Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IntroductionIntroduction to to thethe theorytheoryof of densedense plasmasplasmas
Michael BonitzInstitut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
2nd Summer Institute „Complex Plasmas“, Greifswald, 4 August 2010
G. Dominique , A. Filinov, P. LaPlante, H. Baumgartner, H. Kählert, L. Rosenthal, P. Ludwig, J. Böning
C. Henning, K. Balzer, S. Bauch, T. Ott, M. Heimsoth, D. Hochstuhl, MB
Cooperations:
V. Filinov (Moscow),A. Piel, H. Kersten (Kiel), Yu. Lozovik, A. Melzer, H. Fehske (Greifswald), J.W. Dufty (Florida) , Z. Donko and P. Hartmann (Budapest)
Group
ContentsContents
1. Theoretical approaches to nonideal classical plasmas
1.1. Fluid models: - ground state- thermodynamic equilibrium- collective excitations
1.2. First principle simulations: - molecular dynamics- Monte Carlo
ContentsContents (2)(2)
2. Nonideal quantum plasmas
4. First principle quantum simulations
2.2. Quantum kinetic theory
2.1. The Schrödinger equation
2.3. Hartree Fock and Nonequilibrium Green functions
2.4. Quantum hydrodynamics
3. Atoms and molecules. Partially ionized plasmas
1. Theoretical approaches to nonideal classical plasmas
Electrolytic solutionsDusty plasmasIons in traps
∑ ∑∑= ≠=
−++=N
iji
N
jii
N
i
i rrUrVm
pH11
2
)(21)(
2
V: external potential, U: pair interaction
N identical particles: Hamilton function
WhenWhen isis a a plasmaplasma nonidealnonideal ??Ideal gas behavior of electrons and ions: when Coulomb interaction energy U
is much smaller than kinetic energy K
TNkK B23
=In thermodynamic equilibrium:
∑≠ −
=ji ji
ji
rree
U||2
1
Estimate mean interaction energy: 3/1−∝≡− nrrr ji3/1
2
nreU ∝∝
Degree of nonideality:T
nkTre
KU 3/12||
∝∝=Γ
Nonideal behavior at low temperature or high density
NonidealNonideal plasmasplasmas
Trapped ions
Tne
rTke
EU
BKIN
3/122||∝==Γ
Occurences:
1. Low temperature
3. High charge
Dusty plasmas
Semiconductors
2. High density
1≥Γ
1. Theoretical approachesto nonideal classical plasmas
1.1 1.1 FluidFluid modelsmodels
Examples: strongly correlated ultracold ions or dust particles in spherical trap (Yukawa balls) concentric shells
Ion crystal, M. Drewsen
„Yukawa ball“O. Arp et al.
( talks on Monday, Tuesday)
Goal: theory explaining shell formation, density distribution in cluster
Classical density functional theory
U(r): Energy in external confinement,2nd term: mean field energy3rd term: correlation energy
Problem: find density profile n(r) that minimizes E
Mean field theory (T=0)
Note: parabolic decay with r, sharp step at finite radius RCoulomb limit: n(r)=const
Radial density distribution
Deviations for large screening due to neglect of correlation energy
C. Henning et al., Phys. Rev. E 74, 056403 (2006)
Radial density profile at T>0
Solve hierarchy for equilibrium distribution functions (BBGKY)Simplest approximation: mean field theory, example: Coulomb interaction
Wrighton, Dufty, Kählert, Bonitz, PRE 80, 066405 (2009)
)}({)()()( /)(
rnVrUrUern
indeff
kTrU eff
+=
∝ −
Result: Boltzmann factor:
Include correlation effects at T>0
)()(
),(
21
221
rnrnF
rrc
ex
δδβδ
−
=
Kraeft/Bonitz, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 35, 78 (2006)Wrighton, Dufty, Kählert, Bonitz, PRE 80, 066405 (2009) and Contrib. Plasma Phys. 50, 26 (2010)
g: pair distribution function(joint probability)
F_ex: excess freeenergy
lengthwaveDeBroglie:Λ
Adjusted hypernetted chain approximation
HNC
Excellent reproduction of exact Monte Carlo data (crosses)Wrighton, Dufty, Kählert, Bonitz, PRE 80, 066405 (2009) and Contrib. Plasma Phys. 50, 26 (2010)
„Adjusted HNC“,
FluidFluid theorytheory: : collectivecollective excitationsexcitations
• Response of nonideal plasma in trap to weak excitationdetermined by (dN) collective modes
Examples: collective rotation, oscillation (sloshing), „breathing“ mode
