IMF TaxreforminVN

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    1/54

    ISSUES FOR 2011-2015

    Norregaard-Matheson-Mullins-Schatan

    1

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    2/54

    Content Overview of Revenue Issues

    VAT Excises

    Natural Resources

    Personal Income Tax

    Property Taxes Environmental Taxes

    Conclusion 2

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    3/54

    Overview of Revenue Issues

    3

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    4/54

    -

    Is comprehensive, fair, efficient and

    Is simple and transparent Promotes competitiveness and exports

    Encoura es investment es eciall in hi h

    technology

    4

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    5/54

    GDP in 2008. Sli ht decline to a roximatel 27% in 2011 due

    to lower oil prices

    Non-oil revenues continued to rise from 18.4%of GDP in 2008 to 20.6% of GDP in 2010

    Target revenues of 23-24% in Reform Strategy

    appear achievable, despite projected declinein oil and trade revenue and foreign grants

    5

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    6/54

    -

    35.00

    40.00

    25.00

    30.00

    10.00

    15.00

    20.00

    0.00

    5.00

    -10.00

    -5.00

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

    Revenue/GDP Expenditure/GDP Non-oil revenue/GDP Deficit/GDP Primary Balance

    6

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    7/54

    Revenue Performance:

    Regional Comparison

    e nam as one o g es ra os o revenue

    to GDP in the region

    Only Malaysia and Bhutan are higher

    Relative to GDP per capita, Vietnams revenuerat o s t e g est

    7

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    8/54

    40

    45

    30

    35

    20

    25

    even

    ues/GDP%

    10

    15

    0

    5

    8

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    9/54

    Relative to other emerging Asian countries, Vietnamrelies more heavily on CIT

    Trade (including import excises)

    And less heavily on PIT

    Property

    Excises

    This is not prescriptive, but shows possible areas forrevenue development.

    9

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    10/54

    Comparison of Tax Revenue Shares, Vietnam and Emerging Asia, 2010

    30.0

    35.0

    25.0

    15.0

    20.0

    10.0

    5.0

    0.0

    Tax/GDP PIT CIT Property VAT Excises Trade

    Vietnam Emerging Asia (unwtd. avg.)10

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    11/54

    Trade revenues also expected to decline

    Steady contribution of non-oil CIT, excises Very small contribution ofrecurrentproperty

    taxes

    Growing importance of VAT revenue

    11

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    12/54

    30.00

    Vietnam: Composition of Revenues, 2004-2010

    25.00

    20.00PIT

    15.00

    rcentageofGDP

    Property

    CIT (non-oil)

    ExcisesTrade

    10.00

    PNRT

    CIT (oil)

    Other

    5.00

    0.00

    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*12

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    13/54

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    14/54

    -

    invoice-credit method

    goods (clean water, fertilizers, fresh food, sugar.)

    -and services

    No standard threshold

    Refunds only above threshold

    14

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    15/54

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    16/54

    VAT Standard Rate, 2010(In percent)

    14

    16

    18

    10

    12

    4

    6

    0

    2

    16

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    17/54

    - VAT Efficiency, 2010(Consumption based)

    1.20

    1.40

    0.80

    1.00

    0.60

    0.20

    0.40

    0.00

    Vietnam Thailand Indonesia Nepal Cambodia Bangladesh Pakistan Philippines17

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    18/54

    -

    Reduction in exempt goods and services

    Reduce number of goods and services subject to

    5% rate

    Study the feasibility of one uniform rate by 2020 Move towards credit-invoice (deduction) method

    for all taxpayers (except those below threshold)

    Introduce VAT threshold applied to turnover in line

    with international practice

    18

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    19/54

    Streamline substantially the list of exemptgoo s w spec c proposa s

    Eliminate the lower 5% rate and classify goodso w c ower ra e app es e er as exemp or

    subject to the standard rate

    n ro uce an exemp on res o or smabusinesses in terms of turnover (with turnover

    Eliminate refund threshold for exporters

    en ra ze paymen o w rans ers o

    local governments) 19

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    20/54

    20

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    21/54

    Wide arra of oods services sub ect to tax:

    tobacco air conditioning devices

    alcoholic beverages playing cards

    oil products votive paper autos gambling

    aircrafts amusement services

    yachts

    and different rates

    21

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    22/54

    all rates ad valorem

    ow rate on petro pro ucts 10%

    contraband/ low rates in Cambodia

    22

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    23/54

    consumption goods; eliminate those withscarce revenues/high collection cost and easilyeluded;

    Consider possibility of increasing gasoline tax; Introduce specific excises to replace ad

    valorem;

    Streamline rates (e.g: lotteries and gambling);

