التعلم والتدريس من منظور النظرية البنائية.pdf

! "#

% &

----

: !" # ........ ................%%

&' " ....................... ..........)* +.........................................................), - - . "&'........"....................01 ! &' &........................................0, &' 23!.......................................41 ! &' 5-'...................................40 6 ! 7#8 &' 59.............40

&' :( & "" )" *#.......+,

! Trivial Constructivism.................*1 & ! radical Constructivism ................*) &' ! social Constructivism..................*0 -9: ! cultural Constructivism................*4 9 ! critical Constructivism.................*; ) A

-' :&. &. ...................................,/

! @ " "B

' : !"" !....".............79/

P- ? - Q& R- ! # ...................0,) P- ? - #E . ! ...............0,; R R- ! : PS . ..................0,* ! H 3........................................0C1

?3 T - ......................0C0 " "B - - 9....................................0C4

"9 .................................................0C> " - ! H &' 9 .................0CA

" - ! H 9.........................0CA

? I

E...................................0A* U& !#...............................................41,

- @B DV N

!" .. # )":

2 " DT - R! R' 5 9 3+ S Z B

= @- X" " - :T &+ J : X" : " G)N XD XDE+...bF ( X" !

+ J JF X = ] X" &+ XB" 9 + S& E+ X" - :T : X : X9 D-

D ? XN

: ! & K9 R3

. &. theory of knowledge

. - < )))"

U& F B5 73+ J - X& 9 I5 -8 D JF)C ( . "B-- @"= & "john locke

K5

'' : 9 :" :" J 9 8 . B-& ? . X& .KF 9

='' : : ? ?E D- U9" "kant 9 D- J '9 E N 'F D'9 XNE R9- - l

D K " J ' & ". = : D- U9 ? ?E"

"Darwinism "B"S "P.

Moreau F E. Hilaire "

"Charles Darwin ! I- 5 F

7 R : ! X ! . ="2 :& ? ?E D- U9))1 ( pragmatism : " "

& "William james X" H& "George Simmel "@ & "john deweys "7& "Alexander bogdarnov +8 fE Z ! I-"8 "instrumentalism -

U9 = "# . ))( "# ] X"-3& -)")) (

- " - . B &Theory of cognitive learning " - . B ! " 7 7- D

Z : K& - -. ! &' 5-3 - 6:

)" . :

! &' E constructive epistemology 5- 5# X-assumptions .

B:B: X- ? L+ : -

&' K. : -

: J- X# "B 3 - : " I - 8 'j "# : "B ' XU-

: "B : :'j N . "!9 " +^ + =3 J . N \ "B# K: "B

." D X8 ? 6- " NB R9- V 7' X& +^ L+ = I 99 L+

- 7+ - & - 7 7 D XJ JF E 9

59 6 X! 5-' &% XB 9

B3 " !9

&' &

N *#(

&

#( N *

BF @G J =F

! & J I# : ?3 K'T :- "B 9 5 IB' J B + " .

' N V : !Trivial Consttructivism

! & b Z XE - ! : ... B"-3& - " E+ ! R B X !

Personal Constructivism . !

H) Social Constructivism X" J I IE :T -' " &' "

' K#E' " "B = -' U& #D

Crirical Constructivism 75 B X-9: &' ! . - - K J 9 ! .

! N J 7B h3E' S9 B.. ! JD & 9.

7E") "Taylor, 1996 (B X9 ! ?+ & - h3E3 U& = X- K -9: &'

- . N : Z -9: . & 9 .

J E ^ B- . I ' "] 9"=- 7& " ' ' ! "=- " - 2& S X E S +

& " - - . J

5 ! &' -9: . "# & 25)) ( 9&'.

! K K

9& -9: ! K K

-. 9 & - ! K &' -9: ! K

9 U#

9" 5 ! . D 9

- 5 & X- 5 "B

= < :&H S( & S( L# .

- E9 IE - ! H 9- 7' fEGoals & 5

"2 : .

- - :

I ! H 9- " : ). ! ". 9 9 h

M E)6 (. &. &

&" &

M E)+ (&" &

"Behaviorism "B- X&+

":humanism %

;: ".&;:

-'

&. &.

&. &.

& # ! S. " T & ?E "B & B "BG T fE -

V)

V ! D& "B: B : ! S. ? &' K E8 - D& & genetic

epistemologists

: & D& ' " & J-

G ? B& G' "&' I I = 3!# D & 3 ' N 7& I d- & IE #

F 9 B K8 B G

: 6' N& "&' 6 9 B 25

3 - ? D - 9 I: - 2E DV- = " D& B ?5 disequilibrum

:

D& d- & D DF & \ !- "F = 7 DV- # I D .3

& "- 7+ 3: D- F & \ & "+5 &

] ST # 9 ' D'T N

" E 9: D& - - ! "

H &. .

E

- & " ' ! ) "

' : ; E L . ;

"- E# 5- & " "I &B "Passion for life [9 25

3 # J- H+ Z E9 N 5

) ?( IY - X I ?&

" !# U # YB YT # X! - - - . )&' ( " - . B JF -5% X

GE : B J XR5 -)A (paradigm & &- ? .

E # T = F"

" "E !X- X

" "E 7 "Einstructional Design Y- YB 6Y

:VY- X:3: 6]8 N + JF "E H ". J '8 - = X\ + R +' K3Y E' .

HY N ?& 3- ] K3 E3 ^ H d-"B

/. - 8 B I 6]8 EE+ E

8 . )e "7-) ")C;Ae)A4> (Pavlov *

> e " "Tolman " - D B

= J :: ) . " 8 ?BE ! . 3 - "B -8 ".

" & & E \ . 0 . !&% 'Operation Conditioning

& \F & I& & ? D- " "

"D& ""& "Briggs R#3 78 % "& "Mager D - B# " 78 ]E " ")A>0 KB

78 + GE ". 9 9 I E ? H \ Xtask analysis

IE - 78 B fE IGE K& JF9 .3 # = .

+ 5I # 7' 9

" "9

4. &' "!3 " Program for Learning in Accordance with Needs

&3- NFlanagan " 9 - + -D3:

9 " 111 7 G" " + J 99 " J

7 " +' IF 35- &3 "

=: NH" Computer Assisted Instruction

I " "+ 9 + K: ? - ' IBM " D E - ": X

' - . I " @ - Control data corporation and mitre

corporation & plato, ticcit X " B - S

" " 4. Behaviorism and teaching :

N : ?& & "" - & ] .

:

B- " " . ! K T D U9 "9 X = B- 2E [ + =

S

" . : &" " :

e ": " U# = !B 78 D& XK8 = D!5 J "9 S D ? K8

D99 D 25 7 J . e : . # & " D: # &'

X #

&' N . d- X= - " T 7B ? - - ! U G -B - &

.&' J E " 7B- D J E E "+ . &' J E "-

& 7B J ST ' & S X # \ - EE "+ &' J E "B X !.

I = - @ N B. - X T !' D I# " S + h5 = B. X=

E ?& !' ? K!- X 9 - NK J ? B- : I!

7# D- D 9 . - # "- D ?

B- D U

9 D U5+ U - I! 9 J &

7# - ".