• accessible by molecular dynamics simulation and experimentally (talk by A. Melzer)
• Alternative approach: time-dependent fluid theoryfor Coulomb systems: Dubinfor Yukawa systems: Kählert (2010)
FluidFluid theorytheory: : collectivecollective excitationsexcitations
V: external potential, friction included
Solve by linearization around Yukawa ground state (cold fluid limit)
Kählert, Bonitz, Phys. Rev. E (2010)
Complicated due to space-dependent density
FluidFluid theorytheory: : collectivecollective mode mode spectrumspectrum
Kählert, Bonitz, Phys. Rev. E (2010)Talk by Hanno Kählert, Monday
1.2 First 1.2 First principleprinciple simulationssimulations
Classical systems: - equations of motion can be solved exactly forlarge particle numbers (millions)
- no restrictions with respect to interaction
I. Monte Carlo: - virtually exact thermodynamic properties- also: efficient tools for time-dependent processes(„kinetic MC“, see talk by Lasse Rosenthal, Thursday)
II. Molecular dynamics: - virtually exact equilibrium and nonequilibriumproperties (see talks by Peter Hartmann and Torben Ott, Tuesday)
simulations very useful in combination with analytical tools
Classical Monte Carlo • calculation of thermodynamic averages
• Probability distribution for canonical ensemble with
• high-dimensional integral, evaluation with Monte Carlo algorithm:
• create configurations with probability distribution p(R)• Markov-chain• Metropolis algorithm
Metropolis algorithm• transition probability between two configurations
• always accept steps that decrease potential energy• if ΔU>0 accept new state with probability given by Boltzmann factor
• satisfies detailed-balance condition
• calculate averages according to
For details see: A. Filinov and M. Bonitz „Classical and Quantum Monte Carlo“, Chapter in: „Introduction to Computational Methods in Many-Body Physics“, Rinton Press, Princeton 2006
Classical Monte Carlo: Examplesdensity profile of 3D Yukawa balls: n(r) pair-distribution function g(r)
Density profile of Coulomb balls:J. Wrighton, J.W. Dufty, H. Kählert, and M. Bonitz,Phys. Rev. E 80, 066405 (2009)And Contrib. Plasma Phys. 50, 26-30 (2010)
Probability of metastable states
temperature kT
H. Kählert, P. Ludwig, H. Baumgartner, M. Bonitz, D. Block, S. Käding, A. Melzer, and A. Piel, Phys. Rev. E 78, 036408 (2008)
Interaction makes life interesting
Dipl.-Phys. Patrick LudwigPromotionsvortragRostock, 12. Dezember 2008
Coulomb-Korrelationen in HalbleiternInteraction makes life interesting
Molecular Dynamics
numerical technique for simultaneously solving the (Newtonian) equations of motion of many-particle systems.
Advantages
complete phase-space informationexact solution of model systemcomparison with experimental data (dusty plasmas, colloids, ions in traps..) large systems solvable (N~104-106) ∆t
t1
tN
Torben Ott
Disadvantages
purely classical descriptiondepends on choice of model (forces)possibly computationally demanding
Interaction makes life interesting
Dipl.-Phys. Patrick LudwigPromotionsvortragRostock, 12. Dezember 2008
Coulomb-Korrelationen in HalbleiternInteraction makes life interesting
Molecular Dynamics
interaction with other particles
external potentiale.g., electric fields
6N equations need to be solved
T. Ott, P. Ludwig, H. Kählert, M. Bonitz: "Molecular dynamics simulations of dusty plasmas" in M. Bonitz, N. Horing, P. Ludwig (eds.) "Introduction to Complex Plasmas", Springer (2010)
straightforward conceptbut: sophistication required
Interaction makes life interesting
Dipl.-Phys. Patrick LudwigPromotionsvortragRostock, 12. Dezember 2008
Coulomb-Korrelationen in HalbleiternInteraction makes life interesting
Molecular Dynamics
1000 particles of an OCP: (a) microcrystalline, (b) strongly correlated (liquid-like), (c) weakly correlated (gas-like) . Shown are the trajectories over the course of 100 (a,b) and 20 (c) plasma periods.