    Re ional coordination to revent smu lin

    23

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    24/54

    Natural Resources

    24

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    25/54

    Current Fiscal Regime: Natural

    Resources CIT rate 50%

    Promoted projects: 32-40%

    Royalties

    Oil: 7-29%

    Metals: 10-15%

    n ng r g s ee an a ona . -

    Export duties

    ron ore, go , o Natural gas export forbidden

    25

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    26/54

    - 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%

    Malaysia ; 1996 R/C + 20% equity

    Sri Lanka ; Mannar basin

    Norway ; Offshore

    or e ec e eg mes

    Field: Vietnam Upstream

    Size: 71 MMBOE

    Project Description

    Discount Rate: 10.0%

    Vietnam ; 2010 non-incentive 25%

    Malaysia ; Deep Water + 20% equity

    Indonesia ; 2008

    Ghana ; Post Jubilee (2008)

    Timor-Leste ; TL_ZOCA

    osts: .

    Oilprice: $100 Bbl

    IRR pre tax: 53%

    etnam ; non- ncentve equ ty

    Indonesia ; 2011 DW

    Timor-Leste ; TL_BU

    India ; model 2009 DW

    Timor-Leste ; JPDA

    Vietnam ; 2010incentive 25%e uit

    AETR NPV0

    AETR NPV10

    Maginal

    Notviable

    Cambodia ; 2007

    Philippines ; 15% participation.

    M_Thai_JDA ; 201 0

    Thailand ; TH_III (ex cl. SRB)

    Vietnam ; 2010 incentive 0% equity

    Australia ; PRRT

    26

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    27/54

    In rn i n l m ri n: l- 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    Mongolia; gold

    Ghana; CurrentRegime

    Project: GoldMine

    Size: 1.3 MM ounces

    Unit costs: ConstReal $769

    Gold price: ConstReal $1400

    Botswana; gold

    Sierra Leone; NMA2009

    Liberia; gold

    AETR NPV0

    AETR NPV0

    AETR NPV10

    IRR pre tax: 48.0%

    South Africa; gold

    Tanzania; gold

    China; gold

    Australia; WA (gold)

    27

    , ,

    of tax collections to the NPV of the project pre-tax net cash flows.

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    28/54

    90%

    100%

    ent

    138%140%

    50%

    60%70%

    80%

    tedat10

    per

    20%

    30%

    40%

    TRdiscoun

    0%

    ewterms

    Mongolia

    oldterms

    CanadaIndia

    porttariff

    ZambiaChile

    otswana

    Australia

    azakhstanPN

    G

    porttariff

    Indonesia

    ilippinesPeru

    A

    Vietnam

    Vietna

    mnewterms,no

    e

    amoldterm

    s,noe

    Vietn Vi

    et

    28

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    29/54

    Combination of high royalty rates, high CIT

    rates and export taxes may render investment

    in Vietnams energy and mining sectors

    unattractive relative to other countries.

    Export taxes are an inefficient way tostimulate domestic refining.

    29

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    30/54

    Carefull review overall taxation of ener andminerals to ensure international competitiveness Consider shifting the balance between taxes on

    ,for marginal and maturing projects.

    Since natural resource taxation is highly technical,exper ass s ance s a v se .

    Phase out export taxes and VAT penalties for

    Implement EITI accounting standards to ensuretransparency

    30

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    31/54

    31

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    32/54

    Internationall com etitive CIT rate of 25%

    Range ofCIT incentives some rationalization inrecent years, but continue to be very generous

    CIT Income/Deductions broadly consistent with

    removing deduction limitations and simplifyingdepreciation allowances

    ra ua y ntro uc ng ru es to ea w t a us vetax planning: transfer pricing rules; new thinca italization rules

    32

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    33/54

    CIT International TrendsRates falling, but revenue has held upthough lessraised in LICs (pre-crisis) than elsewhere

    0.602.50

    Low-Income Countries

    0.45

    0.50

    3.50

    4.00

    High Income

    0.30

    0.40

    .

    1.00

    1.50

    2.00

    ercentpoints

    0.20

    0.25

    0.30

    0.35

    0.40

    1.50

    2.00

    2.50

    3.00

    .

    erc

    entPoints

    0.00

    0.10

    .

    0.00

    0.50

    1980

    1982

    1984

    1986

    1988

    1990

    1992

    1994

    1996

    1998

    2000

    2002

    2004

    2006

    2008

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    .

    0.00

    0.50

    1.00

    Corporate Tax Revenue (%GDp)

    Corporate Tax Rate (Right Axis)

    Corporate Tax Revenue(%GDP)

    Corporate Tax Rate (Right Axis)

    reducing CIT incentives

    33

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    34/54

    CIT International Trends

    Challen es:

    Incentives , -

    Only attract FDI if governance good

    ,

    Profit-shifting

    How much can one reasonably expect to control this?