5-' & J - " - . - assumptions ':

). ? I " 5 I& - 9 + -' 0. & " "9 " Z

- IE - I& - :

."=: " " " "E

" 9 : &'stimulus and response

7. " ) "Jerome S.Bruner " "" - - ' : . 9 " " J

&'

+. "&" ). "Vygotsky I- "# X& -9: . "# " . J"Chomsky ""Simon " " B G "" " K & T

E'artificial intelligence # - -

2 '[Interference Effects: I+ + Z I+ U 9 .

Y. '[Organization Effects: !9 + 7E B 2E .

/. #'

.

- - :V & " "E - E Z X3B' . "+ - & 25

X J J @ !& I - I V ". N] D&

J & J " !& !(chunking) .

C . + & - "expert & [ novice Z D + " + & 7 J 7

K 9. . :

). [ novice + Bexpert & D+ D - " J I# ".

0. - - I : J D U

" & '& @ I X I

6

& K " -Collaborative construction of knowledge &' 6

))1 (! . " "E

I/ HG

&J "$! +"$!

%;K: +"$!

"$! +"$! & %;K: +"$!

$&% c1 = < ,= !" 1 % 4Ao =

& ! $! O# ;& ,= 1 M10"

. U 1 $MO ++ ; 14 0 I F

U 1, 1 i # ,= 1 )!

j" $MU % + ; U % AO1 1E

srr1 rrk rr rrI ;rr rr % rr7 s rr % $&rr+ .+rr

.+ < + E

$ % OS U ++ ;

k ,= % e &U j1 1 0

+ O 1! Ia Q 1 . E3 ++ ; !

Q G U . $ % 1 Q O#+ evitcae

E+ S L 3 AO1 ; & 1 AO1

.+ ;

X I 1 OS O &1 O# M"

Ia w $,O 1 $ , v1 i O#H"

!$"+ :K;%constructivisist learning environ ment

+k #O i K : " "; I &

!; % A wO +b e k s 7 S

"L e s S !; H A

U&e . % ; I = + 1 i #O i

O) + + , ! !; es UM

"; U&e . "&4 GE) ( #O H i O ).

!L ) (; :;I/ :K; ):

O# Q 0 MK , kebserWOQ )O7 s+ H 1F ,= & F % MU O

:;! ! O O# . U AO1 , 1 - % H 3 Oj )+ - U k & ; , ; g & + -

.+ E3 s .; ,= ;! ! + -

: ; M1 k O O# ,= ;

.$ ) 3 L0 s1 -

. & ! 3 % -

S 1 + i 3 -

. +F s11 + O i . !o ! k % - O s& % % 3 1+ , -a

.7 % MU E $0, kcab deef .FF , jI 10 -

1 i G &" % ;! S O ! E1

H j ,= e& 1 c +I I . 1 e

+ ! ) e 1 ,= e&U ;! !

A eA o e O i % 7 1 F ,=

e % e" ) ;! ! . $# $H e . $0, I ; % %

H $ " 1F O i 9" &1 O#

H" ) . % MU ,U % L g ! , c 1

M F

1 4O& O# e" 1F ," O 1

, X1

7 UH ,% &1

.I 44 e

I O#

); . kMI O , s I 1

s)1 ! ! ! b ,= 7 s +% 7 % &1 1 ;Q = I renedrag 0 1

& O : E + O;g ecnegilletni elpitluM

.I 0

citsiugnil -labrev. I j c e" ! ,= &% % c j ! ,= 3 j O1

+ I Y % I . ,% < 41 91

;O & !1 & 0 , ;O )1 s%& 1 )

,% v1S $) ; % b" v1! , . !Ho e1 : j c % I9 % 0 ,

& ,% v1S !1 MK e1&% e Y I % I ,%

w s& e Y I v1S Av1 AK 1 : Y % I

. & & + , H * 1 ! - .)A ) se , -

. L " K; + MO1 -

e 3 1 ,= 1 e1 -

lacitamehtam lacigol! I 1E

. O = & 1 1E 1OY I % I *

K; I Y % I ;O e s U O1 s4

; K; I % I . 1! ! &1 1! )0

" + `# ;O v1 s)i M s4 $++

K; I % I ; " 3 s 1O 0

b" v1!. ;" e&U ) O1 s)O !

&. )A & 1 1 , H

. 0 , % I I

eY I Y % I L" e&U

: w s& I Y % I , ;

. Ao ! )+ A H O# - % E 3 S ! !1 -

. F 9U ,! M1

. H e ! L &1 , - . e ) 1O 1! , -

cimhtyhr lacisum) != I $!,

c+1 `# sj s; e" ! ,= k

I Y & L) % . I % I

3. K i+ ; ,= j 1 j H , s

K I ) ! K; I Y j $! ) ! % 9

. ; # 1 ) ! j : 13

I % I , A ) != $! : w s& e Y I Y % I . F 4 i

% ) != , $, $ " 3 s A -

e 9U " 3 = ) != # O "

. M $MO " ;" ) K s4A ; -

....A j K+

K , % O & F % " HQ = -

(. K & )O +Ia ! ) j sK W ; ; " HQ ! ) ! e+ -

" ; ! I 3 $! F # Ia !

. a ! ) ! sM1 0+Q +I

laitaps lausivOH1 -I 1*

e" ! ,= &% K ,! $)A+ L" e&U

1) K; I % I O1, ) A1#Y . 1E

X$ s1 ;O . 1# H , O

b" v1! + c1 H O&1 s4

1) 9" ; . = H e

+) 9 sK; +% 1* H1 1L : % s& EQ I % I . !

. " H O= - W ; # " K - .; H c1 + 1 M1 W H M " K -

.H citehtsenik ylidob I ;1

. ! ,= )A ! ! 1 L1

I % I ; $,! e#3 k e " jF ,%

& e )O + s1 )A +. e !

F se % s9 s1 I%

OL * 1 1H & & : +I Y % I

:% s& EQ I % I . % 1E %

." e 4 i )A 0a - . h E ) 9" & - " E 0 1 -

.W! M1

. " * 1a )A 0+

ecnegilletni lanosrepretni. 3H/ DM$

1 I 3 . eAo ,= + e,1a AK 0 , % I & ! a eAH ! E

3 . = dM1 & 1 O !" e,1a I % I & L E, 0 K;

. ! `1 b" v1! K; I I 9" ; e1 )

e1, ! 1a $ % " e1, < % K; I eAH U) , . , ,

.M 13

: &% e Y I Y % I ,% v1S .)A ) j - .0" j - ) " F " dM1 + 4 i - . " 4Ao e+ + 0 Ia eAH - ,r " e1 Er &r r r ,r= r -

.;

ecnegilletni lanosrepartni @P+ O

rF $)r &r+ I% 0, 1r

;r r3 r r3 r r% sKr : ,r" r3 r 9r" $ej

b" v1! K; I I $ . se $0, % 9 I $0, .e i ,

A rI r e O : 13 %

.) 1 3 I X41 + ,v &% eY I Y % I , &1 4\

: I Y % I ,% v1S . + "

" ; &1 - " O M1 ,! S " % -

$ ) " e;% L ; 9! XW1 ,= -

.& 1a % $ )

:) H O#

&+ I A ) ,% 1F ,= ,Oa ! & O# !

