المركزية واثرها في اداء االعامليم

]]]]]]]]

.........

"$#"!

&'&'&'&'(((())))*+,-./*+0*+,-./*+0*+,-./*+0*+,-./*+0...

<

.

) 30(

.

) 100( .SPSS

.

.

:

.1

.)0.05 (

.2

.)0.05 (

:

. .1

. .2

ABSTRACT

The Decentralization Implementation and their Impact

of Employee Performance Level

Applied Study on Kuwait National Guard

Prepared by:

Fahed Eid Nasser Ben Fahed

Supervised by:

Prof. Dr. Prof. Dr.

Nagem AL - Azawi Yaser AL-Edwan

The study aimed to revealing the Impact of Decentralization on

Employee Performance Level; in addition to investigating the significant

statistical differences employees perspective to Decentralization due to Age;

Education level and Experience years.

In order to achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher designed a

questionnaire consisting of (30) paragraphs to gather the primary information

from study sample. The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) program

was used to analyze and examine the hypotheses. The study sample consists of

(100) individuals from Kuwait National Guard.

The study used many statistical methods such as Simple; Multi

Regression and One Way ANOVA. After executing the analysis to study

hypotheses; the sudy concluded that:

1. There is a significant statistical impact of Decentralization on employee

performance in Kuwait National Guard at level (0.05).

2. There is no significant statistical difference in sample study to extent of

Decentralization implementation due to Age; education level and

experience years at level (0.05).

According to the findings of the study, the researcher list bellows the

most important are recommendations:

1. Simplification the information flow between Managerial units in Kuwait

National Guard.

2. Emphasis on the Problem Solving and Decision making in team and

group.

WWWW)1 1( WWWW)2 1( WWWW)3 1( WWWW)4 1( WWWW)5 1( WWWW)6 1( WWWW)7 1( WWWW)8 1(

- 2 -

WWWW)1 1(

.

.

.

.

.

,Gmez(

2008: 55.(

- 3 -

.

.

:

.

. :

:

.

:

.

. :

- 4 -

WWWW)2 1(

.

:

( "

. " )

:

( :

)

- 5 -

:

( :

)

WWWW)3 1(

:

.1

.2

.3

.

WWWW)4 1(

) (

:

- 6 -

. 1

.

. . 2

( . 3

. )

. 4

.

WWWW)5 1(

:

HOHOHOHO1111 4>2#23

( "

)

:

HO1-1: . )0.05(

HO1-2: . )0.05(

- 7 -

HO1-3: . )0.05(

HO1-4: . )0.05(

2 HOHOHOHO2222 232#5

"

(

: . )0.05( )

HO2-1:

).0.05(

HO2-2:

)0.05.(

HO2-3:

)0.05.(

- 8 -

WWWW)6 1( :

:

.

. :

/ 20/3 1/9/2009 :

2010.

,Daft( :

). ( ) 2001

WWWW)7 1( .1

.

.2

.

. .3

- 9 -

WWWW)8 1 (

:

). 2006 (

.

:

).Jeston and Nelis, 2006:9(

:

(

).2007

:

).2005 (

:

).136: 2004 (

:

.

).2008 (

:

.

- 10 -

WWWW)1 2( WWWW)2 2( WWWW)3 2( WWWW)4 2( WWWW)5 2( WWWW)6 2( WWWW)7 2(

- 11 -

WWWW)1 2(

.

.

.

) (

.

: ) 288 285: 2007 (

- 12 -

.

.

.

) (

(

).

.

) (

.

.

- 13 -

.

.

.

.

. Synergy .

Cells

.

- 14 -

) (

.

WWWW)2 2(

). 193: 1999 (

).121: 2001 (

.

.

.

.

) 334: 1991 (

.

)Kreitner, 2004: 321 (

- 15 -

.

.

:William, 2005( .

) 365

.

).Ferrell & Geofrg, 2003: 254 (

.

- 16 -

WWWW)3 2(

) Robbins, 2001: 287 - 292(

:

.1

.

.

.2

.

.3

.

.

