مدى ادراك والتزام الأخصائيين الاجتماعيين بالقيم الأخلاقية

–

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

http://www.pdffactory.com


2




3

Abstract

The Social Workers’ Recognition and Obligation of Code of Ethics for Social Work Practice

This study aims to explore the extent of social worker’s recognition

and obligation of Code of Ethics for social work practice published by

National Association of Social Workers (NASW). Two hundred thirty

social practitioners (133 males and 97 females) from medical, social,

and educational settings were administered a standardized

questionnaire to investigate the relationships between study

variables. Raw data was manipulated via descriptive and inferential

statistics. Results have shown a positive weak relationship between

the extent of social workers’ recognition of code of ethics and their

obligation through practice. The multiple regression results showed a

predictive model of 58% to assign the extent of code of ethic’s

obligation. The study results can be used to develop working

procedures to promote social work practice outcomes.

Keywords: Social work code of ethics, professional values of social

work practice.




4

Working Definition NASW

Compton & Galaway,1994

Bartlett

Gordon




5

NASW

NASW, 2006

Misconduct

Berliner, 1989

Legislations




6

– –




7




8




9

Cognition

Lycan

Lycan




10

Obligation




11

Garol

Professional EthicsEthics




12

NASW

NASW

Reamer

The

Morality Period

Exploration of Values




13

NASW

Ethical Theory

Medical Ethics Theories of Moral Philosophy

Maturation of

Ethical Standards NASW




14

Hugman, 1995

Munson, 1986




15

Rottler, 1994

Kinderknecht, 1995

Debra Borys, 1998




16

Hardina, 2004

Reamer, 2005

PrivacyConfidentiality




17




18

–




19




20

– – – –

––– –




21

t-test




22

SPSS




23

Competence




24




25

t-test

–




26




27




28

Enter Field

F

R2= 0.58

R2=0.58

BUnstandardized Coefficient




29




30




31




32

––




33




34

&




35

Bartlett, H. (1970). The Common Base of Social Work Practice. NASW, New York. Berliner, A. (1989). Misconduct in Social Work Practice. NASW Press, January.




36

Compton, B. & Galaway, B. (1994). Social Work Processes. Brooks/Cole, California. Debra Borys, S. (1988). Dual Relationships Between Therapist and Client. Unpublished Thesis. University of California. Field, A. (2000). Discovering Statistics. SAGE Publications, London. Garol, H. (1987). Direct Practice in Social Work. Encyclopedia of Social Work, V.1, NY. Gordon, W. (1969). Basic Concepts for an Integrative and Generative Conception of Social Work. Council of Social Work Education, New York. Hardina, D. (2004). Guidelines for Ethical Practice in Community Organization. Social Work, V. 49, n. 4. Hugman, R. & Smith, D. (1995). Ethical Issues in Social Work. Routledge, London. Kinderknecht, H. (1999). Social Work Ethical Violations. Unpublished Thesis, University of Kansas. Lycan, W.G., (ed.). (1999). Mind and Cognition: An Anthology, 2nd Edition. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, Inc. Munson, C. (1986). Editor’s Comments. The Clinical Supervisor, V.4, n.1. National Association of National Social Workers. (2006). NASW Press, NY. Reamer, F. (1998). Ethical Standards in Social Work: A Review of The NASW Code of Ethics. NASW Press, Washington, D.C. Reamer, F. (2005). Documentation in Social Work: Evolving Ethical and Risk-Management Standards. Social Work, v.50, n. 4. Rottler, R. (1994). Teaching Social Work Ethics. Unpublished Thesis, University of Utah.




Science

مدى ادراك والتزام الأخصائيين الاجتماعيين بالقيم الأخلاقية