Upload
stephen-navarro
View
15
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Task variety. HIGH. Task concentration. HIGH. Task fragmentation. % Novel Tasks. LOW. HIGH. % Grown Tasks. STUDY 1: OFFLINE. STUDY 1: OFFLINE. Task variety. Task concentration. Task fragmentation. 70%. 13. r = .36*. % Grown tasks. 60%. 12. r = .46**. 50%. 11. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
0-3 y(n=8)
4-5 y(n=14)
6-10 y(n=9)
10+ y(n=6)
8
9
10
11
12
13
Org. tenure (years)
r= .36*
r= .46**
Task variety
% Growntasks
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
% Novel tasks
CONCLUSIONS
IDIOSYNCRATIC TASK COMPOSITIONS
A B
INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT FACTORS
SALARY POSITION ORG. TENURE
TASK INTER-DEPENDENCE
PERSONALINITIATIVE
ADDS TO EXPLAINING WITHIN OCCUPATIONAL TASK VARIANCE
…THE VARIANCE IS THERE. HOW DO WE DEAL WITH IT?
SALARY POSITION ORG. TENURE
TASK INTER-DEPENDENCE
PERSONALINITIATIVE