.4

.

- 17 -

.5

.

.6

.

.

).200 199: 1994 (

: ) 311: 1990 (

.1

.

.

.

- 18 -

) 164: 1992 (

:

.1

.

.

.

. .2

.

. .3

.

.4

.

.5

.

- 19 -

.6

.

( )117- 116: 1998

:

.1

.

.2

.

.3

)110- 108: 1999(

:

.1

.

. .2

. .3

- 20 -

. .4

.5

.

.

WWWW)4 2(

( ) 123 121: 2001 ( ) 12- 11: 2002

:

. .1

.2

.

. .3

. .4

- 21 -

.5

.

.6

.

.7

.

.8

.

.9

.

. .10

.11

.

) 73: 2002 13: 2002 (

:

.1

.

. .2

- 22 -

.3

.

.4

.

.5

.

.6

.

)110- 108: 1999 (

:

.1

.

. .2

. .3

. .4

.5

.

- 23 -

)385: 2008 (

.

.

WWWW)5 2(

) 228 225: 2006 (

.

: .

.1

.

.2

.

.3

- 24 -

.

.4

.

.5

.

& Redman(

Wilkinson, 2008: 223.(

) Torrington, et..al, 2008:302(

.

:

: .

: .

- 25 -

.

) 196: 1986 (

.

.

) 370 369: 2009 (

:

.1

.

- 26 -

.2

.

) Anthony, et..al, 1999: 383(

. .

.1

) 11(

.

.

. .

) ( ) 21(

- 27 -

.

) 31(

) 7- 5(

. ). 7( ) 5 ( ) 1(

. ) ( ) ( :

.

) 41(

.

) 51(

.

.

- 28 -

.

.

) 61(

.

.

.

) 71(

.

) 81(

).1 2 (

- 29 -

)1 2(

) Dessler, 2003:323(

:

. .1

. .2

- 30 -

.3

.

)DeNisi & Griffin, 2001: 298(

:

.1

.

. .2

.3

.

.4

.

) Dessler, 2003:323(

% 80

.

- 31 -

) 386 - 385: 2004 (

: .

)(

) 2 2( . ......

.

)2 2(

: . 1

: . 2

: . 3

: . 4

: . 5

- 32 -

).Dessler, 2008: 218(

) Foot & Hook, 2008: 187(

.

: ) Armstrong, 2006: 507(

. .1

.2

.

. .3

.4

.

- 33 -

.5

.

.6

. .

.7

.

) Newton and Findlay, 1996: 42-56(

:

.1

.

.2

.

.

.3

.

. .4

- 34 -

) Patterson, et..al, 1997(

:

.1

.

.

.

.2

.

) 263: 2006 (

:

. .1

. .2

. .3

. .4

. .5

. .6

- 35 -

.

WWWW)6 2(

" )2008 (

."

.

) 75(

) 423( ) 483(

.

:

.

- 36 -

") 2006 (

. "

36

. 73

.

.

. 3

.

" )2003 (

."

.

:

.

.

- 37 -

A Temporal Analytical Approach to ") Gmez,2008(

Decentralization: Lessons from Brazils Health Sector" .

.

.

.

Back to basics: Does ") Atkinson & Haran,2004(

Decentralization Improve Health System Performance? Evidence from Cear

in north-east Brazil " .

45 . Cear

.

Cear :

.

Back to basics: does ") Atkinson & Haran,2004(

decentralization improve health systemperformance? Evidence from Cear in

north-east Brazil" .

- 38 -

) 45( . Cear

. .

-The impact of the employee ") Koh & Yer,2002(

organization relationship on temporary employees' performance and attitude:

testing a Singaporean sample" .

.

. ) 191(

.

Decentralization Central Office Role and ") Rivera,1999(

Responsibilities " .

.

.

.

. :

.

- 39 -

.

Decetralization , Paradox: The Magnetizim of ") Lrose,1998(

Centrality on a Vision of Collaborative Decision" .

: .

.

