19
DUKTIILIT MUOTOVIIVAT VS. LINEAMENTIT VS. HAURAAT RAKENTEET Rakoseminaari 3.12.2015 GTK, Espoo Pietari Skyttä

DUKTIILIT MUOTOVIIVAT VS. LINEAMENTIT VS. HAURAAT …kyt2018.vtt.fi/seminaari_03122015/Skytta.pdf · 2016. 1. 13. · DUKTIILIT MUOTOVIIVAT VS. LINEAMENTIT VS. HAURAAT RAKENTEET Rakoseminaari

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • DUKTIILIT MUOTOVIIVAT VS. LINEAMENTIT VS.

    HAURAAT RAKENTEET

    Rakoseminaari3.12.2015

    GTK, Espoo

    Pietari Skyttä

  • IN COLLABORATION

    Jussi Kinnunen, University of Turku

    Jukka-Pekka Palmu, GTK

    Kirsti Korkka-Niemi, University of Helsinki

    2

    Modelling with MOVETM from

    Midland Valley Exploration Ltd

  • Palmu, 1999; GTK; National Land Survey3

    SETTING

  • Väisänen and Skyttä, 2007

    4

    1) Structural

    interpretation of the

    bedrock in the area

    Replacement of lineaments with

    structural form lines

    Recognition of major

    deformation zones and their

    geometries, including shear

    zone terminations

    • Linear patterns and

    deflections into ductile shear

    zones utilized

    Dextral strike-slip nature of the

    Somero shear zone used as the

    framework for structural

    interpretation OK

  • 5

    Regional-scale faults (based on aeromag)

    Note the parallel individual branches and the

    horsetail style shear zone termination

  • 6

    Fine-tuning of the

    deformation zones Structural point data

    Magnetic map

    Bedrock map (foliations,

    folds)

    The ”regional” faults on

    a 100k bedrock map

    “Fine-tuning” will utilize

    several steps and

    alternative

    interpretations

  • 7

    Faults, revision #1, based on ductile form lines and lithology

    Fault repositioned

    along fold axial trace;

    cross-cutting relations

    modified

    Fault repositioned

    along N-edge of

    anomaly,

    according to GTK

    bedrock form lines

    High

    uncertainties

    in the

    magnetically

    ”pale” area

    (highlighted)

  • 8

    Alternative solutions

    – from regional point of view

    One major SZ branch

  • 9

    Alternative solutions

    – from regional point of view

    Two major SZ branches (E-W)

  • 10

    Dip analysis Structural point data

  • 11

    Dip analysis LiDAR

  • 12

    DEM bedrock surface (GTK) colour-mapped by elevation

    2) Bedrock

    DEM vs.

    shear

    zones

  • 13

    DEM bedrock surface (GTK) vs lineaments

  • 14

    Aeromag & form lines vs lineaments

    - Arrows stand for glacial striations

  • 15

    3) Future outlook

    a) Modification of existing

    bedrock surface DEMs

    >> distinct breaks instead of

    smooth transitions

    >> consequences for

    understanding the internal

    stratigraphies

    >> applicable in

    hydrogeological modelling

  • 16

    b) Use of structural geology as input data in

    surface interpolations

    Kriging with

    orientational parameters

    from the bedrock

    structures…

    … according to their

    occurrence!

  • 17

    Use of structural geology as input

    data in surface interpolations - II

    Planned collaboration with Canadian Survey

  • 18

    More reading available…

  • 19

    THANK

    YOU!