) S % E, I )OS ;H1 L g 1 < H M i ! % s

I7 & ,1 w % ) . ; ; ) : H O# ,= ;

&% ; O + & E 1 U ,= = U e3 + O+ L g ; O + lufgninaeM

L)+ e E, MK Q kW 1 , + &% % +h ; 9U ,=

O;9 ,% !$ ; ,% U 1! % " , % % H b" % " I % Ia

. e1 M" sc e" , O 1 % s& % ;H" U `" Ia O i ,= 1 U)&e *

$ % j 9U G I ,1b ,= 9! . M" sc 1 ) H &% 0 KU % E, ) E,

$ !H1 ,= ) j " = 0j1 1 hcnerF1 rI . sU )r != AKr +r + $e A+

1Y

. % sc " MO1 91 K = )O " % % ) O i O# + , % & 1

&% Lg U % d sM1 ,= & OX 9 , 1 H W Ia s& 0 ) ; I7 E3 )< OX+

!H &% e e $MU 3 L. ,= O I7 % MU , OX Ia . 0 + !H % OX+

, 1 ; " 3 U ) + !1

.3 &% + # 0 !H & s))

, < H1 :9U A Ho % H s ) $)1# O$% ;E1 &% k 4O& 1

% MU+ 1 U ,= " 4 I E $1Q . H )O $ % )!O % W% O U 1+ ,% +

% b3 H L 1 : c O#

$47 $! O# % = O S ) O $F Ow e1 c1 1 i )

Ia c1 e1 MH#o * eY & 1 gnivlos melborp) Ia O i L" e&

$)A eY 1r r r r Or# gnikniht lacitirC k

:+ , % c1 e1 U ;! S Ia s . citnehtua F U O i e" ev K U - $0, F )) % - .)A s) A 1 ; - .FF ! ,= $) H )1 -

. deretnec tndutsk ,= 1F L

!$"+ :K;% Q/M:

rr) %rr rr rr! rr #O rr rri o#rrHM %rr, rr U ;

i O aI K =, F 1 % ; + K 7 r ri Fr 1 =r 1r & ,r %r, Urb rH!)$ r .

F0 o#HA aI 1:

- ; Y e & . - rrr 1rrr orrr;multiple perspectives 1rrr rrr Irrr s

1E j 1 aI 3 ! g L + & .

- , $ . - , &;#U 3 E , +

"H "M. - r ! !L r ri r!authentic r r U&re YO1rreal

world + SOv. - r r 9 1 r multiple representations 3r 7r r

U %, #F " 9 Y Oover-simplifacation . - 1) , % 1 =, k. - Ks + =, kauthentic tasks

1 ) "` .

- A O) r #O r ri !Or r; r Fr&1 r 1 =,flexibility &$creativity .

- rrr1 rrr rrr rrr ,rrr rrr #O rrr rrri collaborative construction Of knowledge , ,rr0s rr "rr` rr

Social negotiation ( jonassen, 1994) . - % O)s =, #O i j +:

* !rr 1rrOA rr rr, insufficient previous experience

* % "O % 1 * $insufficient interest *$ & 1 * .

, + % 1K % , i : rrr) rrrmaterial rrr+ rrr& rrr rrr Qrrr

1 IA % % - i) + 3e what question - +1v A) =, % 3euse their own mthods - e + aI ,discussion H$communication - 0 + k0 % . - . - U extendable - + O % =, "+(wheatly,.1991)

! ) 1L "! #O ) 1L: #O ) =, 1 1 s = O

Ye 1W i O #O 1& O =, .! $ O GE S #O ) 1L ! ) 1L % )(

0) ( ! ) 1L #O ) 1L % !

" N) " N)

K&k 6 ": "9 B IGE "

: L1 ) O# + % ;o : 0V

renrael laicos eht: +"$! @P+ O

0, ! X O# # 1 + + K &% H 0, s L g $& + +Ia H 1

, < $ : ,% v1S ;W 3 M1% ,= )O " 9 & U ,= , k ;!#S A A MU

k ;!#S A A MU . , 0 b $ X < = &% ,! . , 0

U k ;!#S K" + ,% v1S , 0, ! 9" $0, . vO + E,

.++ H 0, 1 renrael evitaerc eht: +"$! +.

Xrrr O# rrr ,rrr= Errr1 &errr rrrU rrr errr rrrU U & O# " U e % r , r . e 1 k+

rr1 A rr

0rr rrU $,rr err c1rr rr rr" $rr HLO

. 7 $e : @0 %;8 [PV Y=X: $ +"$! & ^ ;:

W ) s)) `" O# eY 3 I w . $0, $& HL I eY

;$ $1OY eY U $0, s&

& M lessev ytpme < , * ,= 1F ;1 1 " ;S

: ;: &% . ;0+ " 3 e&U S + + : @

&% I $ & L1 M Q I A " ,= 0 9 1 $ %

gnitseretnIa rr rrI err1 !rr# ,rr= 0rrk err 9 rr1 rr rr, : e& 7 e& ytivitca . elbatset % % ," OX UMO - O3 M" L+ ! 0 & " - . L+ troffe puorg&% $) % e , - " % c1 + ,= + H" + L 0O+ -

.0 c stpecnoc yramirp L : XW; 1F ,= 0F 1 ! ;" = 0F % ;" h , 0F $ 1 F ,= s strap laudividnI

$= 9" Ia ;!#S F noitacilppasim) O S j ;!!+ 7 s&

# saedi7 s & : % !1 0+ c1: XY E1 ; . &e &9 1 ,% & 1a snoinipO

L % ,% & 1 % egdelwonk deliated1 H &9 1 % Ack AvO+ L= &%

9" Ia s & 0+ % . % + + 0 b % 1* ! %

, & ,= 3 = &e . 0+ ," G H M1. H+ 1E+ ,% & 1

. % O 1 ,% + . % snoitisoppus+h Av 1E gnitpada& : %"

% Ia 1 % 0 1 ,= & 1 vU & 9" I A Y . O!+ A 0 I I O . 0+ AvO L 0 %

. S % + lufgninaem0" = j1 txetnoc gnihcaet! % ) < : M

% A &0 e&" XW1 L , & ;!S M )) O+ $KU = `+

: $) % &0 . & 91 )!U - . & 91 1 - . & 91 ,U 3 - . 91 bOv < & - & 91 , ,= !" !U -

( )0V . a . =BV) "$! 0B' $: ;:

< 7 s+ O / O# % s Oj vO! . ec < % 0" FF % ;! S b" 0 s

k UG + & 1 b% 1 F ,= 0+ c1 Ia $)rrrr10 egarotsArrrrF% gnidocnerrrr1 F : 1 rrrr s))rrrr

laveirter +Ia $)1 1 I7 $)1 14 Ia

! I7 1 H , & 1 AK 1 . !K s) 1 , sfeileb lanoitavitom

," " Ia 3 b+ Ow X + " 0 9" Ia 1 Av 0 & 1 . K 4

I7 ! 1 1 1 ! 1 evitingoc1

0 -sE = $0, noitingocatem( , 1 ) U; % 3 L s, % + ,% . lanoitome oicoS

&% O" 1 +Ia s& L . ) + a : e % H " ! X

HOG # 7 s $0 ,= I X ! % c1 = O S ) )O " K = + M $

.< : ? O: 8 +Z; + % 0

1 1c O =, &$cognitive theory . - ;H 3) A)$ 1.

