Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji

7/26/2019 Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji

1/18

773

UDK: 347.925(497.11:4-672EU)

: 01.09.2014. : 01.12.2014.

*mojasevic@prafak.ni.ac.rs

**

,

( 179046).

,*

,

()

**

: ()

. , ,

: ,

,

, ,

. ,

( ,

) . ,

; ;

.

,

,

,

,

,

.

: , , , , ,

, .


2/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

774

1.

2006. 1

.

, ,

:

. , ,

,

20132018. (. ),2

, :

;

, ,

;

. , ,3 ,

, .

()

, ,

. ,

,

,

. (De Palo, Harley, 2005: 469479)

: , , . , ,

.

2.

2.1.

() (, ,

2012: 710) - , 2002. . ,

1 : http://ww w.srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_sekcija.

php?id=45678

2 : http://ww w.mpravde.gov.rs/files/Nacionalna%20

Strategija%20reforme%20pravosudja%20za%20period%202013.-2018.%20godine.pdf

3 2013. : http://www.mpravde.

gov.rs/sekcija/53/radne-verzije-propisa.php


3/18

. | . 773-790

775

-. ,

, (,

), , : , .

, :

(IFC) (ABA/CEELI).

, .

.

. 2005. 4( : ),

. ,

, (, ) (

IFC). , ,

.

- , , -

,

, ,

! , ,

2006. 2013. , 3.500 .5

. ,6 2012. ,7

4 , . , 18/05.

5 : http://novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html:460347-

Gasi-se-Centar-za-medijaciju, : 10. 2014. .

6 : http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/statist ika_2012.pdf

7

2011. (2.742.772 ). ,

2010. , ,


4/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

776

, ,

. :

?

.

2.2.

,

-

, , .

, ,

, .

,

2005. . , (

),

!

( ),

( )

?

, ,

. , (,

, 2011: 11) : ;

;

;

;

, , . ,

(, 2014: 103245)

, ,

: ,

;

,

. : http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/aktuelno/

statistika_o_radu_sudova_za_2011.pdf, http://www.vk.sud.rs/assets/files/o_sudu/izvestaji/

godisnji_izvestaj_o_radu_2010.pdf


5/18

. | . 773-790

777

;

;

, , .

, ,

, ,

. ,

.

2008.

,

. (, 2014)

pro futuro ,

2013., .

( ) ,

.

(, 2014: 236245)

() :

, ;

;

;

,

, . , , ,

, , (, 2014).

, .

3.

3.1.

. ,

, 20. . ,

, ,

1.300 , ,

,

(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 351). , ()

( 2010.


6/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

778

) (Jean, Jorry, 2013:

34), , , 493

() ,

() ( 110%). ,

,

2010. , ,

(.tax on incoming ca-

ses). (De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 352)

:

, , .

(

)

.

,

.

,

(Bruni, Sitzia, 2013: 4950). , 1991. ,

(. Justice of the Peace; . Giudice di Pace);

, 1993. , . 580,

; , . 281,

; , 2003. . 5

( ); 2006.

. 55 ,

; 2007. , . 179

,

; 2010. , . 183

, . ,

2009. , . 69,

,

28/2010.


7/18

. | . 773-790

779

. ,

, .

3.2.

. 580, 1993. ,

,

,

. (De Palo, 2007: 2):

1999. 2005. , ,

, 327 ,

277 , 45

,

.

(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 352)

. ,

,

2001. , 98%

, 2001.

4%

(De Palo, Harley, 2005: 472). ,

(De Palo, Harley, 2005:

473475) (, )

,

. , ,

, (De Palo, Harley,

2005: 476478) :

;

( , ); , , , ,

;

, .

. (Gabellini,

2010: 6465) :


8/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

780

() ,

(

28/2010), ,

.

(Morek, 2013), 2011.

( ) 2012.

215.689 ,

12%. ,

, 50%.

, 2011. 2012. ,

,

(

). (De Berti, 2012)

. ,

,

, ,

,

0,5% (Colombo, 2012: 79). ,

, .

, 2008. 37 ,

843 2012. ; 35309

(De Berti, 2012). , (Colombo,

2012: 78) ( ) :

?

, ,

; ,

,

.

4.

4.1.

,

, ().

, ,


9/18

. | . 773-790

781

. , :

(. justice of the peace),

(Schlichtungsbehrden) ( ) . ,

.

,

40%(Meier, 2006: 45).

,, ( ) - , 1980.

, ,

. ,

, , : , ,

, ,

, . 2005. ;

. ,

, .

, 2007. , . (.Swiss Mediation Rules)

. , 1. 2011. ,

, (),

.

.8 ,

,

. ,

. , ; , .

. ( ),

(Baizeau, Kunz, 2013: 93, 95).

8 2008/52/. ,

.


10/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

782

4.2.

(Baizeau, Kunz, 2013: 93, 95). ,

; , ,

, , ,

. ,

,

, . ,

,

; ,

. ,

() . , (

), , .

() . , ,

. , ,

. ,

(

) (

40%), .