a b c
Alder, Wainwright 1959: contact interaction
continuous potential
B.J. Alder and T.E. Wainwright, Journal of Chem. Phys. 31, 459 (1959)
Interaction makes life interesting
Dipl.-Phys. Patrick LudwigPromotionsvortragRostock, 12. Dezember 2008
Coulomb-Korrelationen in HalbleiternInteraction makes life interestingMolecular Dynamics
1. Finite Systems (Yukawa- oder Coulomb-Balls)
crystal structure1
short-time behaviour, time-dependent crystallization2
phase transition, melting behaviour3
normal modes4
development of and comparison with analytical models5
transition to macoscopic systems
1H. Baumgartner et al., CPP 47, 281-290 (2007) 5W. Kraeft, M. Bonitz: J. Phys: Conf. Series 35, 94 (2006) 2H. Kählert, M. Bonitz PRL 104, 015001 (2010) (2009) 6T. Ott, M. Bonitz: PRL 103, 1950013J. Böning et al. PRL 100, 113401 (2008) 7M. Bonitz et al., PRL, 105, 055002 (2010) 4C. Henning et al, PRE 76, 036404 (2007)
2. „Infinite“ Systems (extended dusty plasmas)
characterization of diffusion and other transport processes6
waves and fluctuation spectra7
influence of magnetic fields7
nature of phase transitioninput for analytical models such as QLCA
2. Theoretical approaches to nonideal quantum plasmas
Dense plasma in planets, compact stars, quark-gluon plasmaElectron gas in metals, electron-hole plasma in semiconductorsLaser plasmas, ion beam compressed plasmas etc.
∑ ∑∑= ≠=
−++∇
−=N
iji
N
jii
N
i
i rrUrVm
H11
22
)(21)(
2h
V: external potential, U: pair interaction
N identical particles: Hamilton operator
Also: all reaction processes require quantum treatment (of electrons)
WhenWhen isis a a plasmaplasma „„quantumquantum““ ??
Quantum wave length („extension“) of a particle (De Broglie):mvh
=λ
depends on particle mass and velocity
r λ
Tmkh Bπλ 2/=Example: thermodynamic equilibrium:
1. Particles are quantum if r≥λ
Quantum Quantum degeneracydegeneracy
transform ratio of length scales to densities: 31
rn ∝
2. Define quantum degeneracy parameter (dimensionless) :12
3
+=
snλχ
Classical plasma: 1<χ
Quantum plasma: 1>χ
3. Energy criterion: quantum plasma if: ( ) 3/222
32
nm
EkT F πh=<
Fermi energy
CorrelationCorrelation andand Quantum Quantum effectseffectsCoulomb Interaction: reerU baab /)( =
TkU B/⟩⟨≡Γ
StrongCoulomb
correlations
1=ΓDeBroglie
wave length
Tmkh Bπλ 2/=
r
Overlapof wave functions,
Spin effects
Quantum effects
λ
r=λ
13 == λχ n
175=Γ crystal
2.1 2.1 TheThe SchrSchröödingerdinger equationequation
Time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE)
Full N-particle TDSE
indicates, that the N-particle wave function is eithersymmetric (+: bosons) or antisymmetric (-: fermions)
includes all N particle coordinates
Example 2-particle TDSE
Two-particle wave function
(i) Bosons: Ψ(x1,x2) = Ψ(x2,x1)
(ii) Fermions: Ψ(x1,x2) = -Ψ(x2,x1)
Example: two interacting bosons in potential well
repulsive interactionw(x1-x2)
Numerical solution of the TDSE
Limitations:Maximum of N=4 particles for trapped particlesMaximum of N=2 particles for continuum dynamics (scattering, ionization, etc.)