    Case for regional/wider cooperation,

    including on policy, becoming stronger?3

    4

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    35/54

    Further base broadenin b rationalizin incentives

    allowing for a reduction in the CIT rate in themedium to long term

    verage ra e or s a reg on n was .

    Align CIT deductions with international practice by:

    entertainment and sponsorship for sporting and artisticevents

    with 3 or 4 depreciation pools

    Ensure effective implementation of rules to addressabusive tax planning

    35

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    36/54

    36

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    37/54

    Poor tax revenues (0.8% of GDP - 2008) due to:

    High basic personal allowance

    Hi h de endent allowance Interest income exempt

    Business income/self employed professionals shelter

    under lower CIT rate Pensions exempt

    37

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    38/54

    or 0.1% on selling price;

    or 2% on selling price;

    Other irregular income, such as prizes and

    38

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    39/54

    tax pensions

    lower PIT top marginal/ align with CIT

    unify capital gains tax rates/consider a

    ua ax sys em broaden the base of capital gains tax

    39

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    40/54

    40

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    41/54

    Land & Housing Tax Key Features

    New design for non-agricultural land from 1 January 2012

    A lies to land onl revious lan to include buildin s notaccepted)

    Tax base continues to be: land size x price per square meter

    multiple of the agricultural land tax as previously)

    Tax rate:

    exceeded: 0.03% standard; 0.07% for land up to 3 times inexcess of quota; 0.15% for excess greater than 3 times.

    Same rate for residential and commercial land

    Exemptions/reductions - similar to previous law includingfor investment projects and special locations

    local level with revenues staying with the local government

    41

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    42/54

    Property Taxes - International

    Exper ence Real estate taxes can be efficient and e uitable

    and particularly suitable for local governments: relatively benign for growth;

    raise few issues of international coordination; and

    while their incidence is not fully understood, they seem- .

    Revenue potential modest in absolute terms, but:

    A relatively easy source of some progressivity?

    Challen es are mainl administrative: develo incadastres and valuation methods

    42

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    43/54

    ,

    43

    L d & H i T P i l

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    44/54

    Land & Housing Tax Potential

    Re orms New re ime is a ositive reform es eciall the

    move to market valuation In short term, allow time for the new regime to be

    implemented implementation and valuationwould be helped by developing a moderncompu er ze ca as re

    In the medium to long term consider:

    ncreas ng e ax ra e as e curren ra es are very ow

    Expanding the base by including buildings

    rates within a range set by the central government

    44

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    45/54

    45

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    46/54

    Environmental Protection Char es

    Extraction charges (minerals, fuels)

    Base: Volumes/Weights of fuel

    ,

    Waste water charges

    Base: Pollutants (Hg, Pb, As, Cd, suspended solids) Exemptions: Some user types, use forms, and regions

    Rates: Ranges (floors and ceilings)

    Solid waste char es

    Revenue use: local restoration

    46

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    47/54

    Tax on various fuels, certain classes ofc em ca s

    Exemptions: natural gas, biofuels (all biofueltypes)

    Very low (specific) rates without indexation

    47

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    48/54

    Part of top 34 fuel consumption subsidies providers

    48

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    49/54

    Increase fuel taxes, do poverty alleviation via,

    Started small Environmental Tax Reform (2012)

    ep ace a va orem axes w spec c ra es an n ex

    Specific rates for new taxes, not indexed

    49

    The Way Forward:

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    50/54

    The Way Forward:

    The Governments Objectives

    Government 5-Year-Plan forenvironmental taxes encourage enterprises and people to change their acts to

    use and consume product which help protect the

    environment increase the revenue of the state budget

    continue to study and supplement taxable subjects

    products which have negative impacts on environment andecosystem

    50

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    51/54

    International agencies can provide damages

    Charge fuels / cars according to their damage

    Do not provi e exemptions If competitiveness concern, one can resolve this problem by

    handing environmental tax revenue back to industry as an outputsubsidy, but still tax pollution equally for all sectors of theeconomy.

    Efficiency requires that equal damage must be

    equally priced Do not allow deductibility of environmental tax payments.

    51

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    52/54

    Tax upstream according to the pollutantcontent of fuels Apply oil tax at refinery level, coal tax at the mine, or at

    ports fewer collection points, less administration cost

    than charging consumers This would address electricity subsidy without excise

    Use targeted transfers not fuel subsidies for

    Avoid leakages of fuel subsidies Achieve much bigger poverty reduction for same cost

    52

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    53/54

    53

  • 7/30/2019 IMF TaxreforminVN

    54/54

    On tax, Vietnam compares favorably in the region

    .and much has been done already! -

    and needs to be carefully prepared and sequenced

    Significant scope for further simplification and base-

    -

    More work is, however, needed (on resource tax,

    , ,

    estimation)54