: [ ] (Meier, 2006: 18). ,

, ,

,

,

.

( , ),

, ,

. ,

(Meier, 2006: 19)

,

!


11/18

. | . 773-790

783

5.

5.1. :

(De Roo, Jagtenberg, 2002:

128133) 16. Leidse Vredema-

kers(.Layden Peacemakers), ,

,

Bereaux de Paix, Juges de Paix.

, ,

( )

. , 19. ,

, (

), , .

. , 20. ,

, , ,

(

),

, , ,

,

. ,

20. , ( , ),

,

, , . ,

,

,

, . ,

,

,

. 1993.

(. ),

.

. ,

,

. (De Roo, Jagtenberg,

2002: 130) , , (19962001),


12/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

784

1.222 , ,

(, 1993. 2002.

2.000, ),

, , , . ,

(CEPEJ, 2012: 139)

: 100.000

, : 4.015,

.

. 1996. ,

. , 2000. 2003.

, :

,

, ,

.

,

(, Journal

for Mediation),

,

, .

5.2.

, . ,

(Pel, 2012)

2008/52/., . ,

, - 1995.

, 2000. .

, , ,

- 1980. :9 )

, ) ,

) .

9 : Art. 2, 7, 14, 20 of UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, A/RES/35/52, 10.12.1980.


13/18

. | . 773-790

785

,

, , , ;

,

, , (De

Roo, Jagtenberg, 2002:135, 145). ,

, .

, ,

, , ,

, .

, ,

, 2011. 52.000 ,

(17.058 33%)

(12.922 25%) (Pel: 2012). , 2010.

(Vogels, van der Zeijden, 2010: 47) (,

69% ) ( )

,

(36,7%, 34,4%). ,

(Vogels, van der Zeijden, 2010: 49)

-, ( )

.

, , ,

,

. ,

(. -

) condition sine qua non ,

. , , . ,

.

, ,

,

(De Palo, Carmeli, 2005: 349). ,

2012. , (CEPEJ, 2012: 132141)

, ,


14/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

786

. , ,

,

. ,

, . (. ), .

.

6.

(, ,

, )

,

, . , ,

-, . ,

(

). ,

,

, . ,

,

.

2010. , ,

, ,

.

,

( ) . ,

,

, .

. ,

() , ()

, .

: . ,

(

) .

, ,


15/18

. | . 773-790

787

, , ,

, , ,

.

,

,

.

,

,

. ,

,

( , ) . , .

Baizeau, D., Kunz, A. C. (2013). Switzerland. U Renate Dendorfer-Ditges (Prir.),

Mediation in 16 jurisdictions worldwide 2013. London: Law Business Research Ltd.

Bruni, A., Sitzia, M. (2013). Italy. U Renate Dendorfer-Ditges (Prir.), Mediation in

16 jurisdictions worldwide 2013. London: Law Business Research Ltd.

Colombo, F. G. (2012). Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Italy: European

Inspiration and National Problems. Ritsumeikan Law Review. 29. 7180

De Berti, G. (2012). Mandatory mediation: the Italian experience, two years on.

[Electronic version]. Retrieved 21, April 2014, from http://www.internationa-

llawofice.com

De Palo, G. (2007). Cross-Border Commercial Mediation: How Legislation Affects

Mediation Use. [Electronic version]. Retrieved 7, May 2014, from http://www.

europarl.europa.eu/comparl/juri/hearings/20071004/depalo5_en.pdf

De Palo, G., Carmeli, S. (2005). Mediation in Continental Europe: A Meande-

ring Path Toward Eficient Regulation. U C. Newmark i A. Monaghan (Prir.),

Butterworths Mediators on Mediation: Leading Mediator Perspectives on the Prac-

tice of Commercial Mediation. Manchester: Tottel Publishing

De Palo, G., Harley, P. (2005).Mediation in Italy: Exploring the Contradictions.

Negotiation Journal, 21(4). 469-479

De Roo, A., Jagtenberg, R. (2002). Mediation in the Netherlands: Past Present

Future. Electronic journal of comparative law. [Electronic version]. Retrieved

28, April 2014, from http://www.ejcl.org/64/art64-8.pdf


16/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

788

2008/52/ 21. 2008.

European Commission for the Eficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Council of Europe.European judicial systems, Edition 2012 (data 2010): Eficiency and quality of

justice. (2012)

Gabellini, R. (2010). The Italian Mediation Law Reform(ADR Bulletin, 12(3), Ar-

ticle 4). [Electronic version]. Retrieved 1, May 2014, from http://epublications.

bond.edu.au/adr/vol12/iss3/4

2012. , http://www.

vk.sud.rs/assets/iles/o_sudu/izvestaji/statistika_2012.pdf

2011. , http://www.

vk.sud.rs/assets/iles/aktuelno/statistika_o_radu_sudova_za_2011.pdf

2010. http://www.

vk.sud.rs/assets/iles/o_sudu/izvestaji/godisnji_izvestaj_o_radu_2010.pdf

Jean, J., Jorry, H. (2013).Judicial systems of the European Union countries:Analysis

of data by the European Commission for the Eficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Council

of Europe

Meier, I. (2006). Mediation and Conciliation in Switzerland. [Electronic version].

