100 150 300 900
3. 80 40() 90 30()
150() .
6 ?(2007)
1. (lump-sum tax)
. .
7 (compensating variation) ?
(2002 )
,
.
.
(-) .
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 136
1.
.
.
8 (perfect complements).
?
(2007)
.
.
.
0.
(equivalent variation) .
2. .
.
.
9 ?(2005 )
.
.
.
.
(lump-sum tax) .
2. .
. (lump sum
tax) .
10 ?(2004 )
.
.
.
.
(lump-sum tax)
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 137
3.
(inferior goods). , .
.
.
.
11 ?(2006 )
.
.
.
.
.
3.
( )
.
12 ?(2007)
.
.
.
.
(marginal excess burden)
.
4. ()
. . .
13 (Ramsey rule) ?
(2003 )
.
(second-best) .
.
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 138
1. .
,
.
14 (Ramsey) ?(2002 )
.
.
.
.
.
4. .
.
15 () 1.2 A 0.4 B
. A B
?(2003 )
A : B = 1 : 4
A : B = 1 : 3
A : B = 1 : 1
A : B = 3 : 1
A : B = 4 : 1
3. . A B
3 A B 1/3 .
16(W. Corlett)-(D. Hague) ? (2004 )
.
.
.
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 139
5. .
.
17 ?(2005 )
.
.
.
(Mirrlees) 0()
.
-(Corlett-Hague) .
1. () .
.
18 Harberger . Harberger
?(2006 )
.
.
, , .
.
.
5. . (inferior
goods) .
.
.
19TabY (T : , Y : , 0b1, a b )
?(2003 )
.
.
.
.
(negative income tax) .
1. .
() .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 140
.
.
16
1. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
4. .
.
2. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
1. .
. ()
.
3. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 141
4. .
. .
4. T=a+bY , a>0 0
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 142
3) .
4) .
5) .
1. , .
() , .
,
.
8. . ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. . 500
8% 40 .
35% 175 .
9. . ? (,
.)
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
2.
. .
10.
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 143
5) .
2. . .
.
11.
?
1)
2)
3)
4) ()
5) (unearned income)
4. .
.
.
12. ?
1) 10% 20%
.
2)
.
3)
.
4) (inferior goods) .
5)
.
2. .
.
.
13.
?
1) .
2) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 144
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. .
.
14. (full loss offset)
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. *
. 20% 1,000 1,000
*20%, 200 .
.
15. (risk-taking) ?
1) .
2) .
3) , (full-loss offset)
.
4) (-)
.
5) .
2. . (+)
, (-) .
16. Inflation Tax
?
1) , .
2) , .
3) () .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 145
4) .
5) () .
1.
.
.
17. ?
1)
.
2) ,
.
3)
.
4) indexation .
5)
.
5. .
.
.
18. .
(purchasing power) ?
1) 2) 3)
4) 5)
1.
. .
19. ?
1) () .
2) .
3) .
4) () ().
5) , .
1. (lump sum tax) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 146
. .
20. (0) .
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
1. (0)
. ,
.
21. 5,000 . 30%
1,500 .
(MB) ?
1) 5,000 2) 1,500 3) 3,500
4) 30 5) 0.3
5. (MB) .
22. (MC) ?(, * )
1)
2) *
3) **
4) *
5)
2. .
23. (transfer pricing) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 147
.
5)
.
3.
() .
.
24. ?
1) unitary tax system(
) .
2) 3 .
3) .
4) .
5) .
5.
.
25. (EITC) ?
1) .
2) ( 800 ) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
4. .
. .
.
26. (EITC) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 148
5. .
.
.
1 ?(2007)
.
(lock-in effect)
.
.
.
.
3. .
.
( )
.
2
?(2005 )
-(Haig-Simons) .
, .
.
(imputed income) .
.
2. .
.
.
3 -(Haig-Simons) ?(2003
)
.
.
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 149
.
1. () .
,
() .
4 -(Haig-Simons) (comprehensive income)
?(2002 )
.
.
.
.
.
4. (imputed income) .
,
.
.
5
?(2003 )
.
.
.
(positive system).
.
4. .
.
() .
6 ?
(2004 )
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 150
.
.
.
.
4. () .
, ,
. ,
.
7 (deduction) (tax credit)
?(2003 )
.
.
.
.
.
3. .
( 8%-35%)
.
8 ? (2002
)
.
() .
.
.
.
4. .
( )
, .
9 ? (2002 )
(negative income tax)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 151
(flat tax)
.
.
.
.
3. .
() .
.
10 ?
(2006 )
.
.
.
, ,
.
.
2.
. () .
.
.
11 U = min{3L, Y} (L=, Y=).
?(2006 )
.
.
.
.
.
5. .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 152
L . L .
.( L
.)
, .
,
. .
12 8 1 2
. (L=, Y=) . 20%
?(2005 )
. 0.25 .
0.25 . 0.5 .
0.5 .
3. (Y) Y=2+(8-L)*1 . U=LY
U=L[2+(8-L)*1]=10L-L2 , (0) L 5. 10-2L=0
L 5 .