- O,$ % !1v IM . - wO +b 3 L $ =, % 3 e

3 . - , . - ! !L % h. - ` ; I =, k. - ! IMbeliefs attitudes O,$ % . - + 0 1 O + G % 1 i +

Ks 1OA =, &$ S , .authentic experience

gg;WX : gg+ :gg; :hgg/% V0gg) igg/0 gg+ jgg= kgg"% lgg gg3 +(: 4- !$" !$"+ :;0autonomy V0initiative

1rr& 1rr GOrrH =rr rr rrK rr rr %rr rr+ %rr *1rrO r r$ r ! O r 1 $ rE1$ %

r& =r, e&

7 !#, "9 c.

rrO rr I rr rr&$ % rr rrU %rr, grr;O =rr Urr rr r+ ; r+L r; rW ,rE ir)$ rL1 %I U g L "rrL =rr, %rr 1rr ;OrrH rr rr+ irr +!rr, =rr, IrrMk

re % r re 19$ " U&e r 7r r r U&%1M & 41 KA & =,.

r& %r& r r0 r; Ur + + H = !1 O =, % % U + . Ur 3 g ; + K

%

rrr& rrrH!)$ grrr;O =rrr =rrr, +rrr +rrr =rrr Irrr rrr O.

gH gW; DH+g

:;&." B$o/ DH+

7 "$! -3?l o= O$J B "V l %"t(! "k$ ; $0, v1! j 1 kK " L g

1K ,1 &a I7 ) & $M1% U .= " ,= + " ,

c U H ! ! 0 H 1 , ,= $)1 M +h &% I $ , U ,= &% + 0

.;o + !

,% v1S v1 $)i L "$! -3?l )+I=%V & M. LD 0D 0Lt @&+.u0(! 1 . W e3 e 7 sesehtopyh laitini [;:

c+1 , 103 1 K * c1 ; % W O# e U MO1 b 3 1E+

1 $ I ) e&" b . s W + e ; U U O U & $ ;

A s, & +Ia s& ,= + L!#S ! &% . 0 b U &1 1 dM1 0+ c1

!

emit tiaw "$! -< j %L' W+ k+ + % ,= U I% 1L s)i O+

O 13 + U sk &% $) , D0 O % ! HO; 1 10 % $ ej

+ & 1 s)i 1L+ 7 + U#+ . O , O" &1 + s)1 )

. ; U Q c s ++ )i A , !Ha &% v1 s)i % , Kj 1 & 1 X

G , !11 , I7 &% s v !11 0F# . e1 1 A

:; .& 8 1$o0 :;

sksat+ : & Ia $)1 % WUW ,K1 ,O ,% ,= gnirahse spuorg evitarepooc, (.); O % e&"

b% e&U " % ksat< +Ia $)1 O + 1 0 e& W 7 ;g % ,% L +Ia e& % e

MU , Kj 1 " ,= La A e , b+ ); 1 ,= & . Ow e K"

:$)1 H "

:( +"$! . + ; $)) 1F L e& % W I 9"

s1 I . % % $M S +Ia + % O" % : 1 Ia + , % e1 s))

b% + e&U .L g &" % O ;g $ & & )O % .

1v ! 1 ;g % ,= A !1 & + 91 % v1! .

. ;" 91 % 0 K; G H : Ia AK + S e&

L 0 : + M1 9"OU Q &% $ + . L1 I j 7 A 11 = 7

$M 1 b% e& j! + + v1! L ;" 0 L K; G I % + $ ) )1 1F

.L e& tahw3 % ,= v1 $)i % = e .

X ; Q 1 A1 % &1 : 9" fi sE

e % ,= )A ) O+ O;9 AK L g

& % , + 1 " 3 e& b

+ S & ; ,= AOF % $K % e3 $v . + ,= b= O;g v & + ( )) + 1L $,

.= &+ % " 3 Ia e&( , )1 : + % ) Ia e&

X = . e" ,= ,H1 $)e ! . 9" O;g + ,! . e3 % ,= e ; = G $0+ .

$ L+ % I% O;9 G elbafnetxe & U .

! . + k

K O;g $ , 1 + K ; + .1L )i 0 % W

K O;g ,% 0 +

: ? O: +"W: .

I ) gninrael evitarepooCO= Ia $)1 O , % MU ,1 )1 ! % ,1E H "

, b " , W % % % 91 " 1 " , ,= A Y ;" e& I I ;" 7 % MU O E $0,

vO! +Ia $)10 < F$ ,% s1 3 s + e , " ,b "

, % MU 1a ,= " + * 1 $ 1 $ ;& I ! Ia &1 Mk 7 &1 K; ;

0 w ,

., & 1 k" K L = 01 I1 9 1 % s 1 , ) $O1! = X

. A % 1 ) ;g ,+, = L" M K " ksat gninrael" + + :

.+ ! X = & 9g % & $)1 : 3:.

9" I & 1L $M 1 % 1L" < +Ia $)1 L g 1 U I " , L+ ,= H" $) = )A K$ 7

1 $L L MU % , L 7 ; $) c. ; 7 . e K$ % $ + 7 &

e " ,= S ++ &" % ; $) A e O + &1 & Ia . K ;" 7 $e&U

rieht fo snoitanalpxe. )$$+ % MU 1 )$$+ ! " HG Ia $)1 < 1E : gninosaer

:H , ) !

:D-G %w)+.0;?;: +"$! + .n F 3$:BD +; H MO Ia $)1 kL O#" < 9"

:1E ) Ia $)1 w + U ;" e&U .

.+ k91 % v1! & + 91 % L"e&U L + &% L :; , Ia $)1 E , % j 1.

$M H; G + S e1 ) O +. ," % 3 + 3 b+ Ow. O# 1 ) ) $a S .

+ , + i S I I11 $ $0+F $ ) $e b + .

1 Q & ) Ia $e ; g $ & Q .

,H1 E* ,= b% Ia $)1 & MK ! I ,= % A+ .

& c MK ! S w s& % O" , .e& ! O# 1

< L" e&U ! $ HG Ia $)1. .! L$ 0F +Ia e&U

elcyc gninraeL)+.0;?;: +"$! : XW;" 0 0 " Ia $)1 10 Ow $& c1 O# 1 ,

"

..F$: @%D I; . 103 e Ia 1L 1L $ = % Ia

; H = O U AO1+ ; 1L ) 1L $)e& 7 % MU e , +

; &% % : X . ;Q 41 0 + U AO1+ ; 1L K + = O

$)&e b1 Ia ; = F % O41 +I + ) % MU e1 e+ % MU L+ = & )

. = * 1 7 % H 1 O41 . S , + b 1L ! ++I Ia 1L

esahp noitcudortni tpecnoC :.F$: @0

1L - W $e 1 $)&e ) $e E W ) e 7 1L ! H MO1 . $

0 , 1 M1 W &I O L! 0 % .

:L" e&" A EG e&" &% O 1 ,% 1

Ho] .F )+.0;?;: +"$!( )

01 I1 < +Ia D)1 9 1 ,= A Y % O" ! w D4 &% $)14 +

., A Y

:0Ho;] +D-G %w)+.0;?;: "$!

0 , % A 1 14 + , A Y < :+Ia D)1 Ao !

e a 7 % MU , E ) ; . (, + 0

; + O 1 +Ia s1 . 3 e&" O ) H w e&U .

= )e+ " 1L % 1L" 7 E MO1 ( $LO " % 1 U ! 1 !O

.9 1

& # &" &% ! % MO1 L W ! H + .