Essential Components of School ") Tyra,1998(

Decentralization :Astudy of Theory to Practice in Kentucky Model of School

Based Decision Making as Vieweded by Elemintary Principal Governance

175 .

- 40 -

). (

WWWW)7 2 (

.

: .

. .

.

- 41 -

"!#$

WWWW)1 3( WWWW)2 3( WWWW)3 3( WWWW)4 3( WWWW)5 3( WWWW)6 3(

- 42 -

WWWW)1 3(

.

.

.

WWWW)2 3(

) 100(

). 800( % 10

- 43 -

. ) 47( ) 35( ) 15( ) 3: (

WWWW)3 3(

)1 1(

- 44 -

WWWW)4 3(

.

:

:

.

:

.

Likert

SPSS. .

WWWW)5 3(

:

- 45 -

. Cronbach Alpha

.

.

:

2.33 1

3.66 2.33

. 3.67

WWWW)6 3(

. ) 1( .

- 46 -

) 1 3(

)1 3(

66.5 1 72.6 2 84 3 82.7 4

92.5

80.1

- 47 -

%

-),+&)*()'&

WWWW)1 4( WWWW)2 4( WWWW)3 4( WWWW)4 4( WWWW)5 4(

- 48 -

WWWW)1 4(

.

:

- 49 -

WWWW)2 4(

1967

.

.

.

.

.

- 50 -

.

.

:

. .1

. .2

. .3

. .4

. .5

.6

.

. .7

.8

.

:

. .1

.2

- 51 -

.

. .3

. .4

. .5

. .6

. .7

.8

.9

.

WWWW)3 4(

.

. )1 4(

- 52 -

: )1 4(

)%(

36 36 30 50 50 40 30

41 50 9 9 1

5 5 51 4 4

5 5 63 63

2

28 28 3 3 15 15 35 35

3

47 47 18 18 5

29 29 10 5 47 47 15 10

6 6 15

18 18 22 22 34 34

5

26 26

- 53 -

)1 4(

.

WWWW)4 4(

( :

)

.

:

:

).2 4(

- 54 -

)2 4(

2 0.56 4.27 1

2

1 0.65 4.33

3

3 0.65 4.20

4

4 0.79 4.03

5 1.00 3.42 5

0.48 4.05

)2 4(

" .

"

)0.65 ( )4.05 ( ) 4.33 (

- 55 -

"

) 4.27 ( "

" ). 0.56 ( ) 4.05 (

"

)4.20(

" . )0.65( ) 4.05(

"

) 4.05 ( )4.03(

" .)0.79(

)3.42( "

.)1.00( ) 4.05 (

.

:

).3 4(

- 56 -

)3 4(

1 0.80 3.97 6

5 0.84 3.64 7

2 0.83 3.91 8

9

4 0.87 3.65

10

3 0.92 3.87

0.59 3.81

)3 4(

" .

) 3.97 ( "

" )0.80 ( )3.81 (

"

- 57 -

). 0.83 ( ) 3.81 ( ) 3.91(

"

)3.87( "

. )0.92( ) 3.81 (

" "

) 3.81 ( )3.65(

" .)0.87(

) 3.81 ( )3.64( "

.)0.84(

.

:

).4 4(

- 58 -

)4 4(

11

1 0.77 4.06

12

4 1.00 3.42

13

5 0.99 3.33

14

3 1.03 3.51

15

2 0.92 3.69

0.74 3.60

- 59 -

)4 4(

" .

) 4.06 ( "

)0.77 ( )3.60 (

"

) 3.69 ( "

" ). 0.92 ( ) 3.60 (

"

)3.51(

" . )1.03( ) 3.60 (

)3.42( "

.)1.00( ) 3.60 (

"

) 3.60 ( )3.33( "

.)0.99(

.

- 60 -

:

).5 4(

)5 4(

16

1 0.89 3.68

17

5 0.94 3.47

18

4 0.99 3.55

19

3 1.04 3.56

20

2 0.98 3.64

0.75 3.58

- 61 -

)5 4(

" .