20% U=L[2+(8-L)*0.8]=8.4L-0.8L2
(0) L 5.25 . 20% .
13
, .
10,000 100 , 10%
10 . 10
(lump-sum tax) (flat rate tax:
) ?(2003 )
10 100
.
100 100 .
100 .
100 100
.
100 .
2. .
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 153
( 20%)
=0 5% 5% 1% 4%
=5% 10% 5% 2% 3%
14
?(2006 )
.
.
,
.
.
.
5. (inflation tax) .
( )
.
, .
. () 5%. 5% 10%
5% . 20%
.
5% 20% 1% 4% .
10% 20% 2% 8% , 5%
(8%-5%) 3% 1%point
. .
15
?(2007)
lock-in effect tax arbitrage bracket creep
inflation tax tax credit
3.
. (bracket creep) .
(inflation tax)
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 154
16 ( )
?(2003 )
(transfer payments) (crowding-out effect)
(inflation tax) (tax shifting)
(tax wedge)
3.
.
17 ,
? (, .)(2007)
, .
.
, .
.
.
5. ( )
. . (
), ( ).
.
.
.
.
18 . (lump-sum tax)
? (, .) (2005 )
.
.
.
.
.
3. .
.
19 (inter-temporal resource allocation model)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 155
? , , ,
. (2005 )
,
,
,
,
,
1. . (
)
( ) .
20I. Fisher
.
? (,
.) (2004 )
.
.
.
.
.
1. ()
.
.
.
21 3,000 (
).
?(2007)
,
.
.
.
,
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 156
.
,
.
4.
. .
, (=
) .
.
,
.
.
22 - .
.
.
( + )
. ? (,
.) (2003 )
() .
.
.
.
.
1.
.
23 .
?(2007)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 157
4. (full-loss offset)
. (+)
.
,
0 .
. .
24(full loss offset)
? , ,
, 0(),
() .(2004 )
,
,
,
,
,
1.
. (+)
.
25 10% () 10% . 25%
, ?(2006 )
-2.5% 0% 2.5% 7.5% 10%
1. 10% 10% (0%) .
25% (2.5%) () -2.5%
.
,
.
26 5% 3% .
20% ?(2004 )
10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
5. 5% 3% 2%. 20%
1%. 1% .
(2%) (1%) 50% .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 158
27(N. Stern)
. ?
(2005 )
() .
() .
() .
() .
.
4. (+) .
.
28 ?(2006 )
.
.
,
.
.
.
3. .
. (idea)
(Corlett & Hague) .
, , ,
.
29
. ? (2006 )
.
.
2 () .
.
22 .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 159
3. 2 . .
8,000, 35%
.
30() (negative wage tax) (wage subsidy)
? , () ,
.
.(2004 )
.
.
.
() .
() .
1.
.
.
31 2005 7,000 , 1,000
. 2006 30%
30% . (Indexation) 2006
?(2006 )
390 450 840 1,500 1,950
1. , 2005 7,000 1,000 6,000
.
1,000*10%+2,000*20%+2.000*30%+1,000*40%=1,500
, 30% 9.100(7,000*1.3) 1,000
8,100 .
1,000*10%+2,000*20%+2,000*30%+3,100*40%=2,340
,
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 160
indexation 1,300, 1,300 10%, 1,300
3,900 20%, 3,900 6,50030%, 6,500 40% .
7,800(9,100-1,300)
. 1,300*10*+2,600*20%+2,600*30%+1,300*40%=1,950.
390.
(2,340-1950=390)
32(EITC : Earned Income Tax Credit)
EITC ,
EITC (phase-out range) .
EITC ?(2006 )
,
,
,
,
4. ()
. EITC , , .
.
.
,
. .
33 ?(2005 )
(negative income tax) (-) .
(basic allowance) .
.
(EITC)
.
(EITC)
.
1.
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 161
34
? , , 1
.(2005 )
.
0() .
.
.
.
4. (MB) .
(MC) .
35 ?(2006
)
unitary taxation treaty shopping tax haven
transfer pricing tax resorting
2. . , unitary tax
.
.
, .
, treaty shopping .
(paper company)
.
, tax haven
.
, , (tax paradise) .
(tax shelter)
(tax resort) .
, transfer pricing
. 1,000
2,500
.
36 .
?(2006 )
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 162
.
.
.
.
.
1.
, .
(host country) (home country)
.
100 40% 50% .
40, 50, 90 40
50 .
, 40 60
50% 30 70 .
.
, 40
.
37 100
. 40%, 50%.
?(2004 )
10 30 50 60
1. , 40, 50 10.
, 40, 30
30. , 40, 50 40
10 50.
38
?(2003 )
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 163
1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
1 0 01 0 0
: , : : , :
: , : : , :
: , :
2. .
( ) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 164
17
1. ,
. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
1. .
.
2. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
2. ,
.
.
3.
. (distortion) ?
1) .
2) .
3) 10% .
4) .
5) .
2. ,
.
4. ?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 165
1) .
2) () .
3) .
4) (APC) .