O 1 ; g & 7 $e , ;) k .O %

kMI a % , . A Y se $ .e MU 1L $)&e )) K" = K * + 1 !

E ! % ,U , % . % MU e %

&% ( ) ! % = , % , L)

% !Ha % +X$ .

, +b $ L1 e YA =, 1 M + 14O ! O + % ", ; 1OA %

.

e Y A , +,O 0 A G E %& "&e UM %; E:

) (!$"+ :o3W ];oH0 oM

& !$"+ :;?;0.+) DH+) :;W D

& J \ : Y X = Y XhY

= : H &": S("Q.) "Novak:( Humanistic Constructivist Model (HCM). RY* 9 =- 5 = JF 75 X

B# Z" "& "

Jerome Bruner - " learning Cogitive "Y D ?& X"

BF "=- " 5 E Z3: - & - B : J \E "B J -8 JF .. D- = J K " 6G. - =' Y U

BF "=- " 5 E Z3: - & - B : J \E "B J -8 JF .. D- = J K " 6G. Y U

3 U 9 B

6 . "Explanation N - # - B I& I+ U5 - "

YB. Y XY9 IE - Z8 ]E - G - X 9" #8 E' . JY +V d- & -

Y J 6 "B5 " B "B9 : Y 6Y X"YB

: Cooperative Learning Strategy ! &

" ?& Y N = X " & Y Y IGE " & " Z S9 " ". "

I

e = ` " " : ). F -8 ' X - I9

" :Individual accountability DY - @# R- " & " 6] V- Y & " - DE R'! " V = YE RY9 RYB& " D- XR! R "

- 7' . +. H) ;Social skills

Y 6YG X&' B "9 " J ?&B N :

9 UE I9 Bdecision

making 9: K X E'trust building Y- E I

F& .B N Y !Y YE

XU 9 ":)( X)? ( Y UY )H( X) ( Y3 &.

U N M :One minute interview !8 J ? : o P" B K8 " o PB "B

# I5 I " "9. e Y# D D " " J X " "

KB 'F JB # ". e

X" " B5 - ? +

99 "9 Authentic Assessment

D J "9 7 " @ I& - 9 "B

5 = !9' # . I ""9 7 " JF E

=': UY @Y 2Y X= & +' J "9 9 +' \)Jonassen,1991.(

Y JY "Y H @ " "9 S9 H R9- D 25 B Y: "B "E F XI9 E E9 : Y

= & "9 X 78 X"B . Y SY9 "Y9 78 E9 &)Romiszowski, 1998( NY

H:

Y I NE "3 = D3 - "9 "B: "9 S "9 ? ? f @ "9 = P"9 B D9F B D " 6]8. " T D9 " S N&' K8. : XK8 : 8 : 7

;. Y ?3 9 ?& D J U& 99 "9 Y

& R

I)" I2

L#< #. SY

- "9 JF D9 Y Y XL+k

-?;V o= 8 )?= 04;;! [% MU % ) A1 % $ L g bG 0 % # &% + U ! $ 7 % 0+ 1 U

:+ % Ia $ ! ! % MU )U ! $ b" % , ! % MU v1! .

.$MO $MO $ &< " U + F I 91 % $MO L g &< + 1 .

I OI Uc H LE1 )U ! s 0Q U ; .

. + ),+ ,= 1 !+ H . +% $)) U ! $ + : + .

.c ! ,= I ! + % W!+ EG w O " )U ! $ AK .

. + + 0 + H )U ! $ L g .

1 ,= I &% U % c H b" % 1 s= . Q + + A O + 0 &% + % O"

rr ,rr rr" rr rr 1Krr rr1 ,rr= rra err rr ,. rI7 +r r= . ;! ! " 41& 0 ;H" , + r r

.U O! , )& , 0+ 1 ;! !

Ho L g + c " ;b 1a ), U ,= )+ A .

)" ! s ) ! 9" Ia U !+ . L + % MU `# A = + !O"

= K ,% , ,% $MO + c+ .

. E+ ,= v1S AHo I $

FF + eAH 9! < U .

; % U % !# ,= , % U % L . . % U b+ Ow % L dM1

+ ,= &% )U ! $ O .

% )" AHo &% )A O;g ,% ` A = & . K; !U eAH AK `

" " 103 + OI ! ! .

.K 1 U !+ + `# O"

@M+@M+= %;8 )?= 04;;! @

$MU % )U ! $ $MO k ! k HrG )rU r= ,&r< $MOr r= c+r1 $r r !r r ;r . ! $

. " ! s ,= ! ,= )

1Ms UM$ % % 1 %& : 1 OM$ 1 % =, "#$ ! $ ! ")

& ( H) 1* b % ! % ,% 4\ &% . 1 1 9 1a 7 O I !

EG

$ ,= O ;!O A ,4Q + H &I &% . % ! 1 A O O b % I e "

$ L g I " $ % L " + )U !

1 ,= U U $ &% &a O) 3 $ . + 1 O;9 , , e )U ! $ AK #+

b % w $M1 & % , 0 e&" , .&% , E G )O M a 7 )M" E% "

UL < b1 ; " ,= b" $, &% b% w $, = ; ,= w $M 7 = EG MU w

= EG stfard s &% b " w . . & 1 , & 1 + " 3 O !+

:HG AO1 )A )U ! $ " , % % U

oiloftop gnikrow ehT)? 04;;! @ X " elyts noidrocca eO 4& d s

,O ,% )"

: redlof % +" !

EG U A &% E+ )" ! $ .oiloftrop tnenamrep1

+ Ia $)j ,+ MI U + = .7

! U ! b" ,+ 9" & 1 b )" ! .$ #

oiloftrop tnenamrep ehT)? 04;;! @ D! enidrebmal & reklaw( eO S 4& A0 I eO $

: ; & d% & A )4991 , ; ,= ; !a e1 $ 3 M

" E HS , & , + )O M

.E I $01 1 ,= , ! +#

: 1, w UL + +& H" = #h eO" O , )U ! $ , 0 + ! .

E; b ,% )U ! $ ; ! " 7 e 3 U . $) + , !

. O" O $,E . $ +" , "

.

1e 1 " e %

& KA 4$ ; %&

"H "O % 0.

1 WUW ,1 1 = "H :

) ([ =?) DH+) .;-"

! $ ! U) 1 UM % $ ! , ! & H %

& 7 . +) & 1 %

$ wO b + Ov :

). U IB "9 Process skill assessment

0. - "9inquiry assessments

4. @ "9content assessments

;. E+ 39 .3 Interview notes

*. .3 9observation notes

>. .3 !Observation notes

,. L

= < : 5 H "R :

8 3+ 9 . & . ?& S g9 K8 ' U5 D)Dwyer,1993 .( J ?& ' Z

= U5 H+ @+ & S & =

.+^ K # ?3 E

- NG 5

"] J - U

'

!"

!

!" !

& \ B J ! JF . & F Innovation

!" !

& \ B J ! JF . & FInnovation

F T !& 3+ D &% 7 N) )" 5 #

&' ? & ? &% - ! 8 6-' & &' & B5- V - !