) 3.68 ( "

" )0.89 ( )3.58 (

"

) 3.58 ( ) 3.64 (

" ). 0.98 (

"

. )1.04( ) 3.58 ( )3.56(

"

)3.55( "

.)0.99( ) 3.58 (

"

) 3.58 ( )3.47( "

.)0.94(

.

- 62 -

. :

).6 4 (

- 63 -

)6 4(

21

6 0.79 3.92

22

5 0.73 3.94

23

4 0.82 3.96

24

2 0.76 4.08

25

3 0.88 4.00

26

1 0.74 4.23

27 8 0.80 3.90

28

10 1.02 3.70

29

7 1.02 3.91

30

9 0.89 3.83

0.51 3.94

- 64 -

)6 4(

3.70( .

" . )4.23

) 4.23 ( "

)0.74 ( )3.94 (

" "

) 3.70 (

). 1.02 ( ) 3.94(

.

- 65 -

WWWW)5 4(

HOHOHOHO1111

( "

. )

4(

.)7

)7 4(

7 )R(

:79 )R square(

+;+

F

@#?2F

A+2

> :B+

Sig.*

C=# +:2

2;DE "C=# FGH)JG $

K;L

0.668 0.446 78.943 3.92 0.660 0.000

)7 4(

.

) R) 0.668

- 66 -

) 0.446( )0.446( 2R . ) 0.05(

)) 0.660

) 78.943( F ). 0.660(

) 0.05( F ). 3.92(

:

:

HO1-1:

. )0.05(

4(

.)8

4/#230"/#564789:#/;4?3!4)/@09)0.05(

- 67 -

)8 4(

7 )R(

:79 )R square(

+;+

F

@#?2F

A+2

> :B+

Sig.*

C=# +:2

C=# FG$2#MNH)JG $

K;L

0.547 0.299 41.798 3.92 0.593 0.000

)8 4(

.

R

)0.299( 2R . ) 0.05( ) 0.547(

) 0.299(

)) 0.593

) 41.798( F ). 0.593(

). 3.92( F ) 0.05(

:

- 68 -

HO1-2:

). 0.05(

4(

.)9

)9 4(

7 )R(

:79 )R square(

+;+

F

@#?2F

A+2

> :B+

Sig.*

C=# +:2

OH-NP#79C=# FGH)JG $

K;L

0.545 0.297 41.423 3.92 0.491 0.000

)9 4(

.

R

)0.297( 2R . ) 0.05( ) 0.545(

) 0.297(

899CB4/#230"/

- 69 -

)) 0.491

) 41.423( F ). 0.491(

). 3.92( F ) 0.05(

:

HO1-3:

). 0.05(

4(

.)10

89),&D"!4/#230"/

- 70 -

)10 4(

7 )R(

:79 )R square(

+;+

F

@#?2F

A+2

> :B+

Sig.*

C=# +:2

O GQRS+9C=# FGH)JG $

K;L

0.461 0.212 26.410 3.92 0.310 0.000

)10 4(

.

R

)0.212( 2R . ) 0.05( ) 0.461(

) 0.212(

)) 0.310

) 26.410( F ). 0.310(

). 3.92( F ) 0.05(

:

- 71 -

HO1-4:

). 0.05(

4(

11(.

)11 4(

7 )R(

:79 )R square(

+;+

F

@#?2F

A+2

>

:B+

Sig.*

C=# +:2

2TG#U;9C=# FGH)JG $

K;L

0.652 0.425 72.296 3.92 0.466 0.000

)11 4(

.

R

44/#230"//EFGH89

- 72 -

)0.425( 2R . ) 0.05( ) 0.652(

) 0.425(

)) 0.466

) 72.296( F ). 0.466(

). 3.92( F ) 0.05(

:

HOHOHOHO2222

"

(

). 0.05( )

:

HO2-1:

).0.05 (

899CB4/#230"/

- 73 -

.)12 4(

) 12 4(

51 50 41 40 30 30

PV=Q#?

WB:*Q

PV=Q#?

WB:*Q

PV=Q#?

WB:*Q

PV=Q#?