Crank-Nicolson procedure on spatial grid
See S. Bauch et. al in “Introduction to Complex Plasma Physics“, Springer, Berlin 2010
Discretization of space (Δx) and time (Δt)Employing boundary conditionsPropagating initial state Ψ0
Approximation of time evolution operator
leads to tridiagonal system of equations
for new wave function (n+1) at time t+ΔtCoefficients ai, bi, ci and ri depend only on Ψn
Application: Electron-Ion collisions in strong fields
Method: wave packet scattering, full solution of time-dependent Schrödinger equation
Energy absorption from laser field during collisionQuantum mechanics: absorption of single photons (peaks in kinetic energy spectrum)Classical mechanics: transfer of quiver motion to translational motion, significant cut-off energies
S. Bauch and M. Bonitz, Contr. Plas. Phys. 49, 558 (2009)
Angular distributions of scattered electrons
Angle-resolved kinetic energy spectrum of scattered electrons
Intensity of laser field:1015 W/cm²
Photon energy:ω = 0.2 a.u.
Initial k of wave packet:k = 1.0
Classical cut-offs
Method: 2D wave packet scattering
S. Bauch and M. Bonitz, Contr. Plas. Phys. 49, 558 (2009)
2.2 Quantum 2.2 Quantum KineticKinetic TheoryTheory
Two main approaches:
1. Method of reduced density operators (directgeneralization of classical kinetic theory)
2. Second quantization (based on field operatorsfor fermions or bosons)
For details see book: M. Bonitz, „Quantum Kinetic Theory“
Density operator
Quantum description for mixed states
KΨΨ ...1Superposition of all N-particle states(Solutions of N-particle Schrödinger eq.)
Definition of density operator: 1,1
=ΨΨ= ∑=
ρρ TrWK
iiii
Weights (real probabilities): ∑ =i
iW 1
Replaces classicle N-particle probability distribution
Kinetic Theory for quantum plasmas (1)
Classical plasma Quantum plasma
N-particle probability density (x=r,p):
∫ =1...),,...( 11 NNNN fdxdxxxf
Liouville equation:
0},{ =−∂∂
NNN fHft
With Poisson brackets:
∑=
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛∂∂
∂∂
−∂∂
∂∂
=N
i N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NNN r
fpH
pf
rHfH
1},{
N-particle density operator
1ˆ,ˆ ...1 =NNN Tr ρρ
Von Neumann equation:
[ ] 0ˆ,ˆ1ˆ =−∂∂
NNN Hit
ρρh
With commutator:
abbaba ˆˆˆˆ]ˆ,ˆ[ −=
Kinetic Theory for quantum plasmas (2)
Classical plasma Quantum plasma
One-particle probability density (x=r,p):
),...(...)( 1211 NNN xxfdxdxxf ∫=
Kinetic equation:
},{ 12111 VfIpf
rU
rfv
tf
=∂∂
∂∂
−∂∂
+∂∂
Mean field approximation: 2112 fff ≈
Linearization: fff δ+= )0(11
Yields Vlasov dielectric function
One-particle density operator:
NNTrF ρ̂ˆ...21 =
Quantum Kinetic equation:
[ ] }ˆ,{ˆ,ˆ1ˆ12111 FVIFH
iF
t=−
∂∂
h
Mean field approximation:2112
ˆˆˆ FFF ≈
Linearization: FFF ˆˆˆ )0(11 δ+=
Yields „Random phase approximation“( see Norman Horing‘s talk)
For details see book: M. Bonitz, „Quantum Kinetic Theory“
Kinetic Theory for quantum plasmas (3)
Classical plasma Quantum plasma
Efficient numerical solution of kineticEquation using PIC-MCC
[particle in cell method (for mean field part) plus Monte Carlo methods for collisions.]