!9 : 9 B9 ' D+ D-

&- U 6-3 E+ -

IE T = ]E X! 'T @# @+:

F PD& ! D Z " - ! H J R! ?& B X" 7 J 7 ? F T &%

T J . 9 " 7 ! ]E :- : JF " 7B E+ ?& - )%( X& X&' X- X

X9+ . ! PE+ K ?& - ! B- R] "BV- X?& N "B "

- ?&cognitive domain S T XN D

- #contextual knowledge ?& F X# " U

H - V: R = T B 9 [9 U 9 j D H \ F X

@)Edward & Mercer,1987 ( -

F Dd- IE . ]

"BY+ Y - + 9- "B X 25- 9 "B # =.

R:: :"9 F Z " - ! H D& N &

"9 ! : X & - I B& : IY5 @ = XN " J "9 ! E9 =B-

= "Y9 Y "9 @ = XD "9 - "" "9 &+ % @ = X6 "B5.

*. "9 : Y- " ?& S 2E ! 6 @ ] Xh& " "B KB "9 D!5 Y " "B

R!&F I N J .D NT T h : - : F "B "B " 7 7- X" B - = # YB Y& S "B - ": P=

B- XD +j PI J "B "9 JF ! H.! D "9 ? : RY#3 = X5 +' JF ! '

B " J 5 99 & ' DV B . K'T 9 " - ! H #3 U# d- ": : S 8 X E

dY- X- " ! H D& 3 5 S 8 " - H 9 [9 ] # "T R

7Y DY+ DY J+ X ] H V b . YB- X=Y "TY K 7&' [9 79 !

Y DY F D G G ' - " H NG H R& R& :8 e JYF S

X!8 R 9 T 9: e P- ? R& R- ! # e P- ? - #E . ! e P! . R R- ! :

BF . d- X! . J 7# 8 T &% F JF E # d- X- I. - & : D

# V - ! D - X- ? ! # D

! ! F XR

:- X- " - ! H 3 : "B - - 9 JF -5F ?3 - K E -

! H - R : 3 + X"- " - . B = J ?G 6 # #

9 S -

)A( & Adaptation S O Application " ; Analysis

"M Approach " 9 Assimilation

! !; Authentic Learning ! !; ! Authentic Assessment

aO Attention e 1OA Active experience

O& 1 Acquired knowledge 1 Assumption

1j 1v Alternative Framework ! L1 Advanced stage

)B( ) Behaviorism

I g;O Brain research 0 Biological acts ) Behavioral objectives

)C( Concepts

+ 1M Concept map ); Concrete concepts + vD Conceptual scheme

H Credibility "K Communicating

1 Cognitive domain + Comprehension

&; Controlling 14 /1` Conditions

s 7; Criterion

D Creativity O1c = Cognitive structures

1 1c Cognitivism + Concept Formulation

,D 1 & Creative thinking ! 1 & Critical thinking Coach (teacher as a)

Cooperation Cooperative learning

1O 1c Computation theory 1 ;H Cognitive terminology

; Content b Contradictions

#O 0$ Constructive epistemology , 1 Cognizing subject

) Contextual 1 c Cognitive organizer

1 jb Cognitive constraints c Conceptual system

# , Constructive process 1 Cognitive domain 1 Contextual knowledge

7; 01 OM Criterion referenced tests 1 ! Cognitive complexity

1 U Cognitive scaffolds , Cooperative group

Conceptual expansion Conceptual invention + S O Concept application

,

i jE Encouragemental constraints Ks Essentialism

L1! Empirical proposition 1OM Experts

1 OA L1 Expertise stage e&)$ L1 Exploration Phase

)F( iA ) Falsification

&4 Formal concepts #10D L1 Formal operational stage

Uv Fluency 1 Flexibility

"&4 j K Format , Fitness

` c Functioning schemes &e 1 Figurative knowledge #1 X Focus question

)G( Generalizations

0 e$ Guided discovery 0 H!)$ Guided inquiry

Generative learning #!$ 0$ Genetic epistemology

0 E1* , Goal oriented process #eLs 1 Gut knowledge

1*s % 1;

! Goal free evaluation )H(

1 hypothesis 1 * K Hypothesizing D 1c Humanism

W ", Heredity

, !, #` Higher mental functions D

)K(

1; I Kinesthetic intelligence

1 "! O Knowledge transmission 1 O Knowledge construction

Knower , 1 Knowledge claims

)L( Learning how to learn

Learning cycle ! I Logical intelligence j I Linguistic intelligence

!, #` Lower mental functions ! $)$ Logical reasoning

! Logical grouping ) O Learner constructed

1 Level of structure 0L Learning needs

Learner autonomy , UM % O& Learning acquired

+ =, #! ; Logical determinism M h1 Logical operations + Learning task

! O1 Logical Empiricism O1 E Logical positivism

)M( Measuring

* K Modeling + =, #! "= " Meaningful learning

) 1OM Mediated learning experiences I Multiple intelligence

E1 I Mathematical intelligence hb ", Maturation

1v Methods !, , Mental processes

!1 1 & &

Mechanical responder

1 1)1 ( Metacognition % Mechanists

I H Mental image !, Mental acts

= ,K Meaning making + \vA %

& Misconception

#10D Methodological side )N(

O b Natural curiosity Neo-behaviorism

) A I U Non-achievers 0 1 Nave knowledge

# Nave concepts 7;

! Norm referenced evaluation

)O( ,E Objectivity

c Organization 1) Overview

; L1 Operational stage ,E),E I( Objectivitism

1c Overt behavior 0 ! !;) 0s( Ontological reality

10D 1 Operative knowledge

1 & Reflexes

1 L$ Retention U Records

&1 #O Radical constructivists 3 Reality

A O Raw data 01)$

FF Retrieval Reinforcement

H 1 Rote learning A 3# Raw fact

(S) )$ 1 9 % O$ Stimulus response learning

" Succession ,0 U, Social interactions

1; ; L1 Sensory-motor stage I c Self-regulation

; Simulation 1I FA Storage in memory

U&e ); Sensitivity to problem I Self-learning

U S1 Student team teaching = Situated learning

*1 I Spatial intelligence I Styles of intelligence

aO$ /D! Selective attention ,0$ Social negotiation

c , Structured world K /, 0 A Schemes

= =b Sense making learning #! 1 Spontaneous knowledge

(P) h# / Products

&e "L Problem solving 41 /+0 Prescriptive O Principles

I Personal world s

#10D "O L1 Performance Proportional stage

h1O Programmed instruction 1* purpose

Processing required O! 1 Prior knowledge

s + Primary source 01O I pragmatism

h1O Programmed learning U&e "L =, #! Problem central learning

O! H Pre-conception + Philosophy of understanding L$ probabilism

#10D 1 Procedural knowledge Perspectives

) HA4( Personal goals + 0& ) Psychology of understanding

, Processes of science (R)

O!)$ Receiving )$ Readiness 1

H )" 9( Representation

$)$ Reasoning 1! + Reading skill

vO) 1 & Deductive thinking

(T)

U

; Transformation MU ! Testability 1 Teaching package

SW Trust worthy L1v Treatise

H %!

Teacher as a source Teacher as a prompter

e Teacher as a partner 1 Teacher as a facilitator

I; Teacher as a model Teacher as a modifier

)$ ; Teacher as a challenger 1 1c Theory of cognitive learning

(V) Viable

"&4 1A < 1)(V)

Vee mapping teaching strategy

, Value claims (W)

1I Working memory c$ Q Wait time

(Z) 1! !)& ( Zone of proximal

Development

lP.

lP.