WB:*Q

3.69 0.42 3.68 0.50 4.06 0.74 3.64 0.29

) 12 4 (

. 50 41

. ) 13 4 (

- 74 -

)13 4(

SOS

MS

DF

F

F

Sig.*

3 0.397 1.191

23.212 0.242 96

99 24.403

1.642 2.68 0.185

)13 4 (

) F( ) 0.05 (

) 2.68( ) F( )1.642 ( ) 0.05 (

: ) (

)0.05(

- 75 -

HO2-2:

)0.05.(

.)14 4(

) 14 4(

PV=Q

#?

WB:

*Q

PV=Q

#?

WB:

*Q

PV=Q

#?

WBN

*Q

PV=Q

#?

WBN

*Q

3.69 0.68 3.72 0.58 3.73 0.26 3.72 0.46

) 14 4 (

.

. ) 15 4 (

- 76 -

)15 4(

SOS

MS

DF

F

F

Sig.*

3 0.001 0.004

24.399 0.254 96

99 24.403

0.005 2.68 0.999

)15 4 (

) F( ) 0.05 (

) F( )0.005 ( ) 0.05 (

: ) ( ) 2.68(

)0.05(

- 77 -

HO2-3:

)0.05.(

.)16 4(

) 16 4(

5

5 10

10 15

15

PV=Q

#?

WB:

*Q

PV=Q

#?

W:B

*Q

PV=Q

#?

WBN

*Q

PV=Q

#?

WBN

*Q

3.56 0.43 3.67 0.48 3.79 0.51 3.87 0.60

) 16 4 (

. 15

4 (

. ) 17

- 78 -

)17 4(

SOS

MS

DF

F

F

Sig.*

3 0.295 0.884

23.519 0.245 96

99 24.403

1.203 2.68 0.999

)17 4 (

) F( ) 0.05 (

) F( )1.203 ( ) 0.05 (

: ) ( ) 2.68(

)0.05(

- 79 -

I4J

"(@)/K&0) @

@ @@ @@ @@ @

WWWW)1 5( WWWW)2 5(WWWW)3 5( WWWW)4 5(

- 80 -

WWWW)1 5(

.

.

WWWW)2 5( . .3

. .4

.5

.6

.

. .7

.8

. )0.05 (

) 2003(

. .

- 81 -

) Atkinson & Haran,2004(

. Cear

.9

)0.05 (

WWWW)3 5(

:

. .1

. .2

. .3

. .4

.5

.

- 82 -

.6

.

.7

.

.8

.

.9

.

. .10

WWWW)4 5(

:

.1

.

- 83 -

.2

.

.3

.

.4

.

.5

.

.6

.

.7

.

- 84 -

a@ba@ba@ba@buauauaua@ @@ @@ @@ @

@ @@ @@ @@ @Q-Y?2Q-Y?2Q-Y?2Q-Y?WWWW2::::((((

ZZZZWWWWY-QY-QY-QY-Q4-]274-]274-]274-]27

- 85 -

Q-Y?2Q-Y?2Q-Y?2Q-Y?WWWW2::::((((

=L=L=L=LWWWW

" : " )2004( .1

.:

" : " )2001( .2

.:

.: " " )1991( .3

: " " )2002( .4

.

: " " )1999( .5

.

" )2008( .6

. : " :

. : " " )1998( .7

- 86 -

" )2005( .8

. : "

" " )1999( .9

.:

" )2006( .10

.: " :

" : " )1990( .11

.:

" " )2008( .12

.:

" )2009( .13

.: "

" )2007( .14

. : " :

: " " )2004( .15

.

" : " )2002( .16

. :

- 87 -

WWWWV

- 88 -

ZZZZWWWWY-QY-QY-QY-Q4-]274-]274-]274-]27

Books:

1. Armstrong, Michael, (2006), Performance Management: Key strategies

and practical guidelines. 3rd ed., Kogan Page.

2. Daft, Richard L., (2001), "Organization Theory & Design", St Paul, West

Publishing Co.