},{ 12111 VfIpf
rU
rfv
tf
=∂∂
∂∂
−∂∂
+∂∂
Quantum Kinetic equation:
[ ] }ˆ,{ˆ,ˆ1ˆ12111 FVIFH
iF
t=−
∂∂
h
For details see book: M. Bonitz, „Quantum Kinetic Theory“
• So far there are no efficient quantumgeneralizations of PIC, manychallenges remain
• alternative approach: classical PIC plus (small) quantum corrections
• we have developed direct solutions of QK equations usingTime-dependent Hartree Fock and Nonequilibrium Green‘s functions
2.3 Hartree-Fock and Nonequilibrium Greens Functions
Time-dependent Hartree-Fock
Use approximate N-particle wave function in TDSE
Fermions: Slater determinant
with one-electron (molecular) orbitals , , ,and
Hartree-Fock equations (TDHF) – Coupled system of effective one-particle TDSEs
Hartree term Fock (exchange) term
one-electron Hamiltonian
one-particle density matrix
Nonequilibrium Green's functions (NEGF) ITo go beyond mean field (TDHF) use concept of second quantization
Field operators
Properties
Definition of the one-particle NEGF
Keldysh/Kadanoff-Baym equations
one-particle orbital
+ adjointequation
self-energy functional
interaction potential
Nonequilibrium Green's functions II
Examples of accessible time-dependent observables
One-electron density
Current density
Particle number
Total energy
chemical potential
inverse temperature(~ ground state)
One-electron density
Example: Formation of Wigner moleculesConsider N=5 strongly correlated electrons in a 2D parabolic trap
Isotropic confinement of frequency Coupling parameter in trap
Length scaleMolecular orbitals
Example: Formation of Wigner molecules
Consider N=5 strongly correlated electrons in an 2D parabolic trap
Isotropic confinement of frequency Coupling parameter
Length scale
Inverse temperature(~ ground state)
Molecular orbitals
One-electron density
Example: Formation of Wigner molecules
Consider N=6 strongly correlated electrons in an 2D parabolic trap
Isotropic confinement of frequency Coupling parameter
Length scale
Finite temperature
Molecular orbitals
One-electron density
Occupation numbers
Example: Electron-hole bilayer
Phase-diagram of an N=10 bilayer
Mass symmetryLayer separation
New J. Phys. 10, 083031 (2008)
2.4 Quantum Hydrodynamics
• D. Bohm 1952: quantum mechanics in terms of real amplitude and phase
• Time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two equations of motion:
Probability density (norm) P=A^2 is conserved
Quantum Hydrodynamics (2)
• classical Newtonian dynamics with additional „Quantum potential Q“
• quantum probability density follows from ensemble of trajectories
• But: limited to pure states
Quantum Hydrodynamics (3)
Extension to mixed states: Madelung (1926), Bohm (1954)Use Density matrix Wigner distribution f(R,p,t)
Example: 1 particle. P: probability amplitude, v: mean velocity
Need closure of hydrodynamic equations: approximations
Effective Schrödinger equation
1,1
=ΨΨ= ∑=
ρρ TrWK
iiii
0,iiW δ=
Recall density matrix:
1.) Bose condensate:
Nonlinear Schrödinger equation for ground state (Gross-Pitaevskii & beyond)
2.) Spatially homogeneous fermions at T=0(Manfredi)
AAeAx jxik
jjj ==Ψ ,)(
Incoherent fermion system mapped onto coherent wave functionPoorly justified and not verified
Neglect of exchange and correlations. Application to plasma questionable
See Chapter by Bonitz et al. In: „Introduction to Complex Plasmas“, Springer 2010
3. Atoms and molecules. Partially ionized plasmas
• e-i-Plasma at low temperature: Coulomb attraction leads to bound electrons
formation of atoms, molecules, clusters etc.