< : 0): >0. S4. I -))AA; .(" "E " :9 . ."9 S ;. +^ X] " H&) .)AC4 .( " .9 .- " X XH& J & .

),1(

>*. ) .)AC0 .(" I! : - I& 9" .& L XI + X 8 X: ">, L,0.

>>. X ) .)AA0 .( & . !S .7 IV X '.

> . + 7 +))AAC .( - 99 "9 . . Y# . Y)0> . L))C L)40. ,.

?& ) .)A>A .( - . .I9 : .( - .)&' . ( &

. : & .

A. "F ) .)ACC .( "+ : H " &' " "B- E J " I H

?3 @ & .I ] I . . &.

)1.

"] ) .)A,1 .(

Avery, p. (1999). Authentic assessment and instruction, Social Education, 65 (6): 368-373

32. Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In D. Groun and T.cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

33. Bodner, G.M. (1986) Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10). 873-878

34. Brooks, J& Brooks, M.(1995). Constructivist Classrooms. Virginia, Alexandria.

35. Brooks, J& Brooks, M.(1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case For Constructivist Classrooms. Virginia, Association for Supervision and Curriculum development.

36. broody, C.M. (1995). "collaboration or cooperative learning ? complimentary practices for instructional reforms,. The Journal of staff, program & organization Development, 12(3),133-143.

37. bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University.

38. Caine, R.N & Caine, G.(1999). Theory and practice: brain/mind learning principles. Available at:

htt:/www.cainelearning.com/theoryexpanded.html.

39. Carr, A., Jonassen, D, litzinger, M., & Marra, R.(1998). Good ideas to foment educational revolution situated learning, constructivism and feminist pedagogy. Educational Technology, January- February, (5-15).

40. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Construct vistand sociocultural perspectives at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

41. Cotton & Cook. (1997). About cooperative learning. New horizons for learning. Available at: http:/www.newhorizons.org

42. Cottel & Nillis. (1998). Active and Cooperative Learning. Center for the Enhancement of Teaching. University of Northern Iowa.

43. Cunningham, D.J (1991). Assessing constructions and constructing assessment: A dialogue, Educational technology, 31(5):13-17.

44. Crowthenr, D. (1997). The constructivist zone. Electronic Journal of science Education, 2(2).

45. Dijkstra, S.(1997). The integration of instructional systems design models and constructivistic design principles. Instructional Science, 25 (1-3).

46. Driver, R. & Bell, B. (1986). Student thinking and the learning of science: A constructive view. School Science Review, 67, 443-456.

47. Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Constructivism :new implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31 (5). 7 12.

48. Edwards, P. (1976). The Encyclopedia of philosophy, Vol. 3. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc & The Free Press.

49. Ertmer, B.A., Newby , Tj . (1993). Behaviorism , cognitivism : Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspiring . Performance Improvement Quarterly , 6 (4), 50 70.

50. Elon, BS & Linn, M.C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education .Review of educational Research, 58 (3), 251 301.

51. Fogarty, R. (1999). A rchitects of the intellect . Educational leadership, 57 (3), November: 76-78.

52. Fosnot, c. (1993). Learning of teach, teaching to learn: The center for constructivist teaching / teacher preparation project. Teaching Education, 5 .(2): 69-78.

53. Fourie, I. (1999). Using portfolio assessment in a module in research information skills. Education for Information, 17; 333-352.

54. Garrison, Bently, M., larchelle;M.,M., & Desoutels , J. (1999). Critical constructivism , science education, and teacher epistemological development . Paper presented at the science and culture conference . Unviversity op Pava.

55. Grsh. H. & Von glassersfold, E. (1978). Vico (1668 1744): An early antipator of radical constructivism . The lrish Journal of Psychology, 4 (1):22 32.

56. Gilbert, J.K. Osborn, R.J. (1986). Children's science and its consequences for teaching: Science in schools, In:Brown et al. (Eds.), open University Press. Milton Keynes, Philadephia.

57. Gillies, R. (2000). Thw maintenance of cooperative and helping behaviours in cooperative groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70:79-111.

58. Goodman, N. (1984). Of Mind and Other Matters. Carnbridge , MA: Harvard University Press.

59. Grant, W. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. ERIC Digest, available at : http://www.ericae.net/db/edo/ed3286/.html

60. Grurney , B. (1989). Constructivism and professional development: A stereoscopic view. Paper presented at thw Annual Meeting of the National Association for research in Science Teaching .62 nd. San Francisco, CA, March 30 April, 1, ERIC Reporduction Service No. ED 305 259.

61. Hanley, s. (1994). Constructivism . College Park, University of Maryland. 62.

Holmes, G & Leitzel (1993). Evaluating learning through a constructivism Paradigm. Performance & Instruction, September: 28-30.

63. Howick, W.H. (1980). Philosophies of Education. Danville, IIIinois, The Interstate Printers & Publishers Inc.

64. Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1969). The Early Growth of Logic in the Child . New york and London: Kogan Page.

65. International Dictionary of education . (1977). New york & London: Kogan Page.

66. Jofili, z & Geraldo, A (1999). A course for critical constructivism through action research : a case study Rrombiology. Research in science & Technological Education, 17 (1): 5-19.

67. Johnson, K.(2000). Constructive evaluation. The science Teacher, 67 (2):38-41.

68. Johnson. D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1985). Cooperative learning and adaptive education. In . M.C. Wang & H.J. Walberg (Eds.) Adaptive instruction to individual differences . Berkley, CA: McCuthchan.

69. Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Evaluating constructive learning Educational Technology, 31(9): 28-33

70.Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need anew philosophy paradigm?. Educational Technology, Research and Development of Reasoning. Berlely CA: University of California.

71. Karplus, R: et al. (1977). Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning. Berkely CA: University of California.

72. Kagon, S. (2000). Cooperative Learning and Personality. National Professional Resources. Inc.

73. Kerka, s. (1997). Constructivism, workplace learning, and vocational education. ERIC Digest No. 181, available at: http:www.ed.gov./databsses/ERIC-Digests/ed407573.html

74. Kitchener, R.E. (1987). Piaget theory of knowledge: genetic Epistomoly and scientific reason. New Haven. C.T. Yale University Press.

75. klein, E & Merritt, E. (1994). Environmental education. As a model for constructivist teaching. Journal of Environmental, 25 (3): 14-21.

76. Kuhn, T.(1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

77. Lakoof, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

78. Lawson, E.A. (1982).The reality of general constructive operations. Science education, 66 (2): 229 241.

79.Lucks, R. (2000). Constructivist teaching vs direct instruction. University of Delaware, available at: http: //www.utc.edu/EDU 390.99f

80.

Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design & learning theory. University of Saskatchewan, available at: http: //www.usask.ca/educationcoursework/802 papers /mergel/ Brenda. Htm.

81. Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design & Learning Theory. Available at: http:/www.usask.caleducation/coursework/802papers/merget/bredahtm# the %20 Basics %20 of Behavioeism.

82. Milson, A& Brantley, s.(1991). Theme-based portfolio assessment in social Education, vol 65 (6) : (374-376).

83. Molenda, M. (1991). Philosophical critique of the claims of constructivism. Educational Technology, 31 (9): 44 48.

84. Moore, A. (2000). Teaching and learning. London : Routledge, Falmer.

85. Morris, V.C. (1961). Philosophy and the American School. Boston, Houghton Miffin Co.

86. Nilsen, B. (2001). Week by Week : Plans for Observing and Recording Young Children (2nd ed.). Albany : NY: Delmar.

87. Narode, R.B. (1987). Constructivism in match and science Education. ERIC Reproduction Service, ED 290616.

88. Ncconnell, D. (1992). Theory. Process and autcorne of cooperative learning. Center of the Study of Networked Learning. University of Sheffield, UK.