Retrieved 27, April 2014, from http://www.175jahre.uzh.ch

, . (2014). : -

. :

, . (2014).

.

. 66

, . (2014). () :

, mimeo

Morek, R. (2013). Mandatory Mediation in Italy Reloaded. [Electronic version].

Retrieved 23, April 2014, from http://kluwermediationblog.com/2013/10/09/

mandatory-mediation-in-italy-reloaded/

a a 2006. , http://www.

srbija.gov.rs/vesti/dokumenti_sekcija.php?id=45678

a a 20132018. ,

http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/iles/Nacionalna%20Strategija%20reforme%20

pravosudja%20za%20period%202013.-2018.%20godine.pdf

, ., , . (2011). .

: (IFC).


17/18

. | . 773-790

789

, ., , . (2012). :

. :

Pel, M. (2012). [Electronic version]. Retrieved 28, April 2014, from http://kluwer-

mediationblog.com/2012/03/07/promotion-and-legislation-on-mediation-in-thenetherlands/

2013.

. : http://www.mpravde.gov.rs/sekcija/53/radne-verzije-

propisa.php

UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules, A/RES/35/52, 10.12.1980

Vogels, R.J.M., van der Zeijden, P.Th. (2010). The Situation Regarding Mediation

in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: The Netherlands Mediation Institute

. . . 18(2005).

http://novosti.rs/vesti/naslovna/drustvo/aktuelno.290.html:460347-Gasi-se-

Centar-za-medijaciju


18/18

| 68 | LIII | 2014

790

Aleksandar Mojaevi, LL.D.

Assistant Professor,

Faculty of Law, University of Ni

Eficiency of (Judicial) Mediation in Serbiaas

Compared to some European Countries

Summary

Analysis of eficiency of (judicial) mediation in Serbia and other European coun-

tries (Italy, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Denmark) illuminates the causes of

poor representation of this legal institution in our country. Analysis of mediation

in Italy, culturally most closely resembling country to Serbia, indicates that alegalistic approach to the promotion and implementation of mediation, especi-

ally if it is heterogeneous, is not eficient. On the other hand, countries that have

implemented a bottom-up approach (irst applied, and then regulate), such

as the Netherlands and Denmark, have developed eficient mediation system.

Switzerland, a country that relied on an approach based on the promotion of

culture of mediation, has a mediation system that has not been developed to the

extent to the developed system of conciliation. In any case, the Italian experience

has taught us that the regulation of mediation is not a sure path to success in the

implementation of this legal institution; Swiss experience highlights the impor-

tance of developing a culture of peaceful settlement of disputes; Dutch and Da-

nish experience emphasizes pragmatism in the promotion and implementation

of mediation. Since Serbia lacks an eficient regulatory framework of mediation,

culture of peaceful dispute settlement and pragmatism in implementation of

this legal institution, it seems that the experiences, for the purpose of analysis,

observed countries are more than useful.

Key words: eficiency, mediation, Serbia, the Netherlands, Denmark, Italy,

Switzerland.

Efikasnost Medijacije u Srbiji

Documents

Energetska efikasnost - IGM

Pravilnik Za Enegretska Efikasnost

Spoljni učinak: efikasnost, kvalitet i dostupnost ... · Spoljni učinak: efikasnost, kvalitet i dostupnost pravosudnih usluga a. Efikasnost u pružanju pravosudnih usluga Preporuka

Uvodjenje medijacije

7. Efikasnost Intelektualnog Kapitala

UČEŠĆE GRAĐANA U DEMOKRATSKIM PROCESIMA U SRBIJI 2017 · • skretanjem pažnje medija na probleme građana - ove godine u efikasnost te akcije veruje 28% građana dok je prethodne

energetska efikasnost seminarski

Efikasnost Uprave carina u sprovođenju mjera naplate ...¡taj o reviziji uspjeha Efikasnost Uprave carina u... · Efikasnost Uprave carina u sprovođenju mjera naplate carinskog

Indikatori Za Energetska Efikasnost

Zakonski propisi Republike Srbije koji regulišu oblast medijacije

Procesna i Energetska Efikasnost

9. Intertemporalna efikasnost

energetska efikasnost -voved

Akcioni plan za razvoj medijacije u Bosni i Hercegovinimpr.gov.ba/web_dokumenti/Bosnia_Action_Plan_June_2008_Bos_FINAL.pdfpostupku medijacije), koji je Parlamentarna skupština BiH

Energetska efikasnost zgrada u Srbiji ‡ stawe i perspektivetermotehnika.vinca.rs/content/files/energetska-efikasnost-zgrada-u... · Elektronska adresa autora: sumi@eunet.rs, sumi@grf.bg.ac.rs

Podrška primeni medijacije u - PARTNERS-SERBIA

Oporezivanje i efikasnost

Energetska efikasnost u zgradarstvu.pdf

ENERGETSKA EFIKASNOST

Obiljezja Obiteljske Medijacije (1)