• Examples: - Planet interiors,- Low-temperature laboratory plasmas
• dense plasma:Bound state properties modified bysurrounding charged particles (screening)
• note: bound states always require a quantum treatment
PartiallyPartially ionizedionized HydrogenHydrogenHydrogen conductivity
(laboratory experiment) in cm/ohm410
210
010
210 −
210 − 010410 − 410
Nellis et al.
+ Fortov et al.
T=3,000-10,000K
Existence of an insulator-metal transition?Is this related to change of degree of ionization (chemical composition)?
3.1. Thermodynamic theory of partially ionized plasmas
High-density plasmas in the Interior of Jovian planets(Jupiter, Saturn)
Hydrogen/helium plasmawith total electron density of up to 32410 −= cmn
Thermodynamic and transport properties depend on how many electronsare free and how many are bound in atoms, molecules, i.e. on the degree of ionization, the plasma chemical composition.
There exist two approaches: 1. chemical models and 2. Physical models (mostly computer simulations)
Chemical models of partially ionizeddense plasmas
Example: partially ionized and dissociated hydrogen: e, p, H, H_2
2HHHHpe
↔+↔+
22 HH μμ =
Hpe μμμ =+
I. Starting point: Choice of relevant particle species
inta
idaa μμμ +=II. Chemical potentials:
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡
+=
12ln
3
a
aaa s
nkT λμ
Ideal part: a) classical particles:
11)2( )],([
04
122/332
+= −
∞+ ∫ aa
anTE
saa e
EdEmn μβπ h
ii) quantum particles (fermions):
Basis: Quantum statistical theories, integral equations etc.
III. Interaction contributions of chemical potentials- charged particle interactions: e-e, e-p, p-p - neutral particle interactions: H-H, H2-H2, H-H2 - charged-neutral particle interactions:
Nonideal Saha equation
Chemical composition:
Percentage of ionized, atomicand molcular hydrogen(proton number fraction)
Schlanges, Bonitz, Chjan, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 35, 109 (1995)
Mass action law (Saha equation): )(1 intintint2/1~),( HpeB eeenTK
nn EI
A
i μμμββ −+−−=
For more details see book: Kremp et al., „Quantum Statistics of charged particles“,Springer 2003
What happens to atoms at high compression?
Effect 1: Destabilization of atom in plasma environment:- Screening of e-i attraction, reduced binding energy(ionization potential) many-body effect
Effect 2: Overlap of two atoms (electron wave functions) at high n:Tunneling of electrons from one atom to anotherquantum destabilization, tunnel (pressure) ionization of atoms, „Mott effect“at densities corresponding to 32410.., −≅∝ cmneiar B
Both effects occur simultaneously, are equally important
Both effects occur even at zero temperature,Temperature increase helps to destroy atoms, molecules
Mott Effect. Pressure IonizationIdeal Plasma Non ideal Plasma
Lowering of the continuum edge due to screening and quantum effectsreduces number and ionization energy of bound statesvanishing distinction between free and bound states
Nonideal plasma: reduced current conduction: due to Coulomb interaction and bound state formation
Ideal plasma: conductivity increases with density of charged particles
PhasesPhases of of twotwo--componentcomponent (TCP) (TCP) CoulombCoulomb systemssystems
Re E
kTT23
=3/11 n
ra
r e
B
se
∝=
ion crystal in e Fermi gas
Bonitz, Filinov, Levashov, Fortov, Fehske, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 235006 (2005)
ion quantumliquid
Problems of Chemical Models
- inconsistent treatment of chargesand neutrals (critical at Mott point)
- subdivision in free and boundparticles artificial!
- Exclusion of particles other thanchosen in the beginning
These problems are avoided in the „physical picture“
4. First principle quantumsimulations
Requirements for quantum simulations
A. Single-particle properties
- coordinate and momentum not measurable simultaneously(Heisenberg uncertainty)
- Quantum particle has finite extension- quantum particle may be in many states(superposition principle)
- free quantum particle diffuses with time nn Ex),(Ψ
Fermions Bosons
B. Many-particle properties
- Spin statistics, indistinguishability(symmetry/antisymmetry of N-particlewave function)Availability of a quantum state for oneparticle depends on the states of all otherparticles (even without interaction!)
