View
243
Download
10
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
16
1-272014 7
1
E-mailadan@homeland.org.tw
2005
1
2 16
Special Issues: Cross-Sector Collaborations
The Transformational Process of
Turning A Community-based NPO into
A Social Enterprise
Chia-Chan Liao
The co-founder of the Newhomeland Foundation
Abstract
The central problem for the high risk global age is how to find a sustainable
development model for local industries and organizations. In the Past 20 years, the
Taiwans civil society was full of life, especially during the 921 earthquake
reconstruction. Now we must to deliberate how to develop an integration and
transformation strategies for making collective actions. Based on the past experiences,
the role and function of the community-based nonprofits organization were very
important, especially it had charity and nonprofit characteristics. According to the
ideals of the social enterprises and community experience study, the Newhomeland
Foundation had been adjusted its organizations mission, structure, and function in
2005. It expected to achieve promoting community collaboration governance and
making local economic regeneration.
Key Words:Nonprofit Organization, Social Enterprises, Community Industry,
Newhomeland Foundation
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=WToqDO/search?q=aue=%22Chia-Chan%20Liao%22.&searchmode=basic
3
1993
2008
1996
NGO
1998
1999 2
9 921
2003
2008
20011602005108
2004200620072007
20082012
20042006
4 16
organization
transformation
2007103-104
2008578
1.Unfreezing
2.Movement
3.Refreezing
OECD
5
OECD, 1999
1
EMES
Defourny&Nyssens, 2006:5-6
DTI, 2002:13Defourny&Nyssens
2006: 12
social aimeconomic aim
social ownershipBorzaga & Defourny, 2001
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2
OECD, 1999
1
2002
2
2002
3
2003
Kerlin, 2006.
6 16
2
200515
921
921
1999
2,415 29
11,305 51,711 53,768
1999 10 9
1.
2.
2003
7
1
1
41
1
1994
921
19994
921 60
63 60 1 4
1OURs
3460
8 16
2002 2 921
921
20041
921
2009105
2002
7
empowerment200621-23
2
200621-22
9
2
2007130-13
NPO
NPO
NPO
10 16
5 921
1982
1997
921
2008
921 10
2000 1
2000 4
5
18 23
78%56 37%
2001
4
11
Green Economic
2011
2
2002 2
15
30 16
28 2 5 13
921
2013 1
384.8% 921
87.2%61.9%
2006
2009
2 5%
10%DIY 5%
3
- (II) NSC 100-2621-M-260-001-MY2 100 8 102 7
12 16
12
1.2.3.
4.
2010
1.
1990
20032006
3
13
6
3
1999 7,659,720 51% 7,369,053 49% 15,028,773
2000 3,280,000 13% 22,488,166 87% 25,768,166
2001 20,400,641 84% 3,878,815 16% 24,279,456
2002 24,211,405 93% 1,790,107 7% 26,001,512
2003 12,591,158 100% 0 0 12,591,158
2004 16,347,730 100% 0 0 16,347,730
2005 12,384,653 91% 1,200,000 9% 13,584,653
2006 150,000 100% 0 150,000
2007 1,900,000 24% 6,000,000 76% 7,900,000
2008 4,711,000 31% 10,280,800 69% 14,991,800
2009 5,707,705 92% 500,000 8% 6,207,705
2010 1,584,369 100% 0 0 1,584,369
2011 2,349,850 100% 0 0 2,349,850
2012
14 16
2.
921
2006 2
921
200410-11
201089
2005
3.
2005 1 921
10
58 Paper Dome
Paper Dome
921
Paper Dome
20083
Paper Dome 10
9 2000
Paper Dome
15
2005
2005 5 4
2012
20052007
1.
2.3.
1.2.
3.4.
5.
16 16
1.
2.3.4.
2012
2012
1. NPO
2.
3.
2011
17
200820122012
2010
18 C
2010
4
4 1960 1970
2 1960
18 16
2011 18 20
10
2011
NGO 3
3
340
1999
2011
19
NPO
3 2
3
2014
2014
10 2011 4
1 2012 3 120 220
53%2013
40
2013
20 16
2013
4
2013
Butterfly
21
42013
10
2000
Intentionality
2012
NPO
1999 921 15
5
2005
22 16
5
+
/
/
/
/
/
1996
1999.
2.4
2002
2005
2009
23
Molly S, Cate()2011
2008
26(1)87-141
2013
2003
2007
199944-5
2010-
2003
31-28
20072012 1 22
http://www.tri.org.tw/research/impdf/814.pdf
2008--
7(1)63-67
2007
2006
2005 39
2009 6 24
http://www.cesroc.org.tw/e_paper_detail.php?sn=165#5
2008--
33(1)82-107
http://readopac.ncl.edu.tw/cgi/ncl3/detail?A03047284http://readopac.ncl.edu.tw/cgi/ncl3/detail?A03047284http://readopac1.ncl.edu.tw/nclserialFront/search/guide/search_result.jsp?la=ch&dtdId=000042&search_index=JT&search_value=%E5%B0%B1%E6%A5%AD%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8$http://www.cesroc.org.tw/e_paper_detail.php?sn=165#5http://readopac1.ncl.edu.tw/nclserialFront/search/search_result.jsp?la=ch&search_type=adv&dtdId=000040&sort_index=PD&sort_type=1&search_index=AU&search_mode=&search_value=%E9%82%B1%E6%80%A1%E8%96%87$http://readopac1.ncl.edu.tw/nclserialFront/search/guide/search_result.jsp?dtdId=000042&search_index=JT&search_mode=&search_value=%E7%A5%9E%E5%AD%B8%E8%88%87%E6%95%99%E6%9C%83$&la=ch
24 16
2012
303-330
2011.12.27 A18
2008
2012
95-122
2001--
29(2)160-167
2006
667-105
2005 10-11
20021939-51
2004921
1-2
2005--
148103-130
2006----
2004
20071
93-100
2009921
10 921 96-107
2008.1.2
2012
25
2010
2009
10 921 118-141
2007
127-139
2007
2006--
2004
2005
2002--
2003
257-263
2009
10 921 262-271
2008 Paper Dome
Borzaga, Carol and Defourny Jacques (2001). The Emergence of Social
Enterprise. London and New York: Routledge.
Defourny, Jacques and NyssensMarthe (2006). Defining Social Enterprise.
MartheNyssens with the assistance of Sophie Adam and Toby Johnson(ed.),
Social Enterprise: At the Crossroad of Market, Public policies and Civil Society
(Pp. 3-26). New York: Routledge.
DTI(Department of Trade and Industry) (2002). Social Enterprise: A Strategy for
26 16
Success. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Retrieved August 03,2012,
from the World Wide Web:
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/me
dia/cabinetoffice/third_sector/assets/se_strategy_2002.pdf.
Kerlin, Janell A.(2006). Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe:
Understanding and Learning from the Differences. Voluntas, 17, 247-263.
OECD (1999). Social Enterprise. Paris: OECD Publishing.
27
2000-2001
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2 921
3
4
5
Recommended