3. DeNisi, Angelo S. & Griffin, Ricky W., (2001), "Human Resource

Management", 2nd ed, Houghton Mifflin Company,

4. Dessler, Gary, (2008), Fundamentals of Human Resource Management,

Pearson, International Edition.

5. Dissler, Gary, (2003),"Human Resource Management", 9th edition, New

Jersey: Prentice- Hall.

6. Ferrell, O.C. & Geofrg, Hirt, (2003), business: A Changing World,

McGraw-Hill, New York.

7. Foot, Margaret & Hook, Caroline, (2008), Introducing Human Resource

Management, 5th Edition, Pearson.

8. Kreitner, Rebort, (2004), Management, 8th ed, Houghton Mifflin Co.,

Boston.

9. Redman, Tom & Wilkinson, Adrian, (2008), Contemporary Human

Resource Management: Text and Cases, 3rd Edition, Pearson.

- 89 -

10. Jeston, John & Nelis, Johan, (2006), "Business Process Management:

Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations", First edition,

Butterworth.

11. Robbins, Stephen, (2001), Business Today, Harcourt Inc., Florida.

12. William, Pride, (2005), Business, 8th ed, Houghton Mifflin Co.,

Boston, 2005.

Journals:

13. Atkinson, Sarah & Haran, Dave, (2004),"Back to Basics: Does

Decentralization Improve Health System Performance? Evidence from Cear

in north-east Brazil", Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82: 822-

827.

14. Gmez,2 Eduardo J., (2008), A Temporal Analytical Approach to

Decentralization:Lessons from Brazils Health Sector, Journal of Health

Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 33, No. 1, February.

15. Koh, William L and Yer, Lay Keow, (2002), The impact of the

employee-organization relationship on temporary employees' performance and

attitude: testing a Singaporean sample, Int. J. of Human Resource

Management, 11:2 April: 366-387.

16. Newton, T and Findlay, P, (1996), Playing god?: the performance of

appraisal, Human Resource Management Journal, 6(3): 4256

- 90 -

17. Patterson, M G, West, M A, Lawthom, R and Nickell, S (1997), Impact

of People Management Practices on Performance, Institute of Personnel

and Development, London.

18. Torrington, Derek; Laura Hall, Steven Taylor, (2008), Fundamentals

of Human Resource Management Managing People at Work, pearson.

Thesis:

19. Larose, M.J. (1998),"Decetralization Paradox: The Magnetizim of

Centrality on a Vision of Collaborative Decision", Ph. D. dissertation, Regent

University, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.

20. Rivera, M.I, (1999)," Decentralization Central Office Role and

Responsibilities", Dessertation Abstracts International A60/02: 303.

21. Tyra, A.A., (1998),"Essential Components of School Decentralization: A

study of Theory to Practice in Kentucky Model of School Based Decision

Making as Vieweded by Elemintary Principal Governance, Dissertation

Abstracts International A58/07:2487,Jan.

- 91 -

ya@bya@bya@bya@b@ @@ @@ @@ @

@ @@ @@ @@ @_[H^?2@H^?2]_J]L@H^?2]_J]L@H^?2]_J]L@WWWWJ]L(:(:(:(:

ZZZZWWWW2V2(.+V2(.+V2(.+V2((.+7=V:27=V:27=V:27=V:(

- 92 -

R

- 93 -

R

- 94 -

&&&&?#&gq?#&gq?#&gq?#&gq <

- 95 -

2Stu+abv2Stu+abv2Stu+abv2Stu+abv @ @@ @@ @@ @

@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @

@ [[[[ )1( @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @>_)g 302[V@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @3040 2[V @ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @

4150@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @51 2[V5E^S @ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @@ @

)2( ]G=C=#Q]G=C=#Q]G=C=#Q]G=C=#Q ;S2 2[Z Y]=w2GE?G

?L; GOV

)3( 2;L#2279;L#2279;L#2279;L#279 +] +`

+ `

" (_

- 96 -

2?-N2?+

- 97 -

2?-N2?+

- 98 -

2?-N2?+

Documents

المركزية واثرها في اداء االعامليم