5) .
2. .
.
.
5. .
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) (APC) .
5) (MPC) .
4. . ,
() .
6. , 3
?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3.
.
7. ?
1) .
2) .
3) (APC)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 166
.
4) 10% .
5) .
1.
.
. .
8. ,
?
1) .
2)
.
3) ,
.
4) .
5) .
1. .
.
9. ?
1)
.
2) 100%
.
3) Tobin-q
.
4)
.
5)
.
5. .
,
. .
10. () ?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 167
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. .
() .
1 4 1. ,
1, 1 5, 5 . 10%
? (2007)
1 1 5 2 5 3 5 4
3. . 4, 1
5 1.5 . 2.5 10% 2,500
. 2.5
.
2, , 3 10% .
0() ? ,
. (2005 )
5. .
.
3 ?
(2003 )
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 168
.
.
.
.
4. .
10%
.
4 . ? (2003 )
(multi-stage turnover tax) .
.
.
.
.
5. .
() .
5 ( ) ()(expenditure tax)
?(2007)
.
0 .
(in rem tax) .
.
.
3.
. ( )
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 169
18
1. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
4. .
.
2. ?
1) 2)
3) 4)
5)
5. 1 1 13%, 1
25% 2 .
3. () ?
1) .
2) .
3)
.
4) .
5) .
3. .
.
4.
?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 170
. .
. .
. (lump-sum tax) .
. .
1) .
2)
.
3) .
4) .
5) ,
.
4. .
5. , ?
1) .
2) .
3) (social costs) .
4) (capital gains)
.
5) (regulation) .
1. () .
6. ?
1) ,
2) ,
3) ,
4) , ,
5) , , ,
4. .
.
7. (user cost of capital) ?
1) .
2) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 171
3) .
4) .
5) .
5. .
.
8. (user cost of capital) ?
1) .
2) () .
3)
.
4) .
5) .
2. ,
. (Jorgenson) .
9. (user cost of capital) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. . .
10. ?
1) .
2) (+) .
3) .
4) (-) .
5) (-) .
5. (-)
.
11. King Fullerton ?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 172
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
2.
. .
12. ?
1)
.
2) .
3)
.
4)
.
5) .
3. .
.
13. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) 1 3
5) 2 3
5. ( 3)
( 2) .
14. .
. ?
1) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 173
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. .
15. Tobin-q ?
1) -q .
2) Tobin-q .
3) -q .
4) -q .
5) -q .
2.
Tobin-q .
16. (Imputation method) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
3. ,
.
17. 2,000 50%.
60% ? (,
.)
1) 400 2) 2,000 3) 2,400 4) 1,200 5) 1,750
1. -(gross-up) 4,000 .
60% 2,400 .
2,000 400.
18. () ?
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 174
() 100 ()
() . 100
.
1) - .
2) (tax shield) .
3)
.
4) -
.
5)
.
5. M-M
. .
.
.
19. ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
2. - .
.
.
20.
?
1) .
2) .
3)
.
4) .
5) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 175
5. -
.
.
21. (tax expenditure) ?
1) .
2) .
3) .
4) .
5) .
1. .
22. ?
1) .
2) .
3)
.
4) .
5) .
5. .
,
. .
1
?(2003 )
.
.
.
.
.
5. (
) .
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 176
2 ?(2007)
.
.
.
.
.
2. () .
() .
.
3 ?(2002 )
.
.
.
.
.
5. .
, .
4
.
?(2006 )
.
.
.
.
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 177
5.
. , . ,
.
.
,
. , .
.
.
.
5 ?(2003 )
.
.
.
.
.
3. ( )
.
6
. ?(2006 )
.
(output effect) .
.
(factor substitution effect) .
,
.
2.
.
.
.
Pareto .
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 178
7 ,
? (2005 )
.
() () .
() ()
.
.
.
1. .
.
8 (D. Jorgenson)
,
? (, .)(2005 )
+
+
+
+
2. . .
, , ,
.
9 ?(2005 )
(partnership method) .
(partnership method) .
(capital gains method)
.
.
.
3. ,
.
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 179
10
. 1,000
? , 60% 70%
.(2004 )
800 700 250 100 -100
3. 60% 1,000 2,500
. 2,500 70% 1,750 . 1,500
250 .
11 ?(2007)
,
.
,
.
.
(-)
.
5)
.
3. ( )
.
.
.
12 ?(2002
)
(user cost of capital)
.
.
.
.
(-)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 180
.
3.
. .
13 ?(2004 )
.
(replacement cost)
.
.
.
.
1. () .
.
14
?(2006 )
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
3. ,
. ,
.
.
. .
( () .
.
.)
(http://blog.daum.net/ecomania) 181
15 ?(2002 )
.
.
, , .
(dividend paradox) .
.
4.
.
.
16 -(Modigliani-Miller) 1
. ?
(2003 )
.
.
.
.
.
2. -
.
17 ?
(2002 )
-(Modigliani-Miller)
.
-
.
(tax shield) .
.
.
5. .
1,000 20% 200 30%
300 .