Types of simulations
Equilibrium Nonequilibrium
- Monte Carlo- Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics
A. Extension of classical methods
B. Special quantum methods
- Exact diagonalization (CI)- Density Functional Theory (DFT)- Hartree-Fock- Multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock (MCHF)- Matsubara Green functions
- Schrödinger equation- Time-dependent DFT- Time-dependent Hartree-Fock- Time-dependent MCHF- Nonequilibrium Green functions
- Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics- Kinetic equations (see above)
4.1 Quantum Monte Carlo
- Generalization of classical Monte Carlo (several methods)
- In particular: using Richard Feynmans‘s „Path integral“ representation of quantum mechanics „PIMC“
- Very successful „first-principle“ approach, avoids model assumptions
For details, see text book „Introduction to Computational Methods forMany-body Systems“, Rinton Press Princeton 2006,
S. Bauch, K. Balzer, P. Ludwig, A. Filinov, and M. Bonitz: “Introduction to quantum plasma simulations“, in: "Introduction to Complex Plasmas", M. Bonitz, N. Horing, P. Ludwig (eds.), Springer (2010) ,
Idea of path integral Monte Carlo
MkTMkTVKH /1/,/1, ===+= βτβwith system hamiltonian:
K, V: kinetic and potential energy operators, M: (large) integer number
Key quantity: canonical density operator (unknown): He βρ −=
Feynman‘s idea: express in terms of high-temperature density operator which is known:
Idea of path integral Monte Carlo (2)
In coordinate representation:
R contains coordinates of all particles (3N dim vector)
each particle is represented byTrajectory from R to R‘ („path“)
Density operator contains weightedSum over all paths (superposition)
Scheme of path integral Monte Carlo
MC procedure:
Optimize particle position and pathShape of probability density
Example: 3 particles
Fluctuating probability density of 3 particles
Spin statistics in path integral Monte Carlo
For bosons (fermions) density matrix has to be (anti-)symmetric:
Perform (anti-)symmetrization:
This is realized by exchanging (connecting) paths of several particles:Example: 5 particles on a plain with exchange of 1 and 2
Applications of path integral Monte Carlo
2 bosons in a harmonic trap
Variation of confinement strengthand temperatureSimulation: Jens Böning
Mesoscopic electron crystal
Melting by compressionSimulation: Alexei FilinovPhys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3851 (2001)
Applications of path integral Monte Carlo
Partially ionized hydrogen plasma, T=10,000KSimulation: Vladimir Filinov
32010 −= cmn 321103 −⋅= cmn
T = 10,000 K, n = 3⋅1025 сm-3, ρ = 50.2 g/сm3
Filinov, Bonitz, Fortov, JETP Letters 72, 245 (2000)
- proton- electron
- electron
Proton crystallization in dense HydrogenProton crystallization in dense Hydrogen
1st-principlePath integralMonte Carlo simulation
SummarySummary (1) (1) Nonideal plasmas are omnipresent in nature (astrophysics,Dusty and low temperature plasma, condensed matter…
Nonideal quantum plasmas: difficult due to simultaneousquantum, spin and correlation effects
Quantum tools: Hartree-Fock, Green‘s functions, quantum kinetics,Equilibrium: First principle path-integral Monte Carlo
Classical plasmas: powerful first-principle methods (MD, MC)and accurate fluid approaches
SummarySummary (2)(2)For more details see our text books:
M. Bonitz, „Quantum Kinetic Theory“, Teubner 1998
„Introduction to Computational Methods for Many-Particle Systems“,M. Bonitz and D. Semkat (eds.), Rinton Press, Princeton 2006
„Introduction to Complex Plasmas“, Springer 2010
http://www.theo-physik.uni-kiel.de/~bonitz
SupportedSupported byby DFG via DFG via TransregioTransregio--SFBSFB Greifswald/Kiel Greifswald/Kiel „„Grundlagen Komplexer PlasmenGrundlagen Komplexer Plasmen““