89. Nelson, B.(1996). Cooperative learning. The Science Teacher, 63 (5): 23-25.

90. Newmann, F & wehlage, G. (1993). Five standards of authentic Instruction. Educational Leadership, April : (8-12)

91. Novak, J. (1987). Ed, Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: Misconception and Educational Stratiges in Science and Mathematics. (Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University) Vol (II).

92. Novak, J. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6:167-193.

93. Novak, J.D. & Gowin, B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. London: Cambridge University Press.

94. Novak, J.D. & Gowin, D.P. & Johansen. G.T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with Junior high school students. Science education, 67 (5), 625-635

95. Novodnorsky, I. (1997). Constructing a deeper understanding. The Physics Teacher , 35: 242-245.

96. Oliver, k . (2000). Mthods for developing constructivist learning on the web. Educational Technology, 40 (6), November December 5-18 97.

O'oughlin , M. (1992) Rethinking science education: Beyond piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of research in Science Teaching , 29(8); 791-820.

98. Perkins, D.N. (1991). Technology Meets constructivism: Do they Make a Marriage. Educational Technology. 31 (5). 18-23.

99. Perkins, D.N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner ,Educational Technology. 31 (9). 19-21.

100. Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism . Educational leadership, 57 (3): 6:11.

101.Petraglia, J. (1998). The real world on a short leash:the (mis) alication of constructivism to the design of education technology. ETR & D, 40 (3): 53-65.

102. Piaget, J . (1961). Les mechanisms Perceptifs (The mechanisms of perception). Paris: Presses Universitaires cited in Anotonio, B. (1989). What constructivism and why all taking about it. ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED325 402.

103. Piaget, J. (1964). Development and learning . Hournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2 (3):176-186.

104. Piaget, J. (1970). Science Education and the Psychology of the child. New york: Orion Press.

105. Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The future of Education . New york, Grossman Publishersw.

106. . Pines, & West, L.H. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: An interpretation of research with a sources of knowledge framework. Science Education, 70 (5): 583-604.

107. Posner, G.J. & Hertzog, W.A. (1982). The clinical interview and the measurement of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 195-210.

108. Rath, W. (April, 1990). Collaboration and constructivism in the science classroom> Paper presented at the Annual Concention of the American. Educational Research Association. Boston MA. ERIC Reproduction Service, ED318631.

109. Reigeluth , C.M. (1991). Reflections on the implications of constructivism for educational technology. Educational Technology , 31 (9),34-37.

110. Rieber, L.P. (1991). Computer-based microworlds A bridge between constructivism and direct instruction . ERIC Repreduction Service, ED 375007.

111. Robertson, A. (1994). Towad constructivist research in environmental education, 25 (2): 21-31.

112. Savery , J. & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning : An instructional model and its constructivist Framework. Educational Technology, 35(2):20-25.

113.

SEDL . (1996). The Practice Implications of Costructivism SEDL etter, vol IX

(3).

114. SEDL. (1999). Is it constructivism. Southwest Educational Development laboratory, available at: http://www.sedl.org/pubs/sedlettervogon3/construct.html

115 . Schmuck, R. (1985). Learning to cooperate ,cooperating to learn . Basic concepts . In R. Salvin ,S Sharan, S.Kagan, R. Heetzlazdrowitz, C.Webb, & R.Schmuck (Ed.s)., Learning to cooperate , Cooperating to learn, New York:Plenum Press. 1-4.

116.Schuman, L. (1996). What are the problems and strengths of these theories ? available at http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec540/presectives/problemsandstrngth.html

117. Smith, J. (1996) using portfolios for authentic assessments. Available at : http://www.int.gov/pubs/or/consumerguidesclassuse.html.

118. Sprague , D & Dede, c. (2000) if I teach this way, am I doing my job? Constructivism in the classroom us and Canafa, International society for Thnology in Education.

119. Staver , J. (1998). Constructivism: sound theory for explicating the practice of science and science teaching . Journal of research in science Teaching, 35 (5): 501-520.

120. Strommen, E. (1992). Constructivism, Thnology, and the fture of Cassroom learning . Brucelincoln, College of Education.

121. Tenrsyon, R.F. (1992). An educational learning theory for instructional design. Educational Thcnology, 32 (1):36 41.

122. Terwel, J. (1999). Constructivism and its implication for curriculm theory and practice . Journal od curriculum Sudies. 31 (2): 195-199.

123. Teslow, J., Carlson, L., & Miller, R. (1994). Constructivism in colorado: Alications of recent trends in cofnitive science. Proceedings of the Annuel conference of the American society for Engineering Education, 136-144. Paper presented June, 28,1994, Edmonton , Albetra, Canada.

124. Trowbridge, L.W., and bybee, R.W., (1990). Becoming a secondary School Science Teacher. Merril Publishing Company.

125. Tsai, c. (2000). Realtionships. Between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments. Educational Research, 42(2): 193-205.

126. Von Glassrsfeld, E. (1983). An interpretation of piaget's constructivism. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 36(4): 612-635.

127. Von Glassrsfeld , E. (1984). An interpretation to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (ed.), The Inventted Reality. New York: W.W.Nortin.

128. Von Glassrsfeld, E. (1987). Constructivism as a scientific Method. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

129. Von Glassrsfeld, E. (1989). An exposition of constructivism: why some like it radical . ERIC Reproduction service No.ED 309935.

130. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. E. Hanfann and G. Vaker (Trans) Cambrifge, M.A:M.I.T. Press

131. Walker, G. (1998). Student assessment. Chattanooga university of Tennessee. Available at: http//www.utc.edu/utchome.html

132. Waymen, M & pulliam, K. (1997). Constructivist teaching . Available at : http://www.athena.ivv.nasa.gov.project/teachercostruc.html

133. Whealey, G.H. (1989). Instruction for the gifted: Methods and materials. In . J. Felanusen, J. Van tassel-baska, and k.Seeley, (Eds.) Excellence in gifted Education. Denver: love publishing Co.

134. Whealey, G.H. (1989). Constructivism perspectives on science and mathematics. Science Education , 75 (1): 9-21.

135. Willis, J . (2000). A general set procedures for Constructivist instrucational design: the new r2 d2 model. Educational Thechnology, 40 (2): 5-20.

136. Wilson, B. (1997). Reflection on Constructivism and Instruction Design. University of Colorado.

137. Wison, B., Teslow , J.& osman. Jouchoux, R. (1997). The impact of Constructivism (and postmodernism) on ID fundamentals . Denver , University of Colorado .

138. Winn, W.D. (1991). The assumptions of Constructivism and instructional Design. Educational Technology, 31 (9). 38-40.

139. Yackel, E:, Cobb, P., Whealey, G. (1990). The importance of social interactions in children's Construction of mathematical knowledge. In T.Coopy. (Ed.), 1990 yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

140. Yaeusso, L. (1992). Constructivism vs. objectivism . Performance & Instruction, 31 (4):7-9.

Documents

التعلم والتدريس من منظور النظرية البنائية.pdf